Connect with us

Arizona

Arizona regulator can seek utility documents

Published

on

Arizona regulator can seek utility documents


PHOENIX — State utility regulators have the person energy to hunt company information to see if an organization is funneling “darkish cash” into the campaigns of their colleagues.

And a majority cannot block it.

The state Supreme Courtroom in a ruling Wednesday rejected arguments by Arizona Public Service that Bob Burns, who was a member of the Arizona Company Fee, had no impartial proper to demand a glance their company books to seek out out in regards to the cash it has spent — and will spend sooner or later — to elect candidates of its selection.

Attorneys for the utility didn’t dispute that regulators do have the ability to subpoena firm information.

Advertisement

However they argued that energy belongs to the fee as a complete. And so they stated the truth that Burns couldn’t get a majority of the five-member panel to go alongside, left him powerless to behave on his personal.

Persons are additionally studying…

Advertisement

Not so, stated Justice Clint Bolick writing for a majority of the state excessive court docket.

The choice of the justices can have no instant impact. That is as a result of Burns has since left the panel and the APS fee case that was pending on the time has been determined.

And Bolick stated the court docket was not looking for to resolve all potential future problems with fee procedures.

However the ruling might change how the panel operates, giving future commissioners extra impartial license to probe the actions of regulated utilities.

APS filed for a fee hike in 2016.

Advertisement

Burns issued subpoenas to each APS and guardian firm Pinnacle West Capital Corp. looking for info on all the things from charitable and advertising bills to political donations.

Amongst what he was looking for is to find out if APS was the supply of cash spent in 2014 by “darkish cash” teams to assist elect Republicans Tom Forese and Doug Little to the fee. Arizona regulation permits these teams to protect the supply of their funds from public disclosure.

When the corporate refused, he requested the opposite commissioners — together with Forese and Little — to implement the subpoenas in addition to to require a listening to officer to name witnesses for him to query. The others refused, saying the data sought was irrelevant to the speed case.

Burns then went to court docket.

Bolick identified Arizona Structure vests particular person commissioners with particular powers. The best way APS would learn it, stated Bolick, would “subordinate that proper to the unreviewable determinations of different commissioners.”

Advertisement

And Bolick stated what makes that unacceptable is that Burns was attempting to find out whether or not any of the opposite commissioners, had they acquired APS money that was not publicly disclosed, had been biased in favor of granting the corporate’s request for a fee hike.

“Burns’ allegations display how untenable such a development is, whereby a commissioner’s investigation into attainable improprieties regarding his colleagues might be squelched by the very topics of the investigation,” Bolick wrote.

It later turned out that the corporate had, in truth, put $10.7 million into the 2014 race to elect Little and Forese, funneling the money by darkish cash teams. However that did not get revealed till 2019.

In lastly releasing knowledge on its 2014 spending on the fee race, APS additionally admitted at the moment that it offered $50,000 to the Republican Governors Affiliation which helped the primary election of Gov. Doug Ducey, and $425,000 to the Republican Lawyer Generals Affiliation which, in flip, purchased commercials to elect Republican Mark Brnovich.

Jeff Guldner, who took over the reins of APS in 2019, advised regulators on the time that the corporate wouldn’t fund future candidates working for the fee.

Advertisement

The promise stays in place, a spokeswoman for the corporate stated Tuesday. Aside from that, Jill Hanks stated APS was reviewing the ruling and had no remark.

Howard Fischer is a veteran journalist who has been reporting since 1970 and overlaying state politics and the Legislature since 1982. Comply with him on Twitter at @azcapmedia or e mail azcapmedia@gmail.com. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Samford Bulldogs play the Arizona Wildcats, aim for 6th straight win

Published

on

Samford Bulldogs play the Arizona Wildcats, aim for 6th straight win


Associated Press

Samford Bulldogs (9-2) at Arizona Wildcats (4-5, 0-1 Big 12)

Tucson, Arizona; Wednesday, 9 p.m. EST

Advertisement

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Wildcats -19.5; over/under is 168.5

BOTTOM LINE: Samford is looking to keep its five-game win streak intact when the Bulldogs take on Arizona.

The Wildcats are 3-1 in home games. Arizona averages 83.4 points and has outscored opponents by 12.4 points per game.

The Bulldogs are 2-2 on the road. Samford averages 19.1 assists per game to lead the SoCon, paced by Rylan Jones with 6.1.

Arizona’s average of 6.3 made 3-pointers per game is 1.2 fewer made shots on average than the 7.5 per game Samford allows. Samford averages 19.5 more points per game (90.5) than Arizona gives up to opponents (71.0).

Advertisement

TOP PERFORMERS: Caleb Love is shooting 36.6% and averaging 13.3 points for the Wildcats.

Jones is averaging 10.5 points, 6.1 assists and 1.6 steals for the Bulldogs.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona regulators reaffirm monthly fee for APS solar customers

Published

on

Arizona regulators reaffirm monthly fee for APS solar customers


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Arizona Public Service (APS) electric customers with solar panels will still need to pay a relatively new monthly fee after the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) voted in favor of the grid access charge.

Commissioners reaffirmed the fee in a 3-1 decision on Tuesday. The APS grid access charge (GAC) was approved in February and came under fire after opponents said it discriminated against residential solar customers by increasing rates.

“In general, all costs related to such services should be equitably distributed to each class of service. As demonstrated… residential solar customers are paying less than 70% of the costs to serve them,” Judge Belinda Martin said.

Proponents of the upgraded charges say there is a cost shift in place now and that the restructured charges will balance costs between the two types of customers.

Advertisement

“$61 million were imposed on APS’ residential customers that do not have solar. That means about one million customers have been paying the bill for those that have solar on their homes,” said Jim O’Connor, an ACC chairman.

APS says the fee is a fixed charge that helps recover the costs of maintaining services and equipment. Regulators say that solar customers rely on APS’ power grid to provide electricity when their systems aren’t working, which is why the increase is justified.

Still, groups like the Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association (AriSEIA) disagreed, saying that utility provider miscalculated the cost of service to solar customers.

“APS testified that if the ACC eliminated the solar fees, the difference would be $.25 to residential customers. Despite the evidence, the ACC will penalize solar customers several dollars per month and approved an amendment to increase it in APS’ next rate case, which is anticipated to be filed in 2025,” the association said in a news release after the ruling.

“The evidentiary record makes it clear that solar customers are subsidizing non-solar customers and yet APS and the ACC continue to penalize solar customers with unfounded and discriminatory fees,” said Autumn Johnson, the executive director of AriSEIA.

Advertisement

In a news release, the ACC said critics of the opinion have “mischaracterized the GAC as a ‘solar tax’ on about 184,000 Arizonans with rooftop solar.”

“I understand no one wants to pay more on their bills, but this is about parity and fairness for all ratepayers,” said Commissioner Kevin Thompson. “I hope there’s a day when homeowners can live completely free from the grid, but we are not there now. I believe all costs related to providing service should be equally and fairly distributed among all classes of customers, and we have a duty to address cost shifts and subsidies when they exist.”

AriSEIA said an appeal is likely early next year.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona Cardinals vs Los Angeles Rams Week 17 matchup is set for a Saturday prime-time slot

Published

on

Arizona Cardinals vs Los Angeles Rams Week 17 matchup is set for a Saturday prime-time slot


play

The Arizona Cardinals will be in the Week 17 spotlight.

Advertisement

The Cardinals’ road game against the division-leading Los Angeles Rams has been scheduled for 6:15 p.m. Saturday, Dec. 28, in a matchup at SoFi Stadium in LA.

The game will be televised nationally on NFL Network and locally on NBC.

The Saturday slate will kick off with the Los Angeles Chargers at the New England Patriots, followed by the Denver Broncos at the Cincinnati Bengals with the Cardinals-Rams matchup capping the tripleheader. Like the Cardinals-Rams game, the other two games will also be broadcast on NFL Network.

The Saturday schedule:

Chargers at Patriots, 11 a.m. MST

Advertisement

Broncos at Bengals, 2:30 p.m. MST

Cardinals at Rams, 6:15 p.m. MST

For the Cardinals, the Saturday night game could have significant playoff implications. They are one game behind the Rams in the NFC West standings. Depending on results this week, a win could put them ahead of Los Angeles or draw them even. Plus, a win would give the Cardinals the tiebreaker, having already crushed the Rams, 41-10, back in Week 2.

Two other games under consideration were the Colts at Giants and Falcons at Commanders, both of which move to Sunday, Dec. 29.

Advertisement

The Falcons-Commanders game flexes into the Sunday Night Football slot, replacing Dolphins-Browns.

The Colts-Giants game will be played Sunday afternoon in New York.

(This story has been updated to add information.)



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending