Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska lawmakers advance bipartisan election bill to implement ballot curing, signature verification

Published

on

Alaska lawmakers advance bipartisan election bill to implement ballot curing, signature verification


JUNEAU — A invoice to replace Alaska’s election legal guidelines handed out of the Senate State Affairs Committee on Tuesday, a part of a bipartisan effort to revive a set of proposals that failed throughout final yr’s legislative session.

The invoice, which heads subsequent to the Senate Finance Committee, is a compromise that largely avoids extra controversial modifications to how the state’s elections are run. It could set up a poll curing course of, signature verification, poll monitoring and necessities to extra commonly replace voter rolls, amongst different components. It doesn’t embody any reforms to how campaigns are financed, nor does it alter the state’s ranked-choice voting system.

The provisions — salvaged from an unsuccessful 2022 election invoice — would permit voters to appropriate errors on their ballots as soon as they’re submitted, permit election staff to extra reliably confirm the id of voters, and permit voters to trace their by-mail ballots after they’re submitted.

Advertisement

Sen. Scott Kawasaki, a Fairbanks Democrat who chairs the State Affairs Committee, stated the invoice relies on his collaboration with Sen. Mike Bathe, a Wasilla Republican who chaired the committee final yr.

Kawasaki stated that whereas solely two weeks stay earlier than the Legislature should wrap up its work for the yr, he’s hopeful the invoice might be adopted by each the Home and Senate by the tip of the session.

“I acknowledge that not every little thing that we’re going to cross within the Senate would cross within the Home, however we’ve got kind of tacitly agreed to creating positive that we cross the issues that we each agree on in each our bodies,” stated Kawasaki.

The invoice goals to handle a number of ongoing considerations with Alaska’s elections, together with onerous necessities which have been blamed for lowering turnout in rural elements of the state and amongst voters for whom English will not be a major language.

[Alaska Senate advances a 75-25 Permanent Fund dividend formula bill to a hostile House]

Advertisement

It could additionally handle considerations raised in a lawsuit filed final yr, which accused the state officers of violating voters’ constitutional rights by failing to implement a course of to repair faulty ballots. The invoice would give voters the chance to appropriate their ballots if there are errors, together with a lacking or unverifiable signature or identifier. Below the invoice, the state Division of Elections can be required to contact voters by cellphone or mail to tell them of points with their poll, after which present them the chance to appropriate it.

The invoice would additionally repeal a requirement for a witness signature on absentee ballots that was chargeable for hundreds of poll rejections final yr within the state’s first by-mail election.

Witness signatures are supposed to forestall voting misconduct, however the division at present has no methodology of verifying the witness signature, and accepts any mark on the signature line with out evaluation. The witness signature requirement disproportionately affected rural Alaska voters within the 2022 particular major election, the state’s first by-mail election. In a single rural district, practically 11% of all ballots forged have been rejected for lacking witness signatures.

One other a part of the invoice would require the Division of Elections to ship absentee ballots in Alaska Native languages when voters request them. The state has repeatedly didn’t adjust to the federal Voting Rights Act, which mandates providing language help in elements of the state the place English will not be the first language.

The invoice would additionally permit the Division of Elections to start counting absentee ballots earlier than election day and require election staff to submit early tabulations of ranked selection elections earlier than all ballots are counted. In 2022, Alaskans needed to wait two weeks after election day to get the outcomes of some races that got here right down to ranked selection tabulations, as a result of election officers had determined to not launch preliminary tabulations.

Advertisement

Rep. Sarah Vance, a Homer Republican who has taken the lead on election reform laws within the Home majority, stated she would contemplate the Senate election reform invoice if it reaches the Home.

Within the meantime, she is advancing a a lot narrower invoice that may empower the Division of Elections to revoke voter registrations extra simply and clear voter rolls of inactive voters extra continuously, following a step promoted by Republican lawmakers in numerous different states. State officers haven’t reported any indication of widespread voter fraud in latest elections.

Vance stated she was additionally excited by a few of the measures within the Senate’s invoice, together with poll curing and signature verification.

“Individuals who make a mistake don’t really feel that there’s a course of that their vote can rely,” she stated.

Contribution limits off the desk

One factor that didn’t make it into this yr’s Senate election invoice: marketing campaign finance reform.

Advertisement

Alaska used to have a few of the lowest political donation limits within the nation — $500 per particular person, per yr. However in 2021, a federal appeals court docket dominated that the caps unconstitutionally restricted free speech.

[Al Gross should have stayed on U.S. House ballot, Alaska Supreme Court says]

Within the 2022 legislative session, lawmakers proposed numerous new caps. A invoice to restrict contributions at $2,000 per particular person, per yr, handed the Home however stalled within the Senate. The session ended with no decision on the difficulty — and enormous donations to candidates for governor and candidates in aggressive legislative races started pouring in forward of the 2022 election. Since then, efforts to put in a brand new cap seem to have fizzled out.

“I don’t assume we’ve gotten an settlement on any kind of marketing campaign finance reform invoice this yr,” stated Kawasaki, who obtained a number of four-figure checks in his latest marketing campaign.

“However on the identical time, I personally consider that the majority candidates for workplace and most elected officers would like to spend their time campaigning reasonably than fundraising,” Kawasaki stated.

Advertisement

A invoice launched by Kawasaki to restrict contributions to $700 per particular person, per yr, whereas permitting the determine to rise with inflation, has been heard within the Senate State Affairs Committee, however the committee has not superior the invoice after some members raised considerations it will face the identical problem to its constitutionality that ended the state’s earlier restrict.

Opponents of limits on marketing campaign contributions level to a 2010 U.S. Supreme Courtroom case known as Residents United, which discovered that cash equals speech.

“Marketing campaign contributions is freedom of speech and I consider that we shouldn’t be limiting political speech and subsequently we shouldn’t be limiting marketing campaign contributions,” stated Vance.

A final-ditch effort to repeal ranked selection voting

The election invoice making its method by the Senate additionally doesn’t change any of the election reforms applied by a poll measure that handed in 2020, together with ranked selection voting and open primaries.

[Alaska Supreme Court, in landmark ruling, says partisan gerrymandering violates state constitution]

Advertisement

A number of conservative Republicans have stated they intend to work on repealing ranked selection voting, however members of the bipartisan Senate majority have signaled they don’t intend to repeal any a part of the 2020 poll measure that handed by a slender margin, implementing a brand new election system that was first used final yr.

In a listening to Tuesday on a invoice to repeal ranked selection voting and open primaries, Vance, who launched the invoice, stated that it had been the highest concern she had heard about from her constituents. She stated that the system, which permits voters to rank as much as 4 candidates on the overall election poll, was overly complicated and complicated.

Public testimony within the Home State Affairs Committee listening to was three-to-one in favor of maintaining ranked selection voting and open primaries.

Repealing the brand new voting system was stated to be the highest legislative precedence for some Home Republicans initially of the legislative session. Aside from one committee listening to on the same repeal invoice in late March, Tuesday’s public testimony was the primary legislative listening to this yr on ending ranked-choice voting.

Vance stated Wednesday that regardless of the Senate’s disinterest in returning to the state’s previous voting system, and overwhelming testimony opposing her invoice, the measure was “nonetheless a precedence.”

Advertisement

“I believe it’s nonetheless a risk as a result of I’ve seen loads of issues occur within the final couple weeks of session,” she stated.

Dealing with unlikely odds, opponents of ranked selection voting and open primaries have turned their efforts to a brand new poll initiative. Artwork Mathias, one of many sponsors behind the repeal group, stated it had collected simply over half of the 27,000 signatures required to get the petition on a statewide poll. The group has till February to submit its petition booklets to the Division of Elections.

If the signatures are verified and permitted, the initiative would doubtless seem on the 2024 November election poll. A easy majority of voters can be required to approve the ranked-choice voting repeal initiative.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s court system has had solutions for expensive, unnecessary delays since 2009. What’s lacking is accountability.

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s court system has had solutions for expensive, unnecessary delays since 2009. What’s lacking is accountability.


As a former prosecutor, I was shocked and saddened to read reporter Kyle Hopkins’ recent reporting in the Anchorage Daily News and ProPublica on pervasive, unconstitutional, heartbreaking delays of violent felony cases. Judges granting continuances 50 to 70 times over seven to 10 years — with “typically” no opposition from the prosecution, and no mention of the victims. Victims and their families suffering years before the closure that a trial can bring, some even dying during the delays.

Hopkins’ reporting is recent. The problem isn’t. The Office of Victims’ Rights (OVR) has been covering delays for years in annual reports to the Legislature, beginning in 2014. In 2018, after monitoring nearly 200 cases, OVR said judges were mostly to blame.

Other causes have been noted: understaffed public defender and prosecutor offices; the incentive for defendants to delay because witnesses’ memories fade. But in 2019, OVR said, “It is up to the judges to control the docket, to adhere to standing court orders, to follow the law and to protect victims’ rights as well as defendants’ rights.”

Advertisement

In 1994, 86% of Alaskans who voted supported a crime victims’ rights ballot. That overwhelming mandate was enshrined in our state constitution. It includes victims’ “right to timely disposition of the case.” For years, Anchorage Superior Court judges have ignored this right.

After reading the recent coverage, I began searching. Maybe other jurisdictions had found solutions to similar delays. What I discovered shocked me even more.

In 2008, a working group co-chaired by an Alaska Supreme Court justice determined the average time to disposition for felony cases in Anchorage had nearly quadrupled. “This finding amounted to a ‘call to arms’ for improvements …(.)”

In November 2008, the state paid to send three judges, two court personnel, the Anchorage district attorney, the deputy attorney general and three public defenders to a workshop in Arizona about causes of delays, and solutions. David Steelman was a presenter. He worked with the Alaska group in Phoenix and Anchorage. That work resulted in a 59-page report dated March 2009.

I found Steelman’s report online (“Improving Criminal Caseflow Management in the Alaska Superior Court in Anchorage”). His findings are revealing.

Advertisement

Delays resulted from informal attitudes, concerns and practices of the court, prosecutors and public defense lawyers. To change this “culture of continuances,” it was critical the court exercise leadership and the attorneys commit to change. Judges and the public-sector lawyers must recognize they were all responsible for making prudent use of the finite resources provided by taxpayers. Unnecessary delays wasted resources.

Steelman recommended the judges and lawyers agree to individual performance measurements, and the court engage in ongoing evaluation of his Caseflow Improvement Plan. The plan included a “Continuance Policy for Anchorage Felony Cases.”

I found an unsigned Anchorage court order dated May 1, 2009. It included Steelman’s Continuance Policy recommendation that the court log every requested continuance in the court file, name the party requesting it, the reasons given, whether the continuance was granted, and the delay incurred if it was granted.

More telling, it omitted Steelman’s recommendation that, “Every six months, the chief criminal judge shall report to the Presiding Judge on the number of continuances requested and granted during the previous period(.)”

That provision might have ensured accountability.

Advertisement

After years of only bad news, in 2018, OVR reported a glimmer of “good news” — a pre-trial delay working group was formed by Anchorage Presiding Judge Morse and the court system. In September 2018, Judge Morse issued a Felony Pre-Trial Order. Its goals included reducing delays of felony case dispositions and minimizing the number of calendaring hearings. (Sound familiar?)

But, OVR added, “The real test will be whether judges will hold to the new plan and hold parties accountable for delays. The jury is out on whether the will to change is actually present, but the court ultimately will be responsible for improving this problem unless the legislature steps in and passes new laws to resolve this continuing violation of victims’ rights.”

The jury has been out since 2009. The court failed that test. Based on the ADN/ProPublica reporting, the court failed the test of 2018. Things are worse than ever.

And the court’s response? A spokesperson told Kyle Hopkins there was “new” training for judges on managing case flows, as well as an Anchorage presiding judge’s order limiting when postponements may be used. (Sound familiar?)

I also reached out to the court. I requested documentation of this “new” training and a copy of the latest order. I also asked about the unsigned May 2009 court order. I’ve received no response. Similarly, when Hopkins reached out to Anchorage Superior Court judges, none of the criminal docket judges responded directly.

Advertisement

There are two things courts and judges will respond to: their budget and retention elections.

First, the Alaska Senate and House Judiciary and Finance Committees should hold the court system accountable for its proposed budget. Require it to cost out delays from past years. According to a 2011 report by Steelman, just two Anchorage cases (each with over 70 scheduling hearings), “(M)ay have cost the State of Alaska the full-time equivalent of an extra prosecutor or public defender attorney.”

The court system has proven, since 2008, it can’t be trusted to not waste money on unnecessary delays. It must finally be held accountable by the Legislature.

Second, retention elections. Superior Court judges are appointed by the governor, but they must stand election for retention by the voters every six years. The Alaska Judicial Council evaluates each judge before their election and makes that information public. The council incorporates surveys of attorneys, law enforcement, child services professionals, court employees and jurors.

The Judicial Council does not survey victims, or those who assist them, such as OVR or Victims for Justice. It should. Other than the defendant, victims are the only ones with a constitutional right to a speedy trial. That right is being ignored by judges. Alaska voters who issued a mandate should know which judges are ignoring it.

Advertisement

Val Van Brocklin is a former state and federal prosecutor in Alaska who now trains and writes on criminal justice topics nationwide.

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Seattle offers much more than a connection hub for Alaska flyers

Published

on

Seattle offers much more than a connection hub for Alaska flyers


Lately I’ve spent too much time at the Seattle airport and not enough time exploring the Emerald City.

It’s not just about downtown Seattle, either. I’ve been catching up with friends in the area and we shared stories about visiting the nearby San Juan Islands or taking the Victoria Clipper up to Vancouver Island (bring your passport).

There are some seasonal events, though, that make a trip to Seattle more compelling.

Advertisement

First on the list is Seattle Museum Month. Every February, area museums team up with local hotels to offer half-price admission.

There is a catch. To get the half-price admission, stay at a downtown hotel. There are 70 hotels from which to choose. Even if you just stay for one night, you can get a pass which offers up to four people half-price admission.

It’s very difficult to visit all of the museums on the list. Just visiting the Seattle Art Museum, right downtown near Pike Place Market, can take all day. There’s a special exhibit now featuring the mobiles of Alexander Calder and giant wood sculptures of artist Thaddeus Mosley.

But there are many ongoing exhibits at SAM, as the museum is affectionately known. Rembrandt’s etchings, an exhibit from northern Australia, an intricate porcelain sculpture from Italian artist Diego Cibelli, African art, Native American art and so much more is on display.

It’s worth the long walk to the north of Pike Place Market to visit the Olympic Sculpture Park, a free outdoor exhibition by SAM featuring oversized works, including a giant Calder sculpture. The sweeping views of Elliott Bay and the mountains on the Olympic Peninsula are part of the package.

Advertisement

My other favorite art museum is the Burke Museum at the University of Washington. What I remember most about the Burke Museum is its rich collection of Northwest Native art.

But the term “museum” covers an incredible array of collections. A visit to the Chihuly Garden and Glass Museum is a chance to see the most fanciful creations of renowned glass blower Dale Chihuly. It’s right next to the Space Needle.

You have to go up to the top and see the new renovations.

“They took out most of the restaurant,” said Sydney Martinez, public relations manager for Visit Seattle.

“Then they replaced the floor with glass. Plus, they took the protective wires off from around the Observation Deck and put up clear glass for an uninterrupted view,” she said.

Advertisement

If you visit the Space Needle in February, there’s hardly ever a line!

Getting from the airport to downtown is easy with the light rail system. There’s a terminal adjacent to the parking garage in the airport. The one-way fare for the 38-minute train ride is $3. From downtown, there are streetcars that go up Capitol Hill and down to Lake Union.

Martinez encourages travelers to check out the Transit Go app.

“All of the buses require exact change and sometimes that’s a hassle,” she said. “Just add finds to your app using a credit card and show the driver when you get on.”

Pike Place Market is a downtown landmark in Seattle. Fresh produce, the famous fish market, specialty retailers and restaurants — there’s always something going on. Now there’s even more to see.

Advertisement

Following the destruction of the waterfront freeway and the building of the tunnel, the Seattle Waterfront project has made great strides on its revitalization plan. The latest milestone is the opening of the Overlook Walk.

The Seattle Waterfront project encompasses much more than the new waterfront steps. Landscaping, pedestrian crossings and parks still are being constructed. But you cannot miss the beautiful staircase that comes down from Pike Place Market to the waterfront.

“There’s a really large patio at the top overlooking Elliott Bay,” said Martinez. “The stairs go down to the waterfront from there, but there also are elevators.”

Tucked under one wall is a completely new exhibit from the Seattle Aquarium, which is right across the street on the water. The Ocean Pavilion features an exhibit on the “Indo-Pacific ecosystem in the Coral Triangle.” I want to see this for myself!

Wine lovers love Washington wines. And Seattle shows up to showcase the increasing variety of wines available around the state. Taste Washington brings the region’s food and wines together for an event in mid-March.

Advertisement

Hosted by the WAMU Center near the big sports stadiums, Taste Washington features 200 wineries and 75 restaurants for tastings, pairings and demonstrations. There are special tastings, special dinners (plus a Sunday brunch) and special demonstrations between March 13 and 17.

There’s another regionwide feasting event called Seattle Restaurant Week, where participating restaurants offer a selected dinner for a set price. No dates are set yet, but Martinez said it usually happens both in the spring and the fall.

It’s not downtown, but it’s worth going to Boeing Field to see the Museum of Flight. This ever-expanding museum features exhibits on World War I and II, in addition to the giant main hall where there are dozens of planes displayed. I love getting up close to the world’s fastest plane, the black SR-71 Blackbird. But take the elevated walkway across the street to see the Concorde SST, an older version of Air Force 1 (a Boeing 707) and a Lockheed Constellation.

One of the most interesting exhibits is the Space Shuttle Trainer — used to train the astronauts here on the ground. There’s an amazing array of space-related exhibits. Don’t miss it.

Some travelers come to Seattle for sports. Take in home games from the Seattle Kraken hockey team or the Seattle Sounders soccer team this winter.

Advertisement

Other travelers come to see shows. Moore Theatre is hosting Lyle Lovett on Feb. 19 and Anoushka Shankar on March 13. Joe Bonamassa is playing at the Climate Pledge Area on Feb. 16. There are dozens of live music venues throughout the area.

It’s easy to get out of town to go on a bigger adventure. The Victoria Clipper leaves from the Seattle Waterfront for Victoria’s Inner Harbour each day, starting Feb. 16. If you want faster passage, fly back on Kenmore Air to Lake Union.

The Washington State Ferries offer great service from downtown Seattle to the Olympic Peninsula. Or, drive north to Anacortes and take the ferry to the San Juan Islands. Or, just drive north to Mukilteo and catch a short ferry over to Whidbey Island.

There are fun events all year in Seattle. But I’m circling February on the calendar for Museum Month. Plus, I need to see that grand staircase from Pike Place Market down to the water!





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Lawmakers and union call on Dunleavy administration to release drafts of state salary study

Published

on

Lawmakers and union call on Dunleavy administration to release drafts of state salary study


A key public-sector union and some Democratic state lawmakers are calling on Gov. Mike Dunleavy to release the results of a million-dollar study on how competitive the state’s salaries are. The study was originally due last summer — and lawmakers say that delays will complicate efforts to write the state budget.

It’s no secret that the state of Alaska has struggled to recruit and retain qualified staff for state jobs. An average of 16% of state positions remain unfilled as of November, according to figures obtained by the Anchorage Daily News. That’s about twice the vacancy rate generally thought of as healthy, according to legislative budget analysts.

“The solution, it’s not rocket science,” said Heidi Drygas, the executive director of the union representing a majority of rank-and-file state of Alaska employees, the Alaska State Employees Association/American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 52. “We have to pay people fairly, and we’re underpaying our state workers right now.”

Drygas says the large number of open jobs has hobbled state services. At one point, half of the state’s payroll processing jobs were unfilled, leading to late and incorrect paychecks for state employees.

Advertisement

“This is a problem that has been plaguing state government for years, and it is only getting worse,” she said.

Alaskans are feeling the effects, said Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage.

“We’ve been unable to fill prosecutor jobs. We’ve been unable to fill snowplow operator jobs, teaching jobs, of course, on the local level, clerk jobs for the courts, which backs up our court system, and so on and so forth,” Wielechowski said.

So, in 2023, the Legislature put $1 million in the state budget to fund a study looking to determine whether the state’s salaries were adequate. The results were supposed to come in last June.

Wielechowski said he’s been hearing from constituents looking for the study’s findings. He’s asked the Department of Administration to release the study. And so far, he said, he still hasn’t seen it.

Advertisement

“This has just dragged on, and on, and on, and now we’re seven months later, and we still have nothing,” he said. “They’re refusing to release any documents at all, and that’s very troubling, because this is a critical topic that we need before we go ahead and go into session.”

Dunleavy’s deputy chief of staff emailed the heads of state agencies in early December with an update: The study wasn’t done yet. The governor’s office had reviewed drafts of the study and found them lacking.

They sent the contractor back to the drawing board to incorporate more data: salaries from “additional peer/comparable jurisdictions”, plus recent collective bargaining agreements and a bill that raised some state salaries that passed last spring.

“Potential changes to the State’s classification and pay plans informed by the final study report could substantially impact the State’s budget, and additional due diligence is necessary, especially as we look at the State’s revenue projections,” Deputy Chief of Staff Rachel Bylsma wrote to Dunleavy’s Cabinet on Dec. 6.

Though the final study has not been completed, blogger Dermot Cole filed a public records request for any drafts of the study received to date. But state officials have thus far declined to release them, saying they’re exempt from disclosure requirements under Alaska law.

Advertisement

“The most recent salary study draft records the state received have been withheld under the Alaska Public Records Act based on executive and deliberative process privileges,” Guy Bell, a special project assistant in the governor’s office who deals with records requests, said in an email to Alaska Public Media. “Any prior drafts that may have been provided are superseded by the most recent drafts, so they no longer meet the definition of a public record.”

To Wielechowski, that’s absurd.

“It’s laughable. It’s wild,” he said. “That’s not how the process works.”

The deliberative process privilege under state law protects some, but not all, documents related to internal decision-making in the executive branch, according to a 1992 opinion from the state attorney general’s office. It’s intended to allow advisors to offer their candid recommendations, according to the opinion.

“The deliberative process privilege extends to communications made in the process of policy-making,” and courts have applied the privilege to “predecisional” and “deliberative” documents, Assistant Attorneys General Jim Cantor and Nancy Meade wrote. However, “courts have held that factual observations and final expressions of policy are not privileged,” they continued.

Advertisement

Lawmakers are about to get to work on the state budget, and Wielechowski said it’s hard to do that without a sense of how, if at all, state salaries should be adjusted.

“Nobody knows how it’s going to turn out,” he said. “Maybe salaries are high. But it will certainly give us an indication of whether or not this is something we should be looking at as a Legislature.”

Wielechowski sent a letter to the agency handling the study in December asking for any of the drafts that the contractor has handed in so far. He said he’s concerned that the Dunleavy administration may be trying to manipulate the study’s conclusions.

“We didn’t fund a million dollars to get some politically massaged study,” he said.
“We funded a million dollars so that we could get an objective organization (to) go ahead and look at this problem and to tell us what the numbers look like to tell us how competitive we are.”

An ally of the governor, Sen. Mike Shower, R-Wasillia, said he, too, would like to see the results — but he said he sees the value in waiting to see the whole picture.

Advertisement

“I think that in this particular case, it is important that the administration, or even the legislature or the judicial branch, all of which commission studies, ensure that they are appropriately finished (and) vetted,” Shower said. “Sometimes you don’t get back everything you were looking for.”

Though he’s the incoming Senate minority leader, Shower emphasized that he was speaking only for himself. He said the caucus hasn’t discussed it as a group.

But majority-caucus lawmakers say they’re not interested in waiting. Incoming House State Affairs Committee chair Ashley Carrick, D-Fairbanks, said she plans to take a look at the issue as the session begins.

“I think that there are a lot of questions that are unanswered, and we will be spending the first week of the House State Affairs Committee, in part, addressing the lack of a response from the Department of Administration,” she said.

Drygas, the union leader, sent a letter to her membership on Wednesday asking them to sign a petition calling for the state to release the draft study. It quickly amassed more than a thousand signatures. She said the union is “eagerly awaiting the results,” which she said would provide helpful background for contract negotiations.

Advertisement

“Our membership is fired up,” she said. “We’re not going to just let this go.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending