Connect with us

Alaska

OPINION: Alaska needs to find the most affordable, advantageous fuel

Published

on

OPINION: Alaska needs to find the most affordable, advantageous fuel


Many people have recently been submitting commentaries on the transition to renewable energy in Alaska to the ADN and other publications. The difference in the approaches is between fear of greenhouse gas buildup and concern over potential failure of the electric system. In my opinion, we need to build a reliable electric system from the start, even if it means keeping the natural-gas-fueled generation for a lot longer. In Alaska, public safety is more important than decarbonization.

The way to move forward with the incorporation of renewable or alternate energy sources into Alaska’s electric power systems is clear. Start with the displacement of the most expensive fuel sources in the state. Kotzebue, Kodiak, Cordova and other locations have been doing this successfully. These communities have taken advantage of their strengths to modify their power systems. Wind, solar and hydropower have been used to modify the hydrocarbon-fueled power systems to allow a decreased dependence on hydrocarbon fuels. In these locations, the fuels are shipped in and stored in tanks, at considerable expense. The remote communities in Alaska have an advantage in the move to renewables, which is that they have extremely expensive existing fuel supplies, which gives them good incentive to make the changes to their systems. The electric loads in these communities are relatively small compared with urban and industrialized areas, so they can more easily fulfill a high percentage of their connected load with solar and wind farms near the community.

The second part of the solution for progress toward non-hydrocarbon fuel is to find the local resource that can provide the base source of energy. This replacement base source energy supply, would provide energy to the system when the renewables are inadequate to meet the needs of the community. These communities must currently maintain a supply of diesel fuel to provide energy to the electric system when the wind doesn’t blow, the sun doesn’t shine and the river doesn’t run as strongly. It has been a plan for decades that excess renewable energy(such as solar in the summer) would be used to electrolyze water and produce hydrogen which then can be stored in some manner to use when needed weeks or months later. This has not proven out yet for Alaska, but we are working on it.

Advertisement

The Railbelt electric utilities can’t realistically make a quick and massive move to renewables, since the cost of renewable energy is not really less than the cost of natural gas or coal-fueled generation yet. Texas, which has more wind turbines than any other state, does not have lower electric power prices, and California, with all its solar power, also does not have cheaper power than hydrocarbon and nuclear power sources can provide. The Railbelt can smartly incorporate renewables into the system to provide for microgrids outside the urban areas of the system, so that the rural parts can be energized when primary power sources are interrupted or transmission and distribution are affected.

Many had anticipated that the Susitna-Watana Dam hydro project, Eklutna Lakes pumped hydro, or some other pumped hydro project would eventually provide a significant amount of base power for the utility, but public opinion has been very negative for such projects in Alaska outside of Southeast Alaska. Pumped hydro is a preferred method, as the pumping can be energized by 100% (no constraint) of the excess energy developed by the variable, renewable energy sources. Without hydropower, it looks like we will need to look toward geothermal, hydrogen or nuclear for a stable base source of energy.

There are some things we can do to make proper progress in our power systems that will result in affordable power with the ability to promote industrial growth in Alaska, everywhere in Alaska.

1. Develop a demonstration hydrogen electrolyzer project that would be used to help remote communities work out how hydrogen production can be incorporated into their power systems.

2. Accelerate assessment of potential geothermal resources near Mount Spurr for the Railbelt and at Mount Wrangell for Interior locations, including some mine locations and communities not on the Railbelt.

Advertisement

3. Look for other potential geothermal resources near existing and planned mines in Alaska.

4. Make innovative and aggressive efforts to secure more Cook Inlet gas for the Railbelt energy needs for at least 20 years into the future.

5. Provide positive incentives for continued solar and wind system installation, including possible community solar farms. If there are obstructions to the community solar farms or other wind and solar applications, let’s have some discussion of what enabling legislation or other incentives are needed.

6. If we can’t get a natural gas pipeline from the North Slope, maybe we can run a high-voltage transmission line from the Slope to Fairbanks and use the natural gas to power generators at the source of natural gas.

We just need to keep working on plans that will provide affordable energy to fuel a great economy and increase industry within the state.

Advertisement

Robert Seitz is an electrical engineer and lifelong Alaskan.

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Alaska

Alaska predator control deemed unconstitutional – The Wildlife Society

Published

on

Alaska predator control deemed unconstitutional – The Wildlife Society


The Alaska DNR killed about 200 bears to boost a struggling caribou herd

An Anchorage Superior Court judge recently ruled that the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s program to kill nearly 200 brown bears to boost a caribou herd was unconstitutional. The agency originally developed the program to kill wolves (Canis lupus) and increase their prey species. The department expanded the program in 2022 to include brown bears (Ursus arctos), which prey on the Machatna caribou (Machatna caribou) herd, which has been struggling. The herd, which once numbered about 200,000 in 1997, has declined to about 13,000. Judge Andrew Guidi’s recent ruling, citing a lack of due process and adequate public notice of the program, means, at least temporarily, the Alaska DNR must end the brown bear control program.

Advertisement

Read more in the Alaska Beacon.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Fueling the ‘world’s best-trained workforce’: ASYMCA feeds military families free of charge

Published

on

Fueling the ‘world’s best-trained workforce’: ASYMCA feeds military families free of charge


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The Armed Services YMCA of Alaska Marketplace Food Assistance Program is fueling service members and their families across the Last Frontier, free of charge.

“If we can help offset budgets and they’re able to shop here and get what they need and then take that money that they would have spent and apply it somewhere else, then that’s really what it’s for,” ASYMCA of Alaska Executive Director Sarah Riffer said. “It’s just another way to help our Alaska-based military community feel welcomed in the state, feel appreciated in our state, and to make sure that they have what they need in order to stay mission-focused.”

The ASYMCA of Alaska operates Marketplaces on JBER, Fort Wainwright, and Eielson Air Force Base. They provide groceries, personal care products, and other household goods to service members and their families.

Riffer explained that the marketplace aims to strengthen the military community as a whole.

Advertisement

“We know that strong communities start with strong families, and we know from that we’ll have strong kids and so on,” she explained. “[This program] is just a really easy thing for us to provide and to offer to help with that ultimate goal of having a really strong military community.”

The ASYMCA of Alaska recently received a $15,000 grant from the Kroger Company Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Foundation and Fred Meyer to continue providing essential goods at its three marketplace installations.

Donations like these are what keep the marketplaces operational, Riffer said, helping the nonprofit live up to its mission of providing services to ensure service members have “great Alaskan experiences.”

“I think it’s our job as a community to make sure that we are able to provide every piece of support that our military members need while they’re stationed here,” Riffer explained, adding that all active-duty and reserve service members can receive support from the ASYMCA of Alaska, no matter where they are located in the state.

“We are a moment’s notice away,” she said. “All they have to do is reach out.”

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska House approves cut in draft budget for gender dysphoria treatments, but impacts remain unclear

Published

on

Alaska House approves cut in draft budget for gender dysphoria treatments, but impacts remain unclear


JUNEAU — The Alaska House this week amended its draft budget to cut Medicaid funding for so-called optional treatments for gender dysphoria.

Multiple lawmakers said if the proposed cut is ultimately approved by the Legislature, it would likely not cut health care for transgender Alaskans. But that remains unclear.

Additionally, the Legislature’s attorneys warned the proposed cut to gender dysphoria care could be unconstitutional and unenforceable.

Rep. Sarah Vance, R-Homer, noted that the Alaska State Medical Board urged the Legislature in March to ban hormonal and surgical treatments for minors seeking to transition from one gender to another.

Advertisement

She said the cut would ensure taxpayer-funded coverage for gender dysphoria treatments are limited to only what is “medically necessary” and required by the courts.

In 2021, the state settled a class-action lawsuit that challenged the legality of excluding transgender Alaskans from health coverage related to their gender transitions. Now, that coverage through Medicaid is required.

Jennifer Martinez, a spokesperson for Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, said the organization believed that the proposed cut would likely not result in reduced Medicaid coverage for transgender Alaskans.

But if the cut is ultimately approved by the Legislature, Martinez said that Alaska’s Medicaid office would determine which treatments to cover. That could impact what she called “edge” treatments, such as follow-up surgeries for transgender Alaskans, Martinez said, but it remained unclear.

The intended cut to gender dysphoria treatments was approved on a 21-19 vote. Two Republican members of the Democrat-dominated majority — Reps. Chuck Kopp and Louise Stutes — joined the 19-member, all-Republican minority to approve the cut in the draft budget. All other members of the majority voted no.

Advertisement

Kopp amended the bill to state that optional psychiatric coverage would still be funded for children under age 18 who are experiencing gender dysphoria. He said those services could help “interdict” a child before they made “a life-altering, permanent medical decision.”

Anchorage independent Rep. Alyse Galvin, the mother of a transgender daughter, called the vote largely “political.” She said it would make transgender Alaskans feel “othered and hated.”

The amendment prompted passionate debate on the House floor.

Anchorage Democratic Rep. Andrew Gray, the first openly gay man to serve in the Alaska Legislature, opposed cutting Medicaid funding for transgender Alaskans, who he said are “one of the most marginalized, powerless minorities in our country.”

“I know what it was like to be a 16-year-old whose mother told you that you were wrong, that you were a mistake,” he added.

Advertisement

In response, Vance said the cut was about reducing the deficit. She told the House that it was not intended to suggest transgender children are “broken.”

“God doesn’t make mistakes,” Vance said on the House floor.

In 2021, the state estimated it would cost $28,000 per year to extend Medicaid coverage in Alaska for gender dysphoria treatments, Alaska Public Media reported.

Vance asserted on the House floor that gender dysphoria coverage through Medicaid costs the state $338,000 per year. But she didn’t know how much the state spends on treatments that are required by court order.

That dollar figure was shared with Vance’s office from the Alaska Division of Health Care Services. It represents Medicaid claims since July last year with a primary diagnosis indicating gender dysphoria, Vance’s staff said. But the $338,000 in Medicaid coverage includes funding from both federal and state sources, Vance’s staff added.

Advertisement

Ruth Botstein, the ACLU of Alaska’s legal director, opposed the amendment. She said medical decisions should be made by doctors, patients, and parents in cases involving minor children — not the Alaska Legislature.

”The American Medical Association, together with all other major medical organizations in the United States, supports gender-affirming care because it is medically necessary, evidence-based health care that is crucial to the health and well-being of people suffering from gender dysphoria and gender incongruence,” she said.

Rose O’Hara-Jolley, Alaska state director of Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates, said the organization is “deeply disappointed” that the House approved “a harmful, performative amendment attacking gender affirming health care.”

“This amendment is rooted in bad faith. It aims to stir confusion, spread misinformation, and fuel fear within Alaska’s LGBTQ+ community,” O’Hara-Jolley said in a prepared statement. “We urge lawmakers to reject this amendment in the final version of the budget. All Alaskans — no matter their income or gender identity — deserve dignity, respect, and access to the care they need.”

Last year, the prior Republican-led majority spent days debating a transgender sports ban bill. But the measure was rejected by the Senate. In 2023, the Alaska School Activities Association banned transgender girls from competing on girls’ teams in high school sports.

Advertisement

Minority House Republicans separately tried to cut Medicaid funding in Alaska for abortions. But the minority’s proposal was rejected on a 20-20 vote. Stutes joined her colleagues in the Democrat-dominated majority to block the proposed cut.

Monday’s vote was the latest in a yearslong series of attempts by Alaska legislators to cancel public funding for abortion services. Prior votes have had little effect.

The Alaska Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the right to an abortion is protected by the state’s constitutional right to privacy. Additionally, the court ruled in 2001 that the state would violate the constitution’s equal protection clause and discriminate against poor women if it denied abortion services under Medicaid.

Budget amendment debates continued in the House on Tuesday. Once it is approved by the House, the operating budget next heads to the Senate for its consideration.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending