Connect with us

South

Dallas Based Southwest Air Faces Lawsuit From Cancer Sufferer Who Tried to Book Two Seats For His Disability Only to Be Attacked By Gate Agent

Published

on

Dallas Based Southwest Air Faces Lawsuit From Cancer Sufferer Who Tried to Book Two Seats For His Disability Only to Be Attacked By Gate Agent


A Southwest Airlines passenger who was undergoing intense chemotherapy at the time that he tried to fly with Dallas based carrier says he was physically attacked and had his cell phone robbed from him by an airport gate agent who refused to honor Southwest’s ‘extra seat’ policy.

The now infamous and controversial ‘extra seat’ policy allows Southwest passengers to book two seats for one person if they are obese or might otherwise encroach into the space of the neighboring seat.

Passengers who feel they might need an extra seat simply need to phone Southwest’s reservation call center to make the purchase, which then allows Southwest to adjust its available seat count based on the needs of passengers.

Advertisement

If, however, the plane takes off with spare seats, then customers who have bought an extra seat should be allowed to claim a refund.

David Ford from Avon, Connecticut, says in a recently filed lawsuit against Southwest Airlines that rather than honoring its extra seat policy, he was left demeaned and humiliated by gate agents who told him that he didn’t look disabled before physically assaulting him and snatching his cellphone.

Weighing 230 pounds and with a height of 6’1″, David is on the larger size but wouldn’t be considered the stereotypical user of Southwest’s extra seat policy. He is, however, a cancer survivor, and at the time he tried to fly with Southwest in June 2024, he was undergoing chemotherapy and radiation treatment.

As a result, David says he moved about a lot and would encroach on the neighboring seat.

Advertisement

David phone Southwest’s call center and explained his circumstances and, according to a lengthy legal complaint, the reservation agent was more than happy to book him an additional seat through the ‘extra seat’ policy.

On the outbound flight from Las Vegas to Spokane, David says there weren’t any issues, but on his return, he ran into multiple problems with the gate agents who demanded to know what disability he suffered from and told him that he didn’t look like he needed an additional seat.

David was left embarrassed, although the treatment that he received in Spokane was only the tip of the iceberg, according to his attorney.

On June 12, David had a flight booked with Southwest from Bradley International Airport and he had again called Southwest’s reservation center ahead of his flight to book an extra seat.

Advertisement

Again, the gate agents demanded to know what disability he suffered from and told him “You don’t look handicapped,” before refusing to issue a boarding pass for David’s additional seat.

As David demanded a supervisor to complain, a second agent then allegedly climbed on the check-in weighing scales in order to stand over him and told him: “You ain’t getting a second seat on my watch.”

By this point, David says he was feeling intimidated, so he started recording the encounter on his cell phone, only for the agent to rip it out of his hand and refuse to return it.

Not long after, local police arrived to find out what was going on, and only at this point did the agent return David’s phone. Eventually, a supervisor intervened and agreed to print both boarding passes so that David could travel with an extra seat beside him.

Advertisement

Shaken and upset, David thought the matter might be over, but the lawsuit alleges that the agent who snatched the phone from him then boarded the plane once everyone was sat down and took the seat beside David to demand he delete the video recording.

David has already complained to Southwest about his treatment at the hands of its agents, and the airline allegedly wrote back to him, admitting that it had “failed to comply with regulations in your case”.

The lawsuit seeks to sue Southwest on a number of grounds, including unfair trading practices over the way it markets its extra seat policy, and infliction of emotional distress. David is suing Southwest for an unknown amount in compensatory and punitive damages.

Advertisement

Subscribe to our newsletter

No spam, just a weekly roundup of the best aviation news that you don’t want to miss

Mateusz Maszczynski


Mateusz Maszczynski honed his skills as an international flight attendant at the most prominent airline in the Middle East and has been flying ever since… most recently for a well known European airline. Matt is passionate about the aviation industry and has become an expert in passenger experience and human-centric stories. Always keeping an ear close to the ground, Matt’s industry insights, analysis and news coverage is frequently relied upon by some of the biggest names in journalism.

Advertisement





Source link

Oklahoma

Housing affordability act becomes law, Oklahoma lawmakers react

Published

on

Housing affordability act becomes law, Oklahoma lawmakers react


The landmark housing affordability bill known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law July 11 at midnight after 10 days of inactivity from President Trump.

The bipartisan 21st ROAD to Housing Act was first created by the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs in July 2025, advancing after a 24-0 vote on July 29. It was introduced as H.R. 6644 in the House of Representatives on Dec. 11, 2025 by French Hill (R-AR.)

Bipartisan bill in Congress aims to solve the nation’s housing affordability crisis

After six months of edits and exchanges of the legislation between the House and the Senate, the final Senate vote was June 22, passing 85-5. The House of Representatives voted 358-32 to pass the bill June 23.

Advertisement

Per congressional record of the votes, Oklahoma Representatives Bice, Cole, Hern and Lucas voted Yea, as well as Senators Armstrong and Lankford. Representative Josh Brecheen of Oklahoma’s 2nd District was one of 41 to not vote.

The 21st ROAD to Housing Act was sent to President Trump’s desk for action June 24. He canceled the signing via Truth Social post.

The president refused to sign the housing affordability bill despite previously supporting it due to his stronger support for the SAVE America Act. He referred to the SAVE America Act, which has still not been passed, as “a National Emergency.”

Trump cancels bipartisan housing bill signing, reiterates demand for SAVE America Act

Advertisement

Many Oklahoma lawmakers reacted to the passage of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act in June when it passed the House and Senate.

Rep. Brecheen, who did not vote in the final house call for the housing affordability legislation, posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, in support of President Trump’s stance.

Advertisement

President Trump posted to Truth Social July 10 that he still would not sign the housing affordability act into law.

Per the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, the president must either veto or sign a bill within ten days (excluding Sundays) of it being sent to his desk. In the event that the president does not either return or sign the bill, it becomes law as if it were signed.

As of midnight July 11, 2026, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became federal law. The law will combat a number of obstacles facing homeowners and those hoping to become homeowners.

A full list of what each section contains, published by the House Committee on Financial Services can be found here.

Advertisement

Oklahoma City Mayor David Holt posted Saturday morning about the housing affordability act becoming law.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Editorial: There’s an easy solution to SC budget impasse, but legislators won’t like it

Published

on

Editorial: There’s an easy solution to SC budget impasse, but legislators won’t like it


South Carolina’s Legislature has one job it must complete every year: Pass the state budget. This year — or, since we’re past the July 1 start of the state’s new fiscal year, last year — lawmakers failed. Their failure continues.

We are nearly two weeks into the 2026-27 budget year, and there is still no 2026-27 budget. It remains in a conference committee, which has met a total of two times since House leaders presented the full House with their massive take-it-or-leave-it rewrite to the Senate budget on May 6.

Now, to be fair, lawmakers’ failure to do their one essential annual job is not even in the same league as Congress’ routine failure to do the same. Unlike the Congress, the Legislature passed what’s called a continuing resolution, which continues to fund state government at its 2025-26 level for the entire year, or until lawmakers pass a real 2026-27 budget.

But doing that absent extraordinary circumstances — like during the first year of COVID, when no one had any idea how long the tax collection freefall would continue — is a first step in the direction of D.C. dysfunction.

Advertisement

There are, as The Post and Courier’s Nick Reynolds reports, several important policy differences in the House and Senate versions of the budget, such as a save-the-bars provision that once again throws DUI victims under the bus, minor reforms for data centers and efforts to either demand a tiny bit of accountability from the Commerce Department for its overspending on the Scout Motors project or else sweep the whole mess under the rug.

But when our House and Senate negotiators held their second meeting on June 30, they said their main sticking points involved the Senate’s irresponsible idea of slashing property taxes for seniors and the House’s irresponsible idea of squandering money on unvetted give-always to nonprofits.

The hang-up, to be clear, isn’t that the House opposes irresponsible cuts that involve taxes the state doesn’t collect, and whose reduction likely will lead to more caps on how much local elected officials can raises taxes even when their constituents support them. Nor is it that senators oppose unvetted earmarks, although Senate Finance Chairman Harvey Peeler does and even his colleagues might oppose sending them to unvetted nonprofits — as opposed to simply unvetted local government programs.

The sticking point is that there’s not enough money to pay for both, and technical budgetary rules make it difficult to compromise. Not impossible, since lawmakers are in a special session called by the governor and so can work around those rules, but difficult.

Fortunately, there’s a really easy solution to this problem, and there’s no reason negotiators can’t adopt it when they meet Tuesday for what they hope will be their third and final session. It’s the solution Senate negotiators repeatedly used at the June 30 meeting to kill Senate provisions in the bill they didn’t actually like and House negotiators repeatedly used to kill House provisions they didn’t like: Strip them from the budget.

Advertisement

Kill the Senate’s $248 million plan to wipe out property taxes on the first $150,000 instead of just the first $50 000 of senior citizens’ residential property taxes; the homestead exemption cuts taxes for seniors of all incomes and wealth, including those who can easily pay them, while requiring struggling young homeowners to pay their full share, even if that forces them out of their homes.

And kill at the least the House earmarks that go to entities — sometimes quite questionable — that have managed to attain nonprofit certification. Better still, kill all $315 million in House earmarks, along with all $130 million in Senate earmarks. That way, we’ve got a budget agreement, and as a bonus we’ve gotten rid of two particularly irresponsible parts of it.





Source link

Continue Reading

Tennessee

Former Tennessee Football Position Coach Beats Out Vols For Commitment of Elite Recruit | Rocky Top Insider

Published

on

Former Tennessee Football Position Coach Beats Out Vols For Commitment of Elite Recruit | Rocky Top Insider


Tennessee Football recruiting
Photo via Tennessee Athletics

Tennessee football made the final cut for one of the top linebackers in the class of 2027, Roman Igwebuike, but couldn’t seal the deal. Instead, he’s taking his talents to Notre Dame as he announced his commitment to the Irish on Saturday evening.

It was a former Josh Heupel Era UT position coach who led the charge for Igwebuike, as well. Brian Jean-Mary, the Vols’ linebackers coach from 2021-23, now leads the linebacker room at Notre Dame and was the primary recruiter for Igwebuike.

Jean-Mary left Tennessee for a position at Michigan as defensive run game coordinator/linebackers coach. However, with the coaching change in Ann Arbor this offseason, he landed on his feet and joined the Irish’s staff as Marcus Freeman’s run game coordinator/linebackers coach.

More From RTI: Nike Reportedly Not Willing to Help Ohio State’s Recruitment of David Gabriel Georges

Igwebuike is one of the top linebackers in the class of 2027. On 247 Composite, he ranks as the No. 123 player in the country, No. 9 linebacker and No. 8 player from the state of Illinois. He is from Chicago, where he plays for Mount Carmel.

“Well-rounded linebacker that has a chance to be a linchpin in the middle for a College Football Playoff hopeful after a productive prep career outside of Chicago,” 247 director of scouting Andrew Ivins wrote. “Looks the part with a muscular 6-foot-3, 225-pound frame. Sees it well from the shelf as he reads his keys and flows to the football. Navigates busy intersections at a higher level and can slip underneath blocks. Comfortable dropping into space and is rather effective as a spy…”

Advertisement

Igwebuike’s primary recruiter at Tennessee was linebackers coach William Inge. He has made trips to Knoxville to see the Vols, including the Orange and White Game this past April, but never announced an official visit to UT.

Tennessee currently holds 16 commitments in the 2027 class, which ranks 43rd in the country on 247. This features two linebackers, both legacies, in four-star Kenneth Simon II and three-star JP Peace.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending