Connect with us

Northeast

'Playing with the courts': Trump admin hit with dozens of suits after years of president condemning 'lawfare'

Published

on

'Playing with the courts': Trump admin hit with dozens of suits after years of president condemning 'lawfare'

President Donald Trump’s court battles have not ended now that he’s back in the Oval Office — instead, dozens have piled up against his administration as Democrats and activists vow to fight Trump and his policies in the judicial system.

Trump faced four criminal indictments during the interim of his first and second administrations, which landed accusations of “lawfare” on the national stage as Trump maintained his innocence and slammed the cases as efforts by the Democratic Party to hurt his political chances for re-election during the 2024 cycle. Despite the left-wing efforts to ensnare Trump in a web of legal cases, Trump was re-elected president — with a resume that now includes “convicted felon” and a famous mugshot frequently displayed on pro-Trump apparel.

Upon Trump’s inauguration Jan. 20, he has issued near-daily executive orders and actions to shift the federal government to fall in line with his “America First” policies, including snuffing out government overspending and mismanagement, banning biological men from competing in women’s sports, and deporting thousands of illegal immigrants who flooded the nation under the Biden administration. 

Trump has signed more than 60 executive orders, in addition to other executive actions, as of Tuesday, which has resulted in at least 49 lawsuits against Trump and his administration, Fox News Digital has found. 

‘ANYTHING BUT ORDINARY’: LEGAL EXPERTS SHRED NY V. TRUMP AS ‘ONE OF THE WORST’ CASES IN HISTORY

Advertisement

New York Attorney General said she is “prepared” to ask the judge to seize former President Donald Trump’s assets if he cannot pay the $354 million judgment handed down in his civil fraud case.  (ABC News/Screenshot | Brendan McDermid-Pool/Getty Images)

The lawsuits come as Democratic elected officials fume over the second Trump administration’s policies, most notably the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which is investigating various federal agencies in the search of cutting government spending fat, corruption and mismanagement of funds.

“Right now, we’re going to keep focus on the need to look out for everyday New Yorkers and everyday Americans who are under assault by an extreme MAGA Republican agenda that is trying to cut taxes for billionaires, donors and wealthy corporations and then stick New Yorkers and working-class Americans across the country with the bill,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in January. 

CLIMATE LAWFARE IS RUNNING INTO A POWERFUL FORCE LIBERALS DIDN’T EXPECT

“That’s not acceptable,” he said. “We are going to fight it legislatively. We are going to fight it in the courts. We’re going to fight it in the streets.”  

Advertisement

President Donald Trump has signed more than 60 executive orders, in addition to other executive actions, as of Tuesday, which has resulted in at least 49 lawsuits against Trump and his administration.  (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

“We are gonna be in your face, we are gonna be on your a–es, and we are going to make sure you understand what democracy looks like, and this ain’t it,” Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, said at a protest over DOGE and its chair, Elon Musk, earlier in February.

With just over three weeks back in the Oval Office, at least 49 lawsuits have been filed against Trump or the federal government over Trump’s policies and executive actions. Among the list of plaintiffs are a handful of groups that brought forth suits against Trump in previous years, most notably New York Attorney General Leitita James, as well as labor unions and left-wing advocacy groups. 

James, a former city council member in New York and public defender, launched her run for New York attorney general during the 2018 cycle, while emphasizing that if she were elected she would aggressively pursue legal charges against Trump.

HOW TRUMP, AG BONDI CAN PERSUADE DEMOCRATS TO ABANDON LAWFARE

Advertisement

“I’m running for attorney general because I will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president when our fundamental rights are at stake,” James declared in September 2018. “From the Muslim ban, to efforts to deport immigrants, to denying transgender students the ability to choose whatever bathroom they want, rolling back regulations to protect our planet, colluding with foreign powers, putting profits over people, dividing us in ways we haven’t seen in generations.” 

“And what is fueling this campaign, what is fueling my soul right now, is Trump and his abuses, abuses against immigrants, against women, against our environment. We need an attorney general who will stand up to Donald Trump,” she said during a debate in August 2018. 

James won her election that year, about two years into Trump’s first administration, and took a victory lap while vowing to expose the “con man.” 

New York Attorney General Letitia James launched her run for New York attorney general during the 2018 cycle, while emphasizing that if she were elected she would aggressively pursue legal charges against President Donald Trump.  (Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Congressional Black Caucus Foundation)

James brought forth a civil fraud suit against Trump, the Trump Organization and its senior leadership in 2022, frequently sitting in the courtroom throughout the proceedings, and celebrated the prosecution of Trump in the Manhattan criminal trial over the 34 counts of falsifying business records. Trump was ordered to pay a $454 million civil fraud judgment in James’ lawsuit against him, which is currently on appeal. 

Advertisement

All in, James said back in November 2024 that her office took nearly 100 legal actions against Trump’s first administration — vowing to restart the efforts during the second administration. 

AS DEMOCRATS REGROUP OUTSIDE DC, GOP ATTORNEYS GENERAL ADOPT NEW PLAYBOOK TO DEFEND TRUMP AGENDA

“We did not expect this result, but we are prepared to respond to this result. And my office has been preparing for several months because we’ve been here before,” James said following Trump’s election win in November 2024. “We faced this challenge before, and we used the rule of law to fight back. And we are prepared to fight back once again because, as the attorney general of this great state, it is my job to protect and defend the rights of New Yorkers and the rule of law. And I will not shrink from that responsibility.”

So far in 2025, James has spearheaded at least five legal actions against the Trump administration, including leading a coalition of state attorneys general to sue the federal government to halt DOGE’s access to the Treasury Department’s internal systems, as well as another lawsuit related to the Trump admin slashing grant funding to research institutions and universities. 

“As the richest man in the world, Elon Musk is not used to being told ‘no,’ but in our country, no one is above the law,” James said of the DOGE suit. “President Trump does not have the power to give away Americans’ private information to anyone he chooses, and he cannot cut federal payments approved by Congress. Musk and DOGE have no authority to access Americans’ private information and some of our country’s most sensitive data. I am taking action to keep our information secure, and to prevent any unconstitutional freeze on essential funding that Americans rely on every day.”

Advertisement

Trump slammed New York as the “most corrupt State in the Union” in a Truth Social post on Tuesday, calling on even-handed judges and elected officials to crush the “lawfare” in the Empire State. 

“​​We need great Judges and Politicians to help fix New York, and to stop the kind of Lawfare that was launched against me, from falsely valuing Mar-a-Lago at $18 Million Dollars, when it is worth, perhaps, 100 times that amount (The corrupt judge was replaced by another judge, only to be immediately put back on the case when the Democrat political leaders found out that a change of judges was made. It has become a great embarrassment for the New York Judicial System!),” he posted to Truth Social, referring to James’ civil fraud case against Trump.  

Labor unions that previously sued the first Trump administration are also back in court.  (Jabin Botsford/Pool via USA TODAY NETWORK)

“To a woman that I had no idea who she was, making a FAKE and ridiculous accusation, to a ‘case’ that was made up by a corrupt and highly conflicted Judge in order to criminally attack me for political purposes,” he continued, referring to two-year E. Jean Carroll court cases. 

Labor unions that previously sued the first Trump administration are also back in court, including the American Federation of Teachers suing over DOGE’s access to private information at the Education and Treasury departments, and the American Federation of Government Employees suing the administration in at least two cases related to DOGE and federal employment policies under the 47th president. 

Advertisement

“We wouldn’t bring so many lawsuits if they wouldn’t break the law so often,” Andrew Huddleston, American Federation of Government Employees’ director of communications, told Fox News Digital when asked about the lawsuits. 

TRUMP HAS HIGHER APPROVAL RATING THAN AT ANY POINT DURING FIRST TERM: POLL

While the American Civil Liberties Union — which took at least 400 legal actions against the first Trump administration — filed a lawsuit against the second Trump administration earlier in February regarding an executive order that prevents transgender and nonbinary individuals from changing their passports to reflect their gender identity and not their biological sex.  

REPUBLICAN AGS BACK TRUMP FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BUYOUT AS JUDGE DECIDES ‘FORK IN THE ROAD’ DIRECTIVE’S FATE 

Another nonprofit, the State Democracy Defenders Fund, recently filed a lawsuit on behalf of FBI agents who investigated Trump-related cases in an effort to block the DOJ from releasing their names. The State Democracy Defenders Fund previously was involved in other Trump-related cases, including filing an amicus brief in January advocating that Manhattan Judge Juan Merchan sentence Trump in the Manhattan case just days ahead of his inauguration.

Advertisement

President Donald Trump repeatedly seethed that “lawfare” was running amok of American politics, including, left to right, former Special Counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis.  (Getty Images)

Ahead of taking office, Trump repeatedly seethed that “lawfare” was running amok of American politics, frequently targeting James, Merchan, as well as former special counsel Jack Smith, Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and others. 

“They’re playing with the courts, as you know, they’ve been playing with the courts for four years,” Trump said during a press conference at Mar-a-Lago after Congress had certified his election win in January. “Probably got me more votes because I got the highest number of votes ever gotten by a Republican by far, actually, by a lot. And, you know, we had a great election, so I guess it didn’t work. But even to this day, they’re playing with the courts and their friendly judges that like to try and make everybody happy… It’s called lawfare. It’s called weaponization of justice.” 

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Boston, MA

Celtics reportedly trading Jaylen Brown to 76ers for Paul George, picks

Published

on

Celtics reportedly trading Jaylen Brown to 76ers for Paul George, picks


In a stunning, franchise-shaking move, the Celtics reached an agreement Wednesday to trade Jaylen Brown to the Philadelphia 76ers, according to a report from ESPN’s Shams Charania.

In return, Boston reportedly will receive nine-time All-Star wing Paul George, two first-round picks and two second-round picks.

Brown had been the subject of rampant trade rumors in recent weeks, with Charania reporting earlier Wednesday that the Celtics were “strongly shopping” their longest-tenured player following a failed attempt to trade him and two draft picks for Giannis Antetokounmpo.

But the 76ers, who ended the Celtics’ 2022-26 season by upsetting them in the first round of the NBA playoffs, had not been mentioned as a potential suitor for Brown. He’ll now join the likes of Joel Embiid, Tyrese Maxey and VJ Edgecombe on a talented Philadelphia roster, while the oft-injured George heads to Boston.

Advertisement

Shipping out Brown splits up one of the NBA’s most talented and successful duos. The tandem of Jayson Tatum and Brown led Boston to five Eastern Conference finals, two NBA Finals and one championship since they joined forces in 2017.

Brown, the 2024 NBA Finals MVP, played most of this season without his longtime co-star, and he thrived, averaging 28.7 points, 6.9 rebounds and 5.1 assists — a stat line matched in Celtics history only by Larry Bird and John Havlicek — while Tatum recovered from Achilles surgery. Brown made second-team All-NBA and finished sixth in MVP voting, and the underdog Celtics far exceeded preseason expectations, posting the second-best record in the East (56-26) and the league’s fourth-best net rating.

But questions about Brown’s future began swirling after Boston blew a 3-1 series lead against seventh-seeded Philly, losing three straight — including Game 7 at home, which Tatum missed due to knee stiffness — to suffer their earliest postseason exit since 2021.

Brown, who was a minus-57 over the final three losses, made headlines after the series when he insisted that this was his “favorite season” despite Boston’s poor finish. Basketball Hall of Famer Tracy McGrady, a mentor of Brown’s, did the same when he said on his podcast that Brown had “frustration (that) lies deeply within the (Celtics) organization.”

Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens said in his end-of-season news conference that Brown had expressed no such feelings to him. But Stevens admitted Boston needed to improve its roster to compete with the NBA’s elite teams (New York, San Antonio, Oklahoma City, etc.). A month later, after the Milwaukee Bucks rejected Boston’s bid for Antetokounmpo, Stevens said he wouldn’t “predict the future” when asked whether Brown would remain with the Celtics.

Advertisement

“Jaylen Brown is a big part of us,” Stevens said last Tuesday. “I’m never going to predict the future, but every indication, everything that I think about over the past few years has been building around those guys, right? So obviously, you never know.

“But at the same time, the one thing I want to make very clear is how valued he’s always been. He’s been amazing. He’s been an amazing teammate, a great person to be around. And whether that run ends 10 years from now when he retires, or before, there’s a lot to celebrate. We have a great relationship, an open relationship where we talk about everything. But I don’t want to predict the future.”

George has enjoyed a long and decorated career across stints with the Indiana Pacers, Oklahoma City Thunder, Los Angeles Clippers and 76ers. Over his 16 seasons, he’s averaged 20.5 points, 6.2 rebounds, 3.7 assists and 1.7 steals per game while shooting 44.0% from the field and 38.4% from 3-point range.

The 36-year-old is well past his prime, however, and has struggled to stay on the court, suiting up for more than 60 games just once in the last seven seasons. He played in 37 games this season, missing time for both injuries and a 25-game suspension for violating the NBA’s anti-drug policy.

George did give the Sixers strong minutes during their playoff series against Boston, making 55.0% of his 3-pointers across the seven games. Still, he’s a substantial downgrade from both the Celtics’ original target, two-time NBA MVP Antetokounmpo, and Brown, who is six years younger.

Advertisement

The Celtics will inherit the final two years of George’s contract. He’s set to make $54.1 million this coming season, then has a $56.6 million player option for 2026-27. It was not immediately clear whether Boston plans to move forward with George or flip him in a subsequent trade.

This trade marks the third time in the last four offseasons that the Celtics made major changes to their roster. Ahead of the 2023-24 season, they shipped out Marcus Smart, Robert Williams III and Malcolm Brogdon in trades for Kristaps Porzingis and Jrue Holiday — deals that helped push their Tatum/Brown-led core over the championship hump after years of near misses. Last summer, the Celtics traded Porzingis and Holiday and lost Al Horford and Luke Kornet in free agency to escape the prohibitive second apron of the NBA’s luxury tax. (A subsequent series of in-season trades pushed Boston out of the tax entirely.)

Parting ways with Brown is the boldest swing yet for Stevens.

The 29-year-old (30 in October) was Boston’s longest-tenured player, having joined the C’s as the No. 3 overall pick in the 2016 NBA Draft. He ranks 10th on the franchise’s all-time scoring list — one spot behind Tatum and two behind Bill Russell — and is coming off the best season of his career. Among active players, only Stephen Curry, Draymond Green, Devin Booker, Nikola Jokic and Antetokounmpo have appeared in more games without changing teams.

Brown, whose No. 7 likely will hang in the TD Garden rafters one day, also built a strong connection with the Boston community through his 7uice Foundation, Boston XChange initiative and other philanthropic efforts.

Advertisement

“I love Boston,” he said in a May 6 Twitch stream. “If it were up to me, I would play in Boston for the next 10 years.”

Brown was set to become eligible for a two-year, $140 million contract extension with the Celtics next month. His current deal, which runs through the 2028-29 season, was the richest in NBA history when he signed it in 2023 (five years, $304 million). He is set to make $57.1 million this coming season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pittsburg, PA

Pittsburgh’s Fort Pitt Museum reveals roots of Independence Day

Published

on

Pittsburgh’s Fort Pitt Museum reveals roots of Independence Day


play

Pittsburgh’s Fourth of July traditions are rooted in centuries of American history, and Fort Pitt Museum sits at the heart of that story.

Located in Point State Park at the confluence of the city’s three rivers, the museum traces western Pennsylvania’s pivotal role in the French and Indian War, the American Revolution and the early expansion of the United States.

Advertisement

An exhibit you don’t want to miss

Inside, the “Pittsburgh’s Revolution” exhibit spotlights how this frontier outpost helped shape the Revolutionary War and the push for independence. Rare artifacts, detailed maps and personal stories walk visitors through a time when control of Fort Pitt meant control of the West, giving colonists a crucial foothold in the struggle against British rule. The exhibit also emphasizes the diverse communities at the Point, including soldiers, Indigenous nations, traders and settlers, whose lives intersected in ways that still echo in Pittsburgh’s identity today.

For modern visitors, the museum offers an immersive experience that connects familiar July 4 images with the realities of life on the 18th‑century frontier. Families can explore galleries that explain how supplies moved through Pittsburgh to support the Continental Army, how diplomacy unfolded with Native nations, and how everyday people navigated a world in conflict. It turns Independence Day from a single date on the calendar into an ongoing story that started along these rivers and radiated outward.

As America marks the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Fort Pitt’s “Fourth at the Fort” programming brings that history into the present with flag ceremonies, living history encampments and hands‑on activities in Point State Park.

Advertisement

For Pittsburghers looking to go beyond fireworks, a visit to Fort Pitt Museum offers a reminder that Independence Day here is not only about celebration, but about standing on the ground where American history was made.

This article by Gabby Sartori was created with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Immigrant advocates urge Connecticut to prepare after Supreme Court TPS ruling

Published

on

Immigrant advocates urge Connecticut to prepare after Supreme Court TPS ruling


Immigrant advocates in Connecticut are calling on state leaders to prepare for the possible loss of legal protections for thousands of people after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can move forward with ending Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, for Haitians and Syrians.

TPS is a federal program that allows people from countries facing war, natural disasters or other extraordinary conditions to live and work legally in the United States. The Trump administration has argued that conditions in some countries have improved enough that the protections are no longer necessary.

For organizations that work with immigrants, however, the ruling has triggered fear and uncertainty.

“The Haitian community, in particular, is reeling,” said Maggie Mitchell-Salem, executive director of Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services, commonly known as IRIS.

Advertisement

Mitchell-Salem said the number of Syrians affected by the decision is much smaller than the number of Haitians nationwide, but she argued that the impact goes beyond statistics. Her organization has led resettlement efforts for Syrian refugees in Connecticut since the federal government offered TPS status amid the Syrian civil war in 2012.

“Numbers don’t matter,” she said. “A single person being impacted by inhumane racist immigration policies is a person who’s impacted, and we should care.”

A community preparing for uncertainty

Mitchell-Salem said immigrant advocacy groups and local officials are already discussing how to help families who could face difficult decisions if the Trump administration decides to end TPS protections.

Among the biggest concerns are families that could be separated if parents lose their legal status or face deportation.

“We’re working with municipalities, with any community leaders that we can, who are coming up with plans on what to do to help individuals here,” she said.

Advertisement

She urged families whose immigration status may be at risk to create preparedness plans and designate trusted relatives or friends who could care for children if necessary.

The state of Connecticut has one on their website,” she said. “We urge everyone who has a family situation that is no longer stable to fill that out.”

Looking to Massachusetts as a model

Mitchell-Salem said Connecticut should consider following the example set by Massachusetts leaders, who responded to the Supreme Court ruling by holding a press conference, reassuring TPS holders of their rights, announcing legal clinics and creating an emergency response fund.

“What I think is beautiful about what Massachusetts did is that it signaled you are valued, you are part of our community, and we care about you,” she said. “For that, I would love to see Connecticut do something similar.”

At the same time, she cautioned that there are limits to what states can do if federal protections ultimately end.

Advertisement

“I think the state of Connecticut is right to really think about what remedies are truly possible,” Mitchell-Salem said.

Warning against scams

Mitchell-Salem said one of her organization’s biggest concerns is that desperate immigrants could become targets for fraud.

“What we’re most concerned about is that because people will be so desperate that there are those that will take advantage of them,” she said.

IRIS has been posting information in English, Haitian Creole and Arabic warning immigrants that there are “no magic solutions” and encouraging them to seek advice only from trusted legal organizations and immigration attorneys.

A call to action

Mitchell-Salem said the Supreme Court’s decision should prompt action not only from government officials but also from the public.

Advertisement

“Flood congressional phone banks, call Congress every single day, tell them what you think,” she said. “Get your friends in states that are less blue than Connecticut to do the same.”

She said public pressure has altered the course of other administration policies and could again influence federal immigration decisions.

“This isn’t an issue that’s just a blip that’s going to go away,” Mitchell-Salem said.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending