Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Supreme Court Preserves Municipal Control Over Early Absentee Voting Sites

Published

on

Wisconsin Supreme Court Preserves Municipal Control Over Early Absentee Voting Sites


The City of Racine Clerk’s Office mobile voting van is pictured July 26, 2022, at the Dr. Martin Luther King Community Center in Racine, Wis. (Ryan Patterson/The Journal Times via AP, File)

In a 4-3 ruling, the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed a right-wing legal challenge that sought to limit the authority of municipalities to designate early absentee voting locations and prevent future use of a mobile voting van deployed by the city of Racine during the 2022 election cycle. 

The majority opinion — from which all of the court’s conservative justices dissented — did not address the merits of the case, instead concluding that the individual plaintiff who sought judicial review lacked standing. 

Tuesday’s decision stems from a 2022 lawsuit from the conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL), which not only sought to prohibit Racine from using a mobile van to conduct in-person absentee voting, but also aimed to restrict the city’s designation of in-person absentee voting sites more broadly. In Wisconsin, such sites allow individuals to request, vote and return their absentee ballots prior to Election Day. 

WILL filed the case on behalf of a Racine voter, Kenneth Brown, after unsuccessfully bringing an administrative complaint over the same absentee voting issues before the Wisconsin Elections Commission — the state’s bipartisan election administration agency — in August 2022. 

Advertisement

“Brown has failed to demonstrate that WEC’s decision caused him any such injury. As a result, Brown does not have standing, and his complaint must be dismissed,” today’s decision reads.    

In a January 2024 ruling, a Wisconsin trial court judge partially sided with WILL, concluding that the city’s geographical distribution of early voting sites during the 2022 primary election unlawfully afforded an advantage to Democratic voters. 

While the judge additionally deemed the use of the city’s election van unlawful, he rejected one of WILL’s arguments to further curtail early voting — namely that in-person absentee ballot sites should be located as near as possible to the office of the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners. 

Following the trial court’s decision, multiple parties to the case — including the Wisconsin Elections Commission, Black Leaders Organizing for Communities (BLOC) and the Democratic National Committee — asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to review the matter, which it agreed to do in a May 2024 order. 

Prior to holding oral argument, the court’s liberal majority paused a portion of the trial court’s order ahead of the state’s 2024 elections that would have banned municipalities from operating early voting sites in a manner that may have conferred a partisan advantage. The justices noted that leaving the trial court’s partisan advantage standard in place could create confusion and uncertainty for both voters and election officials by drastically reducing the availability of early voting sites. 

Advertisement

At oral argument last September, BLOC expressed concerns about how severely limiting the number of available early voting locations throughout the state would disproportionately affect voters of color, who predominately reside in Wisconsin’s cities. 

Other parties on the pro-voting side argued that requiring in-person absentee voting sites to be situated as closely as possible to a municipal clerk’s office would effectively require the state to revert back to a defunct provision of Wisconsin law that only allowed for one alternate in-person absentee site per municipality. 

Meanwhile, WILL contended that Racine’s “scattering” of absentee voting sites throughout different areas outside of where the municipal clerk’s office is located “was what conferred partisan advantage” to Democrats during the 2022 primary election. 

With today’s ruling, Wisconsin voters will continue to have access to early absentee voting sites in future elections. However, given the decision did not address the merits of Brown’s arguments, the door still remains open for future right-wing legal challenges to this election matter. 

The next Wisconsin election will take place April 1, when voters will head to the polls to decide a high-profile state Supreme Court race that will determine ideological control of the bench. Liberal Dane County Circuit Court Judge Susan Crawford and conservative Waukesha County Circuit Court Judge Brad Schimel are vying for a seat that will be vacated by liberal Justice Ann Walsh Bradley.

Advertisement

Read the ruling here. 

Learn more about the case here.



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Wisconsin health professionals share tips to protect against respiratory illnesses

Published

on

Wisconsin health professionals share tips to protect against respiratory illnesses


MADISON, Wis. (WMTV) -Respiratory illness season has begun in Wisconsin, with health professionals reporting increased flu cases and higher demand for medications and vaccines.

Over-the-counter medicines are flying off the shelves at Forward Pharmacy in McFarland, according to manager Tony Peterangelo.

“We’ve had to increase like how much of some of that stuff we’ve kept on hand,” Peterangelo said. “We had to make some special orders to really bulk up on some of it too.”

Forward Pharmacy manager Tony Peterangelo filling prescriptions as the respiratory illness season begins.(WMTV/Camberyn Kelley)

Upland Hills physician Benjamin Hecht said the respiratory illness season typically begins after Thanksgiving.

Advertisement

“As of right now, we are just starting in the last week or two to see some Influenza A. Last year was a pretty tough flu year for us, influenza in Wisconsin. It’s still to be seen how severe of a year this is going to be in 2025-26,” he said.

Respiratory viruses are hard to avoid according to the Upland Hills physician.

“You can wear masks and wash your hands a ton, but you’re going to get exposed to these viruses at some point,” Dr. Hecht said.

RSV poses concern for young children

Dr. Hecht said another concern this season is RSV, particularly for young children with developing immune systems.

“The kids that get this, especially the really young kids, that don’t have a mature immune system, they can get pretty sick from RSV. That’s a particularly scary one. If you’re in a position where you qualify to get that vaccination or perhaps your kids do, please consider that,” Dr. Hecht said.

Advertisement

Forward Pharmacy is meeting demand for vaccines, which Peterangelo said can help protect against viruses.

“All of that stuff reduces the need to scramble on the back end to get antibiotics and cough suppressants. It doesn’t completely reduce your risk, but it reduces it enough that your likelihood of getting that is down,” Peterangelo said.

Forward Pharmacy is meeting demand for vaccines, which Peterangelo said can help protect...
Forward Pharmacy is meeting demand for vaccines, which Peterangelo said can help protect against viruses.(WMTV/Camberyn Kelley)

The pharmacy has given out dozens of flu and covid shots in a day.

“I would say maybe in the 60 to 80 range,” Peterangelo said.

Dr. Hecht said influenza B will come later in the season. He recommends people with severe respiratory symptoms like breathing troubles to see a doctor.

“The big thing is just living a healthy lifestyle, staying well hydrated, getting good sleep, doing what you can with physical activity and exercise to make sure your immune system is in tip top shape,” Dr. Hecht said.

Advertisement

According to new CDC data, doctor visits for flu-like symptoms rose to more than 3% in the last two weeks. The majority of flu cases are caused by a mutated strain that causes more severe illness, particularly among older adults.

Click here to download the WMTV15 News app or our WMTV15 First Alert weather app.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Former Trump aides appear in Wisconsin court over 2020 election fraud charges

Published

on

Former Trump aides appear in Wisconsin court over 2020 election fraud charges


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Two attorneys and an aide who all worked on President Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign appeared in court Monday for a preliminary hearing in Wisconsin on felony forgery charges related to a fake elector scheme.

The Wisconsin case is moving forward even as others in the battleground states of Michigan and Georgia have faltered. A special prosecutor last year dropped a federal case alleging Trump conspired to overturn the 2020 election. Another case in Nevada is still alive.

The Wisconsin case was filed a year ago but has been tied up as the Trump aides have fought, unsuccessfully so far, to have the charges dismissed.

The hearing on Monday comes a week after Trump attorney Jim Troupis, one of the three who were charged, tried unsuccessfully to get the judge to step down in the case and have it moved to another county. Troupis, who the other two defendants joined in his motion, alleged that the judge did not write a previous order issued in August declining to dismiss the case. Instead, he accused the father of the judge’s law clerk, a retired judge, of actually writing the opinion.

Advertisement

Troupis, who served one year as a judge in the same county where he was charged, also alleged that all of the judges in Dane County are biased against him and he can’t get a fair trial.

Dane County Circuit Judge John Hyland said he and a staff attorney alone wrote the order. Hyland also said Troupis presented no evidence to back up his claims of bias and refused to step down or delay the hearing.

Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson asked the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate the allegations.

The same judge will determine at Monday’s hearing whether there’s enough evidence to proceed with the charges against the three.

The former Trump aides face 11 felony charges each related to their roles in the 2020 fake elector scheme. In addition to Troupis, the other defendants are Kenneth Chesebro, an attorney who advised Trump’s campaign, and Mike Roman, Trump’s director of Election Day operations in 2020.

Advertisement

The Wisconsin Department of Justice, headed by Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul, brought the felony forgery charges in 2024, alleging that the three defrauded the 10 Republican electors who cast their ballots for Trump in 2020.

Prosecutors contend the three lied to the Republicans about how the certificate they signed would be used as part of a plan to submit paperwork to then-Vice President Mike Pence, falsely claiming that Trump had won the battleground state that year.

The complaint said a majority of the 10 Republicans told investigators that they were needed to sign the elector certificate indicating Trump had won only to preserve his legal options if a court changed the outcome of the election in Wisconsin.

A majority of the electors told investigators that they did not believe their signatures on the elector certificate would be submitted to Congress without a court ruling, the complaint said. Also, a majority said they did not consent to having their signatures presented as if Trump had won without such a court ruling, the complaint said.

Federal prosecutors who investigated Trump’s conduct related to the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot said the fake electors scheme originated in Wisconsin.

Advertisement

The Trump associates have argued that no crime took place. But the judge in August rejected their arguments in allowing the case to proceed to Monday’s preliminary hearing.

Trump lost Wisconsin in 2020 but fought to have the defeat overturned. He won the state in both 2016 and 2024.

The state charges against the Trump attorneys and aide are the only ones in Wisconsin. None of the electors have been charged. The 10 Wisconsin electors, Chesebro and Troupis all settled a lawsuit that was brought against them seeking damages.

___

This story has been corrected to show that the attorneys who are charged formerly worked on Trump’s campaign, but are still practicing attorneys.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

No. 3 Wisconsin Badgers vs. No. 1 Texas Longhorns: Game Thread

Published

on

No. 3 Wisconsin Badgers vs. No. 1 Texas Longhorns: Game Thread


The Wisconsin Badgers are facing off against the Texas Longhorns in the Elite 8 on Sunday evening, looking to make their way back to the Final Four in Kansas City next week.

Wisconsin pulled off an impressive win over the No. 2 Stanford Cardinal on Friday, as it out-hit the latter in a thriller behind strong efforts from Mimi Colyer (27 kills) and Charlie Fuerbringer (61 assists).

Now, they’re facing a team that they were swept by earlier in the season, as the Longhorns thrived off Badger errors during their first matchup.

Texas has cruised through its competition so far in the NCAA Tournament, beating Florida A&M, Penn State, and Indiana en route to the Elite 8.

Advertisement

If Wisconsin can win, it would face the No. 1 Kentucky Wildcats on Thursday in the Final Four, with the No. 3 Texas A&M Aggies and No. 1 Pittsburgh Panthers being the other two teams still left in the field.

Can the Badgers get a huge upset and break the Texas streak of wins on Sunday? Join us as our game thread is officially active.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending