Connect with us

New Jersey

Education advocates praise boosted school aid, but some worry over cuts – New Jersey Monitor

Published

on

Education advocates praise boosted school aid, but some worry over cuts – New Jersey Monitor


Lawmakers on the Senate Finances Committee heard reward Thursday for Gov. Phil Murphy’s plan to spice up state faculty support, however in addition they heard acquainted complaints about how adjustments to New Jersey’s faculty funding components impacted some districts.

The governor’s $48.9 billion price range proposal, introduced in March, offers for an additional $650 million in state funding for colleges, boosting the overall state faculty support to greater than $19 billion, or roughly 39% of all proposed spending.

“With a rise of $650 million in components support, the overwhelming majority of our members — lots of whom have been chronically underfunded for manner too lengthy — are on their strategy to ultimately getting the assets to which they’re entitled,” Jonathan Pushman, director of presidency relations for the New Jersey College Boards Affiliation, advised the Senate panel.

Nonetheless, he warned, colleges that misplaced state funding when Murphy signed a 2018 regulation rebalancing New Jersey’s 2008 faculty funding components might face additional cuts except the state boosts stabilization support to such districts.

Advertisement

The 2018 regulation instantly eradicated enrollment caps that stored underfunded districts from receiving their full tranche of state support and commenced drawing down support to overfunded districts. These reductions are set to finish in fiscal yr 2025.

Lawmakers accredited $50 million in stabilization support within the present yr’s price range to defray the affect on districts shedding components support, however Murphy’s proposal for fiscal yr 2023 cuts that all the way down to $20 million.

Pushman urged the senators to maintain that funding stage within the coming fiscal yr.

Winners and losers

Whereas the funding components adjustments boosted support to roughly two-thirds of the state’s 600 faculty districts, different districts noticed their allotments fall, and a few faculty officers on Thursday once more urged lawmakers to go off these cuts.

“Toms River Faculties college students want your assist. I don’t understand how rather more we are able to reduce,” stated Anna Polozzo, a Toms River Regional College Board member. “New Jersey scholar studying requirements and schooling laws demand we educate extra every year. The scholars aren’t getting the schooling the legislature meant and that they deserve, whereas the adults scrap over who can pay. I don’t need to scrap over who can pay.”

Advertisement

Polozzo’s district — which educates college students from Toms River, South Toms River, Pine Seaside, and Beachwood — was an overfunded district whose state support fell from practically $67 million within the 2017-2018 faculty yr to $45.4 million within the 2022-2023 faculty yr.

Polozzo urged lawmakers to assist a invoice that will create a activity drive to look at the state’s funding components. The Senate unanimously handed that invoice in February, nevertheless it has but to advance within the Meeting.

The state did approve $7.6 million in stabilization support for Toms River Regional Faculties in October, however that approval got here too late for the funds for use within the present faculty yr.

Polozzo didn’t blame Murphy or former President Steve Sweeney, the architect of the components’s 2018 rebalancing, noting the district had seen cuts in most years of the final decade.

Is 2% sufficient?

Officers within the district have raised faculty levies as much as the state’s 2% cap to defray the impacts of lowered state support. Since 2011, New Jersey has restricted annual property tax hikes to 2%. That cap might be exceeded in few circumstances or when voters approve.

Advertisement

That cap poses an issue for the regional faculty district. Although Toms River has the second largest tax base within the state, second solely to Jersey Metropolis, its tax charges are decrease than they’re in 70% of the state’s municipalities, in accordance with Division of Neighborhood Affairs knowledge.

Toms River, which has the very best faculty levy of the district’s 4 municipalities, has a faculty levy price of 1.238, decrease than 408 of New Jersey’s 565 municipalities. The statewide common faculty levy price is 1.462.

(Three New Jersey municipalities didn’t gather faculty taxes in fiscal yr 2021.)

Together with the three different cities within the regional district, 396 municipalities have a better whole tax price than Toms River. The district additionally has three excessive colleges, which drive up prices.

It’s as much as the cities to boost extra money to succeed in funding adequacy. However the 2% cap, which has confirmed profitable at slowing the expansion of property tax charges in New Jersey, might make that inconceivable, Pushman stated, particularly as exterior financial elements push prices upward.

Advertisement

“Extra broad cap flexibility, even when momentary, can be helpful to all districts as they fight to deal with inflationary pressures, provide chain points, and rising gasoline prices,” he stated. “Whereas the two% cap has been an efficient software at controlling property tax development, because it was enacted, we now have not skilled the kind of value will increase that would drive districts to make troublesome cuts to essential employees and packages.”

It’s unclear if the governor would assist a invoice giving leeway on the two% cap.

In 2020, he vetoed a measure that will have allowed districts that have been seeing formula-based support reductions and spending beneath sufficient ranges exceed the two% cap and not using a poll measure, blaming its breakneck passage through the lame-duck session.

It’s additionally unclear whether or not the legislature would approve such a invoice. It may very well be seen as a tax hike, and that will undercut the affordability message legislative Democrats adopted after 2021’s elections.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Jersey

Authorities Debunk Viral Explanation for NJ Drone Sightings

Published

on

Authorities Debunk Viral Explanation for NJ Drone Sightings


U.S. News

The drones spotted over the Garden State were probably not looking for a missing shipment of radioactive material.

Newsday LLC/Newsday via Getty Images
Zachary Folk

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

N.J. weighs making underage gambling no longer a crime, but subject to a fine

Published

on

N.J. weighs making underage gambling no longer a crime, but subject to a fine


Should underage gambling no longer be a crime?

New Jersey lawmakers are considering changing the law to make gambling by people under the age of 21 no longer punishable under criminal law, making it subject to a fine.

It also would impose fines on anyone helping an underage person gamble in New Jersey.

The bill changes the penalties for underage gambling from that of a disorderly persons offense to a civil offense. Fines would be $500 for a first offense, $1,000 for a second offense, and $2,000 for any subsequent offenses.

Advertisement

The money would be used for prevention, education, and treatment programs for compulsive gambling, such as those provided by the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey.

“The concern I had initially was about reducing the severity of the punishment,” said Assemblyman Don Guardian, a Republican former mayor of Atlantic City. “But the fact that all the money will go to problem gambling treatment programs changed my mind.”

Figures on underage gambling cases were not immediately available Thursday. But numerous people involved in gambling treatment and recovery say a growing number of young people are becoming involved in gambling, particularly sports betting as the activity spreads around the country.

The bill was approved by an Assembly committee and now goes to the full Assembly for a vote. It must pass both houses of the Legislature before going to the desk of the state’s Democratic governor, Phil Murphy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

New Jersey lawmakers will consider new tighter oversight rules on charter schools in 2025

Published

on

New Jersey lawmakers will consider new tighter oversight rules on charter schools in 2025


TRENTON — State officials are considering new rules that could impose greater oversight on New Jersey’s 86 charter schools after a year of increased scrutiny from media outlets and politicians.

The state’s Senate Education Committee heard testimony Monday from experts who urged lawmakers to ensure that existing oversight laws were enforced and, in some cases, to write new laws requiring more public disclosure and oversight in regard to spending and administrator salaries.

“Clearly, there’s some work to be done,” said state Sen. Paul Sarlo of the 36th Legislative District, which represents 11 municipalities in Bergen and Passaic counties. “There are some bad actors out there.”

The legislators cited a series of reports from NJ.com and other media outlets that took aim at charter schools’ high administrator salaries, allegations of nepotism, and accusations that some former school leaders personally profited from their positions. The Asbury Park Press also scrutinized a charter network with campuses in Asbury Park and Neptune.

Advertisement

Deborah Cornavaca, director of policy for the New Jersey Education Association, the state’s largest teachers’ union, urged legislators to establish a task force to review numerous impacts of charter schools, to require more transparency and add disclosure rules for charter schools.

“When we see things that are going wrong… it is incumbent upon us to make sure that taxpayer dollars are being responsibly spent and that the students… are the priority of where the money is going,” Cornavaca said.

Harry Lee, president of the New Jersey Charter Schools Association, said that a majority of these publicly funded schools, which serve about 63,000 students, are not skirting rules, but are rather giving parents in low-income communities access to high-quality education. The schools are also improving academic outcomes for many of New Jersey’s Black and brown students, he said.

“In middle school, charter school students overall are outperforming the state average in reading, despite serving twice as many low-income students,” he said before the Senate Education Committee on Monday. “The longer you stay in a charter school, the more likely you will be able to read at grade level.”

Advertisement

While charter schools are given more flexibility than traditional district-based schools to educate at-need students, they also use taxpayer money in their mission. Yet, charter schools are not held to all the same oversight rules and regulations that district public schools must follow, according to critics.

“It is a privilege, not a right, to operate a charter school in New Jersey, and there are simply higher expectations (for positive academic results),” said Lee. “We stand by that, and we agree that there should be accountability for schools that aren’t doing the right thing.”

The flexibility given to charter schools is why they are succeeding where nearby traditional districts are not, he said. Many charter schools have adopted longer school days and a longer school year to achieve results, he said.

When charter schools fail to meet their educational missions, they are closed, Lee said.

“That is the ultimate accountability,” he added.

Advertisement

Since 2020, four schools have closed, surrendered their charter, or not had their charter contract renewed, according to the state Department of Education.

One of the charter schools that has faced criticism in the press is College Achieve Public Schools, which has sites in Asbury Park and Neptune. Michael Piscal, CEO and founder of the charter school group, made $516,084 in the 2022-23 school year, according to filings obtained through GuideStar, an organization that provides information about American nonprofit organizations.

Piscal also made an additional $279,431 in compensation that year from the school and related organizations, according to the tax documents.

For comparison, the average school superintendent pay in New Jersey was $187,737 last year, according to state Department of Education records.

Advertisement

A representative of College Achieve told the Press that administrative salaries have since between reduced.

State Sen. Vin Gopal, who chairs the Senate Education Committee, said he expected amendments to New Jersey’s charter school law to be proposed sometime in 2025.

“There needs to be more accountability on how that (charter school) money is spent,” he said.

Amanda Oglesby is an Ocean County native who covers education and the environment. She has worked for the Press for more than 16 years. Reach her at @OglesbyAPP, aoglesby@gannettnj.com or 732-557-5701.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending