Entertainment
Opinion: ‘All the President’s Men’ is 50 years old. A former Post staffer tells us why that matters
“All the President’s Men” was released 50 years ago this month, an anniversary that’s been greeted with equal parts rue and reverence by the journalists, political junkies and discerning cinephiles who have worshiped the film for five decades.
As a member of all three of those constituencies, I’ve done my share of genuflecting, most recently as chief film critic at the Washington Post, whose city room was as vivid and fully realized in the movie as Robert Redford’s Bob Woodward and Dustin Hoffman’s Carl Bernstein.
Like so many Posties of my generation, I’ll never forget the so-real-it’s-surreal experience of walking into the fifth-floor newsroom for the first time in 2002. By then, standard-issue electric typewriters and six-ply carbon paper had been replaced by far less visually interesting computers. But the office’s pervading atmosphere of hard work and quiet focus felt uncannily similar to its big-screen analog.
For the last two years, I have been researching a book about the making of “All the President’s Men,” whose production involved almost as many contingencies and unresolved questions as Watergate itself. Among the film’s many mysteries, one I’ve found particularly intriguing has to do with Katharine Graham, publisher of the Washington Post and CEO of its parent company during the Watergate investigations. As the movie amply demonstrates, it took guts for Woodward and Bernstein to persevere with their reporting in the face of terrified sources and their own growing paranoia. But, unbeknownst to many observers at the time, Graham was enduring even more withering pressures, with determination that was all the more impressive for being almost entirely invisible.
I’m still in the process of discovering why she remained invisible in “All the President’s Men.” For now, it’s clear that the backstory is more nuanced than mere oversight or, as many are quick to assume, simple sexism.
In fact, William Goldman’s first script of the film featured a sequence with Graham and Woodward, a scene that appeared in every subsequent draft. Based on an actual meeting between the two, it’s a cagey game of cat-and-mouse, with the publisher taking the measure of a nervous, still-inexperienced journalist, looking for reassurance that his reporting will prove out.
Earlier this year, at a January staged reading of “All the President’s Men” at Harmony Gold Theater in Hollywood — a fundraiser for the Stella Adler Academy — it was possible for fans to conjure what might have been. Mark Ruffalo played Woodward and Ethan Hawke played Bernstein in a version of the movie assembled from different Goldman drafts.
A high point of the evening was when Ruffalo and actor Susan Traylor brought the Graham-Woodward scene to tentative, tense and teasingly playful life. After grilling Woodward about his sources and coyly asking him about Deep Throat’s identity, Traylor’s Graham asked him if the truth about Watergate would ever be revealed. “It may never come out,” Ruffalo’s Woodward replied. “Don’t tell me ‘never,’” Graham laments, before bringing the meeting to a close with a gently peremptory “Do better.”
In poring over director Alan J. Pakula and Goldman’s papers, I’ve probably read that scene dozens of times. But when I heard it play out in real time, I was ambushed by the emotions it stirred — a mixture of pride in Graham’s legacy and deep sadness at how that legacy has been so inexplicably ignored in recent years.
I was also sad that Redford, who died in September, wasn’t there. He often expressed regret that Graham wasn’t a featured character in “All the President’s Men.” Keenly aware of how her spine and steadfastness made Woodward and Bernstein’s work possible, he wanted to honor that crucial support. When I interviewed him for the first time in 2005, he insisted that fearless owners were every bit as important in preserving democracy as the reporters he and Hoffman helped glamorize.
Over the next two decades, every time I saw Redford, he bemoaned the “downward slide of this thing,” by which he meant the constellation of institutions “All the President’s Men” celebrates: not just journalism and a robust First Amendment but a Washington where investigators, prosecutors, judges, the Senate and Congress did their jobs regardless of partisan loyalties, and a Hollywood where a studio as mainstream as Warner Bros. would agree to finance a tough-minded film about a contentious and still-raw period in recent history.
Granted, that film was based on a bestselling book and anchored by two huge stars. But today, with political and corporate leaders — including media companies — falling over each other to curry favor with President Trump, “All the President’s Men” feels like an artifact from a vanished age.
Nowhere is this more distressingly true than at the Post itself, where the newsroom immortalized by the movie has been slashed by more than a third, and where Jeff Bezos, who bought the paper in 2013, seems intent on erasing Katharine Graham’s legacy until it vanishes completely. During the first Trump administration, Bezos stood up to threats against the Post and the press at large that would make Nixon blush, or at least pea-green with envy.
Now, Bezos has become a one-man meme of what author Timothy Snyder calls “obedience in advance,” quashing an endorsement of Kamala Harris, ostentatiously grinning his way through Trump’s second inauguration, vastly overpaying for a promotional film about First Lady Melania Trump and staying conspicuously mum (at least publicly) when a Post reporter’s home was raided by the FBI in January.
All of this has come at an enormous moral and material cost, with thousands of readers canceling their subscriptions and an alarming number of the Post’s finest reporters and writers leaving for other publications and platforms. As my former boss Marty Baron told my former colleague Ruth Marcus in the New Yorker in February, Bezos’ turnaround has been “sickening” to witness: “a case study in near-instant, self-inflicted brand destruction.”
Of course, that brand was built, in no small part, by “All the President’s Men,” which taught a generation how to walk, talk, dress and act like real reporters. (Hint: A good corduroy jacket and a pen in your mouth can’t hurt.)
In 1976, Pakula was interviewed about his dealings with Graham, whom he admired tremendously and with whom he would become close friends. “I could do a film about the Katharine Graham story,” he enthused. “It’s a superb story.”
Thirty years later, Steven Spielberg would bring Pakula’s idea to fruition with “The Post,” about Graham’s decision to publish the Pentagon Papers, a dress rehearsal for the even higher stakes of Watergate a year later.
“The Post,” which starred Meryl Streep in a shrewdly judged performance of aristocratic assurance and creeping insecurity, premiered in Washington less than a year into Trump’s first administration. Bezos attended that screening, which many of us saw as tacit acknowledgment that he was taking her lessons in character, comportment and competence to heart.
That was clearly wishful thinking. Graham may have finally assumed her rightful place in the newspaper-movie canon, but we’re still left to ponder her absence from the most iconic journalism movie of the 20th century.
It’s no longer the shoe-leather reporters who need a big-screen tutorial in how to do their jobs. It’s their bosses. A simple place to start would be to memorize the best two-word speech to never appear in a major motion picture: Do better.
Ann Hornaday was a film critic at the Washington Post from 2002 to 2025, when she retired. “All the President’s Men” plays at TCM Classic Film Festival Saturday at 2:45 p.m.
Movie Reviews
1986 Movie Reviews – Blue City, Jo Jo Dancer, No Retreat No Surrender, and Saving Grace | The Nerdy
Welcome to an exciting year-long project here at The Nerdy. 1986 was an exciting year for films giving us a lot of films that would go on to be beloved favorites and cult classics. It was also the start to a major shift in cultural and societal norms, and some of those still reverberate to this day.
We’re going to pick and choose which movies we hit, but right now the list stands at nearly four dozen.
Yes, we’re insane, but 1986 was that great of a year for film.
The articles will come out – in most cases – on the same day the films hit theaters in 1986 so that it is their true 40th anniversary. All films are also watched again for the purposes of these reviews and are not being done from memory. In some cases, it truly will be the first time we’ve seen them.
This time around, it’s May 2, 1986, and we’re off to see Blue City, Jo Jo Dancer, No Retreat No Surrender, and Saving Grace.
Blue City
As thrillers go… this is one of them.
Billy Turner (Judd Nelson) returns home to Blue City, Florida and immediately learns his father was killed. He sets about trying to solve his father’s murder and reunites with some old friends to help him on his mission.
Awful. Simply awful.
Billy seems to be some sort of copy of Axel Foley from Beverly Hills Cop, and any time he talks about his father’s death it seems like an afterthought.
Add in he hooks up with Annie (Ally Sheedy), the younger sister of his friend Joey (David Caruso), and neither of them seem all that bothered after Joey gets killed, you really have no idea who these characters are.
It’s a very confused film and no one seems to know exactly what tone they are going for.
Jo Jo Dancer, Your Life Is Calling
A surprisingly intimate reflection at one’s own shortcomings after one of the most public falls in history.
Jo Jo Dancer (Richard Pryor) suffers a horrible accident after freebasing cocaine, and he uses his time in the hospital to reflect on his life and what led him to this moment in time.
Yes, it is the world’s most thinly veiled look back at one’s life. Pryor famously was horrifically burned while taking drugs, and this was his way of coming back into the public eye.
It certainly is not a perfect film, but it is engaging and touching. It feels like a man who truly wanted to explore his own past and didn’t know any way to do it than through what he always knew, entertaining people.
A surprisingly candid look at one’s own life and allowing the world to take the journey with him.
No Retreat, No Surrender
Have you ever watched a movie so bad you wish it would punch you through the screen to put you out of your misery?
Jason Stillwell (Kurt McKinney) relocates to Seattle after his father’s dojo in Sherman Oaks, California is taken over by an organized crime syndicate takes it by force. Their plan? To take over every dojo in the country.
… do I need to tell you anything else about the ‘plot?’ This movie was beyond awful and I think the only reason it still exists in any form is it shows off a very young Jean-Claude Van Damme.
This is one of the worst movies I’ve seen in some time, and that’s saying a lot.
Saving Grace
It’s nice to be surprised by a movie, and it rarely happens twice in the same week.
Cardinal Bellini (Tom Conti) becomes Pop Leo XIV. After a year in the position, he gets locked out of the Vatican accidentally and decides to take the moment to reconnect with the average people. He goes to a little village he was aware of and helps them rebuild their aqueduct. Not only does he have that to contend with, but the local hoodlum, Ciolino (Edward James Olmos) doesn’t want him to succeed as he makes his money from everyone depending on him.
Yes, the fact that the fictional Pope is Leo XIV wasn’t lost on me while I was watching it.
It’s not a great movie, but I found myself engaged, and charmed by Conti’s performance. I’m not quite sure why Olmos was playing a rural Italian, but it is what it is.
It’s a charming and heartwarming film, and certainly will keep you entertained.
1986 Movie Reviews will continue on May 9, 2026, with Dangerously Close, Fire with Fire, Last Resort, and Short Circuit.
A child sexual assault case filed against Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler will proceed to trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
The singer is accused of grooming, sexually assaulting and impregnating 16-year-old Julia Misley in the 1970s. The suit, first filed in 2022 in Torrance, claims he “used his role, status, and power as a well-known musician and rock star” to exploit Misley. The complaint also argues Tyler admitted to the alleged crimes in his own memoir, “Does the Noise in My Head Bother You?,” where he refers to her as his “teen bride.”
Earlier this week, a judge dismissed most of the case, citing the statute of limitations in Massachusetts, where the pair lived during their three-year relationship. But they allegedly crossed state lines while Tyler toured the country with his band, including to California, according to the complaint. Because of California’s Child Victims Act — a 2020 statute that allowed a “lookback window” where alleged victims can file lawsuits regardless of a statute of limitations — a portion of the case will still be tried.
“This is a massive win for Steven Tyler. Today, the Court has dismissed with prejudice 99.9% of the claims against Mr. Tyler in this case,” Tyler’s lawyer, David Long-Daniels, said in a statement to The Times. “The court has decided that only one night, 50-plus years ago, out of a three-year relationship is allowed to remain.”
New York has a similar statute that was recently employed by singer Casandra “Cassie” Ventura in her case against Sean Combs. She filed a sex-trafficking and sexual assault lawsuit against the music mogul in 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, just days before the expiration of a lookback window.
The lawsuit against Tyler, who previously appeared as a judge on “American Idol,” claims he and Misley first met at an Aerosmith concert in 1973. According to the document, he “performed various acts of criminal sexual conduct upon Plaintiff that night.” At the time, Tyler was in his mid-20s and Julia was 16.
The alleged encounter was the first of many, the lawsuit claims. In 1974, Tyler was named Misley’s legal guardian and took her on tour with the band.
According to the complaint, he described the nature of the relationship in his 2011 memoir, writing, “She was 16, she knew how to nasty … with my bad self being twenty-six and she barely old enough to drive and sexy as hell, I just fell madly in love with her. … She was my heart’s desire, my partner in crimes of passion. … I was so in love I almost took a teen bride. I went and slept at her parent’s house for a couple of nights and her parent’s fell in love with me, signed paper over for me to have custody, so I wouldn’t get arrested if I took her out of state. I took her on tour with me.”
The lawsuit also describes Misley’s alleged pregnancy with Tyler’s child, which ended in a “pressured” abortion.
In previous court documents, Tyler has denied the allegations and attempted to get the case dismissed.
“This reflects years of resilience and courage by Ms. Misley, driven by an unwavering pursuit of truth and justice. It is time for justice and for Tyler to be held accountable by a jury,” Misley’s attorney, Jeff Anderson, said in a statement.
The trial is scheduled for August.
2/5
02 Hrs 41 Mins | Action Thriller | 30-04-2026
Cast – Dhanush, Mamitha Baiju, K. S. Ravikumar, Karunas, Jayaram, Prithvi Rajan, Suraj Venjaramoodu, Sreeja Ravi, M. S. Bhaskar, Aadukalam Naren and others
Director – Vignesh Raja
Producer – Ishari K. Ganesh
Banner – Vels Film International & Think Studios
Music – G. V. Prakash Kumar
Dhanush is one of those very few lead actors in India currently who are completing films at a quick pace and releasing them in theatres. He released three films(i.e. Kuberaa, Idli Kadai & Tere Ishk Mein) last year and is set to release at least three films this year as well. For his first film in 2026, he teamed up with director Vignesh Raja and made an intense action thriller, Kara. Vignesh Raja’s last film, Por Thozhil, did extremely well. It was one of those very rare films which worked both critically and commercially.
When a film in the combination of Dhanush and Vignesh Raja was announced, the expectations among the audience around the film skyrocketed and the buzz around the film went up further when, Mamitha Baiju, was announced as the female lead in the film. After creating enough curiosity among the audience with the trailer, the film was released in theatres today. Did the director, Vignesh Raja, come up with an engaging film yet again? Did Dhanush score a blockbuster with, Kara? How did Dhanush & Mamitha Baiju, pair look on screen? Did G. V. Prakash Kumar, come up with a memorable album yet again for a film starring, Dhanush? Let’s figure it out with a detailed analysis.
What is it about?
A good Samaritan father(K. S. Ravikumar) based out of a remote village in Tamilnadu, fights against a bank which manipulated him and his fellow villagers and grabbed their land. The son(Dhanush) who earlier ran away from his family to start a business, returns to his village to sell his family’s farming land and start a hotel in a town. What happens when the son returns to his village? Forms the rest of the story.
Performances:
The role of Karasaami aka Kara is tailor-made for Dhanush. We have seen him doing similar roles multiple times in the past. There’s nothing special in the performance he delivered for Kara. It’s just a standard template-driven performance. Mamitha Baiju is a surprise package. She did a role which is a complete contrast to the usual youthful and joyful roles she played in her earlier films. She got a very limited role in the film but she delivered a very good performance in whatever screentime she had.
K. S. Ravikumar in the role of Kandhasaami, delivered his career-best performance. As a loving father, he did a superb job in emotional sequences. The film had many notable actors and almost all of them performed well but their efforts were undone by poor writing and aimless direction.
Technicalities:
Just like most of the Tamil movies, Kara, too has stunning visuals. The cinematographer, Theni Eswar, captured the raw and rustic rural Tamilnadu, very well with his camera throughout the film. G. V. Prakash Kumar, tried his best to lift the lifeless sequences with his background score but it did not work. Editing by Sreejith Sarang, could have been much better. At least twenty minutes of the film could have been easily edited to make it at least a bit better. Especially, the second half of the film drags on forever. Let’s talk about the writer and director’s, Alfred Prakash & Vignesh Raja, work in detail in the analysis section.
Positives:
1. K. S. Ravikumar’s Performance
Negatives:
1. Beaten to Death Storyline
2. Bland Screenplay
3. Poor Writing & Direction
4. Lengthy Runtime
Analysis:
Movie Name – Idli Kadai
Release Date – 01st October 2025
Story Line – A good samaritan father based out of a remote village in Tamilnadu runs a hotel and expects his son to continue his legacy by running the hotel after he passes away. But, he wants to move to the city and have a better life. After the father passes away, the son realises his mistake, shifts base to the village, reopens his father’s hotel and continues running it.
And, now
Movie Name – Kara
Release Date – 30th April 2026
Story Line – A good Samaritan father based out of a remote village in Tamilnadu, fights against a bank which manipulated him and his fellow villagers and grabbed their land. The estranged son returns to the village to sell the land and use that money to open a hotel in a town. After his father passes away, the son realises his mistake and fights against the bank and eventually gets the villagers’ land documents from the bank.
Both the storylines sound similar, don’t they? While watching, Kara, it is not your fault if you start to wonder why in the world, Dhanush, agreed to do two films with similar storylines consecutively. The only difference between the two films is that in, Idli Kadai, the son runs the hotel to fulfil his father’s wish and in, Kara, the son turns into Robin Hood to fulfil his father’s wish. At least, Idli Kadai, for a major part was truthful to its family drama genre. But, Kara, ended up becoming neither a family drama nor an action thriller.
The director, Vignesh Raja, previously crafted a gripping crime thriller, Por Thozhil, which keeps audiences on the edge of their seats throughout its runtime. Once again, while watching Kara, it’s not your fault if you begin to wonder whether it is the same director behind both films. It was surprising to see Vignesh Raja and his writer, Alfred Prakash, coming up with such a bland and unexciting screenplay. The writing of heist episodes and the way they were executed were laughable to say the least. There was not even a single sequence in the film which was written and executed intelligently. The Robin Hood-like hero will not have any plan to rob the bank branches. All he does is to wear a mask, step inside the branch, threaten the bank employees with a gun and rob the branches one after the other. How did the director convince Dhanush to do the film with such a bland screenplay? What was Dhanush thinking while accepting the film? There will be at least a few good episodes even in the bad films of Dhanush but Kara is an exception. There is not even a single sequence throughout the film that excites the audience.
Overall, Kara is a forgettable film from Dhanush and Vignesh Raja. The beaten-to-death storyline, boring screenplay, unexciting narration and lengthy runtime, made it a painful watch. At least the first half was watchable but the film lost the track completely in the second half and tests patience with each passing minutes. Apart from a brilliant performance from K. S. Ravikumar, the film offers nothing and is sure to become one of the biggest flops in Dhanush’s career.
Bottomline – Boring Heist
Rating – 2/5
Related
Tags Kara Kara Review
-
Lifestyle21 minutes agoThe Head-Turning Hats of the 2026 Kentucky Derby
-
Technology33 minutes agoMeta’s historic loss in court could cost a lot more than $375 million
-
World39 minutes agoMay Day protests across Europe and Asia turn into anti-American, anti-Israel political battlegrounds
-
Politics45 minutes agoAbortion pill fight heads to Supreme Court as manufacturer warns of ‘chaos’ after ruling
-
Health51 minutes agoFaith drives man to help another through mental health crisis in dramatic life-or-death scene
-
Sports57 minutes agoBeloved racer Alex Zanardi, who turned tragedy into Paralympic triumph, dead at 59
-
Technology1 hour agoDIY identity protection vs paid services: What works in 2026
-
Business1 hour ago
Spirit Airlines prepares to shut down without a government bailout
