Connect with us

News

Biden’s Supreme Court nominee emphasises ‘neutral’ approach to cases

Published

on

Biden’s Supreme Court nominee emphasises ‘neutral’ approach to cases

Joe Biden’s US Supreme Court docket nominee highlighted her “impartial” strategy to judicial decision-making because the Senate judiciary committee kicked off the general public vetting course of for the appeals courtroom decide who can be the primary black lady on America’s highest courtroom.

Ketanji Brown Jackson on Monday confronted the committee’s 22 members for opening statements, which can be adopted by a question-and-answer session starting on Tuesday. The committee will vote on whether or not to advance her nomination after the listening to concludes later this week, after which the total Senate will render its closing verdict on whether or not she’s going to fill the lifetime seat vacated by Stephen Breyer.

“I resolve circumstances from a impartial posture,” Jackson advised the committee throughout her opening remarks. “I consider the info and I interpret and apply the legislation to the info of the case earlier than me with out concern or favour, per my judicial oath”.

Democratic members of the committee, and even some Republicans, centered on the historic resonance of Jackson’s nomination. “Along with your presence right here at present, you’re writing a brand new web page within the historical past of America, a superb web page,” mentioned Patrick Leahy, a Democratic senator for Vermont.

“Right now, America is witnessing the literal bending of the arc,” Cory Booker, a Democratic senator from New Jersey, mentioned, in a nod to a Martin Luther King quote — “We will overcome as a result of the arc of the ethical universe is lengthy, nevertheless it bends towards justice”.

Advertisement

Thom Tillis, a Republican senator from North Carolina, additionally praised Jackson’s temperament, upbringing and honesty. The decide’s nomination was “making the goals of others seem like inside attain”, he mentioned.

Supreme Court docket confirmations have develop into an more and more fraught political course of lately. Barring any surprises, Jackson is predicted to obtain overwhelming help among the many Senate’s Democrats and presumably some backing amongst reasonable Republicans.

Republican members of the judiciary committee vowed to scrutinise Jackson’s selections as a decide and a member of the US sentencing fee.

“It seems that generally . . . zealous advocacy has gone past the pale and in some cases, it seems that your advocacy has bled over into your choice making course of as a decide,” mentioned John Cornyn, a Republican senator from Texas.

Marsha Blackburn, a Republican senator from Tennessee, gave among the many most confrontational opening statements, accusing Jackson of efforts to “defend convicts”.

Advertisement

“What’s your hidden agenda?” Blackburn requested.

Dick Durbin, the Democratic senator from Illinois and Senate judiciary committee chair who’s presiding over Jackson’s listening to, hit again at what he known as some “last-minute makes an attempt to derail” her appointment, together with accusations from the opposition that she had acquired help from radical left teams. Her file belied that declare, he added.

Durbin outlined earlier accusations that Jackson had been “smooth on crime” as “baseless” expenses.

Republican lawmakers additionally promised to quiz Jackson on her “judicial philosophy,” arguing courts ought to interpret the legislation because it was written slightly than form coverage through a versatile studying of the structure.

Jackson advised the committee she understood her “position as a decide is a restricted one”.

Advertisement

Most Republican senators mentioned they didn’t count on Jackson’s listening to to develop into a spectacle.

Jackson advised the panel she had met 45 senators, together with one-on-one conferences with every member of the judiciary committee. The American Bar Affiliation’s federal judiciary committee deemed her “nicely certified” to serve on the courtroom, its highest score.

Thomas Griffith, a retired federal appeals courtroom decide appointed by George W Bush who launched Jackson, mentioned that whereas they didn’t all the time agree on the result of circumstances, “I revered her diligent and cautious strategy, her deep understanding and her collegial method, indispensable traits for fulfillment” as a Supreme Court docket justice.

Even when she is more likely to be confirmed, some Republican senators might use Jackson’s listening to as a difficulty to “gin up the bottom” forward of midterm elections in November, or to additional their very own presidential ambitions, mentioned Barbara Perry, Supreme Court docket and presidency scholar on the College of Virginia.

Whereas Jackson could encounter Republican pushback, Perry mentioned that until one thing sudden emerged, it was “in all probability the case that she can be confirmed”.

Advertisement

Regardless of the everyday political wrangling round Supreme Court docket appointments, some consultants have argued Jackson’s affirmation simply final yr by a bipartisan Senate vote to the federal appeals courtroom in Washington DC — and earlier than that as a member of the US sentencing fee and as a federal district decide — might work in her favour.

Jackson’s affirmation would permit Biden to fulfil his presidential marketing campaign pledge to nominate the primary black lady to the Supreme Court docket. It additionally represents his first, and doubtlessly solely, alternative to place his stamp on the US’s highest courtroom, a transfer that might encourage the Democratic social gathering’s progressive base after the three justices appointed by Donald Trump tilted the bench’s stability 6-3 in favour of conservatives.

Jackson’s authorized profession has spanned Harvard Legislation Faculty and clerking for Breyer on the Supreme Court docket to personal apply and a job as a federal public defender. A bipartisan group of senators on Monday praised her profession path. If confirmed, she can be the primary justice who beforehand labored as a public defender.

Whereas she wouldn’t alter the bench’s ideological stability, Jackson’s appointment would cease liberals shedding additional floor on the courtroom.

On Sunday, the courtroom introduced that Justice Clarence Thomas — who, after Breyer, is the longest-serving present Supreme Court docket justice, and is usually seen as essentially the most conservative member of the courtroom — had been hospitalised with a “flu-like” an infection and was being handled with antibiotics. He’s anticipated to be launched in a few days.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Published

on

Federal Workers Who Were Fired and Rehired by the Trump Administration

Even as the Trump administration continues to slash federal jobs, a number of federal agencies have begun to reverse course — reinstating some workers and pausing plans to dismiss others, sometimes within days of the firings.

Advertisement

Note: Some dates on the chart are approximate, based on available information.

The Office of Personnel Management on Tuesday revised earlier guidance calling for probationary workers to be terminated, adding a disclaimer that agencies would have the final authority over personnel actions. It is unclear how many more workers could be reinstated as a result.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at some of the back-and-forths so far:

Rehiring Some Essential Workers

Trump-appointed officials fired, then scrambled to rehire some employees in critical jobs in health and national security.

Advertisement

Workers reviewing food safety and medical devices

Advertisement

Around Feb. 15 The Food and Drug Administration fired about 700 probationary employees, many of whom were not paid through taxpayer money.

Advertisement

Workers involved in bird flu response

Advertisement
icon Around Feb. 14 The Department of Agriculture continued plans to fire thousands of employees, including hundreds in a plant and animal inspection program.
icon Days later The agency said it was trying to reverse the firings of some employees involved in responding to the nation’s growing bird flu outbreak.

Workers who maintain the U.S. nuclear arsenal

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Energy Department began laying off 1,000 of its probationary employees, including more than 300 who worked at the National Nuclear Security Administration, which maintains and secures the country’s nuclear warheads. A spokesperson for the Energy Department disputed that number, saying fewer than 50 at the N.N.S.A. were fired.

Rehired After Political Pushback

Advertisement

Public opposition from both Democrats and Republicans has also resulted in some fired workers getting called back.

Advertisement

Workers managing a 9/11 survivors’ health program

icon Around Feb. 15 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cut hundreds of employees, including 16 probationary workers who manage the World Trade Central Health Program, which administers aid to people who were exposed to hazards from the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
icon Several days later After bipartisan pushback, the Trump administration said that fired employees would return to their jobs.

Advertisement

Scientific researchers, including military veterans

Advertisement
icon Feb. 18 The National Science Foundation fired 168 employees, or roughly 10 percent of its work force.
icon Less than two weeks later The foundation began reversing dismissals of 84 probationary employees, in response to a ruling by a federal judge and guidance from the Office of Personnel Management to retain the employment of military veterans and military spouses.

Temporary Reinstatements and Pauses on Firings

The firing spree has prompted a slew of lawsuits, which in some cases have resulted in temporary reversals.

Advertisement

Employees at a federal financial watchdog

Advertisement
icon Feb. 11 Officials fired almost 200 employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial industry watchdog, and ordered the rest to stop their work.

Advertisement

Employees at an international aid department

icon A day later A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt the layoffs.
icon Two weeks later The judge ruled that the administration could proceed with plans to lay off or put on paid leave many agency employees. U.S.A.I.D. moved to fire around 2,000 U.S.-based workers and put up to thousands of foreign service officers and others on paid leave.

Workers from multiple agencies have also filed complaints with the office of a government watchdog lawyer who himself has been targeted by Mr. Trump for termination. In response to requests from that office, an independent federal worker board has considered some of the claims and temporarily reinstated some workers.

Advertisement

Workers at the Agriculture Department

Advertisement

icon Feb. 13 The Agriculture Department began cutting thousands of jobs, including around 3,400 in the Forest Service.
icon Three weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board issued a stay ordering the department to reinstate fired workers while an investigation continued.

Advertisement

Six workers from six federal agencies

Advertisement
icon Feb. 14 The Office of Personnel Management sent an email ordering federal agencies to fire tens of thousands of probationary employees.
icon Less than two weeks later The Merit Systems Protection Board temporarily reinstated six fired federal workers from the Departments of Agriculture, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development and Veterans Affairs, and the Office of Personnel Management.

The back-and-forth and lack of transparency surrounding the administration’s cost-cutting moves have deepened the confusion and alarm of workers across the federal government at large, many of whom also have to interpret confusing email guidance and gauge the veracity of various circulating rumors.

“The layoffs and then rehires undermine the productivity and confidence not only of the people who left and came back but of the people who stayed,” said Stephen Goldsmith, an urban policy professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School and a former mayor of Indianapolis.

Advertisement

Are you a federal worker? We want to hear from you.

The Times would like to hear about your experience as a federal worker under the second Trump administration. We may reach out about your submission, but we will not publish any part of your response without contacting you first.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Published

on

Trump has undermined US economic exceptionalism

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

In his first address to Congress since beginning a tumultuous second term, US President Donald Trump proudly claimed on Tuesday night that he was “just getting started”. That is a bad omen for the world’s largest economy. The optimism among companies and investors that came with the businessman’s election victory is rapidly waning. After the president confirmed tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on Monday night, the S&P 500 initially erased all the gains it had made since the November polls. Consumer confidence has plunged. Manufacturers are reporting steep declines in new orders and employment, and bearish investor sentiment has shot well above its historic average.

Uncertainty is clouding the data and forecasts. Still, it is clear that the president has squandered what was a decent economic inheritance. Not long ago price pressures were fading, the US Federal Reserve was on the cusp of a steady rate-cutting cycle into a resilient economy, and the S&P 500 was gliding upwards. This is no longer true.

The depressing turnaround is a product of the administration’s pursuit of on-and-off import duties, and a chaotic policy agenda. The White House may believe it has a plan but America’s economic exceptionalism, from its relentless consumer spending and booming stock market to its reputation for dependable economic governance, is the collateral damage.

Advertisement

Personal expenditure — a bulwark of recent US growth — fell in January, by its most in nearly four years. With pandemic-era inflation not yet fully extinguished, and the reality of Trump’s price-raising tariff plans now dawning, consumers’ expectations for inflation in the year ahead have surged. The Fed has so far responded to forthcoming price pressures by putting rate cuts on hold, leaving borrowers facing a higher cost of credit. Elon Musk’s planned clear-out of public sector employees is also set to raise joblessness in an already cooling labour market.

Animal spirits are under pressure too. Perhaps naively, many businesses and investors expected import duties to be merely a negotiating tool. But Trump also believes tariffs are about “protecting American jobs”. After the latest salvo towards North American neighbours, the president offered a one-month reprieve for automakers on Wednesday, and was moving to broaden it on Thursday.

The unpredictability of tariff carve-outs, reversals and steps against other trading partners makes it impossible for businesses to plan. Retaliatory measures will also hurt exporters. The broader deluge of policy announcements — some of which have had significant geopolitical ramifications — adds to the decision-making paralysis facing boardrooms and traders.

Faith in US economic and financial institutions is also being tested. Trump has filled regulatory bodies with his chums. The Fed’s independence is an ongoing concern. Then there are zany economic ideas, from building a cryptocurrency reserve to a rumoured “Mar-a-Lago accord” to devalue the dollar. Some analysts note that the dollar’s recent weakness amid economic turmoil suggests financial markets may be beginning to question the safe haven status of the currency.

It is true that the administration’s tax cuts and deregulation efforts are yet to get started. But since they are likely to be paired with tariffs on more trading partners, rash policymaking and a clampdown on undocumented immigrants — which make up an estimated 5 per cent of workers — optimism around near-term US economic growth feels increasingly like blind hope. The contours of Trump’s economic agenda have sharpened. It is already worse than everyone thought, and he is just six weeks in.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Published

on

Steve Carell announces that a charity will fund proms for students affected by LA fires

Steve Carell attends the “Despicable Me 4” New York Premiere at Jazz at Lincoln Center in June.

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images

Steve Carell is making amends for a memorable but painful episode of The Office.

The Golden Globe-winning actor announced in a video posted on YouTube that the charity Alice’s Kids will cover the costs of prom tickets for hundreds of high school seniors in Altadena after a series of wildfires ravaged much of Los Angeles in January.

“Attention! Attention, all seniors,” Carell said in a video posted to the charity’s YouTube channel.

Advertisement

“Alice’s Kids wanted me to let you know that they will be paying for all of your prom tickets. And if you’ve already paid for your prom tickets, they will reimburse you for your prom tickets,” he said.

“It’s a pretty good deal,” he added.

YouTube

Advertisement

The Virginia-based children’s charity said that the prom promise will support approximately 800 students across six high schools, estimating the total cost to be around $175,000.

Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of Alice’s Kids, said Carell was asked to announce the pledge because so many young people binge-watched The Office during the pandemic.

“Steve has supported us for years. When I started talking to principals about paying for the tickets, someone at some point actually mentioned Steve’s name … and he told me that Steve was actually pretty popular with high schoolers because they ‘discovered’ The Office during COVID and they saw Despicable Me,” Fitzsimmons said in an email to NPR.

“So, I came up with the idea of having Steve announce our gesture, and he agreed immediately to cut the video.”

Carell’s promotion of this charitable act calls to mind one of the most polarizing episodes of the beloved American series The Office.

Advertisement

In the season six episode “Scott’s Tots,” Carell’s character, Michael Scott, famously pledges to pay for a class of high school seniors’ college tuition, only to reveal that he lacks the funds to fulfill his promise.

In contrast, students need not worry in this real-world scenario, as Alice’s Kids is fully covering the costs.

Continue Reading

Trending