Connect with us

South

Dallas Based Southwest Air Faces Lawsuit From Cancer Sufferer Who Tried to Book Two Seats For His Disability Only to Be Attacked By Gate Agent

Published

on

Dallas Based Southwest Air Faces Lawsuit From Cancer Sufferer Who Tried to Book Two Seats For His Disability Only to Be Attacked By Gate Agent


A Southwest Airlines passenger who was undergoing intense chemotherapy at the time that he tried to fly with Dallas based carrier says he was physically attacked and had his cell phone robbed from him by an airport gate agent who refused to honor Southwest’s ‘extra seat’ policy.

The now infamous and controversial ‘extra seat’ policy allows Southwest passengers to book two seats for one person if they are obese or might otherwise encroach into the space of the neighboring seat.

Passengers who feel they might need an extra seat simply need to phone Southwest’s reservation call center to make the purchase, which then allows Southwest to adjust its available seat count based on the needs of passengers.

Advertisement

If, however, the plane takes off with spare seats, then customers who have bought an extra seat should be allowed to claim a refund.

David Ford from Avon, Connecticut, says in a recently filed lawsuit against Southwest Airlines that rather than honoring its extra seat policy, he was left demeaned and humiliated by gate agents who told him that he didn’t look disabled before physically assaulting him and snatching his cellphone.

Weighing 230 pounds and with a height of 6’1″, David is on the larger size but wouldn’t be considered the stereotypical user of Southwest’s extra seat policy. He is, however, a cancer survivor, and at the time he tried to fly with Southwest in June 2024, he was undergoing chemotherapy and radiation treatment.

As a result, David says he moved about a lot and would encroach on the neighboring seat.

Advertisement

David phone Southwest’s call center and explained his circumstances and, according to a lengthy legal complaint, the reservation agent was more than happy to book him an additional seat through the ‘extra seat’ policy.

On the outbound flight from Las Vegas to Spokane, David says there weren’t any issues, but on his return, he ran into multiple problems with the gate agents who demanded to know what disability he suffered from and told him that he didn’t look like he needed an additional seat.

David was left embarrassed, although the treatment that he received in Spokane was only the tip of the iceberg, according to his attorney.

On June 12, David had a flight booked with Southwest from Bradley International Airport and he had again called Southwest’s reservation center ahead of his flight to book an extra seat.

Advertisement

Again, the gate agents demanded to know what disability he suffered from and told him “You don’t look handicapped,” before refusing to issue a boarding pass for David’s additional seat.

As David demanded a supervisor to complain, a second agent then allegedly climbed on the check-in weighing scales in order to stand over him and told him: “You ain’t getting a second seat on my watch.”

By this point, David says he was feeling intimidated, so he started recording the encounter on his cell phone, only for the agent to rip it out of his hand and refuse to return it.

Not long after, local police arrived to find out what was going on, and only at this point did the agent return David’s phone. Eventually, a supervisor intervened and agreed to print both boarding passes so that David could travel with an extra seat beside him.

Advertisement

Shaken and upset, David thought the matter might be over, but the lawsuit alleges that the agent who snatched the phone from him then boarded the plane once everyone was sat down and took the seat beside David to demand he delete the video recording.

David has already complained to Southwest about his treatment at the hands of its agents, and the airline allegedly wrote back to him, admitting that it had “failed to comply with regulations in your case”.

The lawsuit seeks to sue Southwest on a number of grounds, including unfair trading practices over the way it markets its extra seat policy, and infliction of emotional distress. David is suing Southwest for an unknown amount in compensatory and punitive damages.

Advertisement

Subscribe to our newsletter

No spam, just a weekly roundup of the best aviation news that you don’t want to miss

Mateusz Maszczynski


Mateusz Maszczynski honed his skills as an international flight attendant at the most prominent airline in the Middle East and has been flying ever since… most recently for a well known European airline. Matt is passionate about the aviation industry and has become an expert in passenger experience and human-centric stories. Always keeping an ear close to the ground, Matt’s industry insights, analysis and news coverage is frequently relied upon by some of the biggest names in journalism.

Advertisement





Source link

Texas

Texas sues Netflix, alleges platform spied on kids and collected data

Published

on

Texas sues Netflix, alleges platform spied on kids and collected data


The state of Texas announced a lawsuit against streaming giant Netflix on Monday, accusing the company of spying on children and other consumers by collecting their data without consent and designing the platform to be addictive.

Texas claims that Netflix has falsely represented to consumers that it didn’t collect or share user data while it actually tracked and sold viewers’ habits and preferences to commercial data brokers and advertising technology companies.

Advertisement

The lawsuit, filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, claims that “Netflix’s endgame is simple and lucrative: get children and families glued to the screen, harvest their data while they are stuck there, and then monetize the data for a handsome profit.”

The state of Texas announced a lawsuit against streaming giant Netflix on Monday. (Nikos Pekiaridis/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

“When you watch Netflix, Netflix watched you,” Texas added in the lawsuit.

NETFLIX CO-FOUNDER REED HASTINGS TO STEP DOWN, DEPARTURE IS ‘SPOOKING INVESTORS’

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
NFLX NETFLIX INC. 85.39 -2.10 -2.40%

The complaint quotes comments made by former CEO Reed Hastings who said in 2020, while he was still leading the streaming company, that “we don’t collect anything,” amid questions over Big Tech companies’ data collection practices.

Advertisement

Netflix was also accused of quietly using “dark patterns” to keep users watching on its platform, such as an autoplay feature that starts a new show after a different show ends.

NETFLIX RAISES SUBSCRIPTION PRICES ACROSS ALL PLANS

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed the lawsuit. (Cheney Orr/Reuters)

Paxton said in a press release that Netflix “has built a surveillance program designed to illegally collect and profit from Texans’ personal data without their consent, and my office will do everything in our power to stop it.”

The attorney general said he’s charging Netflix under the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act and seeks to require Netflix to stop the unlawful collection and disclosure of user data, require Netflix to disable autoplay by default on kid’s profiles, and to secure injunctive relief and civil penalties.

Advertisement

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

FOX Business reached out to Netflix for comment.

Reuters contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia Supreme Court voids voter-approved redistricting referendum

Published

on

Virginia Supreme Court voids voter-approved redistricting referendum

On May 8, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the General Assembly violated the state constitution when it tried to redraw congressional districts, nullifying the results of the April election in which Virginians narrowly approved redistricting.

Electoral maps are usually redrawn once every 10 years, but multiple states began redrawing them early after President Donald Trump urged Republicans to redraw district lines to ensure more favorable results for the party in the November 2026 elections. 

This started a nationwide political battle for control of the U.S. House of Representatives. Texas was the first of several states to redraw districts favoring Republicans, and Virginia Democrats had proposed a constitutional amendment to allow redistricting in order to favor Democrats. 

As of May 8, Republicans had initiated redistricting efforts in eight states; Democrats had led redistricting efforts in three states, including Virginia, the Washington Post reported.

In April, Virginia voters supported the redistricting amendment with 51.7% voting for it out of more than 3 million ballots cast. It could have given Democrats up to four extra seats in the U.S. House, according to the Washington Post (subscription required).

Advertisement

But the Virginia Supreme Court, in a 4-3 ruling, found that there were procedural errors in how the Democratic legislature handled the process, nullifying the election results.

The Virginia Constitution says that proposed constitutional amendments must pass in the General Assembly twice before the public can vote on them: once before an election of the House of Delegates, and again after an election. According to the Virginia Supreme Court majority opinion written by Justice D. Arthur Kelsey, early voting for the general election had already been open for six weeks when the General Assembly cast its first vote on the amendment in October 2025, with more than 1.3 million voters having already cast their ballots.

“This violation irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void,” the court majority opinion stated.

The court’s ruling means the state reverts to the old district maps adopted in 2021. Based on those maps, Virginia voters elected six Democrats and five Republicans to the U.S. House.

Following the court’s ruling, some Virginia Democrats who planned to run for the U.S. House told the New York Times that they have to abandon their campaigns, while others, such as Tom Perriello who is running for the 5th District, face much more difficult campaigns.

Advertisement

Virginia Democrats on Friday asked the court to pause the nullification of the referendum results while they prepare their appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, according to VPM.

Get in touch if you’ve been impacted by the overturned redistricting results

If you’ve been impacted by the Virginia State Supreme Court’s decision to nullify the results of the April 21 special election on redistricting, we want to hear from you.

Send us a tip or question using our contact form. You can also call (434) 218-3649 and give us as much information as you can in your voice message. You can also reach our newsroom on Signal at (434) 218-3649 or @cvilletomorrow.05. Signal is a chat and voice app for your smartphone that has end-to-end encryption and is run by a nonprofit organization.

While we can’t cover every story that’s important to you, we do our best to be responsive to your needs. We use tips from readers to choose which stories to cover, to incorporate information into broader reports or to help us decide how to grow Charlottesville Tomorrow. Here’s where you can tell us what you think we should be covering.

2026 Central Virginia Voter Guide

View live results of Virginia’s redistricting referendum, a high-stakes vote on whether Democrats who control state government can redraw congressional maps ahead of this fall’s election.

Advertisement
Virginia’s redistricting battle moves to the courts

Attorney General Jay Jones vows to appeal as early voting fast approaches.

What does a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote actually mean in Virginia’s special election on redistricting?

Voters are getting mixed messages. Here’s a clear breakdown.



Source link
Continue Reading

West Virginia

West Virginia delegate candidates in Wood County split on top issues, from manufacturing to health care rules

Published

on

West Virginia delegate candidates in Wood County split on top issues, from manufacturing to health care rules


PARKERSBURG, W.Va. (WTAP) – Candidates running for seats in the West Virginia House of Delegates in Wood County say their top priorities if elected range from job creation and workforce development to health care policy changes and infrastructure, as they make their case to voters ahead of the election.

Incumbent Delegate Vernon Criss, a Republican running in House District 12, said jobs would be his top focus, arguing Wood County has been left out of state efforts to attract manufacturing.

“It would be jobs,” Criss said. He pointed to what he described as $340 million available through a high-impact, jobs-related manufacturing fund for companies returning to West Virginia, saying the governor “has refused to use these dollars to help the county.” Criss also cited restoring highway funding and funding for drinking water and sewer projects as priorities.

Criss said he would also push for foster care legislation in the next session, noting the governor vetoed a foster care bill this year that he said would have helped families and relatives caring for children in the system.

In House District 13, Republican candidate Melissa McCrady said her leading priority is repealing the state’s certificate of need program, which she said restricts medical facilities and practices from opening in the state.

Advertisement

“The main issue that I would prioritize is the repeal of the certificate of need,” McCrady said, calling it a program that limits a “free market” approach to health care by requiring approvals before certain services can expand.

McCrady said she would also like to repeal the inventory tax on businesses, which she said makes West Virginia less attractive for economic growth. She also said she supports religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions for children and adults in response to future outbreaks.

On education, McCrady said she wants to give teachers and families more voice in Wood County and reduce what she called burdensome requirements and restrictions placed on classrooms. On jobs and cost of living, she said reducing taxes and regulations and allowing the market to develop would create more opportunity for residents.

Incumbent Delegate Scot Heckert, a Republican running in House District 13, said his top issues include “infrastructure, accountability” and school funding.

“Top issues right now is infrastructure, accountability, for the school funding,” Heckert said. He said policy changes depend in part on what he hears from residents, but added he believes the school aid formula should be reviewed and that traditional public schools, homeschooling and charter schools should be held to the same set of rules.

Advertisement

Heckert said the state needs to do more to support teachers and address long-term retirement funding costs. On jobs and workforce development, Heckert said building a workforce is essential and suggested the state should look at incentives and assistance programs to encourage employment.

Asked about transparency and accountability, Heckert said constituents can contact him directly.

“Any constituent of District 13 can call me anytime,” he said, adding, “You can’t have one without the other.”

Criss and McCrady also emphasized transparency as a priority. Criss said the budget process should remain open to the public, while McCrady said she wants to be accessible through office hours and multiple communication channels.

Candidate for House of Delegates district 12 Charles Hartzog was not available to be interviewed.

Advertisement

Voters in Wood County will choose their delegates in House Districts 12 and 13 in the upcoming election. Details on early voting and Election Day locations are available through the county clerk’s office.

Editor’s note: The video for this story will be added once it airs. Please check back for the updated video.

Copyright 2026 WTAP. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending