Connect with us

News

Are Politicians Too Old? California Democrats Want to Debate an Age Cap.

Published

on

Are Politicians Too Old? California Democrats Want to Debate an Age Cap.

As Democrats grapple with how to recover from their losses in November, an uncomfortable question has emerged in California, the state that has long set trends for the party.

Are their leaders simply too old?

Some party activists, pointing to several examples where they say leaders held onto power long past their prime, want to take the political keys away from state and local officeholders at a certain age.

The idea, initiated by San Francisco Democrats in a resolution, will be considered by the statewide party when it holds its convention later this month. Though it is largely a symbolic pursuit, the fact that the conversation is occurring at all is noteworthy in a place known for revering its elder leaders.

California is the state of Dianne Feinstein, who died in office at age 90 in 2023. It is also the home of Jerry Brown, who served two terms as governor in his 70s; Representative Nancy Pelosi, the former House speaker, who is 85; and Barbara Lee, the former congresswoman who was elected last month as Oakland mayor at the age of 78.

Advertisement

Not all of those leaders have caused worry, and some have had significant achievements late in life, bringing the gravitas and fortitude that can come with experience.

But many Democrats still have regrets over Senator Feinstein remaining in office long after major health issues became apparent and questions were raised about her ability to focus and make decisions.

They likewise recall their consternation over Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s decision not to resign from the Supreme Court while President Barack Obama was in office. She died at age 87 late in President Trump’s first term, giving him the opportunity to replace her with a conservative justice.

But it was former President Joseph R. Biden who brought the issue to the fore last year, when he was campaigning at 81. Many Democrats believe he waited too long to bow out, robbing the party of time to mount an effective effort to beat Mr. Trump.

“We can’t just act like it didn’t happen and like we aren’t going to make changes as a result,” Eric Kingsbury, a San Francisco Democrat, said of Mr. Biden’s decline. “Everyone saw it with their own eyes, and a ton of people told them what they saw wasn’t the truth.”

Advertisement

Mr. Kingsbury, 36, is a member of the little-known yet locally powerful San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee. He said he wrote the resolution as a direct response to Mr. Biden staying in the race too long and some Democrats remaining unwilling to even discuss how to clear the way for younger candidates.

His resolution called for exploring a mandatory retirement age for all elected and appointed leaders at the state and local levels, but not federal positions such as Congress. Notably, it did not specify a particular age.

The proposal passed last month, but only after a heated conversation. Some opponents pointed out that Senator Bernie Sanders, an 83-year-old independent from Vermont, is one of the few leaders energizing the left now.

“It’s offensive,” said Connie Chan, 46, a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and of the local party committee who voted no. “It’s ageism. It’s discrimination against people who have experience.”

The resolution will be among hundreds considered by the California Democratic Party at its convention this month, but it may not advance very far. Even if it does, it would take a state law, passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor, to impose an age limit.

Advertisement

If that ever did come to fruition, California would be the first state to force state and local politicians to retire at a certain age. Thirty-one states — but not California — force judges to retire. The most common cutoff is 70, though Vermont allows judges to serve until they are 90.

Age is not only a Democratic worry. Voters last year in North Dakota, a Republican-led state, approved a measure that prohibited candidates from running for Congress if they would turn 81 or older by the end of the year before their term concludes. But the measure did not affect state and local officeholders, and it was likely to face a legal challenge should an octogenarian candidate file suit.

In 2023, Republicans also raised concerns after Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader at the time at age 81, physically froze while taking questions at news conferences.

There are already federal policies that require mandatory retirement for occupations that require intense focus. Airline pilots must retire at 65, air traffic controllers generally must retire at 56 and military officers typically must step aside at 64.

Of course, the person atop the federal executive branch faces no retirement age. While so much focus was on Mr. Biden last year, many Democrats have been quick to point out that Mr. Trump will be 82 by the time his term ends.

Advertisement

“There should be concern about Donald Trump’s age,” said Scott Wiener, a Democratic state senator from San Francisco who believes the president is wreaking havoc on the economy and international relations. He recently abstained from the central committee vote on the age resolution.

Beyond California, David Hogg, the 25-year-old political activist who survived the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Fla., and is now the vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, has said Democrats must quash the “culture of seniority politics.” Through a separate organization, Leaders We Deserve, he has pledged to spend $20 million to back younger primary candidates against older, entrenched Democrats.

Representative Ro Khanna, 48, Democrat of California, has long urged a generational change in politics, and praised Senator Dick Durbin, 80, of Illinois for his “wisdom” in recently deciding to not seek another term.

Americans seem to support the idea of a mandatory retirement age for officeholders. A Pew Research Center survey from 2023, before Mr. Biden’s age-related difficulties became clear, found that 79 percent of Americans favor age limits for elected officials in Washington, and 74 percent favor them for Supreme Court justices.

Some residents in Northern California said that a mandatory retirement age might make sense, though they recognized the delicacy of the topic. Marcelle Maldonado, a 67-year-old retiree in Dixon, Calif., said she believed that politicians should retire by 65 or 70 to make room for people with “fresh eyes and fresh ears.” But she was not optimistic that such a mandate would pass because the politicians themselves would have to approve it.

Advertisement

In Oakland, Nicole Barratt, a 30-year-old employee at a plant shop, said that she found it odd that many professions required people to retire by age 65, but the country’s leaders have no such rule.

“They become very isolated after they’ve been in office a really long time,” she said.

Several politicians older than 70 did not return requests for comment. That included Ms. Lee, who will be sworn in later this month as Oakland mayor, and Antonio Villaraigosa, 72, a former Los Angeles mayor who is running for California governor in the 2026 race.

John Burton, the former congressman from San Francisco who stepped down as California Democratic Party chairman eight years ago, said he did not like the idea of term limits or age limits. He took umbrage at the notion that he is getting up in age.

“Jesus, don’t call me an elder statesman,” he grumbled in his trademark prickly style. “I’ve never heard that used to describe me.”

Advertisement

He is 92.

John Laird, a 75-year-old state senator from Santa Cruz, said the idea of an age limit was “arbitrary and silly” and that he felt sharper and more engaged than when he was elected to the Santa Cruz City Council at age 31.

He added that California’s term limits help solve the problem. He will be termed out when he is 78.

“My staff was having a field day telling me what to say when you called,” he said with a laugh. “‘Wait, I can’t hear you!’ and ‘Wait, my cardiologist is on the other line!’”

Any legislation instating an age cap would, if passed, head to the desk of 57-year-old Gov. Gavin Newsom — and he is not a big fan. He said that politicians need “the qualities of youth” such as imagination and sharpness, but that those attributes do not decline at the same age for each person.

Advertisement

“We all process life, physically and emotionally, a little differently,” he said.

Some Democrats observed that if California had tried to impose an age limit on members of Congress, Ms. Pelosi would not have been speaker the second time around, nor would she have wielded the influence she still has as a congresswoman. Among her acts last year was to push President Biden to leave the 2024 race.

Last month, the San Francisco central committee resolution passed with 15 aye votes, eight nays and eight abstentions.

One committee member might have felt stronger than the others.

Ms. Pelosi, through a representative, cast a vote against the age limit. She has not said yet whether she will run for another term next year.

Advertisement

Coral Murphy Marcos contributed reporting from Oakland, Calif.

News

Trump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US

Published

on

Trump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US

Donald Trump warned on Tuesday that any country he believes is making drugs destined illegally for the US is vulnerable to a military attack.

The US president’s comments came during a question-and-answer session at the White House at which he also said military strikes on land targets inside Venezuela, which he has accused of narco-terrorism, would “start very soon”.

The exchange with reporters followed a lengthy cabinet meeting at which Trump and Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, moved to put the responsibility with a navy admiral for the extrajudicial killing of two survivors of an attack on an alleged drug smuggling boat in September.

Asked if only Venezuela was in the Pentagon’s crosshairs, Trump said he saw any country producing drugs for contraband as fair game, echoing previous saber-rattling directed at Mexico.

“If they come in through a certain country, or any country, or if we think they’re building mills, whether its fentanyl or cocaine … anybody doing that and selling it into our country is subject to attack. Not just Venezuela,” Trump said, adding that he “heard” Colombia was “making cocaine, they have cocaine plants”.

Advertisement

Trump then said military action inside Venezuela was imminent, further inflaming a conflict that began with targeted attacks on vessels his administration identified as engaged in drug trafficking, although without providing proof to the public, and now on the verge of becoming a wider regional conflict.

“We’re going to start doing those strikes on land, too,” he said.

“You know, the land is much easier, much easier. And we know the routes they take. We know everything about them. We know where they live. We know where the bad ones live, and we’re going to start that very soon too.

“When we start that, we’re going to drive those numbers down so low.”

During the cabinet meeting Hegseth gave a conflicting account of his actions following the 2 September double strike on the alleged drug boat that the armed services committees in both the House and Senate are investigating as possibly illegal.

Advertisement

Hegseth told the cabinet meeting on Tuesday he “watched that first strike” but ultimately did not “stick around for the hour or two hours” after, during which two survivors clinging to the boat were fired on a second time and killed.

This contradicted his comments to Fox News the day after the attack in which he said he had watched the operation in real time, making no claim to have only witnessed part of it.

The admiral who ordered the second strike, Frank M “Mitch” Bradley, is scheduled to brief members of the congressional committees on Thursday.

Quick Guide
Advertisement

Contact us about this story

Show

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.

If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.

Secure Messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.

Advertisement

SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post

If you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.

Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. 

Illustration: Guardian Design / Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

National Guard member in DC shooting shows ‘positive sign’ West Virginia governor says

Published

on

National Guard member in DC shooting shows ‘positive sign’ West Virginia governor says

A person walks past a makeshift memorial for U.S. Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom and U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe outside of Farragut West Station, near the site where the two National Guard members were shot on Dec. 1 in Washington, D.C.

Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

The ambush-style attack last week in Washington, D.C. that killed one National Guard soldier and wounded another has brought grief to a West Virginia community and profound implications for refugees, while a troubling profile of the suspect emerges.

West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (R) speaks while West Virginia National Guard Maj. Gen. James Seward (L) looks on during a news conference on Dec. 1 at the West Virginia Capitol in Charleston, W.Va.

West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (R) speaks while West Virginia National Guard Maj. Gen. James Seward (L) looks on during a news conference on Dec. 1 at the West Virginia Capitol in Charleston, W.Va.

John Raby/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

John Raby/AP

At a press conference on Monday, West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said he received word from Andrew Wolfe’s family that the 24-year-old remains in serious condition but has shown some progress.

Advertisement

“We were told that Andrew was asked if he could hear the nurse who asked the question to give a thumbs up, and he did respond,” Morrisey said. “And we were told that he also wiggled his toes. So we take that as a positive sign.”

Wolfe and Sarah Beckstrom — both members of the West Virginia National Guard — were on patrol on Thanksgiving eve just blocks from the White House when a gunman came around the corner and opened fire at close-range, authorities said. Beckstrom, 20, died from her injuries on Thursday.

Meanwhile, the suspect, 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, remains in custody and faces a first-degree murder charge. Authorities say Lakanwal drove across the country from his home in Washington state to the nation’s capital to carry out the unprovoked attack.

A refugee resettlement volunteer who worked closely with Lakanwal’s family told NPR that the suspect did not show any signs of radicalization — like some U.S. officials have suggested. Instead, the volunteer said they worried about Lakanwal’s wellbeing and feared he was suffering a mental health crisis.

Last week, Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, said the alleged gunman will be charged with terrorism and she will seek the death penalty if either soldier died.

Advertisement

Here’s what to know.

High school principal describes Beckstrom as “always willing to help others”

A photo is displayed of National Guard member Specialist Sarah Beckstrom in Webster Springs, W.Va., on Nov. 28.

A photo is displayed of National Guard member Specialist Sarah Beckstrom in Webster Springs, W.Va., on Nov. 28.

Kathleen Batten/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kathleen Batten/AP

Beckstrom joined the service in 2023, but her commitment to serving others was a defining part of her character, according to Gabriel Markle, the principal at Webster County High School, which Beckstrom attended.

“She carried herself with quiet strength, a contagious smile and a positive energy that lifted people around her,” Markle said at a vigil organized at the high school on Saturday night.

He added, “She was sweet, caring and always willing to help others.”

Advertisement

Gov. Morrisey, who was also in attendance, said Beckstrom’s family and friends described her as having “a bright smile, a very big heart, and someone who loved to serve others.”

“She wore that uniform with pride,” he said. “And this deserves to be said a few times, she volunteered for the mission,” referring to the troop deployment in D.C.

Both Beckstrom and Wolfe were deployed to the nation’s capital in August, when President Trump first brought in troops, saying they were needed to address crime. The deployments have been met with pushback from both local Democratic leaders who said they were unnecessary and federal court judges, who have questioned their legality.

According to Morrisey, Beckstrom and Wolfe were friends leading up to the attack last week. “I’ve heard some of the stories that they talked, they liked each other, they talked fondly about each other,” he added.

The suspect was withdrawn and possibly suffering from PTSD

Advertisement
This photo provided by the U.S. Attorney's Office on Thursday, Nov. 27, 2025, shows Rahmanullah Lakanwal.

This photo showing Rahmanullah Lakanwal was provided by the U.S. Attorney’s Office on Nov. 27.

AP/U.S. Attorney’s Office


hide caption

toggle caption

AP/U.S. Attorney’s Office

Advertisement

New details suggest that Lakanwal was suffering from a personal crisis leading up to the attack, NPR’s Brian Mann reported.

A refugee resettlement volunteer who worked closely with Lakanwal’s family said the suspect spent a lot of time alone in his bedroom without speaking to his wife and kids.

“My biggest concern was that [Lakanwal] would harm himself,” the volunteer said. “I worried he would be suicidal because he was so withdrawn.” The volunteer spoke with NPR on condition of anonymity because they said they feared retaliation for having worked with Afghan refugees, including Lakanwal.

Before he moved to the U.S., Lakanwal served in one of Afghanistan’s elite counterterrorism units, which was operated by the CIA and focused on fighting the Taliban. When the Taliban seized control of Kabul in 2021, Lakanwal was evacuated by the U.S. military and later, resettled to the U.S. through Operation Allies Welcome.

Advertisement

According to the volunteer, Lakanwal struggled to find a stable job and adjust to life in the U.S., which led to growing isolation. The volunteer added that Lakanwal was prone to take cross-country drives without telling his family.

Trump administration toughens immigration policies

A makeshift memorial of flowers and American flags stands outside the Farragut West Metro station on Dec. 1 in Washington, D.C.

A makeshift memorial of flowers and American flags stands outside the Farragut West Metro station on Dec. 1 in Washington, D.C.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Heather Diehl/Getty Images North America

The shooting in D.C. has also led to swift and sweeping changes to multiple immigration processes.

NPR’s Ximeno Bustillo reported that the administration has paused all visa reviews for people from Afghanistan. That includes special immigrant visas, a program specifically designed to relocate those who had helped the U.S. military and its allies, and were at risk living under Taliban rule.

Some veterans and refugee advocates criticized the policy changes, arguing that an entire community should not be punished for the actions of one person.

Advertisement

“Our hearts are absolutely broken for our Afghan allies, who have already endured more trauma, loss, and sacrifice than most Americans can imagine,” Shawn VanDiver, who leads #AfghanEvac, a group that supports the resettlement of Afghans to the U.S., said in a statement.

More broadly, the administration halted all asylum decisions. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said reviews will not restart until the agency has “dealt with the backlog” which is currently over a million cases.

“That backlog needs to be cleared up,” Noem said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet The Press.

Joseph Edlow, the director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, also ordered a sweeping review of green card holders from “every country of concern” — referring to a list of 19 countries that the administration previously ruled has “deficient” vetting and screening.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Read the ruling

Published

on

Read the ruling

Case: 25-2635 Document: 81

Page: 16

Date Filed: 12/01/2025

thereafter leaving (a)(2) and (a)(3) as the only means of selecting a different acting officer. First, § 3345(a) uses present-tense verbs (“dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform”) indicating a single, immediate occurrence, as opposed to, for example, the present perfect tense (has died, has resigned), which could indicate past actions with continued relevance. Hewitt v. United States, 606 U.S. 419, 427–28 (2025). Further, to the extent the Government relies on the phrase “is otherwise unable to perform” (in contrast to “dies” or “resigns”) to demonstrate that § 3345(a) refers to a continuing state, Gov. Br. at 19, such an argument fails. Here, the residual “otherwise” provision is limited by the list of specific examples that precede it. Like “dies” and “resigns,” “otherwise unable to perform” must be read to refer to a single instance. Fischer, 603 U.S. at 489–90. (holding that the “otherwise” clause in 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) is limited by preceding examples in (c)(1)).
The Girauds cogently respond that the statute’s use of the definite article “the” in reference to “the first assistant,” rather than “a” first assistant, “clearly refers to the deputy already in place at the time the vacancy arises.” Giraud Br. 15. According to the Girauds, this interpretation of (a)(1) avoids “the elaborate safeguards in subsections (a)(2), (a)(3), and (b)(1) collaps[ing] into irrelevance.” Id. at 18. Pina’s argument is similarly apt: he points out that the FVRA repeatedly makes expressly clear that “the President (and only the President)” may select the acting officer and that the Government’s approach would violate that language by giving the Attorney General broad discretion under the FVRA to appoint acting PAS officers by designating them first assistants. Pina Br. 27– 28; see also 5 U.S.C. § 3345(a)(2), (a)(3), (c)(1).
Indeed, the upshot of the Government’s argument is that, while subsections (a)(2) and (a)(3) narrowly constrain

16

Continue Reading

Trending