Connect with us

New Mexico

Lawmaker looks to rein in oil and gas exceptions – Source New Mexico

Published

on

Lawmaker looks to rein in oil and gas exceptions – Source New Mexico


A New Mexico lawmaker prefiled three bills aiming to close exceptions for the oil and gas industry’s disposal of contaminated water from federal laws, seek more data on water use and pollution, and potentially limit oil and gas activity near school property.

Rep. Debra Sariñana (D-Albuquerque) said her background as a former teacher, and presentations on a 2023 lawsuit on behalf of people living around oil and gas hotspots in New Mexico, pushed her to act.

“Nobody’s really watching what’s happening, and nobody is holding anyone accountable,” Sariñana said.

The three bills would amend the state Oil and Gas Act.

Advertisement

Only one would allocate money to the New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD), which has a division responsible for overseeing the oil and gas industry.

House Bill 30 would mostly ban oil and gas operators from using fresh water.

The bill also requires annual water use reports from oil and gas producers, documenting volume of fresh water, recycled produced water and treated produced water used in oil and gas operations.

Those reports would be sent to the Oil Conservation Division in the EMNRD. State regulators could note if the reports are incomplete or deficient. All reports would be published on the state’s website, according to the current version of the bill.

House Bill 31 adds fines for oil or liquid waste spills and requires state regulators to make rules on preventing accidents.

Advertisement

The bill would regulate disposal of produced water under the Safe Drinking Water Act, closing a federal loophole that exempts hydraulic fracturing from the law when enacted in 1974.

HB 31 would use the fines to help plug dry and abandoned oil wells. It requires operators to give public notification for people living within two miles of any spill. The proposal also requires notice to any sovereign tribal nation in New Mexico with landwithin 10 miles of a spill.

The bill allocates $750,000 to allow EMNRD to hire five employees to carry out the work.

House Bill 32 would establish “Children’s Health Protection Zones,” add additional penalties for polluting in those areas.

The zones would include a one-mile setback from school property, limiting how close oil and gas production could be from schools.

Advertisement

HB 32 seeks to ban that activity within those zones after 2028, except under very limited exceptions. If the current version passes, it would enact more stringent protocols for detecting leaks and giving public notification around schools when that occurs.

Sariñana is vice chair on the House Energy, Environment and Natural Resources committee, where she said testimony during the interim showed her the gaps in cleanup of abandoned oil and gas wells. She also heard concerns about issues reporting on freshwater use and pollution.

It’s not clear if the bills will make the call, which is set by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, but Sariñana said time was short to address the health and resource concerns.

Lawsuit: State allowance on oil and gas violates New Mexico Constitution

“We need to hold oil and gas more accountable than we ever have before,” she said. “For our kids’ health, for the people who live right by the extraction sites.”

Advertisement

People living in high-production oil and gas areas in the Four Corners and the southeast portion of the state are calling on the state to make a change in court. The lawsuit, filed in May 2023, includes individual families and environmental organizations suing New Mexico top officials, state agencies and rulemaking bodies.

The complaint claims that the state of New Mexico failed to enforce pollution laws, violating a duty laid out in a 1971 amendment in the state constitution. It further says state action allowing more oil and gas production and failing to address pollution is discrimination against Indigenous people, youth and communities surrounded by oil and gas.

Sariñana’s bill proposals are a good start, said Gail Evans, the attorney representing the plaintiffs.

“In the end, we need setbacks, not just around schools, but around where people live and work and get their health care,” Evans said in an interview. “But this is a good first step in terms of protecting our children. Likewise, with the other bills, these are really good steps to begin to protect our land and our water from these spills.”

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

New Mexico

Future of free childcare for all families in New Mexico remains uncertain

Published

on

Future of free childcare for all families in New Mexico remains uncertain


Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has no regrets about universal childcare.

As she approaches the end of her second term in New Mexico’s top office, she acknowledges there are some things she would have done differently. In a recent interview, she called 20/20 hindsight a “very powerful tool” that not enough politicians put to good use.

Moving the state toward a free childcare system — open to all New Mexico families regardless of income — isn’t on that list, however. The issue has turned into one of the defining public policy issues of Lujan Grisham’s tenure — which will come to an end later this year. The state’s heavily Democratic Legislature, initially wary of the program, has since voiced support and created a funding stream to continue the initiative for the next five years.

Advertisement

‘You have to start there’

Childcare costs, benefits

Advertisement

‘We have to get it right’

GOP might ‘peel back’ scope

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Mexico

Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report

Published

on

Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report






Opinion: Applauding Heinrich for bi-partisan permitting reform work – New Mexico Political Report












Advertisement



Advertisement





Skip to content

Advertisement


Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

New Mexico lawmakers, leaders respond to federal lawsuit

Published

on

New Mexico lawmakers, leaders respond to federal lawsuit


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — State lawmakers and leaders released the following statements in response to the federal lawsuit against New Mexico and the City of Albuquerque.

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez

“House Bill 9 is a constitutional exercise of state authority, and this office will defend it.  

The New Mexico Legislature passed this law after extensive consideration of documented harms occurring in immigration detention facilities operating in this state — inadequate medical care, deaths in custody, and conditions that fell well below acceptable standards. The Legislature made a considered judgment that New Mexico’s government, its employees, and its publicly funded facilities should not be instruments of a detention system that has caused serious and preventable harm to people held within our borders. That is precisely the kind of policy judgment that belongs to the states.  

Advertisement

The Constitution reserves to the states the power to govern their own affairs — including how state and local personnel are deployed and how publicly funded facilities are used. Federal agents remain free to enforce federal immigration law. They may make arrests, conduct investigations, and carry out removals. What they may not do is compel New Mexico’s officers, employees, and institutions to administer federal enforcement priorities the state has chosen not to adopt. The federal government has its own personnel and its own resources. It does not have a constitutional right to New Mexico’s.  

This lawsuit asks a federal court to override a democratically enacted state law because the administration disagrees with the policy choice the Legislature made. That is not a constitutional argument. It is an attempt to use federal litigation to reverse an outcome the administration dislikes. We will see them in court.” 

Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller

“I will always stand up for the safety, rights, and dignity of Albuquerque residents. Our policies ensure ALL families can call 911, send their kids to school, and access City services without fear, while making clear that City resources are not tools for federal immigration raids. We are ready to defend our community, our values, and our public safety in court,”

City Councilor Dan Lewis

Advertisement

“Mayor Keller deserves to be sued for his reckless promotion of dangerous sanctuary policies that undermine cooperation between law enforcement agencies and put everyone at risk. Sanctuary laws don’t protect; they create more victims. I opposed Keller’s so-called ‘Safer Community Places’ ordinance from the beginning. It’s nothing more than obstruction of law enforcement and this mayor chose his radical ideology over public safety. Most people in our City agree that there is a public safety benefit when local, state and federal law enforcement work together to enforce the law and protect innocent people.”

Deb Haaland

“As ICE continues threatening communities across the country, the state is the first line of defense against the Trump administration. In New Mexico, we are lucky that the state and localities worked to lawfully pass legislation to protect New Mexicans and their families from ICE. We can’t let the federal government continue to exert their will on New Mexico and we won’t let them intimidate us. We are a multicultural state, we must stand strong with our neighbors. That means as governor, I will do anything in my power to stop ICE from tearing families apart and committing crimes in our streets while advocating for strong, common sense immigration and border security reform.”

The Democratic Party of New Mexico

“The Immigrant Safety Act passed both legislative chambers and was signed into law constitutionally, within our rights as a state, concerning New Mexico’s own personnel, facilities, and resources. The Trump Administration may not like that New Mexico stands for the safety of all the families in our communities and against inhumane and dangerous conditions in for-profit detention centers, but they have to respect our rights as a state.  

Advertisement

The fact of the matter is that the Trump Administration is overstepping its authority as they continue to force a violent, clumsy immigration agenda onto communities it has terrorized across the country against their will.”   

Republican Party of New Mexico

“The lawsuit filed by the United States against the State of New Mexico, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, Attorney General Raul Torrez, the City of Albuquerque, and Mayor Timothy Keller confirms what many New Mexicans have feared for months — that House Bill 9 and Albuquerque’s Safer Community Places Ordinance were driven by partisan politics rather than the safety, stability, and economic well-being of our communities.

Legislators who pushed HB9 chose political ideology over common sense and over the people they were elected to represent. This legislation appears to have been crafted not to improve public safety or immigration outcomes, but to advance an anti-Trump political agenda at any cost. In doing so, they ignored the serious consequences these policies would have on New Mexico families, local economies, county governments, and the very immigrants they claim to protect.

The federal government’s complaint makes clear that these laws threaten decades-long partnerships between local governments and federal authorities that have been essential to maintaining public safety and enforcing immigration law. These partnerships support jobs, economic activity, and critical infrastructure in communities like Otero County, where nearly 300 jobs are now at risk because of these reckless political decisions.

Advertisement

New Mexico legislators also failed to consider the financial burden these measures place on counties and municipalities already struggling with limited resources. Instead of working collaboratively to address immigration challenges responsibly and humanely, they chose confrontation and obstruction.

Most troubling is the complete disregard for the safety of New Mexicans. Policies that intentionally interfere with federal immigration enforcement risk creating greater instability, undermining law enforcement cooperation, and putting thousands of residents at risk. At the same time, these policies do nothing to improve the care, processing, or long-term outcomes for immigrants being housed in detention and processing facilities.

The people of New Mexico deserve leadership focused on public safety, economic security, and lawful solutions — not political theater designed to score partisan points. When elected officials prioritize ideology over citizens, communities suffer. The consequences of HB9 and related sanctuary-style policies are now being challenged in federal court, and New Mexicans are left to deal with the damage caused by leaders who appeared more interested in opposing President Trump than protecting the people of this state.

And now, after advancing policies that threaten jobs, hurt counties financially, undermine law enforcement cooperation, and divide communities, these same legislators want taxpayers to pay them for their failing policies. Instead of moving New Mexico forward, too many elected officials have focused solely on advancing their own political agendas while ignoring the real needs of working families, local governments, and public safety.

This election season, New Mexicans have an opportunity to speak loudly at the polls. The primary elections matter, and voters must carefully choose strong Republican candidates willing to go to Santa Fe and fight against harmful policies that put politics above people. New Mexico deserves leaders who will protect communities, strengthen the economy, support law enforcement, and put citizens first — not politicians who continue to gamble with the future of this state.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending