Connect with us

Maine

Maine Voices: Inaction on gun safety takes teachers’ breath away

Published

on

Maine Voices: Inaction on gun safety takes teachers’ breath away


‘Breathe” we inform ourselves as we drive to our instructing jobs filled with concern and heartache as soon as once more over one more mass capturing. “Breathe” we inform ourselves as we watch fellow lecturers strolling into faculty with heavy hearts understanding they should faux all is effectively but once more to be able to help their college students.

“Breathe“ was the recommendation for a primary yr instructor who sat in tears questioning how she’s going to pull herself collectively right this moment so she will help her college students. Veteran lecturers are going about their day after one other tragic faculty capturing, questioning if they’ve missed psychological well being clues from their college students and achieved sufficient to help all college students, however class is beginning. Breathe …

We’re writing on behalf of a bunch of educators from RSU 5, the varsity district for Durham, Freeport and Pownal. We will now not breathe this away. We now have so many feelings working by our our bodies, anger, frustration, deep unhappiness and helplessness. As civil servants we fear about sharing opinions publicly. Lecturers hesitate to share the way it feels every morning as we unlock the classroom door, double checking that it’s locked in case of an intruder. Lecturers by no means share the way it feels to follow energetic shooter drills with a category, asking our college students to crouch within the nook whereas studying to them hoping to “normalize” a code pink drill.

We don’t hear from lecturers who’ve sat with a toddler, attempting to appease and luxury them, guaranteeing that they’re protected, when the instructor is just not certain themselves. Lecturers don’t share how troublesome it’s to work with households who can’t discover therapists and sources for his or her youngsters. We don’t hear how lecturers really feel when politicians suppose the answer is to arm educators. What has gone unsuitable with our society that arming educators is even an possibility?

Advertisement

We don’t hear lecturers sharing how indignant we’re that politicians don’t make changes to our gun coverage to permit background checks and restrict the sale of semi-automatic weapons. Lecturers watch politicians getting big donations from the NRA and different organizations that blindly help gun rights whereas doing nothing to guard our kids. Lecturers don’t share the way it feels to hear as soon as once more to politicians sending condolences whereas supporting legal guidelines that enable an 18-year-old to buy assault rifles.

What sort of nation are we when our elected leaders inform us that the reply to this violence is to “harden” the faculties, but any gun reform is a nonstarter. Are we going to “harden” each grocery store, church and movie show? How have we change into a rustic that cares extra about a person’s gun rights than defending the individuals?

It’s time that individuals hear from the lecturers who’re on the entrance strains with the youngsters. We wish to be very clear that lecturers are heartbroken for each baby who has been murdered, we’re afraid for our personal faculty neighborhood’s security, we’re exhausted by the mindless acts of violence, and we’re indignant. There have been 27 faculty shootings this yr alone. Horrifically, on the time of this writing, there have been an extra 18 mass shootings within the U.S. for the reason that Uvalde murders. How do you hear this and never take motion? Lecturers will likely be at school tomorrow, they are going to put aside their private feelings round these tragedies, and they’re going to do what is true for the youngsters. When will our elected officers do what is true for the youngsters?

For now, all we will do is breathe …

— Particular to the Telegram

Advertisement

Use the shape under to reset your password. If you’ve submitted your account electronic mail, we’ll ship an electronic mail with a reset code.

« Earlier

Subsequent »

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen

Published

on

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen


Maine Department of Marine Resources Commissioner Patrick Keliher said “f— you” to a man during a Thursday meeting at which fishermen assailed him for a state plan to raise the size limit for lobster.

The heated exchange came on the same day that Keliher withdrew the proposal, which came in response to limits from regional regulators concerned with data showing a 35 percent decrease in lobster population in the state’s biggest fishing area.

It comes on the heels of fights between the storied fishery and the federal government over proposed restrictions on fishing gear that are intended to preserve the population of endangered whales off the East Coast. It was alleviated by a six-year pause on new whale rules negotiated in 2022 by Gov. Janet Mills and the state’s congressional delegation.

“I think this is the right thing to do because the future of the industry is at stake for a lot of different reasons,” Keliher told the fishermen of his now-withdrawn change at a meeting in Augusta on Thursday evening, according to a video posted on Facebook.

Advertisement

After crosstalk from the crowd, Keliher implored them to listen to him. Then, a man yelled that they don’t have to listen to him because the commission “sold out” to federal regulators and Canada.

“F— you, I sold out,” Keliher yelled, prompting an angry response from the fishermen.

“That’s nice. Foul language in the meeting. Good for you. That’s our commissioner,” a man shouted back.

Keliher apologized to the crowd shortly after making the remark and will try to talk with the man he directed the profanity to, department spokesperson Jeff Nichols said. The commissioner issued a Friday statement saying the remarks came as a result of his passion for the industry and criticisms of his motives that he deemed unfair, he said.

“I remain dedicated to working in support of this industry and will continue to strengthen the relationships and build the trust necessary to address the difficult and complex tasks that lay ahead,” Keliher said.

Advertisement

Spokespeople for Gov. Janet Mills did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether she has spoken to Keliher about his remarks.

Lobstermen pushed back in recent meetings against the state’s plan, challenging the underlying data. Now, fishermen can keep lobsters that measure 3.25 inches from eye socket to tail. The proposal would have raised that limit by 1/16 of an inch and would have been the first time the limit was raised in decades.

The department pulled the limit pending a new stock survey, a move that U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine’s 2nd District, hailed in a news release that called the initial proposal “an unnecessary overreaction to questionable stock data.”

Keliher is Maine’s longest-serving commissioner. He has held his job since former Gov. Paul LePage hired him in 2012. Mills, a Democrat, reappointed the Gardiner native after she took office in 2019. Before that, he was a hunting guide, charter boat captain and ran the Coastal Conservation Association of Maine and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters

Published

on

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.

This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.

Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.

Advertisement

The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.

The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.

But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.

Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.

Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.

Advertisement

All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.

This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.

Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Published

on

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection


Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Bev Uhlenhake Maine Democratic Party

The chair of the Maine Democratic Party announced Thursday she won’t seek reelection when members select leaders later this month.

Bev Uhlenhake, a former city councilor and mayor in Brewer and former chair of the Penobscot County Democrats, has served as chair of the state party since January 2023. She is also a previous vice chair of the party.

In a written statement, Uhlenhake noted some of the recent successes and challenges facing Democrats, including the reelection of Democratic majorities in both the Maine House and Senate last November, though by narrower margins, and winning three of Maine’s four electoral votes for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

“While we have laid a solid foundation from which Maine Democrats can build toward even greater success in 2026 and beyond, I have decided to step away from Maine Democratic Party leadership for personal and professional reasons, and will not seek reelection,” Uhlenhake said.

Party Vice Chair Julian Rogers, who was also elected to his post in 2023, announced he also won’t seek reelection to leadership, but will resume a previous role he held as vice chair of the party’s committee on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging.

Democratic State Committee members will vote for the party’s next leaders in elections to be held on Sunday, Jan. 26.

« Previous

South Portland debates natural vs. artificial grass at planned athletic facility



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending