Connect with us

California

Before Santa Rosa Plaza, a beloved theater stood in its place

Published

on

Before Santa Rosa Plaza, a beloved theater stood in its place


Fifty years ago, a determined group of local citizens formed a committee in an attempt to “save the Cal,” Santa Rosa’s historic California Theatre threatened by the city’s downtown urban renewal.

The old theater was built just over a century ago, with construction beginning around mid-1923 on B Street.

“It will be one of the finest theaters in any small city in the country,” said general contractor A. M. Hildebrandt in a Nov. 16, 1923, article in The Press Democrat. “In construction it meets every requirement set by San Francisco standards, the highest in the country, and in other ways it will compare favorably with any like theater.”

Originally called the Reavis G & S Theatre, the $200,000 playhouse would include 2,000 seats, blue velvet drapes, a heating and ventilation system, 17 fire-proof dressing rooms, a $20,000 Wurlitzer organ and other elaborate, modern fixtures (save for the “asbestos curtains”).

Advertisement

The grand opening was held on Dec. 3, 1923, with a showing of the play “Blossom Time,” to which 2,000 people crowded the theater to see, according to the next day’s Press Democrat. The theater offered varied types of entertainment over the years, from plays and vaudeville performances to films and music concerts.

In January 1926, the G & S Theatre had been redecorated, refurnished and renamed as the California Theatre under new management, West Coast Theaters, Inc.

Over 3,000 people attended the Jan. 21 reopening of the renovated theater, which included a song and dance revue called “Salad Ideas” by dancing duo Fanchon and Marco, as well as a “Charleston Contest” and screening of the Constance Talmadge film “Her Sister From Paris,” according to the Jan. 22, 1926, Press Democrat.

The California Theatre was remodeled again in 1932 as “now one of the finest (theaters) on the Pacific Coast,” boasted the Sept. 20, 1932, Press Democrat. Sen. Herbert W. Slater gave the dedication address at the gala reopening, which included a showing of the film “Guilty as Hell.”

After years of entertaining the local masses, the Santa Rosa Urban Redevelopment Agency made plans in the early 1970s to raze the landmark theater along with other old buildings on B Street to make way for a new shopping center. According to santarosahistory.com, locals formed a committee and launched a “Save the Cal” campaign on July 18, 1974, to get a proposition on the November ballot to preserve the historic buildings, which also included the city’s old post office and the Scottish Rite building.

Advertisement

An ad from the committee in the July 21, 1974, Press Democrat urged readers to “voice your desire and interest in saving and renovating this theatre” and “to decide the future character of their city.” In addition to saving the Cal, the citizens’ committee hoped to integrate it with a cultural arts center.

“Saving the Cal may mean saving the city from becoming a concrete jungle,” the ad pleaded.

After some years of public debate, inspections, petitions and lawsuits, Superior Court judge Joseph P. Murphy Jr. made a ruling blocking referendums from both pro-mall and pro-Cal groups due to a conflict with state law on redevelopment. The public wasn’t allowed a vote on whether they wanted to preserve the historic B Street buildings or to build a shopping mall.

The California Theatre held its last show on July 5, 1977, and the following month it sold its organ, seats, ticket booth and other items in a liquidation sale. The Cal was torn down in November 1977 and the Santa Rosa Plaza mall began construction in its place. In 1981, Macy’s department store, the first of the mall’s shops, opened where the Cal once stood.

Santa Rosa’s current, nonprofit California Theatre opened on Seventh Street in September 2022 to continue the legacy of the city’s original Cal Theatre.

Advertisement



Source link

California

Supreme Court blocks California law limiting schools from telling parents about trans students

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks California law limiting schools from telling parents about trans students


The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a California law that limited when schools could require staff to disclose a student’s gender identity, clearing the way for schools to tell parents if their children identify as transgender without getting the students’ approval.

Rear view of multiracial students with hands raised in classroom at high school

The decision came after religious parents and educators, represented by the Thomas More Society, challenged California school policies aimed at preventing staff from disclosing a student’s gender identity.

Erwin Chemerinsky, dean and professor of law at the University of California Berkeley School of Law, said the ruling favors parents’ ability to be informed. “The Supreme Court today rules in favor of the claim of parents to be able to know the gender identity and gender pronoun of the children,” Chemerinsky said.

Advertisement
FILE:{ }transgender flag against blue sky background { }(Photo: AdobeStock)

FILE:{ }transgender flag against blue sky background { }(Photo: AdobeStock)

The decision temporarily blocks a state law that bans automatic parental notification requirements if students change their pronouns or gender expression at school. The Thomas More Society called the decision a major victory for parents, saying the court found California’s policy likely violates constitutional rights.

Chemerinsky said the Supreme Court’s action is an emergency ruling. “This law is now put on hold. So what this means is that schools can require that teachers and other staff inform parents of the gender identity or gender pronouns of children,” he said.

scotus.PNG

Kathie Moehlig, founder and executive director of Trans Family Support Services, said she is concerned about how the ruling could affect students who do not have supportive families.

“I am really concerned about our kids that do come from these non affirming homes, that they know that they’re going to get in trouble, that they’re going to possibly have violence brought against them possibly kicked out of their homes,” Moehlig said.

Moehlig said parents should eventually know, but that the conversation should happen when a student feels safe. “Our students are going to be less inclined to confide in any adults that might be able to help to get them access to mental healthcare, to a support system. They may still tell their peers but they’re certainly not going to tell any other adult,” she said.

Advertisement

Equality California, a LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, shared a statement:

Equality California, the nation’s largest statewide LGBTQ+ civil rights organization, released the following statement from Executive Director Tony Hoang in response to today’s U.S. Supreme Court shadow docket ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta regarding California’s student privacy protections for transgender youth. Today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in this case is deeply disturbing. By stepping in on an emergency basis, the Court has effectively upended California’s student privacy protections without hearing full arguments and before the judicial process has run its course. While not surprising, this move reflects a dangerous willingness to short-circuit the established judicial process to dismantle protections for transgender youth. While this case continues to be litigated, the ruling revives Judge Benitez’s prior decision, which broadly targets numerous California laws protecting transgender and gender-nonconforming students — threatening critical safeguards that prevent forced outing and allow educators to respect a student’s affirmed name and pronouns at school. These protections exist for one reason: to keep students safe and ensure schools remain places where young people can learn and thrive without fear. To be clear: today’s decision does not impact California’s SAFETY Act, which prohibits school districts from adopting policies that forcibly out transgender students. The SAFETY Act remains in full effect, and we will continue defending it. Transgender youth deserve dignity, safety, and the freedom to learn without fear. We will never stop fighting for transgender youth and their families. Equality California will continue working with parents, educators, and advocates to ensure schools remain safe, welcoming, and focused on the success and well-being of every student.

The case now returns to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which will decide whether the California law is constitutional.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Rep. Kevin Kiley announces run in California’s redrawn 6th Congressional District

Published

on

Rep. Kevin Kiley announces run in California’s redrawn 6th Congressional District



Congressman Kevin Kiley has announced his plan to run in California’s newly redrawn 6th district.

In a statement on Monday, Rep. Kiley revealed he had considered running in the 5th District – which could have set up a possible showdown between two current Republican officeholders.

“It’s true that I was fully prepared to run in the new 5th, having tested the waters and with polls showing a favorable outlook in a “safe” district. But doing what’s easy and what’s right are often not the same,” Kiley stated.

Advertisement

Kiley currently represents California’s 3rd district, which originally comprised counties making up much of the back spine of the state.

As of the Prop. 50 redistricting push, the 3rd district was redrawn for the 2026 midterm election to lean toward the Democratic Party – with those eastern spine of California counties lopped off and more of Sacramento County, including Rancho Cordova, added.

California’s new 6th district is now comprised of Rocklin, Roseville, Citrus Heights, much of North and East Sacramento, and the city of West Sacramento. Democratic Rep. Ami Bera currently represents the district, but will be running for the new 3rd district in 2026.

Advertisement

Other declared candidates for the 6th district include Democrats Lauren Babb Thomlinson, Thien Ho, Richard Pan, Kindra Pring, Tyler Vandenberg, and Republicans Christine Bish, Craig DeLuz, and Raymond Riehle. 

Kiley was first elected to the House in 2022 and was reelected in 2024. 





Source link

Continue Reading

California

Preliminary magnitude 3.3 earthquake strikes near San Ramon, USGS says

Published

on

Preliminary magnitude 3.3 earthquake strikes near San Ramon, USGS says


SAN RAMON, Calif. (KGO) — An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.4 struck near San Ramon at 11:21 p.m. Sunday, the U.S. Geological Survey said.

USGS said the tremor was about 8.4 km in depth.

According to the Geological Survey, people typically report feeling earthquakes larger than about magnitude 2.5.

The closer to the surface an earthquake occurs, the more ground shaking and potential damage it will cause.

Advertisement

No injuries have been reported.

This is the latest quake in San Ramon, which has seen multiple strings of tremors in the past several months.

Bay City News contributed to this report.

MAP: Significant San Francisco Bay Area fault lines and strong earthquakes
Zoom in on the map below and compare where you live to the significant faults and where strong earthquakes have struck in the Bay Area.

Stay with ABC7 News for the latest details on this developing story.

Advertisement

RELATED STORIES & VIDEOS:

Copyright © 2026 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending