Connect with us

Colorado

A teen girl died in a Colorado house fire. As investigators dug into the case, the mystery deepened | CNN

Published

on

A teen girl died in a Colorado house fire. As investigators dug into the case, the mystery deepened | CNN




CNN
 — 

Connie Long kept her eyes glued to the door at the high school auditorium. She expected her younger sister to burst in at any moment, frazzled and excited.

As a senior at Platte Canyon High School, Maggie Long was involved in staging the event –- a concert by a local Denver rock band –- and her family knew she’d never miss it.

But as the opening band played and the minutes dragged on, the 17-year-old was nowhere to be found.

Advertisement

“I had a weird feeling. I knew something was very wrong,” Connie said. “Maggie was responsible, dependable. She had helped organize this concert. There was no reason for her to be late or not show up.”

Her intuition was right. Connie didn’t realize it at the time, but her sister had rushed home after classes that afternoon to collect home-baked cookies for the school event in Bailey, Colorado.

Soon after, a mysterious fire broke out at the Long family’s sprawling, ranch-style house. Firefighters discovered Maggie’s remains that night in the charred ruins.

As investigators dug deeper, they uncovered harrowing details about how a simple cookie errand turned into a fatal encounter.

Authorities later determined that Maggie had walked in on intruders who were robbing her parents’ home. After a physical altercation, the men set the home ablaze — with her inside — and escaped with a green safe, a Beretta handgun, an AK-47-style rifle, jade figurines and 2,000 rounds of ammunition, the FBI said.

Advertisement

Shortly before the fire, a tenant renting a guest suite in the house had called 911 and reported hearing loud banging noises. The tenant escaped the blaze unharmed and was cleared by police of any involvement in the crime, authorities said.

A coroner later ruled Maggie Long’s death a homicide. The Park County sheriff told reporters that Maggie likely burned to death when the robbers started the fire to destroy evidence.

Her killers haven’t been identified, and the motive behind the horrific attack on December 1, 2017, remains a mystery. On last month’s seventh anniversary of the deadly fire, police implored anyone with information about Maggie’s killers to come forward.

“She told her friends she’ll be right back, and she was never seen again,” Park County Sheriff Tom McGraw said at a news conference. “We believe someone knows something that could help solve this case and bring a measure of justice to Maggie’s family and the Bailey community.”

Investigators have received about 415 tips related to the case so far, the Colorado Bureau of Investigation told CNN this month. The FBI released a sketch of three suspects and implored anyone with information to come forward.

Advertisement

But as authorities try to unravel what happened that night in the mountain community of 9,000 people, questions and speculation still linger. Was Maggie killed because she saw the robbers? Was it a hate crime against her Chinese family? Or was the home targeted because her parents owned several successful restaurants, and the robbers thought they stored cash in the house?

Connie Long was living on her own in Denver at the time. She’d driven to Bailey to see her sister and support her at the event.

“Maggie was going to set up the VIP room for the concert, and had stayed up all night baking cookies,” she said. “So I went to the high school to meet her. And then I waited and waited.”

Connie tried calling, but the call went straight to voicemail, which she said was not unusual given the spotty cell service in the mountains. She then drove the 30 minutes to their parents’ home, where she encountered a fleet of police cars and firetrucks. Maggie’s silver Cadillac was parked outside.

“I could still smell the smoke – they had just extinguished the fire,” she said. “And I was asking, where’s my sister? What happened?”

Advertisement

The sisters’ parents, San and Hy Long, had lived in the 6,000-square-foot house for nearly two decades. The property sat on 11 acres of remote forest in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, about an hour southwest of Denver.

The Longs are Chinese immigrants who were forced out of northern Vietnam by war. They moved to Macau and eventually Hong Kong, where they lived as refugees for years before immigrating to Colorado in the late 1980s, Connie said.

“They were in the United States with the hope of building a safe and secure life for their family,” Connie Long said. “They were so resilient and went through all of that to come to America — just to face even more trauma.”

The Longs settled in Colorado after they learned about job opportunities for service workers there, said Lynna Long, their oldest daughter, who lives in Westminster, Colorado, a Denver suburb.

San Long worked as a chef in a Chinese restaurant in the early 1990s, and the owner sold him the business after he retired, Lynna said. It marked the beginning of her parents owning four restaurants in the Denver area, she said.

Advertisement

In Bailey they raised a boy and three girls, including Maggie, their third and youngest daughter. Growing up in the mountains, the sisters said, they felt so safe at home that they had no security cameras.

“Not only was it a small community, our house was behind trees and our driveway was like a mile long,” Connie said. “We were nowhere near the main county road. So there wasn’t a lot of concern about anything sketchy happening.”

But that horrific Friday night shattered their lives and sense of security, the sisters said. As the family grieved, they spent several chaotic weeks working with various law enforcement agencies.

To protect the integrity of the investigation, a judge issued a gag order prohibiting anyone involved with the case from releasing information publicly.

By then, the family knew that Maggie’s body had been found in the house, even though that information had not been publicly released. But because of the gag order, they couldn’t share the news or grieve her openly.

Advertisement

“Police wanted to keep details of the investigation from getting out into the greater community,” Lynna Long said. “And the hope was that in the initial days, if they got information from outside sources, they would be able to validate it more easily if not much was known.”

But it only added to the confusion, she said, as many local residents questioned the lack of search efforts for Maggie at the time.

“The community was very upset when they learned later that she had died earlier,” Lynna said.

The remains of the house were marked a crime scene, and the Longs never lived in it again.

Years later, investigators are still searching for suspects — and a motive

It’s now been more than seven years since Maggie Long’s killing, and there have been no arrests.

Advertisement

It’s now considered a cold case, the FBI said. A taskforce that comprises the Park County Sheriff’s Office, Colorado Bureau of Investigation, the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) still meets regularly about the case. The ATF is part of the investigation because of the missing firearms.

Authorities built sketches of three suspects based on witness accounts from the tenant who called 911 and others who saw two light-colored vans and an old pickup truck leaving the property, police said.

Authorities have offered a reward of up to $75,000 for information leading to arrests. Investigators also have suggested there may have been a fourth suspect.

Four years after the deadly fire, the FBI classified Maggie’s homicide as a hate crime in 2021. The FBI declined to comment to CNN on why it believes her killing could have been racially motivated. The Park County Sheriff’s Office referred all questions to the CBI. A spokesperson for the CBI referred questions on the hate crime aspect to the FBI.

Growing up in Bailey, the sisters said, they felt unwelcome in some areas. But they don’t remember any instances of overt racism.

Advertisement

The Longs had owned restaurants in the area for almost 20 years and had numerous employees and neighbors who knew their daily routines and when they’d be home, the sisters said.

“So if our home was targeted for any reason, they would know that no one was home,” Lynna said.

She said she believes the case was classified as a hate crime because of a belief that Chinese immigrants rarely use banks and keep their money at home.

“That is the perspective that investigators were approaching our case (with)” she said. “It’s technically targeting a minority under the assumption that their banking practices are different.”

Not long after their daughter’s killing, the Longs sold one of their restaurants and retired. They moved to the Denver suburb of Broomfield, where they live now with their son.

Advertisement

“My parents were already in the process of retiring from the restaurant business,” Lynna said. “This just expedited their plans to leave the area. It was difficult for them to be there.”

Years later, the Longs are still struggling with the loss of their youngest daughter. They’ve set up a room in her honor in their home. It contains her personal belongings that weren’t lost in the fire, including a red Jansport backpack, a water bottle with her last drink still in it, a clarinet and a navy blue softball jersey. Several awards, including from speech and debate club, are displayed on a table. Portraits of a beaming Maggie adorn the walls.

Maggie died about two weeks before she turned 18. She was excited about attending college but had not picked a major or decided where to go, her sisters said. She was trying to decide whether to follow her passion — performing arts — or go into health care.

“She was stressed. She was trying to figure it out,” Connie Long said.

Sometimes, when Connie misses her sister, she goes through her laptop, journal and other personal items.

Advertisement

The details give her glimpses into Maggie’s final years. “I read in her journal that she borrowed my stuff, like my makeup or clothes,” she said. “I had no idea.”

A year before Maggie was killed, she wrote a tribute in her journal about a close friend and classmate who had died. In a sad irony, her grieving family strives to live by Maggie’s words and channel her spirit.

“I think the only real cure to cope with loss is to continue to be good people. Be kind. Be caring. Be passionate. Be thoughtful,” Maggie wrote in the message, which she also shared on Facebook.

“Share love and consider everyone around you, from strangers to acquaintances to peers to friends,” she added. “Enough people have experienced pain to understand that life is far more measurable in joy and good memories than to be scorched with cruelty and loss.”

Advertisement



Source link

Colorado

Colorado mountains could see near-record temperatures as heat dome develops over the West

Published

on

Colorado mountains could see near-record temperatures as heat dome develops over the West


Colorado’s mountains are in for a hot, dry weekend as a heat dome sets up over the West, according to forecasters.

National Weather Service forecaster Kate Abbott said the ridge of high pressure that is building will push out any lingering moisture away from the Western Slope and could send temperatures soaring. Some locations are likely to break daily high temperature records.

“In general, starting Saturday, most of the region is (forecasted to be) about 10 degrees above normal for this time of year,” Abbott said. “Especially north of (Interstate 70), we see that number grow to 10 to 15 degrees above normal on Sunday and Monday, potentially into Tuesday too.”



The extreme heat comes as Colorado faces a historic drought and five major wildfires burn across the state. 

Advertisement

Counties including Summit, Eagle, Pitkin, Lake and parts of Grand, Garfield, Rio Blanco and Moffat have experienced exceptional drought — the highest level — for the majority of the past three months, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. Every county west of Denver has fire restrictions in place banning campfires.

Support Local Journalism



While a high-pressure system is expected to bring calmer winds than July has seen so far, Abbott said the risk of wildfires will remain elevated due to the heat and record-dry conditions resulting from the drought.

Advertisement

“Just be cognizant of making sure to stay extra hydrated this week and to seek shade or stay indoors as much as possible,” Abbott said. “Even in the mountains, we’re still going to be well above normal for this time of year. Do what you can to keep yourself safe and prepared for the incoming heat.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado Highway getting bicycle bypass bridge

Published

on

Colorado Highway getting bicycle bypass bridge



The first of two closures happened on Colorado Highway 119 as crews install a new bicycle bypass bridge. The upgrade is part of the Safety Mobility and Bikeway Improvements Project in Boulder County. 

Advertisement

CBS


The bike-overpass bridge is being installed at the intersection of 63rd Street and Highway 119. The highway is expected to see a 25-percent increase in drivers by 2040. The goal of this project is to make the highway safer for everyone. It was fast tracked after the death of Magnus White, a teen cyclist who was hit and killed in that area two years ago.

“Obviously, we’ve lost a couple of pretty wonderful young people out there,” one cyclist told CBS News Colorado. “I’ve been here over 40 years so it used to be a lot more accessible.” 

Advertisement

The highway did reopen Friday afternoon, but another closure is planned for Friday, July 17, 2026 from 5:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado to weigh daily hunting limits, ban on fur sales for wildlife hunted for fur 

Published

on

Colorado to weigh daily hunting limits, ban on fur sales for wildlife hunted for fur 


At its upcoming meetings on July 20 and 21, the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission will consider whether to impose daily hunting limits for furbearers and a ban on commercial fur sales. It’s the latest chapter in a years-long debate over how these species — which include beavers, foxes, coyotes, bobcats, martens and other mesocarnivores — should be managed.  

Both potential policy changes have emerged from a surge of public interest in furbearers following Proposition 127 — a failed ballot measure in 2024 that sought to ban the hunting of mountain lions, bobcats and lynx. 

The idea to impose a limit on the number of furbearers a recreational hunter can kill in a single day has been raised in public comments and was among several recommendations made to the agency in a 2025 stakeholder group. 



While Parks and Wildlife proposed a daily limit of 15 for all 17 furbearer species in March, wildlife advocates and some commissioners pushed back, arguing it didn’t go far enough and asked staff to consider a lower number. On July 20, the commission will discuss one new option proposed by the wildlife agency — though its recommendation remains a daily limit of 15. 

Advertisement

The idea to ban the commercial sale of furs in Colorado emerged out of a petition submitted by the Center for Biological Diversity in June 2025. 



The petition argued that it is a common-sense and ethical change that aligns furbearers with how the state manages other wildlife. In a controversial March vote, the commission approved the petition against the recommendation of Parks and Wildlife staff, sending it forward for additional debate. The first hearing will be held on July 21, with Parks and Wildlife offering two options for potential fur sales bans. The agency’s recommendation remains not to impose any ban.

A public divided on Colorado’s current furbearer management 

Public sentiment around furbearers is largely divided into two groups. 

The first, primarily represented by sportspersons and agriculture advocates, argues that the agency’s current management is driven by science and represents a critical part of Colorado’s hunting heritage that provides critical data to the agency. The second, held by wildlife conservation and welfare advocates, contends that the management of furbearers is outdated, unethical and leading to overexploitation of the species

Currently in Colorado, all 17 furbearer species can be hunted with the purchase of ​​a $10 permit. In its 2024-25 fiscal year, the agency sold 19,620 furbearer permits. There are no limits on the number that a permit-holder can kill. 

Advertisement

These species are grouped together as mesocarnivores, sharing high reproductive output, high natural mortality rates and qualities as habitat generalists, according to a March report. 

In a July memo to the commission, Parks and Wildlife Director Laura Clellan wrote that “current annual harvest rates range from 0.6-5.8% of the conservative population projections,” and that there is no scientific evidence that the current level of furbearer hunting is causing population declines. 

A fox keeps an eye on her kits in Steamboat Springs on Wednesday, June 24, 2026. Colorado Parks and Wildlife is considering making changes to how it manages foxes and other furbearer species at its July 2026 commissioner meeting.
John F. Russell/Steamboat Pilot & Today archive

Parks and Wildlife staff have said that the allowed methods of trapping — which were narrowed significantly by a 1996 ballot measure in Colorado — act as a natural limit on how many furbearers can be hunted.

There have been some concerns and criticism that Parks and Wildlife lacks sufficient population estimates for these species. In the memo, Clellan clarifies that the wildlife profession tends not to use population abundance for small game and furbearer management because their populations are limited, not by harvest, but by factors like weather and habitat — meaning there are “often very large population swings year to year.”  

While Colorado law makes it illegal to sell or purchase wildlife for commercial gain, there’s an exemption that allows the sale of “nonedible portions of wildlife,” including furbearer pelts and hides. This includes allowing the sale, barter or trading of items like fur, feathers, teeth, horns, antlers, bones and more that were acquired legally.

Should Colorado implement daily hunting limits on furbearers?  

Mink are among the 17 species Colorado Parks and Wildlife manages as furbearers. The agency is considering making changes to how it manages these mesocarnivores.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/Courtesy Photo

When it comes to imposing a daily limit on the number of furbearers a hunter can legally kill, the agency has offered two options. The first is a limit of 15 that applies to all furbearer species hunted for sport in Colorado. According to Clellan, this is still the agency’s recommendation. 

The second would apply a limit of eight or four, depending on the species. The higher limit of eight would be applied to species identified by state law as those that can cause property damage: badger, bobcat, beaver, coyote, muskrat, striped skunk, western spotted skunk, raccoon and red fox. The lower limit of four would be applied to mink, opossum, marten, ring-tailed cat, gray fox, swift fox, long-tailed weasel and short-tailed weasel. 

Advertisement

In her memo, Clellan said the reason Parks and Wildlife is considering a limit is in response to perceptions that there is a “regulatory loophole allowing unlimited, unsustainable harvest and a regulatory gap between how furbearers are managed in comparison to small game.”

She added that it would also help maintain “social acceptance” of recreational hunting of furbearers.

“There is no information that suggests reducing harvest is necessary to sustain adequate furbearer populations throughout their respective ranges in Colorado,” Clellan wrote, adding that daily limits would only “affect a small number of hunters or trappers, as the vast majority of Colorado furharvesters take only a few animals, even across the whole harvest season.”

A screenshot from a July 2026 Colorado Parks and Wildlife memo showing population estimates and hunting levels for several “priority” furbearer species, including beaver, gray fox, marten, ringtail, swift fox and bobcat.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife/Courtesy Photo

Should Colorado ban the commercial sale of furs from furbearers? 

In a July issue paper identifying potential options for a ban on the sale of fur, the agency gives three potential options for the commission to consider. Parks and Wildlife indicates that the alternatives offered are “substantially different” from the petition to avoid potential regulatory conflicts.

The first — recommended by Parks and Wildlife staff — is not to implement a ban, citing its previous denial of the petition. Clellan wrote in the denial recommendation that there was no “solid evidence that commercial fur sales drive harvest levels in Colorado.” 

The second option would prohibit the sale of “fur products,” defined as the pelt, hide or any part of a furbearer hunted in Colorado. The third would ban the sale of “raw pelts,” referring to the skin or any part of the furbearer intact with skin that has not been tanned. Both would only apply to fur sales within the state, meaning an animal legally hunted in Colorado could still be sold in another state. 

Advertisement

The agency reports that both of these would have enforcement challenges. 

Both the second and third would exempt any furbearers killed for tribal uses or by private landowners and producers dealing with nuisance animals. The latter is currently legal under a state law that allows these individuals to kill nine of the furbearer species for causing damage to crops, private property or livestock without a license. 

In between the March and July meetings, Parks and Wildlife solicited feedback on a potential ban on its EngageCPW.org website and through several stakeholder groups.

chart visualization

The survey received 726 responses, with 57% opposing a commercial fur sales ban. Opponents said the proposal lacks scientific justification, goes against Parks and Wildlife staff recommendations, could hurt local economies and businesses, and would remove an important wildlife management tool.

About 38% supported the ban, citing animal welfare, ethics and the ecological importance of furbearers. Many said ending commercial fur sales would stop the commercialization of native wildlife, arguing that trapping and fur harvesting are inhumane and that the animals should be managed for their ecological value rather than commercial use.

The commission’s March decision to go against staff’s recommended denial of the petition has raised concerns about the overall direction of the board and agency. 

Advertisement

“The consequence will be that now there is an onslaught of petitions coming your way that will tie up your CPW staff,” said Rio Blanco County commissioner Callie Scritchfield at the commission’s May meeting. “Colorado is moving more and more toward ballot-box biology, and now petition biology. This allows for management based on emotions and politics, and I haven’t seen any evidence that that’s more successful than managing based on our science and experience on the ground.” 

Others, however, supported the commissioner’s decision to allow the petition a hearing. In May, Delia Malone, an ecologist based in Redstone, said the “vote to support an ethical, science-based relationship with our natural world by voting to protect native furbearers from commercialization has been one of the most important votes in Colorado in the last century.”

“The commission has made great progress in moving Colorado towards the ethical ecological light of the moral universe and out of the scientifically unethical world where guns dominate wildlife management, and killing is misconstrued as conservation,” she said. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending