Dallas, TX
What the Dallas Cowboys 2023 offseason has taught us
Only one team ends their season without wondering what they should’ve done differently. For the 31 teams that do, there are often a plethora of answers that could be considered correct. Usually the moves that a team makes in the offseason – whether it be coaching changes, trades, free agency moves, or the draft – speak volumes about which answer that team’s brain trust chooses to accept as fact.
So now that the draft is over, and the Cowboys have come pretty close to the roster they’ll open training camp with, what have their offseason moves taught us? Sheil Kapadia of The Ringer has an idea:
They overreacted to their playoff loss.
The Cowboys were a very good team last year. They went 12-5, and their plus-125 point differential was third in the NFC behind only the Eagles and the 49ers. The Cowboys should be a very good team again this season. They made sensible trades to add wide receiver Brandin Cooks and cornerback Stephon Gilmore, and the departures of tight end Dalton Schultz, who left in free agency, and running back Ezekiel Elliott, who was cut in a cost-saving move, are unlikely to be devastating.
But the biggest change will be with their offensive play-calling. The Cowboys let Kellen Moore go, and head coach Mike McCarthy is now running the show. McCarthy indicated this offseason that he thinks the Cowboys can benefit from a more run-heavy approach that limits turnovers and puts games in the hands of his defense. McCarthy’s comments demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding of what is actually wrong with the Cowboys.
Were turnovers an issue in 2022? At times, yes. But overall, not really. The Cowboys turned the ball over on 10.8 percent of their possessions, which was slightly lower than the league average. Dak Prescott was intercepted on 3.8 percent of his passes, which was the worst mark among starters. Not all of the interceptions were his fault, and interceptions were not an issue for Prescott previously in his career. From 2019 to 2021, Prescott had the ninth-lowest interception rate in the NFL. It’s reasonable to think that the Cowboys got some bad turnover luck last year and that Prescott won’t throw nearly as many interceptions in 2023.
The bottom line: It’s hard to envision a scenario where the move from Moore to McCarthy offers an upgrade. In four years with Moore, if we isolate the plays where Prescott was the quarterback, the Cowboys performed like the second-best offense in the NFL in terms of EPA per play. Did the offense look bad in a 19-12 playoff loss to the 49ers? No doubt. But that was one game on the road against the best defense in the NFL. Ideally, the Cowboys would’ve examined what went wrong in that game, made some tweaks, and moved forward. Instead, they made a big change that could result in a step back in 2023.
With all due respect to Kapadia, who really is spectacular at what he does, I have to disagree with him here. He seems to be caught up on the soundbite from Mike McCarthy, about wanting to “run the damn ball,” that went viral earlier in the offseason. The reality is that the soundbite was taken completely out of context and blown out of proportion; furthermore, McCarthy made comments a few weeks later that doubled down on his commitment to improved offensive efficiency, which is what he had actually been talking about.
Kapadia is right about the Cowboys offense facing a solid likelihood of regressing from last year to this year, but that isn’t as simple as “Kellen good, Mike bad.” The Cowboys had exceptionally bad turnover luck in 2022, which is almost certainly going to dissipate in 2023. On the flip side, they posted efficiency numbers on third down and in the run game that are so great they can’t possibly be replicated again. In other words, the basic principle of regression to the mean is coming for Dallas regardless of who calls plays this year.
As good as Moore was throughout his tenure, it’s also clear that he had some shortcomings. And in three full seasons calling the offense under McCarthy, Moore still had those same shortcomings. Kapadia wanted the Cowboys to just make tweaks where necessary instead of making a big change, but McCarthy has likely been waiting on those tweaks for three years now. Perhaps it became clear that the only way to make those tweaks was to do it himself, which also lines up with his comments about wanting to keep the offense mostly the same. It seems very likely that Dallas is, in fact, following Kapadia’s retroactive advice here.
So what did the Cowboys’ offseason actually teach us? More than anything, it taught us that the decision makers in Dallas are actually willing to change their ways when necessary. For a very long time, this team has had firmly established ways of doing things, and they’ve rarely wavered from it. But this offseason was very different.
It started with the decision to move on from Moore. Everyone knows that Moore was heavily favored by Jerry Jones, and it may or may not have been the key reason he stayed on under McCarthy. To move on from him now, after consecutive 12-win seasons, was an unexpected decision. Similarly, the decision to cut Ezekiel Elliott – also a favorite of Jones – was one that many fans and analysts recognized as the right move but doubted the team would actually do.
The team also got uncharacteristically aggressive during the free agency period, trading for two established veterans in Brandin Cooks and Stephon Gilmore to fill their two biggest holes. And while they didn’t break the bank, Dallas spent more than they usually do in order to retain their key free agents – namely Donovan Wilson, Leighton Vander Esch, Johnathan Hankins, and Dante Fowler – rather than letting them take deals elsewhere and save the cap space.
It was fitting, then, to see the Cowboys put the cherry on top in the first round of the draft by taking Mazi Smith with the 26th overall pick. That’s notable because it marked the first time since 1991 that Dallas used a first-round pick on a defensive tackle, a pretty seismic shift in the way this team values the position.
This is not to say the Cowboys are completely different; they’re still going to be worried about how many slices of pie are left and will still prioritize building through the draft and keeping their own guys. But this offseason showed, for the first time in a long time, that the Cowboys were willing to adjust their approach in areas where it was obvious they needed to do so. Time will tell whether it was worth it or not, but the willingness to change is promising.
Dallas, TX
3 biggest problem areas Cowboys next head coach needs to fix
Like every offseason, changes are certain for the Dallas Cowboys. New faces will take place of old ones via free agency and the NFL draft, but this year the biggest change will be who steps in as the new head coach replacing Mike McCarthy.
As of right now there is no clear favorite to become McCarthy’s replacement. But, the one thing we know for sure is whoever takes over as the new HC will try to implement what he deems best for the organization moving forward. Coming off an injury-plagued 7-10 losing season, whoever is in charge has their work cut out for them.
Today, we identify and discuss three of the Cowboys biggest problem areas during McCarthy’s tenure in Dallas that the new head coach needs to fix. If the new HC can fix these problem areas, he may be able to accomplish what McCarthy couldn’t by ending the Cowboys playoff curse in the not-too-distant future.
Cut down the penalties
The Cowboys were the most penalized team in the entire league in 2024. This of course isn’t a new problem for them. In Mike McCarthy’s five season as the HC in Dallas they’ve averaged a league-high 6.8 penalties per game, but where whistled for the eighth fewest penalties per game in the three seasons prior to his arrival. It’s already hard to win games in the NFL, even harder when continuously shooting yourself in the foot.
Penalties of course are going to happen, but it was obvious they happened more often for the Cowboys in McCarthy’s era as HC over the last half decade. Whoever takes over as the new HC in Dallas will have to figure out eliminating the amount of yellow laundry. It is a top priority for the next HC.
Fix red zone woes
It’s no secret the Cowboys struggled mightily this year in the red zone both offensively and defensively. Offensively, they ended up ranked 31st overall in red zone scoring efficiency at 46%. The fact that they also led the league in red zone turnover’s didn’t help either. The lack of innovative, creative play-calling and poor execution often times resulted in a Brandon Aubrey field goal instead of a touchdown.
Defensively they weren’t any better. They finished 32nd in the league in the red zone, allowing an opponents red zone scoring efficiency of 75%. Injuries of course played a big part in all of this, but it’s also been a problem area for them in the past as well. Hopefully whoever takes over for McCarthy finds some way to improve this problem area on both the offensive and defensive side of the ball moving forward.
Cultural change
There’s little to nothing a new HC can do about the chaotic, zoo-like atmosphere Jerry Jones has created for his team, but there is something he can do behind closed doors in the locker room to change the culture for his players. Look no further than what Dan Campbell did to the Detroit Lions when he took over as their HC. He demanded toughness and accountability from his players and it turned them from the laughingstock of the NFL to one of the better teams in just a few years time.
“Toughness” and “accountability” just so happens to be two things this organization seems to have been lacking under both Mike McCarthy’s and Jason Garrett’s tenure as HC. This is a team that has been called “soft” on numerous occasions in the past and hopefully that changes with whoever replaces McCarthy. While personnel changes via free agency and the draft will help, it mostly has to do with an attitude adjustment. After all, “attitude reflects leadership”, at least according to the movie Remember the Titans.
Dallas, TX
Christopher de Vinck: The hidden beauty of a fox at the Dallas Museum of Art
One early morning last week, just before sunrise, I heard a strange sound as if someone was yelling in intervals. At first, I thought it was a cry for help, and then I thought, after all, it wasn’t the sound of a person.
I walked to the dining room window, and then I looked out to the street. Nothing to the right. Nothing straight ahead toward my neighbor’s house, and then I saw a sudden movement to the left beyond some bushes. The wind? A loose piece of rust-colored paper rolling onto the street? It was a fox, a red fox with his famous tail. It looked to its left and right and then, like an athlete, it ran along the road in a sudden dash, past the bushes, past my neighbor’s house, and then it ran past my window. I expected it to stop for a moment and wave hello.
I always feel sorry for foxes. They do eat berries, but they depend mostly on meat: mice, squirrels, birds and worms. It must be easy being a rabbit. It doesn’t have to work hard to find grass or clover, even twigs, bark, flowers and shrubs. But a fox has to hunt and hope there will be a meal just beyond the next rock or next patch of woods.
The quick visit of the fox running in the neighborhood has stayed with me these last few days: the movement of its tail, the way its legs moved in a gallop, the earth color of its fur. We preserve the image of things in our private memoirs, quick moments like the visit from the fox, and we also preserve forever moments: our wedding days, vacations, the memory of our children’s first day of school, the memory of the homes where we grew up.
One of the great things about our culture is that we have established our collective public memories in our museums: works of art, dinosaur skeletons, pottery, Lincoln’s hat, the Wright Brothers’ plane.
The Dallas Museum of Art has a painting by Gustave Courbet, one of the most influential French artists from the 19th century. Courbet led the realism movement, abandoning the romantic painters and their idolized notion of the world. Courbet painted what we see and expected us to come away with our own sense of meaning from the snapshot of reality.
When you visit the Dallas Museum of Art, look for Courbet’s Fox in the Snow. As you look at the painting you might feel the cold air in your imagination. You will get to see the hungry animal devouring a mouse. There is nothing romantic about that image. It is an unsentimental moment of reality, and yet in that reality, there is beauty. There is always hidden beauty in what we see in our ordinary days.
According to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, “the entire red fox population of Central Texas probably descended from 40 foxes released between 1890 and 1895 near Waco.”
It seems as if one is hanging in the museum in Dallas.
In Paris on Dec. 25, 1861, Courbet wrote a Realist Manifesto, and in it, he wrote, “The beautiful is in nature, and it is encountered under the most diverse forms of reality. Once it is found it belongs to art, or rather to the artist who discovers it.” And, like Courbet’s fox, it also belongs to our collective encounters thanks to the DMA.
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com
Dallas, TX
Thunder sit SGA vs. Mavs due to sprained wrist
DALLAS — Oklahoma City Thunder superstar Shai Gilgeous-Alexander sat out Friday’s game against the Dallas Mavericks due to a sprained right wrist.
Gilgeous-Alexander, the NBA’s scoring leader and an MVP front-runner, was a late addition to the injury report.
The Thunder opted to sit Gilgeous-Alexander after he had an abbreviated warmup routine.
Gilgeous-Alexander wore a wrap on the wrist after Thursday’s home win over the Cleveland Cavaliers. He said he felt some pain after falling during his 40-point performance.
“Was fine this morning and then came to the arena and was a little bit sore,” Thunder coach Mark Daigneault said before Gilgeous-Alexander tested the wrist during his warmup.
Gilgeous-Alexander played in all 40 games during Oklahoma City’s 34-6 start, averaging 31.6 points, 6.0 assists, 5.4 rebounds, 2.0 steals and 1.1 blocks.
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science1 week ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology7 days ago
Amazon Prime will shut down its clothing try-on program
-
News1 week ago
Mapping the Damage From the Palisades Fire
-
Technology6 days ago
L’Oréal’s new skincare gadget told me I should try retinol
-
Technology3 days ago
Super Bowl LIX will stream for free on Tubi
-
Business4 days ago
Why TikTok Users Are Downloading ‘Red Note,’ the Chinese App
-
Technology1 day ago
Nintendo omits original Donkey Kong Country Returns team from the remaster’s credits