Connect with us

News

Ukraine Is Wrecking Russian Tanks With a Gift From Britain

Published

on

Ukraine Is Wrecking Russian Tanks With a Gift From Britain

In video after video taken in Ukraine, a puff of smoke and a quick flash of sunshine sign that one other clutch of Russian troops are about to die.

Generally it’s only a cut up second earlier than that gentle streaks to a tank or armored car that out of the blue erupts in smoke and flame, usually bursting from inside as ammunition inside explodes.

Rewinding these movies a bit usually reveals Ukrainian troopers earlier than the assault, patrolling to an ambush level with giant inexperienced tubes carried on their backs — each a present from Britain. In maybe 15 seconds, and generally even sooner than that, the troopers can unsling the weapon, unfold its aiming sight, launch a security catch and wait for his or her prey to look.

The inexperienced tubes are referred to as NLAWs, for Subsequent Era Gentle Anti-Tank Weapons. They’re the results of many years of weapons analysis devoted to constructing small light-weight guided missiles that will have evened the stability of energy in fight between the fearsome tank and the soldier.

In comparison with the American-made Javelin antitank weapon, which has been hailed by officers on the Pentagon and the White Home and despatched to Ukraine by the 1000’s, the NLAW weighs about half as a lot, prices far much less, could be simply discarded, and is optimized to be used within the comparatively short-range fights Ukrainian troopers are stepping into with the invading Russian forces.

Advertisement

The NLAW is a product of the Swedish firm Saab and has been offered to various NATO nations — together with Britain, which assembles the missiles at a manufacturing unit in Belfast, Northern Eire, for the British Military. And though the British Military additionally has the Javelin, it started buying NLAWs about 10 years in the past and has been sending them to Ukraine in ever larger numbers.

A British diplomat, who spoke on the situation of anonymity to debate defensive assist, mentioned Britain had despatched greater than 4,200 NLAWs to Ukraine.

“We nonetheless assess it to be the most effective short-range defensive anti-tank weapons round,” the diplomat mentioned.

The Javelin and the NLAW, each of which a person soldier can carry and fireplace, embrace options beforehand solely seen in a lot bigger and extra cumbersome weapons, the sorts that normally need to be mounted on autos.

Each weapons could be fired straight at targets like enemy troopers or a constructing, however when attacking autos they may also be programmed to hit from above — the place a tank or armored personnel provider has the least armor. The American weapon can pop up after which dive right down to impression and explode, whereas the British missile flies a shorter path — crossing over its goal and firing its cost downward.

Advertisement

The consequence, nonetheless, as proven in Ukraine is identical: an uncounted variety of destroyed Russian tanks, armored personnel carriers and vans.

The missiles have succeeded regardless of efforts to defeat them. The Russian navy had mentioned, and Pentagon management believed, {that a} defensive system on the latest T-90 tanks was able to sensing and destroying anti-tank missiles like Javelins and NLAWs in flight. In an apparently new countermeasure, Russian troops are welding improvised cages of parallel metal bars atop tank turrets. Video proof reveals that each defenses, nonetheless, have failed.

The Javelin, which was designed towards the tip of the Chilly Struggle, consists of two elements: a 33-pound reusable launcher that troopers usually use for reconnaissance and surveillance, given its suite of thermal cameras that may zoom out and in for locating targets, and a 15-pound disposable tube that accommodates the missile itself. The newer NLAW, by comparability, weighs slightly below 28 kilos and has no digicam — only a easy sight to goal.

And whereas the Javelin can kill tanks from as far-off as two and a half miles, its missile flies slower than the NLAW, which is most correct for targets as much as solely a few half mile away. For transferring targets, the Javelin can information itself whereas in flight, due to a heat-seeker within the missile’s nostril, whereas a soldier firing an NLAW merely factors the weapon at a transferring car, engages the steering system and tracks the goal for a number of seconds earlier than firing. The missile then flies to some extent the place it predicts the goal might be.

The capabilities of the 2 weapons make the Javelin extra like a sniper rifle for taking out armored autos at excessive distances, the British diplomat mentioned, whereas the NLAW is best for close-quarter battles and ambush situations.

On condition that the Ukrainians are unable to combat Russian armor with tanks of their very own, they have to use completely different ways, the diplomat mentioned, including that the Ukrainians have proven the need and the extraordinary nerve to get near tanks and destroy them in these missile assaults.

Advertisement

“You could know how you can combat, and also you want the means, nevertheless it’s the need — what’s within the coronary heart of the Ukrainians to combat?” the diplomat mentioned. “They’re preventing an existential risk and so they’re not giving up. So we’ve given them, at their request as a sovereign nation, the instruments to go and do that.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Published

on

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Even as the Trump administration continues to slash federal jobs, a number of federal agencies have begun to reverse course — reinstating some workers and pausing plans to dismiss others, sometimes within days of the firings.

Advertisement

Note: Some dates on the chart are approximate, based on available information.

The Office of Personnel Management on Tuesday revised earlier guidance calling for probationary workers to be terminated, adding a disclaimer that agencies would have the final authority over personnel actions. It is unclear how many more workers could be reinstated as a result.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at some of the back-and-forths so far:

Rehiring Some Essential Workers

Trump-appointed officials fired, then scrambled to rehire some employees in critical jobs in health and national security.

Advertisement

Workers reviewing food safety and medical devices

Advertisement

Around Feb. 15 The Food and Drug Administration fired about 700 probationary employees, many of whom were not paid through taxpayer money.

Advertisement

Workers involved in bird flu response

Advertisement
icon Around Feb. 14 The Department of Agriculture continued plans to fire thousands of employees, including hundreds in a plant and animal inspection program.
icon Days later The agency said it was trying to reverse the firings of some employees involved in responding to the nation’s growing bird flu outbreak.

Workers who maintain the U.S. nuclear arsenal

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Energy Department began laying off 1,000 of its probationary employees, including more than 300 who worked at the National Nuclear Security Administration, which maintains and secures the country’s nuclear warheads. A spokesperson for the Energy Department disputed that number, saying fewer than 50 at the N.N.S.A. were fired.

Rehired After Political Pushback

Advertisement

Public opposition from both Democrats and Republicans has also resulted in some fired workers getting called back.

Advertisement

Workers managing a 9/11 survivors’ health program

icon Around Feb. 15 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cut hundreds of employees, including 16 probationary workers who manage the World Trade Central Health Program, which administers aid to people who were exposed to hazards from the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
icon Several days later After bipartisan pushback, the Trump administration said that fired employees would return to their jobs.

Advertisement

Scientific researchers, including military veterans

Advertisement
icon Feb. 18 The National Science Foundation fired 168 employees, or roughly 10 percent of its work force.
icon Less than two weeks later The foundation began reversing dismissals of 84 probationary employees, in response to a ruling by a federal judge and guidance from the Office of Personnel Management to retain the employment of military veterans and military spouses.

Temporary Reinstatements and Pauses on Firings

The firing spree has prompted a slew of lawsuits, which in some cases have resulted in temporary reversals.

Advertisement

Employees at a federal financial watchdog

Advertisement
icon Feb. 11 Officials fired almost 200 employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial industry watchdog, and ordered the rest to stop their work.

Advertisement

Employees at an international aid department

icon A day later A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt the layoffs.
icon Two weeks later The judge ruled that the administration could proceed with plans to lay off or put on paid leave many agency employees. U.S.A.I.D. moved to fire around 2,000 U.S.-based workers and put up to thousands of foreign service officers and others on paid leave.

Workers from multiple agencies have also filed complaints with the office of a government watchdog lawyer who himself has been targeted by Mr. Trump for termination. In response to requests from that office, an independent federal worker board has considered some of the claims and temporarily reinstated some workers.

Advertisement

Workers at the Agriculture Department

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Agriculture Department began cutting thousands of jobs, including around 3,400 in the Forest Service.
icon Three weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board issued a stay ordering the department to reinstate fired workers while an investigation continued.

Advertisement

Six workers from six federal agencies

Advertisement
icon Feb. 14 The Office of Personnel Management sent an email ordering federal agencies to fire tens of thousands of probationary employees.
icon Less than two weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board temporarily reinstated six fired federal workers from the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development and Veterans Affairs, and the Office of Personnel Management.

The back-and-forth and lack of transparency surrounding the administration’s cost-cutting moves have deepened the confusion and alarm of workers across the federal government at large, many of whom also have to interpret confusing email guidance and gauge the veracity of various circulating rumors.

“The layoffs and then rehires undermine the productivity and confidence not only of the people who left and came back but of the people who stayed,” said Stephen Goldsmith, an urban policy professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School and a former mayor of Indianapolis.

Advertisement

Are you a federal worker? We want to hear from you.

The Times would like to hear about your experience as a federal worker under the second Trump administration. We may reach out about your submission, but we will not publish any part of your response without contacting you first.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Published

on

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

In his first address to Congress since beginning a tumultuous second term, US President Donald Trump proudly claimed on Tuesday night that he was “just getting started”. That is a bad omen for the world’s largest economy. The optimism among companies and investors that came with the businessman’s election victory is rapidly waning. After the president confirmed tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on Monday night, the S&P 500 initially erased all the gains it had made since the November polls. Consumer confidence has plunged. Manufacturers are reporting steep declines in new orders and employment, and bearish investor sentiment has shot well above its historic average.

Uncertainty is clouding the data and forecasts. Still, it is clear that the president has squandered what was a decent economic inheritance. Not long ago price pressures were fading, the US Federal Reserve was on the cusp of a steady rate-cutting cycle into a resilient economy, and the S&P 500 was gliding upwards. This is no longer true.

The depressing turnaround is a product of the administration’s pursuit of on-and-off import duties, and a chaotic policy agenda. The White House may believe it has a plan but America’s economic exceptionalism, from its relentless consumer spending and booming stock market to its reputation for dependable economic governance, is the collateral damage.

Advertisement

Personal expenditure — a bulwark of recent US growth — fell in January, by its most in nearly four years. With pandemic-era inflation not yet fully extinguished, and the reality of Trump’s price-raising tariff plans now dawning, consumers’ expectations for inflation in the year ahead have surged. The Fed has so far responded to forthcoming price pressures by putting rate cuts on hold, leaving borrowers facing a higher cost of credit. Elon Musk’s planned clear-out of public sector employees is also set to raise joblessness in an already cooling labour market.

Animal spirits are under pressure too. Perhaps naively, many businesses and investors expected import duties to be merely a negotiating tool. But Trump also believes tariffs are about “protecting American jobs”. After the latest salvo towards North American neighbours, the president offered a one-month reprieve for automakers on Wednesday, and was moving to broaden it on Thursday.

The unpredictability of tariff carve-outs, reversals and steps against other trading partners makes it impossible for businesses to plan. Retaliatory measures will also hurt exporters. The broader deluge of policy announcements — some of which have had significant geopolitical ramifications — adds to the decision-making paralysis facing boardrooms and traders.

Faith in US economic and financial institutions is also being tested. Trump has filled regulatory bodies with his chums. The Fed’s independence is an ongoing concern. Then there are zany economic ideas, from building a cryptocurrency reserve to a rumoured “Mar-a-Lago accord” to devalue the dollar. Some analysts note that the dollar’s recent weakness amid economic turmoil suggests financial markets may be beginning to question the safe haven status of the currency.

It is true that the administration’s tax cuts and deregulation efforts are yet to get started. But since they are likely to be paired with tariffs on more trading partners, rash policymaking and a clampdown on undocumented immigrants — which make up an estimated 5 per cent of workers — optimism around near-term US economic growth feels increasingly like blind hope. The contours of Trump’s economic agenda have sharpened. It is already worse than everyone thought, and he is just six weeks in.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Published

on

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Steve Carell attends the “Despicable Me 4” New York Premiere at Jazz at Lincoln Center in June.

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Steve Carell is making amends for a memorable but painful episode of The Office.

The Golden Globe-winning actor announced in a video posted on YouTube that the charity Alice’s Kids will cover the costs of prom tickets for hundreds of high school seniors in Altadena after a series of wildfires ravaged much of Los Angeles in January.

“Attention! Attention, all seniors,” Carell said in a video posted to the charity’s YouTube channel.

Advertisement

“Alice’s Kids wanted me to let you know that they will be paying for all of your prom tickets. And if you’ve already paid for your prom tickets, they will reimburse you for your prom tickets,” he said.

“It’s a pretty good deal,” he added.

YouTube

Advertisement

The Virginia-based children’s charity said that the prom promise will support approximately 800 students across six high schools, estimating the total cost to be around $175,000.

Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of Alice’s Kids, said Carell was asked to announce the pledge because so many young people binge-watched The Office during the pandemic.

“Steve has supported us for years. When I started talking to principals about paying for the tickets, someone at some point actually mentioned Steve’s name … and he told me that Steve was actually pretty popular with high schoolers because they ‘discovered’ The Office during COVID and they saw Despicable Me,” Fitzsimmons said in an email to NPR.

“So, I came up with the idea of having Steve announce our gesture, and he agreed immediately to cut the video.”

Carell’s promotion of this charitable act calls to mind one of the most polarizing episodes of the beloved American series The Office.

Advertisement

In the season six episode “Scott’s Tots,” Carell’s character, Michael Scott, famously pledges to pay for a class of high school seniors’ college tuition, only to reveal that he lacks the funds to fulfill his promise.

In contrast, students need not worry in this real-world scenario, as Alice’s Kids is fully covering the costs.

Continue Reading

Trending