Connect with us

West

Following Supreme Court order, Idaho remains committed to protecting life

Published

on

Following Supreme Court order, Idaho remains committed to protecting life

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court returned the Biden administration’s case against Idaho, State of Idaho v. United States of America, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit after my office won significant concessions from the United States that Justice Amy Coney Barrett described as “important” and “critical.”

Advertisement

The administration’s change in position that the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act will rarely override Idaho’s Defense of Life Act prompted the Supreme Court to ask the 9th Circuit to review the issues in light of the federal government’s significant shift.

I agree with Justice Samuel Alito that it is “regrettable” that the high court didn’t reach the merits in our case. Be that as it may, “the underlying issue in this case – whether EMTALA requires hospitals to perform abortions in some circumstances – is a straightforward question of statutory interpretation.” 

Raul Labrador: “I will do everything I can to stand up for laws that hold that all life is precious and worth protecting.” (iStock)

EMTALA does not preempt Idaho’s law because, at the very least, the two laws are perfectly consistent. We fully expect to prevail on the merits in this case.

SUPREME COURT MISTAKENLY POSTS DRAFT OPINION IN KEY IDAHO ABORTION CASE

Advertisement

The Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization clearly allowed states to protect the sanctity of life, including unborn children. Thankfully, the court said Thursday that Idaho may continue to enforce our law and save lives in nearly every situation while the litigation continues.

The Biden administration – which will do anything it can to promote an extreme abortion agenda – will continue to repeat its same tired talking points, trying to paint Idaho’s Defense of Life Act as dangerous for women by suggesting that airlifting mothers to medical facilities in neighboring states is necessary as a result of doctors’ hands being tied by our law. But the facts have come out, and those claims are simply not true.

So, since you likely won’t get the truth from the mainstream media or our executive branch, let me do you a favor and set the record straight: Thursday’s decision is a blow to the administration’s radical misinterpretation of federal law. Ultimately, the Department of Justice should dismiss its meritless case. 

BIDEN DOESN’T SUPPORT ‘FULL-TERM’ ABORTION STANCE PUSHED BY RFK JR, CAMPAIGN SAYS

But for now, as the case heads back to the 9th Circuit, Idaho has major concessions in hand from the Biden administration. And, importantly, while the litigation plays out, the Supreme Court said that Idaho’s ability to enforce its law and save lives will remain “almost entirely intact.”

Advertisement

This is good news for women and their unborn children as the Biden administration, under the guise of caring about “pregnant people,” has consistently put the abortion industry’s bottom line and financial interests above women’s health, human dignity and the sacredness of each and every life. I’m happy to call its bluff.

After Dobbs was decided, the administration magically found a provision in EMTALA to force emergency room doctors to perform abortions. And despite being backed into a corner and having to walk back its novel interpretation so much that the case has to go back to the lower courts, the fact remains that the administration pulled this rule out of thin air to push its radical agenda of abortion on demand up until the moment of birth.

TRUMP VOWS HE ‘WILL NOT BLOCK’ ABORTION PILLS OR MEDICATION IF ELECTED, SAYS HE BELIEVES IN ‘EXCEPTIONS’

EMTALA requires the opposite of what the Biden administration is claiming; it requires that doctors treat the mother and her “unborn child[ren].”

It’s time for our country to start honoring and cherishing the incredible power and contributions of motherhood, not pitting mothers against their children – and I’m proud to defend Idaho’s decision to do exactly this.

Advertisement

Idaho’s law allows doctors to treat women in all emergency situations according to their best and good-faith medical judgment. Women’s health and well-being are protected under Idaho law, and I will continue to talk with hospital administrators and emergency room doctors to ensure there is absolutely no uncertainty or confusion that the law expects they will do all they can to save women’s lives.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

So, we will continue to enforce our law in the vast majority of circumstances. Our stand for human dignity continues. Even if government officials are bent on radical abortion agendas, pro-life Americans are just as motivated – if not more – to protect the unborn and their mothers. That includes my office.

The people of Idaho elected me to uphold and defend our laws, and I will do everything I can to stand up for laws that hold that all life is precious and worth protecting.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Spring is in full bloom at Utah’s magical Thanksgiving Point Tulip Festival

Published

on

Spring is in full bloom at Utah’s magical Thanksgiving Point Tulip Festival


Featuring over one million blooming flowers, including about 400,000 tulips imported from Holland, the Thanksgiving Point Tulip Festival is one of the largest, most popular springtime events in the U.S., held each year at Ashton Gardens in Lehi, Utah.

The festival runs for about six weeks, usually from early April until mid-May. This year’s celebration concludes on May 16, so there’s still time to see the beautiful blooms.

Throughout the course of the festival, new flowers are always blossoming — and not just tulips. Visitors can admire daffodils, poppies, hyacinths and more.

Each year, tens of thousands of people flock to the festival from all over. What really sets Thanksgiving Point apart is that every October, the team redesigns bloom patterns and plants new bulbs, making for a completely fresh experience for visitors each year.

Advertisement

The Thanksgiving Point Tulip Festival is filled to the brim with the sights, scents and sounds of spring. It’s a must-visit for all flower enthusiasts, but there’s really something for everyone to enjoy, including sweet and savory treats, live music on select days, interactive classes and tours, and plenty of unique photo opportunities.

Timed entry tickets are required, and prices range from $17 to $29. Children two and under enter for free. The festival is typically open Monday through Saturday from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. and closed on Sunday. For more information, click here.

We know there are plenty of other stories of unique landmarks and cultural experiences in all corners of the USA, and we’re making it our mission to find and highlight them. If you know of one, we’d love to hear about it. Send a DM to @amazingamericatv on Instagram!

For more amazing stories, click here to subscribe to Amazing America on YouTube and follow us on Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Why is the protester still on top the Frederick Douglass Bridge in DC?

Published

on

Why is the protester still on top the Frederick Douglass Bridge in DC?


play

Despite saying he would “soon” come down, a protester has remained on top of the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge in Washington, DC since May 1, impacting traffic and extending a dayslong standoff with police.

Guido Reichstadter climbed the 168-foot bridge Friday, then draped a black banner and set up a tent while making the bridge his home for the past four days.

Advertisement

Here’s what to know about Reichstadter’s protest and how it is affecting locals in the nation’s capital.

Why is there a man on top of the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge?

After Reichstadter climbed the bridge Friday, he identified himself as a protester, writing on X that he was “calling on the people of the United States to bring an immediate end to the Trump regime’s illegal war on Iran and the removal of the regime power through mass nonviolent direct action and non-cooperation.”

He has posted on X throughout his protest, reminding his followers of his cause as he thwarts attempts from the DC police to bring him down.

“The Trump regime occupying the office of the US executive is prosecuting a criminal war of aggression against the nation of Iran, enabled by the refusal of Congress to assert its constitutional power, and by the continued submission of the majority of the US population to this intolerable state of affairs without effective civil resistance,” he wrote on X, saying it’s the public’s responsibility to nonviolently put an end to Trump’s presidency.

Advertisement

Reichstadter said May 4 he hasn’t eaten for days, but previously told NewsNation he went on a 30-day hunger strike while protesting AI outside the Anthropic headquarters.

He has run out of water, however.

“I’ve got the stamina to stay up here a bit longer,” he told WTOP Monday.

What impact is the protest having in Washington, DC?

Reichstadter’s protest has caused lanes to shut down on the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge, but lanes had reopened for traffic late Monday morning.

Tuesday morning, all lanes were open for traffic, but the pedestrian walkway was closed, according to the Metropolitan Area Transportation Operations Coordination (MATOC) Program.

Advertisement

If he stays on top of the bridge into Tuesday night, it’s unclear how his protest could impact people traveling nearby to the Washington Nationals game.

“My efforts here have had impacts on the local community and its people, and it is my desire not to harm but to work in communication, to lift up and to contribute what strength I can to the ongoing struggle for rights and freedom which this community has been engaged in for years,” Reichstadter said Sunday.

Police said Monday that their negotiators will remain on the scene.

Mike Stunson is the DC Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Statewide candidates split on Wyoming GOP’s plans to defy state law and make endorsements 

Published

on

Statewide candidates split on Wyoming GOP’s plans to defy state law and make endorsements 


by Maggie Mullen, WyoFile

After the Wyoming GOP voted to defy a state law prohibiting the party from backing one Republican over another before the primary election, statewide candidates are split on whether they would accept such an endorsement. 

Some told WyoFile they agree with the party’s decision and will seek out an endorsement, while others said they oppose a political party breaking election law. A few said they were taking a wait-and-see approach. 

“Jury’s still out on this one for me,” Wyoming State Auditor Kristi Racines said Wednesday. 

For years, the Wyoming Republican Party has argued that because it is a private organization, state laws that govern its organizational structure and prohibit it from endorsing or financially backing candidates in opposed primary election races are unconstitutional. 

Advertisement

At its convention in Douglas last weekend, the party took things into its own hands, voting to adopt bylaws establishing a process for vetting, endorsing and spending money to support candidates ahead of the primary. 

Park County’s Tim Lasseter hydrates during the Wyoming Republican State Convention on Saturday, April 25, 2026, in Douglas. (Dan Cepeda/WyoFile)

Supporters of the new bylaws point to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from 1989, which struck down California’s ban on political party endorsements, ruling that the law violated the First Amendment’s guarantees of free speech and association. Opponents, meanwhile, raised concerns at the convention about the bylaws breaking the law, litigation costs and unintended consequences. 

The new bylaws are widely expected to spark lawsuits, while the Wyoming Republican Party has said it plans to file its own legal challenge against the state. 

In the meantime, the new bylaws lay out a process for evaluating candidates based on “commitment to the Wyoming Republican Party Platform, demonstrated loyalty to the Party’s principles, legal eligibility to hold office, and for incumbents, their voting record.” 

The state party will consider candidates running for Wyoming’s state-elected officials — including governor, secretary of state, superintendent of public instruction, treasurer and auditor — as well as congressional candidates. Otherwise, county parties “may vet all other races on their respective County Ballots,” according to the new bylaws. 

Advertisement

The state party, as well as each county party, “shall each create and oversee a Candidate Vetting Committee empowered to review and recommend approval or disapproval of candidates based on established criteria,” the bylaw states. “The Committee shall provide candidates an opportunity to respond to concerns prior to issuing a recommendation.”

Candidates 

Brent Bien, who is running for governor, told WyoFile the bylaw changes are “a long time coming,” pointing back to the 1989 ruling. 

“I think we just got to make sure we get those folks that truly believe on the Republican side of the equation, who truly believe in the platform and what Wyoming stands for,” Bien said. “And I just don’t think there’s been any enforcement mechanism to do that.” 

At the convention, Bien was a clear favorite among many attendees who wore his campaign buttons and t-shirts. Still, Bien said he wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t get the party’s endorsement. 

“I didn’t get Trump’s endorsement,” Bien said. “And some of these legislators around the state, you know, they haven’t endorsed me.”

Advertisement

Bien’s take isn’t shared by all the gubernatorial candidates. 

“Contested primaries should be decided by voters,” Gillette Sen. Eric Barlow wrote in a statement. “The role of the state party is to unite Republicans around shared values and help grow the party, not decide elections before voters have had their say.”

“Under current law, the state party should not choose sides in Republican primaries, and I will not ask them to start now,” he wrote. “My job,” running for governor, “is to earn the trust of Wyoming voters directly.”

At the convention, supporters of the bylaws said the party had tried to get the Legislature to change state statute. Barlow directly pushed back on that argument. 

Sen. Eric Barlow, R-Gillette, at the Wyoming Legislature’s 2026 budget session in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

“As a legislator for the past 14 years, this issue has never come before us,” Barlow said. “If it had, it would have ensured all Wyomingites could weigh in and decisions would have been made openly and transparently — not in the courts and not a few months before an election.” 

Secretary of State Chuck Gray, who is running for U.S. House, told WyoFile he supports the new bylaws. 

Advertisement

“I will participate in the Party’s vetting process and will seek their support because I’m the only candidate in this race with a proven record of standing up for conservative principles — even when it wasn’t popular with the media and the insiders,” he wrote in a statement. 

As secretary of state, Gray is Wyoming’s chief election officer and oversees statewide election administration. Asked if he wanted to comment in his official capacity on the Wyoming Republican Party’s decision to defy state law, Gray did not respond by publishing time. 

U.S. House candidate David Giralt took a more cautious approach when asked for his opinion on the new bylaws. 

“I trust Wyoming Republicans to make good decisions for our party, and I’ll let the process play out,” Giralt said. “I’m focused on getting in front of as many Wyoming voters as possible and making the case for why I’m the right person to represent this state in Congress.” 

Kevin Christensen, another U.S. House candidate, said he wanted to see how fair, transparent and consistent the process played out before weighing in. 

Advertisement

“The Wyoming people are the ones that make the determination in the primary, not the party,” he said. “That being said, if this is about supporting candidates and determining who is really a Republican and who’s just putting an ‘R’ next to their name, that seems like that would be consistent with being the Republican Party.”

Jillian Balow, yet another candidate for U.S. House and former superintendent of public instruction, said she “would be honored to accept an endorsement and money from the state party only if it is in accordance with Wyoming and federal law.”

“The contingency of our party at the convention knew the changes they made defied state law and they curtailed delegate discussion to pass new by-laws anyway,” Balow wrote in a statement. “Some delegates were appalled, some were gleeful, and many were silent, because they were silenced. This is not the way Wyoming does business.”

U.S. House candidate Reid Rasner also pushed back on the new bylaws. 

“As a pro-Trump conservative, I always expected the political establishment to try and stop our campaign,” he wrote in a statement. “But, after making over 200 stops across our communities, one thing is clear: people are tired of the political games.”

Advertisement
Rep. Tom Kelly, R-Sheridan, looks over a bill from the House floor. Kelly announced his intentions to run for Wyoming superintendent of public instruction this week. (Joseph Beaudet/The Sheridan Press)

Sheridan Republican Rep. Tom Kelly, who is running for superintendent, said while he opposes “the idea of parties having the power to disallow anyone from running under their banner,” he thinks “parties should be able to express publicly which people they would like to represent them.” 

Though he’s not actively seeking endorsements, Kelly said he would accept support from the state party. 

“Financial backing? Absolutely,” Kelly said. “Contrary to a popular false narrative, I have no wealthy D.C. donors bankrolling me.”

And if the party endorsed one of his opponents, Kelly said he would tell them, “Congrats. I should have done a better job presenting myself.”

WyoFile reached out to other statewide Republican candidates, including those running for governor, secretary of state, superintendent, U.S. House and U.S. Senate. They did not respond by publishing time.


This article was originally published by WyoFile and is republished here with permission. WyoFile is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending