Connect with us

News

Biden’s Supreme Court nominee emphasises ‘neutral’ approach to cases

Published

on

Biden’s Supreme Court nominee emphasises ‘neutral’ approach to cases

Joe Biden’s US Supreme Court docket nominee highlighted her “impartial” strategy to judicial decision-making because the Senate judiciary committee kicked off the general public vetting course of for the appeals courtroom decide who can be the primary black lady on America’s highest courtroom.

Ketanji Brown Jackson on Monday confronted the committee’s 22 members for opening statements, which can be adopted by a question-and-answer session starting on Tuesday. The committee will vote on whether or not to advance her nomination after the listening to concludes later this week, after which the total Senate will render its closing verdict on whether or not she’s going to fill the lifetime seat vacated by Stephen Breyer.

“I resolve circumstances from a impartial posture,” Jackson advised the committee throughout her opening remarks. “I consider the info and I interpret and apply the legislation to the info of the case earlier than me with out concern or favour, per my judicial oath”.

Democratic members of the committee, and even some Republicans, centered on the historic resonance of Jackson’s nomination. “Along with your presence right here at present, you’re writing a brand new web page within the historical past of America, a superb web page,” mentioned Patrick Leahy, a Democratic senator for Vermont.

“Right now, America is witnessing the literal bending of the arc,” Cory Booker, a Democratic senator from New Jersey, mentioned, in a nod to a Martin Luther King quote — “We will overcome as a result of the arc of the ethical universe is lengthy, nevertheless it bends towards justice”.

Advertisement

Thom Tillis, a Republican senator from North Carolina, additionally praised Jackson’s temperament, upbringing and honesty. The decide’s nomination was “making the goals of others seem like inside attain”, he mentioned.

Supreme Court docket confirmations have develop into an more and more fraught political course of lately. Barring any surprises, Jackson is predicted to obtain overwhelming help among the many Senate’s Democrats and presumably some backing amongst reasonable Republicans.

Republican members of the judiciary committee vowed to scrutinise Jackson’s selections as a decide and a member of the US sentencing fee.

“It seems that generally . . . zealous advocacy has gone past the pale and in some cases, it seems that your advocacy has bled over into your choice making course of as a decide,” mentioned John Cornyn, a Republican senator from Texas.

Marsha Blackburn, a Republican senator from Tennessee, gave among the many most confrontational opening statements, accusing Jackson of efforts to “defend convicts”.

Advertisement

“What’s your hidden agenda?” Blackburn requested.

Dick Durbin, the Democratic senator from Illinois and Senate judiciary committee chair who’s presiding over Jackson’s listening to, hit again at what he known as some “last-minute makes an attempt to derail” her appointment, together with accusations from the opposition that she had acquired help from radical left teams. Her file belied that declare, he added.

Durbin outlined earlier accusations that Jackson had been “smooth on crime” as “baseless” expenses.

Republican lawmakers additionally promised to quiz Jackson on her “judicial philosophy,” arguing courts ought to interpret the legislation because it was written slightly than form coverage through a versatile studying of the structure.

Jackson advised the committee she understood her “position as a decide is a restricted one”.

Advertisement

Most Republican senators mentioned they didn’t count on Jackson’s listening to to develop into a spectacle.

Jackson advised the panel she had met 45 senators, together with one-on-one conferences with every member of the judiciary committee. The American Bar Affiliation’s federal judiciary committee deemed her “nicely certified” to serve on the courtroom, its highest score.

Thomas Griffith, a retired federal appeals courtroom decide appointed by George W Bush who launched Jackson, mentioned that whereas they didn’t all the time agree on the result of circumstances, “I revered her diligent and cautious strategy, her deep understanding and her collegial method, indispensable traits for fulfillment” as a Supreme Court docket justice.

Even when she is more likely to be confirmed, some Republican senators might use Jackson’s listening to as a difficulty to “gin up the bottom” forward of midterm elections in November, or to additional their very own presidential ambitions, mentioned Barbara Perry, Supreme Court docket and presidency scholar on the College of Virginia.

Whereas Jackson could encounter Republican pushback, Perry mentioned that until one thing sudden emerged, it was “in all probability the case that she can be confirmed”.

Advertisement

Regardless of the everyday political wrangling round Supreme Court docket appointments, some consultants have argued Jackson’s affirmation simply final yr by a bipartisan Senate vote to the federal appeals courtroom in Washington DC — and earlier than that as a member of the US sentencing fee and as a federal district decide — might work in her favour.

Jackson’s affirmation would permit Biden to fulfil his presidential marketing campaign pledge to nominate the primary black lady to the Supreme Court docket. It additionally represents his first, and doubtlessly solely, alternative to place his stamp on the US’s highest courtroom, a transfer that might encourage the Democratic social gathering’s progressive base after the three justices appointed by Donald Trump tilted the bench’s stability 6-3 in favour of conservatives.

Jackson’s authorized profession has spanned Harvard Legislation Faculty and clerking for Breyer on the Supreme Court docket to personal apply and a job as a federal public defender. A bipartisan group of senators on Monday praised her profession path. If confirmed, she can be the primary justice who beforehand labored as a public defender.

Whereas she wouldn’t alter the bench’s ideological stability, Jackson’s appointment would cease liberals shedding additional floor on the courtroom.

On Sunday, the courtroom introduced that Justice Clarence Thomas — who, after Breyer, is the longest-serving present Supreme Court docket justice, and is usually seen as essentially the most conservative member of the courtroom — had been hospitalised with a “flu-like” an infection and was being handled with antibiotics. He’s anticipated to be launched in a few days.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Pilots Battling L.A Fires Face Heat, Turbulence, and High-Pressure Risks

Published

on

Pilots Battling L.A Fires Face Heat, Turbulence, and High-Pressure Risks

Piloting a firefighting aircraft is sweaty, tiring work, Mr. Mattiacci said. The conditions that increase fire risk — hot days, high wind, often mountainous areas — also make for turbulent flying conditions. The aircraft fly at low speeds, increasing the turbulence, he added.

“You get pulled up out of your seat and your head bangs against the roof,” he said. In the hot conditions, pilots must keep just hydrated enough not to have to use the bathroom, on flights that can last up to five hours, he said.

There’s also a risk of flying into the thick, blinding smoke that wildfires send up, he said. The aircraft flying low to the ground — sometimes as low as the height of treetops — meaning there’s a significant risk of flying into power lines, radio towers and buildings.

“When we lose all visual reference, it gets a bit scary,” he said.

The stronger the winds, the harder it is to get close to the fire, as winds push the smoke around and obstruct visibility.

Advertisement

The large air tankers in Australia drop retardant from an altitude of about 100 to 150 feet, he said, while smaller ones can fly even lower. The largest tankers — which can carry up to 9,400 gallons of fire retardant at a time, and have been used to fight the Southern California fires — drop from about 250 feet, according to the National Interagency Fire Center.

Mr. Mattiacci said that he often feels pressure as he looks down from the cockpit at homes and structures under threat, knowing his job is to help save them. And if the fire retardant doesn’t land where it’s needed, he added, during a fast-moving fire, “there might not be another chance.”

Continue Reading

News

German economy shrinks for second consecutive year

Published

on

German economy shrinks for second consecutive year

Stay informed with free updates

Germany’s economy shrank for a second straight year in 2024, underlining the severity of the downturn facing Europe’s manufacturing powerhouse.

The Federal Statistics Office said on Wednesday that Europe’s largest economy contracted by 0.2 per cent last year, after shrinking by 0.3 per cent in 2023. Economists had expected a decline of 0.2 per cent.

“Germany is experiencing the longest stagnation of its postwar history by far,” said Timo Wollmershäuser, economist at Ifo, a Munich-based economic think-tank, adding that the country was also underperforming significantly in an international comparison.

Advertisement

Confirmation that Germany is suffering one of the most protracted economic crises in decades comes six weeks ahead of a crucial snap election.

Campaigning has been dominated by the spectre of deindustrialisation, crumbling infrastructure and whether or not the country should abandon a debt brake that constrains public spending.

Friedrich Merz, head of the centre-right Christian Democratic Union who is likely to be Germany’s next chancellor, is campaigning on a reform agenda, promising to cut red tape and taxes and dial back welfare benefits for people who are not working.

Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

While private sector output contracted, government consumption rose sharply by 2.6 per cent compared with 2023.

Advertisement

Ruth Brand, president of the Federal Statistics Office, blamed “cyclical and structural pressures” for the poor performance, pointing to “increasing competition for the German export industry, high energy costs, an interest rate level that remains high and an uncertain economic outlook.”

In the three months to December, output fell by 0.1 per cent compared with the third quarter.

Robin Winkler, chief economist for Germany at Deutsche Bank, said the contraction in the fourth quarter came as a “surprise” and was “concerning”.

“If this is confirmed, the economy would have lost further momentum by the end of the year,” he said, suggesting this was probably driven by “political uncertainty in Berlin and Washington”.

The Bundesbank said last month that stagnation was set to continue this year, predicting growth of just 0.1 per cent and warning that a trade war with the US would trigger another year of economic contraction.

Advertisement

US president-elect Donald Trump has pledged to impose blanket tariffs of up to 20 per cent on all US imports.

Germany is struggling with a crisis in its automotive industry fuelled by Chinese competition and an expensive transition to electric cars, alongside high energy costs and tepid consumer demand.

Output in manufacturing contracted by 3 per cent, the statistics office said on Wednesday, while corporate investment fell by 2.8 per cent.

Germany has in effect seen no meaningful economic growth since the start of the pandemic, with industrial production hovering more than 10 per cent below its peak while unemployment has started to rise again after it fell to record lows.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump’s attorney general pick to face scrutiny on first day of Senate hearing

Published

on

Trump’s attorney general pick to face scrutiny on first day of Senate hearing

Pam Bondi, Donald Trump’s nominee for attorney general, is expected to face scrutiny on Wednesday during the first day of her confirmation hearing about her ability to resist the White House from exerting political pressure on the justice department.

The hearing, before the Senate judiciary committee, comes at a crunch time for the department, which has faced unrelenting criticism from Trump after its prosecutors charged him in two federal criminal cases and is about to see Trump’s personal lawyers in those cases take over key leadership positions.

Bondi, the first female Florida attorney general and onetime lobbyist for Qatar, was not on the legal team defending Trump in those federal criminal cases. But she has been a longtime presence in his orbit, including when she worked to defend Trump at his first impeachment trial.

She also supported Trump’s fabricated claims of election fraud in 2020, which helped her become Trump’s nominee for attorney general almost immediately after Matt Gaetz, the initial pick, withdrew as he found himself dogged by a series of sexual misconduct allegations.

That loyalty to Trump has raised hackles at the justice department, which prides itself on its independence from White House pressure and recalls with a deep fear how Trump in his first term ousted top officials when they stopped acquiescing to his demands.

Advertisement

Trump replaced his first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, after he recused himself from the investigation into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia and, later, soured on his last attorney general, Bill Barr, after he refused to endorse Trump’s false 2020 election claims.

Bondi is also expected to be questioned about her prosecutorial record as the Florida attorney general and possible conflicts of interest arising from her most recent work for the major corporate lobbying firm Ballard Partners.

During her tenure as Florida attorney general, in 2013, Bondi’s office received nearly two dozen complaints about Trump University and her aides have said she once considered joining a multi-state lawsuit brought on behalf of students who claimed they had been cheated.

As she was weighing the lawsuit, Bondi’s political action committee received a $25,000 contribution from a non-profit funded by Trump. While Trump and Bondi both deny a quid pro quo, Bondi never joined the lawsuit and Trump had to pay a $2,500 fine for violating tax laws to make the donation.

As the chair of Ballard’s corporate regulatory compliance practice, Bondi lobbied for major companies that have battled the justice department she will be tasked with leading, including in various antitrust and fraud lawsuits.

Advertisement

Bondi was a county prosecutor in Florida before successfully running for Florida attorney general in 2010 in part due to regular appearances on Fox News.

Continue Reading

Trending