Connect with us

Entertainment

Audrey Hobert’s pop success is more than a lucky strike

Published

on

Audrey Hobert’s pop success is more than a lucky strike

Audrey Hobert isn’t clowning herself anymore. She was meant to be a pop star.

“I had been sitting on all of this music long enough that there was like a tiny man in my soul beating down the door of my soul,” Hobert, 26, said on a recent rainy morning at Swingers Diner in Hollywood.

This week, the L.A. native sets out on her Staircase to Stardom tour across North America, Europe and Australia. Intimate venues will see her perform from her debut album, “Who’s the Clown?,” released via RCA Records in August. She stops at the El Rey Theatre in the heart of Miracle Mile on Thursday, before performing the next day at Inglewood’s Intuit Dome for Jingle Ball.

Though the “Bowling alley” singer has “so immensely” enjoyed her whirlwind year, music wasn’t always in the cards. After graduating from New York University with a BFA in screenwriting in 2021, she fell into place behind the scenes, working in a Nickelodeon writers’ room for the since-canceled “The Really Loud House.”

Everything changed when she started penning tracks with childhood friend Gracie Abrams for the 2024 album “The Secret of Us.” Hobert signed a publishing deal with Universal Music Group soon after and participated in songwriter sessions for a few months before setting her sights on something more personal. Initially writing for herself, it became clear her confessional lyrics couldn’t be confined to her bedroom walls.

Advertisement

She teamed up with producer Ricky Gourmet to pin down the perfect level of bubblegum pop and determine when a song was in need of a good saxophone solo. Despite never being cast in a lead role during her “theater kid” tenure, Hobert’s music exudes main character energy. The first single she put out, “Sue me,” a high-voltage pop anthem about hooking up with an ex if only to feel wanted for a glimmer in time, reached No. 26 on Billboard’s Pop Airplay Chart. The music video accompanying the release — directed by Hobert, as all her videos are — introduced listeners to an artist not afraid to dance like nobody’s watching.

Even though she’s performed only a handful of shows, she already has a dedicated fan base at the ready to belt her most self-aware lyrics at her high-profile live shows — whether that be an expletive-laced chorus in “Sue me” or a line about a forgotten pizza pocket in “Sex and the city.”

Over French toast and black coffee, Hobert mused about the career she never saw coming.

This conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Audrey Hobert fell for songwriting when she collaborated with Gracie Abrams on the latter’s “The Secret of Us.”

Advertisement

(Annie Noelker / For The Times)

As someone who likes to be at home in her creams and nightgown, how have you adapted to the life of an up-and-coming pop star?
I just still feel like a girl who likes to be in her creams and nightgown, and I also, in addition to that, really enjoy the feeling of working and sort of running on fumes. I think if you like that feeling too much, it dips into dangerous territory a little bit, but it doesn’t … feel much like partying. For instance, I’ve been shooting a music video for the past four days, and last night I was up until 3 in the morning with what we were referring to as the skeleton crew. It feels like I’m not even almost entirely there yet, and I will innately know, “Oh my God, I’ve arrived.” But you can sort of protect yourself from it if that’s what you want.

How are you feeling about performing in L.A.?
I think I’m gonna be incredibly nervous because it’s gonna be the majority of my friends and family there, and I’ve made the decision to keep all details of what the tour is gonna be a secret from all of my friends and family, just so that they can see it. I just feel like I’m going to get the best feedback from them if I’m not tipping them or giving them a hint as to what it’s going to be and if they’re just witnessing it for the first time. And that’s kind of what I’m interested [in] with this first tour, because it’s so short and it’s almost an underplay, and I just am wanting constructive criticism and what worked, what didn’t.

Do you get more nervous performing in front of friends and family?
Nervousness and excitement are the same. It’s a very similar feeling. I think it’s more excitement than nervousness. In my experience over the summer, going to places around the world and performing, I always was more excited for the shows that I knew I had people that I personally knew at. Performing in Australia and Amsterdam and Berlin, it was sort of a pressure’s off feeling.

Advertisement

How were the other shows?
It was such a great first crack at singing my songs to a crowd of people. I never really pictured myself as “girl with guitar on stage alone,” but it is how I wrote a lot of the songs. So it didn’t feel like I was cosplaying, necessarily, but I am also a theater kid, and my deep instinct is to be on my feet sans instruments for certain songs, and so I have no idea how it’s gonna feel. I did “Jimmy Fallon,” and that was sort of a taste, but it’s not what performing to a crowd full of people who like my music is gonna feel like. But it was really, really fun, and it did get me excited.

How does it feel to hear people singing your lyrics back already?
Pretty wild. I can think back to the writing of these songs, and remember so well how hard I worked on every single line, because I cared and because I knew that there was a best version of every line of every song. It was yesterday, someone asked me if I were nervous to perform my original writing, and I have been eager since the moment I wrote it, because I just worked hard. So when people sing my lyrics back to me, I’m like, “Damn right, yeah. Took me a while to figure out how to say that thing, and it was all in the hope that you’d be either alone gobsmacked or in this room with me wanting to scream it back at me.”

Singer and songwriter Audrey Hobert at Swingers Diner in Hollywood

Audrey Hobert compares songwriting to entering “a third dimension.”

(Annie Noelker / For The Times)

In your song “Phoebe,” you open with, “I went to New York / ’Cause a man in a suit told me / You’re gonna be a star.” From a listener standpoint, it felt like “Sue me” dropped and everything took off. Can you tell me more about the process of writing and pitching?
I had just discovered that I like to write songs. It was simply that, and it was like a pastime. I had written all these songs with Gracie and signed a publishing deal as a result, and was sort of in this limbo of … I was a child who knew exactly what she wanted to do, and now I’m an adult and am technically a signed songwriter, but I have not spent any of my life wanting to be a songwriter, so I can’t imagine that this is the way my life is going to suddenly go, that I’m going to launch myself into a career that I haven’t wanted my whole life in the same way I wanted to be a television writer.

Advertisement

But at the same time, the way that it all unfolded felt so cosmic and I knew that songwriting felt very interesting. So as it all unfolded, I just never, for a second, questioned it or let myself feel even a stitch of imposter syndrome because I knew better. I knew that to hold myself back from whatever this journey was going to be would be me doing myself a huge disservice.

Gracie and I were living together at the time, and that was kind of in the thick of her intense touring. So she was gone. I was living on the Westside of L.A., which is not a very young area, and found myself sort of feeling like I was this Rapunzel type, living in this cement townhouse and very isolated. And I just started writing songs, and I found that it was like a third dimension, sort of “Twilight Zone”-style, that I could go to and exit my body entirely. Forget that I was maybe feeling a little bit lonely, forget that I missed my best friend, forget that I wanted a boyfriend and didn’t have one, and just write.

There’s nothing as mystical as songwriting to me, because it’s two kinds of writing — melodic writing that is completely unexplainable, and then lyrics, that is sort of the best puzzle. It’s like math, which I’m actually very bad at, but I can see a sentiment come together in my head before it actually does. It was just eight months basically of manic writing. And during that time is when I … told Universal Music Publishing, “I think I want to try an artist project.” It was sort of a way to get out of doing songwriting sessions, and then [I] met Ricky and knew that I didn’t want to spend all day, every day, making something with anybody else. It was just the purest, most greatest fun of my young life.

You said you woke up one day with the title of the album and the cover art, and you thought it was strange at first. Have you gained any more clarity on what that means?
I know that the cover specifically was born out of me sort of assuming that I would put this project together by myself. I just never considered that a label might get involved. And I thought, as a new artist, I’m going to have to intrigue people with the cover of this project, whatever it is. And I just felt like a white girl making pop music hasn’t done horrifying imagery. I just [wanted] to scare someone and to make someone go, “What kind of music is this?” And then you find out it’s just pop. That was the intention.

Take me to the release of “Sue me.” What was that moment like?
The date of the release got pushed back a few times, and every time it got pushed back, my heart broke a little bit. I just couldn’t wait. I was more eager than I’d ever been to do anything … and the second I put one song out, I felt just way more free.

Advertisement

In terms of the response to it, you just never know. You could have a great song and do everything right, and it just doesn’t work. It’s not like “Sue me” is a “Million Dollar Baby,” Tommy Richman-style viral hit, but it did catch fire and that felt great. Also, I had probably, by the time that “Sue me” came out, listened to it upwards of 800 times. So I wasn’t like, “People like the song.” I was like, “I love this song.”

How was the transition to writing songs about your own life?
It just didn’t feel like it was an active switch. Writing with Gracie was the same kind of bliss as it feels to write by myself, but it’s sweeter in a different way. It feels good in a different way because it’s totally shared. And one of my greatest joys in life is sharing in something with her. It always has been since I’ve known her, since we were kids. We never planned or thought we would collaborate in a greater way, because it felt like hanging out was a creative collaboration; I can’t really describe it. When I started writing by myself, it’s a bit more grueling, but then it’s the same sort of drug-like rush that you get when you feel like you’ve written a good line.

Your sound feels very nostalgic to me, but then there are lyrics like those in “Thirst Trap” that could only be from this digital era. You’ve said you didn’t have any direct references for this project, but are there any artists who have influenced your approach to songwriting?
I think that could become true for my next album, but I felt like I didn’t know the rules of songwriting. I always would listen to pop music and … was always asking myself, “Why is this the best song ever? Oh, it’s because this, this, this.” But when I wrote these songs, I remember having the active thought early on of, “There are no rules.” I have far too much of a slant, and it was so fresh and new that I have artists who I look up to in terms of songwriting, but it came all just from deep within me. I remember truly having the thought of, “I don’t know if this is classic, typical structure, I just know that this is what is keeping me interested. So I’m gonna just go with it.”

Your music videos are amazing. Is there a dream director you’d like to work with or do you want to direct every Audrey Hobert music video?
If you had asked me when I was going out to labels and pitching myself as an artist, I would have said I’d never work with a director. But the more I do them, obviously, the more I love to direct, but also the more that I would feel interested in being directed. I really, really like this guy Dan Streit, and we actually are using his camera for the music video that we just finished shooting. I just think he’s super cool, and he’s the only guy that I’ve ever been like, “Huh, I wonder if he’d ever direct one of my videos.”

Advertisement

Your video for “Thirst Trap” was inspired by the Japanese horror film “House.” You also reference “High School Musical 2.” What’s your taste in movies like? Do you have any comfort watches?
I’m just really into seeing movies all the time. I’ve been practicing keeping the social media apps off my phone and just tuning in to something. I had never seen a Robert Altman movie, and I just watched “The Player,” and I really enjoyed that. And comfort watches … “Frances Ha,” “Mistress America.” I just named two Greta Gerwigs, but I just love her as an actress. I mean, I love her as a director, but I really love her as an actress. And “House” was something that I just stumbled upon and then watched twice in a row. I love it. I feel like my taste is pretty eclectic.

Is fashion an important part of your artistic vision?
If you had asked me in fourth grade what I wanted to be when I grew up, I would probably say “fashion designer.” I always felt inspired by the clothes on the Disney Channel. I am interested, I do like it, but in order for me to feel comfortable going about the beginnings of this pop-star life, I need to be dressed in my own clothes or else I freak out. I just did a shoot for Vevo and I wore my own clothes, didn’t really spend much time on my appearance. I remember seeing the photos and being like, “Sometimes it’s worth it to just put in a little bit more of an effort, girl.” But that being said, I need to feel like myself.

Who was your Disney Channel fashion inspiration?
Selena Gomez. All the way.

Have you been writing more or are you taking a breather now that the album is out?
I’ve been thinking a lot about writer’s block and the concept of it, and I don’t know if it’s real, but the conclusion I’ve come to is I don’t have to worry about if I’m a writer or not, because I’ve felt like a writer my entire life. Some people swear by writing a song every day and finishing it, even if it’s bad. Some people take four years off from writing at all. How I feel this morning is when I have a song to write, I know I’m gonna write it. I try not to waste my time worrying about why I’m not writing all the time in the way I was when I wrote the album. And so I guess to answer the question, not really.

What’s been the most rewarding part of this experience? Does it all go back to [opening track] “I like to touch people”?
That’s very astute. Yeah, it’s the most exciting part of all of this. It is more exciting than the flashing lights of the L.A. Times photographer at Swingers Diner and it’s more exciting than someone who I respect following me on Instagram, and it reminds me why I’m doing it all. It’s the coolest thing of all time.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Sacred Heart: His Reign Has No End’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Sacred Heart: His Reign Has No End’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – As America’s Catholic bishops prepare to mark the semiquincentennial by consecrating the nation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, a French docudrama that can aid viewers in understanding the full significance of such an action makes its timely appearance.

A Fathom Entertainment presentation, “Sacred Heart: His Reign Has No End” will have a limited theatrical run June 9-11 and June 14. The version screening on June 10 will be dubbed in Spanish.

Following its initial release in France last fall, the film proved to be phenomenally popular, with ticket sales reaching the half-million mark in a country usually regarded as deeply secular. This unusual development clearly indicates that the movie resonated with audiences in a way that even its creators may not have expected.

Filmmakers Sabrina and Steven J. Gunnell examine the origins, meaning and enduring relevance of devotion to the Sacred Heart. They begin their exploration even before the landmark revelations received in the 1670s by St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, a Burgundian Visitation nun, showing that earlier saints had focused on the subject in medieval times.

Using reenactments, interviews and archival images, the Gunnells also highlight the theological connection between the Sacred Heart and the Eucharist. This is done, in part, by recounting a few of the many Eucharistic miracles granted to the Church over the centuries.

Advertisement

By profiling contemporary devotees of the Sacred Heart, including formerly inactive Catholics, the picture demonstrates the impact the insights given to St. Margaret Mary continue to have on the lives of people around the world. Locations visited range from the gang-infested streets of a Parisian suburb to the once war-torn Central American country of El Salvador.

An excellent and enjoyable catechetical resource, the feature is also both moving and uplifting. It can be recommended for all but the youngest kids.

For theater locations and showtimes, go to: sacredheartfilm.us

Dubbed into English.

The film contains gory images of the Crucifixion. The OSV News classification is A-II — adults and adolescents. Not rated by the Motion Picture Association.

Advertisement

Read More Movie & Television Reviews

Copyright © 2026 OSV News

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Two of music’s most powerful executives maxed out donations to Spencer Pratt

Published

on

Two of music’s most powerful executives maxed out donations to Spencer Pratt

According to data from the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission, Pratt’s supporters include two members of the record industry’s most powerful family who have donated the maximum amount allowed by law.

Los Angeles’ music industry, in recent years, has generally supported progressive causes. But as the primaries for the city’s mayoral race and California‘s governorship wrapped up Tuesday, some music executives and performers have supported and donated large amounts to Spencer Pratt, the right-leaning activist and reality TV star running for mayor.

According to data from the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission, Pratt’s supporters include two members of the record industry’s most powerful family who donated the maximum amount allowed by law.

Pratt is a registered Republican whose heated rhetoric about homeless “zombies” and AI-created advertisements have rankled progressives and delighted conservatives. He has received support from President Trump, who told reporters that “I’d like to see him do well. He’s a character. I don’t know him, I assume he probably supports me… I heard he’s a big MAGA person.”

Advertisement

In response, Pratt told TMZ that “Everybody wants me to succeed because L.A. is the most important city in the country. The only support I need is from moms that wanna feel safe in Los Angeles. I’m laser-focused on that.”

Universal Music Group is home to some of music’s most outspoken progressives, including Olivia Rodrigo and Billie Eilish, whose brother and collaborator Finneas O’Connell donated $250 to the progressive mayoral candidate Nithya Raman on May 6.

Earlier this year, UMG’s chairman and chief executive Lucian Grainge presented Rodrigo with the company’s Universal Music Group x REVERB Amplifier Award, which advocates for “social and environmental nonprofit campaigns through the cultural power of music,” according to a release.

On May 9, Grainge (listed as a resident of Pacific Palisades, where Pratt lost his home in the 2025 fires) maxed out with an $1,800 donation to Pratt’s campaign, as previously reported in The Times. A representative for UMG did not immediately return a request for comment on Grainge’s donation.

He’s not the only Pratt donor in the family.

Advertisement

Grainge’s son Elliot ascended through the record industry with his 10k Projects label, and now heads UMG’s competitor Atlantic Records. Vocal progressives like Cardi B, the Marías and Charli XCX are some of the label’s most high-profile acts.

On May 8, Elliot Grainge also gave $1,800 to Pratt‘s campaign. A representative for Atlantic did not immediately return a request for comment.

Last month, the record producer and composing titan David Foster and his wife, singer Katharine McPhee, performed at a fundraiser for Pratt where they crooned a version of Tina Turner’s hit “The Best” to the mayoral hopeful. “Spencer, you’re simply the best. Better than all the rest. Better than Karen Bass and Nithya Raman,” McPhee sang.

At Warner Music, Gabz Landman, the senior vice president for A&R at Warner Chappell, its powerful music publishing wing, who has worked with Dua Lipa, Laufey and Amy Allen, gave $105.24 to Pratt on Feb. 4. Through a Warner Music representative, Landman said the donation was for merchandise given to a friend, and was not intended as support for Pratt’s campaign.

The superstar EDM producer and DJ Kaskade has left supportive messages on Pratt’s social media, commenting on one of the candidate’s posts that “At this point, who is buying in to Bass’s fairytale narrative?! I am still shocked she hasn’t resigned!” The DJ and producer Diplo also left a supportive comment — a prayer-hands emoji and “please” — on one of Pratt’s social media posts. Records do not show any personal donations to Pratt’s campaign from either artist.

Advertisement

Public records do not show any donations to Pratt’s campaign from live-industry executives atop firms like Live Nation, AEG or Goldenvoice.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Masters of the Universe (2026) | Movie Review | Deep Focus Review

Published

on

Masters of the Universe (2026) | Movie Review | Deep Focus Review

There’s a photo of me (below) from the mid-1980s, when I was around age 5, standing on the hood of an old Plymouth in the overgrown field behind my childhood home. I’m holding He-Man’s shield in one hand and his sword, made of yellow plastic, in the other. (Unrelatedly, I’m also wearing an Incredible Hulk shirt in the picture.) And I’m grinning with pride because I have thoroughly conquered the jalopy. The vehicle never ran again, probably because I fucking destroyed it with my sword and shield. Around that time, I also had a He-Man birthday cake and a sizable collection of Mattel’s Masters of the Universe action figures. They were my first foray into toys of this kind, later replaced by G.I. Joe, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and X-Men. However, my nostalgia for He-Man remains almost nonexistent today, perhaps because, looking back at the material, the mythology remains at once weird and unmemorable, and neither the popular animated series nor the 1987 film, Masters of the Universe, starring Dolph Lundgren and Frank Langella, holds up well. 

Over the years, Mattel has tried to revive the toy line and cartoon, but the company’s biggest effort thus far is the new feature from Amazon MGM Studios, which reportedly spent upwards of $200 million on a blockbuster-sized Masters of the Universe. If the 1980s versions of this franchise unabashedly targeted the preadolescent boy demographic, the new iteration has been reconfigured (by a sausage fest of credited screenwriters: Chris Butler, Aaron Nee, Adam Nee, and David Callaham) to adopt a more conventional mold. The movie also incorporates the last three decades of ironic reassessment: the series’ very 1980s obsession with bulging muscles; the loincloth-centric costumes, all of which look like rejected designs from Zardoz (1974); the vague eroticism between He-Man and several characters, including his nemesis, Skeletor; and the eccentricities of the cartoon, from the many heads thrown back in laughter to the bizarre characters—all of which started first as action figures (Stinkor, Mantenna, etc.), around which the writers built a lame storyline.

Despite its origins, Masters of the Universe sets out to become a four-quadrant feature, appealing to everyone, and in that, no one in particular. The story is too bloated for little children, with a 142-minute runtime that challenged the attention spans of the kids in my prescreening, who became restless after an hour. Admittedly, so did I. The material’s self-awareness and humor aren’t memorable enough to distinguish it from other, better examples in this genre, such as Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves (2023)—a movie that I enjoy more with each subsequent viewing. And director Travis Knight can’t decide whether the audience should take these characters seriously or laugh at their inherent silliness. He attempts both and does neither very well. The result did not rekindle my nostalgia for this chapter of my childhood; it didn’t create an exciting new take for audiences of all ages, either.

A protracted opening establishes the distant realm called Eternia, where sword-and-sandal heroes stand alongside robots and flying ships with laser guns. Eternia’s resident baddie, Skeletor (voiced by Jared Leto, doing an R-rolling master-thespian thing), wants the Sword of Power, which imbues its wielder with, as you might guess, power. But it’s kept in Castle Grayskull, home of King Randor (James Purefoy), who’s disappointed by his son, Adam (Artie Wilkinson-Hunt), a young boy more interested in goofing around than learning to fight. When Skeletor attacks the castle and proves victorious, the Enchantress (Morena Baccarin), the magically inclined protector of Grayskull, sends Adam away to Earth along with the coveted sword. What happens then? Did a couple of farmers adopt him à la Superman? Or did he grow up in the foster system? The writers ignore such practical questions, picking up the story years later, when the adult Adam (now a hulking Nicholas Galitzine) works in corporate human resources. After Adam finally locates his sword, which was lost when he was transported from Eternia to Earth, he eventually finds his way home with the help of his childhood friend, Teela (Camila Mendes), to retake Grayskull from Skeletor. 

Advertisement

Knight’s main source of inspiration, besides the cartoon and earlier movie, seems to be the similarly themed cult classic Flash Gordon (1980). Masters of the Universe’s music features identical-sounding Howard Blake-style guitar riffs and, to echo the original songs Queen wrote for Flash Gordon, the production uses Queen’s “Princes of the Universe” on the soundtrack. In other areas, Knight directs a conventional franchise movie with choppily edited and CGI-heavy battle scenes full of anonymous violence, lifeless chase sequences, digital backdrops resembling video-game environments, and shameless product placements for Coca-Cola and Amazon. The VFX sometimes look impressive; at other times, they look cheap and generic. Fortunately, Knight’s production also offers practical effects and prosthetics for some characters, most memorably the cyborg Trap Jaw. Knight’s secret weapon is costume designer Richard Sale, who visualizes the inherently absurd look of these characters, for better or worse, in tangible garb. The actors inhabiting the excellent costumes don’t have much to do, though. Ask yourself why they hired Kristen Wiig to voice Roboto, a bland robot character whose dialogue could have easily been performed by anyone else, or even just replaced with the beeps and boops of a Star Wars droid. When you have Kristen Wiig, use her.

Masters of the Universe movie still 2

Elsewhere, Masters of the Universe attempts to be self-aware in its irony and sexually suggestive underpinnings. There’s a running gag about how practically everyone can’t keep their eyes off Adam after he becomes his heroic alter-ego, He-Man, given his oiled-up muscles and blonde locks. But under Adam’s pink shirt, he still looks buff, making his eventual Hulk-like transformation into a muscle-bound barbarian unremarkable. Elsewhere, I liked the detail of Adam growing up on Earth and forgetting everyone’s names on Eternia, so he makes up their names based on their physical characteristics. A man with a big metal hand becomes Fisto (Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson), and another with a metal head-butting helmet becomes Ram-Man (Jon Xue Zhang). The writers take advantage of this with veiled dirty jokes about fisting and Ram-Man “giving head” to Skeletor’s goons. That’s about as clever as the movie gets. As for character development, there’s almost none. Skeletor, for instance, wants to be bad for the sake of being bad. His motivations are nonexistent, resulting in an obvious, uninteresting, and one-dimensional villain.  

A key series in the conservative, Reagan-era 1980s, the Masters of the Universe cartoon and previous movie valued strength and power, muscles and might. Today, that message has negative, regressive associations with the political right, which often looks at this period from a fond standpoint. To avoid alienating any part of their audience, the filmmakers desperately try to please everyone with a mild progressive commentary to counter the franchise’s original themes. Adam’s character must learn to “be a man” to please his father, King Randor, and his makeshift father figure, Man-at-Arms (Idris Elba, in a chummy reformed drunk role). But there’s also a half-hearted message that Adam, having worked in human resources, knows the value of empathy and emotional intelligence. For a while there, the movie even claims you can’t solve every problem with muscles—that is, until He-Man resolves the conflict by pummeling Skeletor with his fists. The movie’s message is ultimately nonexistent. The committee making this movie has carefully avoided any line-in-the-sand worldview, all in an attempt to manufacture a box-office hit that will please everyone and offend no one. 

That’s exactly the problem with Masters of the Universe. It’s so afraid to have a perspective or be about something that nothing onscreen has an impact. This is not to say every movie must have a substantive message. Sometimes, a mindless adventure is enough. However, even on those terms, there’s no tension or danger here because Skeletor is never all that menacing, and Adam alternates between self-parody and earnest heroism. None of the emotional beats land, not the many father-son dynamics nor the hero’s journey. And the production’s competing tones, from its intentional camp to its sword-swinging adventure, lack the balance of wit and scope that Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves so delightfully captured. For much of the runtime, I felt bored and, aside from a few chuckles at the childish humor, disengaged from everything happening. Perhaps Roboto describes the movie best when referring to life as “a series of absurdities leading to infinite nothingness.”

Photo: Brian the Barbarian

Advertisement

Masters of the Universe movie still 4

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending