Connect with us

News

The Democrat the White House Fears the Most

Published

on

The Democrat the White House Fears the Most

This month, after The New York Occasions first reported that U.S. officers had been visiting Caracas to discover talks with oil-rich Venezuela, the diplomatic gambit drew an offended response from one senator specifically.

“The democratic aspirations of the Venezuelan individuals,” Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey mentioned in a blistering assertion, “are price a lot quite a lot of thousand barrels of oil.”

These had been harsh phrases coming from a member of the president’s personal social gathering, who was livid that he hadn’t been adequately consulted on the journey. However they had been emblematic of the extraordinary affect the New Jersey Democrat wields over a few of the most politically radioactive matters in U.S. international coverage, present and former lawmakers, officers and Senate aides say. The administration rapidly denied accusations that the Caracas journey was a part of an effort to search out new provides of power to interchange Russian oil or to undercut the Venezuelan opposition.

“There isn’t a dialogue between us and the regime,” Jen Psaki, the White Home press secretary, mentioned below questioning from reporters.

The episode is just the latest instance of how Menendez, who chairs the Senate International Relations Committee, is ready to outline the boundaries of what’s acceptable on topics from Iran to Venezuela. He’s plugged in with Washington-savvy pro-Israel teams and with the politically energetic Cuban- and Venezuelan-American communities in South Florida. Generally in sync with the administration and sometimes at odds with it, he’s all the time to be dealt with with a wholesome quantity of respect and concern.

Advertisement

“He’s anyone that you simply want in your aspect it doesn’t matter what, so that they’re very cautious,” mentioned Juan Cruz, who served as a senior director for the Western Hemisphere through the Trump administration.

Final 12 months, in a measure of the deference given to Menendez, the White Home allowed him to counsel who ought to and shouldn’t be invited to an occasion with President Biden. The three people Menendez nixed had been critics of the decades-old financial embargo of Cuba, which many on the left view for instance of a failed, right-wing coverage.

“Menendez has a really moralistic and rigid view on the usage of sanctions to punish and enhance human rights, no matter proof,” mentioned Christopher Sabatini, a senior fellow for Latin America at Chatham Home, a assume tank in London.

On the similar time, Menendez has been an important administration ally on a lot of Biden’s priorities, from clearing a path for dozens of appointees Republicans have tried to dam to fostering a bipartisan consensus on the Ukraine warfare. Prime administration officers seek the advice of with Menendez a number of instances a month. His relationship with Biden can be an unlimited enchancment over the tension-filled Obama period, allies mentioned.

“Chairman Menendez is a associate on our international coverage targets and this administration advantages from his counsel,” mentioned Adrienne Watson, a spokeswoman for the White Home’s Nationwide Safety Council.

Advertisement

In response to questions on tensions with the Biden administration, Menendez’s workplace pushed again onerous on the notion that he approached the job of chairman any otherwise than he had below earlier presidents of each events.

Menendez’s clout could quickly be examined anew if and when the administration unveils its long-awaited reset of the Iran nuclear deal.

In latest days, officers have briefed members of Home and Senate committees in regards to the standing of the talks in Vienna, and particulars of the 25-page settlement have begun to spill out in newspaper accounts.

One of many ultimate obstacles, in response to those that have attended the briefings, is Iran’s demand that the U.S. not designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps as a international terrorist group.

Doing so would imply little in a sensible sense as a result of different sanctions on the group nonetheless apply, proponents of a deal say. However the Biden administration would wish to expend valuable political capital defending the transfer at a time when it has little to spare.

Advertisement

“I’d wish to see what which means in observe,” mentioned Consultant Tom Malinowski, Democrat of New Jersey, who mentioned he was ready to see the textual content of an settlement. “However as soon as Iran will get the bomb, our skill to confront their different malign actions might be diminished.”

Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat of Connecticut, mentioned in an interview that he’d seen “bone-chilling” assessments of how shut Iran is to producing weapons-grade uranium. Others who’ve been briefed on the U.S. intelligence assessments say Iran may produce sufficient fissile materials for a nuclear weapon in as little as two weeks, escalating the chance that Israel may take army motion.

“The results of no deal are horrific,” Murphy mentioned. “And there’s no different sensible path to cease Iran from getting a nuclear weapon aside from diplomacy.”

The primary purpose the disaster has reached this level, advocates of a deal say, is Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the unique nuclear deal, which allowed Iran to maintain enriching uranium previous agreed-upon ranges.

However the Biden administration additionally moved too slowly to interact Tehran upon coming into workplace, fearing Menendez-led blowback on Capitol Hill.

Advertisement

“It didn’t wish to lose fence-sitters in Congress,” mentioned Ali Vaez, an Iran knowledgeable on the Worldwide Disaster Group.

Now {that a} deal is shut, administration officers are being cagey about whether or not they imagine Congress should be allowed to evaluate its phrases. Below a bipartisan regulation handed in 2015, the Iran Nuclear Settlement Overview Act, the administration should submit the textual content of any “new” settlement to congressional oversight.

Menendez, who opposed the unique nuclear settlement in 2015 and has criticized the present deal below dialogue, has signaled he’ll insist on the Senate having its say. In February, he teamed up with Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican of South Carolina, to suggest his personal diplomatic answer to the nuclear standoff.

“There isn’t a probability in bringing Senator Menendez on board, and the choice that he gives is unworkable for the administration,” Vaez mentioned. “I feel it’s a misplaced trigger.”

State Division officers warning that “an settlement is neither imminent nor sure,” as one put it. The administration can be nonetheless analyzing its authorized choices concerning congressional evaluate of a possible deal, which could not technically qualify as “new.”

Advertisement

If an Iran deal is put to a vote within the Senate, Menendez’s response might be essential. Republicans most certainly will uniformly oppose it. The administration can nonetheless afford to lose a handful of Democrats, as a result of solely 41 votes could be wanted to permit a revived settlement to proceed. However it may take some arm twisting to spherical up sufficient votes to win.

Ben Cardin, the hawkish Maryland senator, has already expressed considerations about delisting the Revolutionary Guards. Different influential Democrats on the Senate International Relations Committee, comparable to Chris Coons of Delaware, have mentioned little in help of a contemporary deal.

A defeat within the Senate may deal the president a dangerous blow on considered one of his signature international coverage initiatives, supporters of the talks warn. And given Iran’s speedy advance towards producing weapons-grade uranium, ought to diplomacy fail, the president might be going through the prospect of a brand new battle within the Center East on high of a grinding warfare in Ukraine.

If there isn’t a deal, Vaez mentioned, “I feel this may escalate in a short time and the specter of warfare will emerge as quickly because the spring.”

Closing phase

Advertisement

It’s actually not uncommon for a senator questioning a nominee to interrupt. At one level through the Supreme Court docket affirmation hearings this morning, Senator Thom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina, did simply that, apologizing to Decide Ketanji Brown Jackson as he did so and explaining he had solely 4 minutes left.

However Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, took it to a different degree — one which made the interruptions themselves, not the content material of the questions and solutions, the principle characteristic of his line of questioning.

Throughout Graham’s trade with Jackson on Wednesday, she requested for permission to talk a number of instances, with Senator Richard J. Durbin, a Democrat and the chair of the Judiciary Committee, often hopping in to assist. When Jackson did communicate, Graham shook his head dismissively or fidgeted in his chair, attempting to leap in.

Towards the tip of his line of questioning, our colleague Catie Edmondson described “audible groaning and noises of protest from lots of the spectators” as Graham interrupted her. When his time was up, he left the dais.

Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, later tried to one-up Graham, refusing to cease speaking when his time was up. When he requested Durbin why he wouldn’t enable his final query, Durbin mentioned, “You wouldn’t enable her” to reply anyway.

Advertisement

And what was Cruz’s excuse for extra time? Durbin wouldn’t cease interrupting him.

Thanks for studying. We’ll see you tomorrow.

— Blake & Leah

Is there something you assume we’re lacking? Something you wish to see extra of? We’d love to listen to from you. E-mail us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Published

on

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Even as the Trump administration continues to slash federal jobs, a number of federal agencies have begun to reverse course — reinstating some workers and pausing plans to dismiss others, sometimes within days of the firings.

Advertisement

Note: Some dates on the chart are approximate, based on available information.

The Office of Personnel Management on Tuesday revised earlier guidance calling for probationary workers to be terminated, adding a disclaimer that agencies would have the final authority over personnel actions. It is unclear how many more workers could be reinstated as a result.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at some of the back-and-forths so far:

Rehiring Some Essential Workers

Trump-appointed officials fired, then scrambled to rehire some employees in critical jobs in health and national security.

Advertisement

Workers reviewing food safety and medical devices

Advertisement

Around Feb. 15 The Food and Drug Administration fired about 700 probationary employees, many of whom were not paid through taxpayer money.

Advertisement

Workers involved in bird flu response

Advertisement
icon Around Feb. 14 The Department of Agriculture continued plans to fire thousands of employees, including hundreds in a plant and animal inspection program.
icon Days later The agency said it was trying to reverse the firings of some employees involved in responding to the nation’s growing bird flu outbreak.

Workers who maintain the U.S. nuclear arsenal

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Energy Department began laying off 1,000 of its probationary employees, including more than 300 who worked at the National Nuclear Security Administration, which maintains and secures the country’s nuclear warheads. A spokesperson for the Energy Department disputed that number, saying fewer than 50 at the N.N.S.A. were fired.

Rehired After Political Pushback

Advertisement

Public opposition from both Democrats and Republicans has also resulted in some fired workers getting called back.

Advertisement

Workers managing a 9/11 survivors’ health program

icon Around Feb. 15 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cut hundreds of employees, including 16 probationary workers who manage the World Trade Central Health Program, which administers aid to people who were exposed to hazards from the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
icon Several days later After bipartisan pushback, the Trump administration said that fired employees would return to their jobs.

Advertisement

Scientific researchers, including military veterans

Advertisement
icon Feb. 18 The National Science Foundation fired 168 employees, or roughly 10 percent of its work force.
icon Less than two weeks later The foundation began reversing dismissals of 84 probationary employees, in response to a ruling by a federal judge and guidance from the Office of Personnel Management to retain the employment of military veterans and military spouses.

Temporary Reinstatements and Pauses on Firings

The firing spree has prompted a slew of lawsuits, which in some cases have resulted in temporary reversals.

Advertisement

Employees at a federal financial watchdog

Advertisement
icon Feb. 11 Officials fired almost 200 employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial industry watchdog, and ordered the rest to stop their work.

Advertisement

Employees at an international aid department

icon A day later A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt the layoffs.
icon Two weeks later The judge ruled that the administration could proceed with plans to lay off or put on paid leave many agency employees. U.S.A.I.D. moved to fire around 2,000 U.S.-based workers and put up to thousands of foreign service officers and others on paid leave.

Workers from multiple agencies have also filed complaints with the office of a government watchdog lawyer who himself has been targeted by Mr. Trump for termination. In response to requests from that office, an independent federal worker board has considered some of the claims and temporarily reinstated some workers.

Advertisement

Workers at the Agriculture Department

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Agriculture Department began cutting thousands of jobs, including around 3,400 in the Forest Service.
icon Three weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board issued a stay ordering the department to reinstate fired workers while an investigation continued.

Advertisement

Six workers from six federal agencies

Advertisement
icon Feb. 14 The Office of Personnel Management sent an email ordering federal agencies to fire tens of thousands of probationary employees.
icon Less than two weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board temporarily reinstated six fired federal workers from the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development and Veterans Affairs, and the Office of Personnel Management.

The back-and-forth and lack of transparency surrounding the administration’s cost-cutting moves have deepened the confusion and alarm of workers across the federal government at large, many of whom also have to interpret confusing email guidance and gauge the veracity of various circulating rumors.

“The layoffs and then rehires undermine the productivity and confidence not only of the people who left and came back but of the people who stayed,” said Stephen Goldsmith, an urban policy professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School and a former mayor of Indianapolis.

Advertisement

Are you a federal worker? We want to hear from you.

The Times would like to hear about your experience as a federal worker under the second Trump administration. We may reach out about your submission, but we will not publish any part of your response without contacting you first.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Published

on

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

In his first address to Congress since beginning a tumultuous second term, US President Donald Trump proudly claimed on Tuesday night that he was “just getting started”. That is a bad omen for the world’s largest economy. The optimism among companies and investors that came with the businessman’s election victory is rapidly waning. After the president confirmed tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on Monday night, the S&P 500 initially erased all the gains it had made since the November polls. Consumer confidence has plunged. Manufacturers are reporting steep declines in new orders and employment, and bearish investor sentiment has shot well above its historic average.

Uncertainty is clouding the data and forecasts. Still, it is clear that the president has squandered what was a decent economic inheritance. Not long ago price pressures were fading, the US Federal Reserve was on the cusp of a steady rate-cutting cycle into a resilient economy, and the S&P 500 was gliding upwards. This is no longer true.

The depressing turnaround is a product of the administration’s pursuit of on-and-off import duties, and a chaotic policy agenda. The White House may believe it has a plan but America’s economic exceptionalism, from its relentless consumer spending and booming stock market to its reputation for dependable economic governance, is the collateral damage.

Advertisement

Personal expenditure — a bulwark of recent US growth — fell in January, by its most in nearly four years. With pandemic-era inflation not yet fully extinguished, and the reality of Trump’s price-raising tariff plans now dawning, consumers’ expectations for inflation in the year ahead have surged. The Fed has so far responded to forthcoming price pressures by putting rate cuts on hold, leaving borrowers facing a higher cost of credit. Elon Musk’s planned clear-out of public sector employees is also set to raise joblessness in an already cooling labour market.

Animal spirits are under pressure too. Perhaps naively, many businesses and investors expected import duties to be merely a negotiating tool. But Trump also believes tariffs are about “protecting American jobs”. After the latest salvo towards North American neighbours, the president offered a one-month reprieve for automakers on Wednesday, and was moving to broaden it on Thursday.

The unpredictability of tariff carve-outs, reversals and steps against other trading partners makes it impossible for businesses to plan. Retaliatory measures will also hurt exporters. The broader deluge of policy announcements — some of which have had significant geopolitical ramifications — adds to the decision-making paralysis facing boardrooms and traders.

Faith in US economic and financial institutions is also being tested. Trump has filled regulatory bodies with his chums. The Fed’s independence is an ongoing concern. Then there are zany economic ideas, from building a cryptocurrency reserve to a rumoured “Mar-a-Lago accord” to devalue the dollar. Some analysts note that the dollar’s recent weakness amid economic turmoil suggests financial markets may be beginning to question the safe haven status of the currency.

It is true that the administration’s tax cuts and deregulation efforts are yet to get started. But since they are likely to be paired with tariffs on more trading partners, rash policymaking and a clampdown on undocumented immigrants — which make up an estimated 5 per cent of workers — optimism around near-term US economic growth feels increasingly like blind hope. The contours of Trump’s economic agenda have sharpened. It is already worse than everyone thought, and he is just six weeks in.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Published

on

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Steve Carell attends the “Despicable Me 4” New York Premiere at Jazz at Lincoln Center in June.

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Steve Carell is making amends for a memorable but painful episode of The Office.

The Golden Globe-winning actor announced in a video posted on YouTube that the charity Alice’s Kids will cover the costs of prom tickets for hundreds of high school seniors in Altadena after a series of wildfires ravaged much of Los Angeles in January.

“Attention! Attention, all seniors,” Carell said in a video posted to the charity’s YouTube channel.

Advertisement

“Alice’s Kids wanted me to let you know that they will be paying for all of your prom tickets. And if you’ve already paid for your prom tickets, they will reimburse you for your prom tickets,” he said.

“It’s a pretty good deal,” he added.

YouTube

Advertisement

The Virginia-based children’s charity said that the prom promise will support approximately 800 students across six high schools, estimating the total cost to be around $175,000.

Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of Alice’s Kids, said Carell was asked to announce the pledge because so many young people binge-watched The Office during the pandemic.

“Steve has supported us for years. When I started talking to principals about paying for the tickets, someone at some point actually mentioned Steve’s name … and he told me that Steve was actually pretty popular with high schoolers because they ‘discovered’ The Office during COVID and they saw Despicable Me,” Fitzsimmons said in an email to NPR.

“So, I came up with the idea of having Steve announce our gesture, and he agreed immediately to cut the video.”

Carell’s promotion of this charitable act calls to mind one of the most polarizing episodes of the beloved American series The Office.

Advertisement

In the season six episode “Scott’s Tots,” Carell’s character, Michael Scott, famously pledges to pay for a class of high school seniors’ college tuition, only to reveal that he lacks the funds to fulfill his promise.

In contrast, students need not worry in this real-world scenario, as Alice’s Kids is fully covering the costs.

Continue Reading

Trending