Connect with us

South Dakota

South Dakota Medical Marijuana Industry Pushes For Rules Changes As Program Enrollment Dwindles

Published

on

South Dakota Medical Marijuana Industry Pushes For Rules Changes As Program Enrollment Dwindles


“Is this program working, and do the rules make sense? Yes for public safety, but do they make sense for the people trying to run businesses?”

By John Hult, South Dakota Searchlight

Cannabis industry advocates said Monday that they need representation on the state’s Medical Marijuana Oversight Committee.

The committee also learned that the number of patient cards issued in South Dakota has continued to fall since a February peak, sparking concern from the group’s patient representative about marijuana card denials.

Advertisement

South Dakota’s medical cannabis program is governed by both state law and a set of administrative rules interpreting those laws for use in the day-to-day operations of the program.

The issues presented by the cannabis industry on Monday were largely related to rules, not the medical pot chapter of South Dakota law. Most of those issues could be resolved through the rulemaking process, but the committee didn’t review any potential rule changes at its meeting in Pierre.

That’s in part because of an early deadline for rules this year. Rules need to be posted, and the public needs time to comment on changes, before getting approval from the state’s Rules Review Committee.

That committee’s final meeting before the 2025 legislative session came last month, which was earlier than previous years.

Emily Kerr of the health department told the committee that there wasn’t enough time to write new rules and hold public hearings after the 2024 legislative session.

Advertisement

“We really want to take the time to have robust conversations with legislators and industry,” she said.

Staffing was also mentioned as a hurdle for rule changes. The program recently hired three more people to help administer the cannabis program, but they’ve only been on the job a few months.

Industry: Rules push up prices

Pot lobbyist Jeremiah Murphy told the committee he understands that timing was an issue this year, in part because the health department runs the program with minimal staffing.

But he also said the committee is failing to address important operational issues that relate to its statutorily required duty to oversee the program and make recommendations to help make sure cannabis is accessible to patients at reasonable prices.

Advertisement

A change to state law in 2023 altered the committee’s makeup, which had originally required the inclusion of three medical cannabis patients. Now, there is one patient, and everyone else on the committee is in law enforcement, lawmaking or a part of the medical community.

Murphy said the lack of operational knowledge has allowed rules that push up the price of doing business—and, in turn, push up the price of cannabis for patients—to go unchallenged.

“We’d like to see the focus turn to include, more broadly, operations,” Murphy said. “Is this program working, and do the rules make sense? Yes for public safety, but do they make sense for the people trying to run businesses?”

Murphy’s only ask for the committee’s lawmakers was for them to consider adjusting the committee’s makeup by changing state law. But he had several examples from the Department of Health’s interpretation of its cannabis program rules he said could be fixed by the committee and the department.

Some of the rules, Murphy argued, are illogical, wasteful and overly burdensome.

Advertisement

One requires growers to test their crops in 50-pound batches, but that 50 pounds is measured before the crop is dried. Dried marijuana weighs about a fifth of its wet weight, Murphy said.

If the health department allowed operators to dry out the product before being divided into batches, operators would only need to pay for a fifth as many tests.

Ned Horsted of 605 Cannabis said he spends “six to 10 times” what he would if the state used the dry weight system commonly used in other states.

Murphy and the other cannabis industry advocates pointed to a handful of other issues, as well. Cannabis deliveries must use the same courier for pickup and delivery, for example, regardless of how many stops they might make or how far they’re going in a given day.

“There needs to be a way to safely put that product in another person’s hands,” Murphy said.

Advertisement

Lawmaker unconvinced of need for law change

Sen. Erin Tobin (R-Winner) said she expects most of the issues presented Monday could be cleared up through the rule-making process, rather than by legislation. She also told Murphy she’s not sure changing the committee’s makeup is necessary to make changes to rules.

Patients, municipal governments, school board members and designated caregivers might also have input for the committee, Tobin said.

She noted that the bill that changed the committee’s makeup specified that its members are meant to take input and consider the views of industry representatives, patients and the like at each of its meetings.

“You could argue that we need one of everything, right?” Tobin said. “We have an opportunity with the speaker and a mic for anybody that would like to come forward, and that’s valuable to us.”

Advertisement

Patient numbers dropping

Brad Jurgensen, the lone patient representative on the committee, noted that the number of medical marijuana cards in South Dakota has dropped considerably.

As of October 24, there were 12,186 patient cards in circulation in South Dakota. That’s down by 1,519 from February, when the state hit 13,705 card holders.

“Is there any state-specific reason why those numbers would be going down?” Jurgensen asked.

By then, Kerr had left the room.

Advertisement

Kittrick Jefferies, of Black Hills-based Puffy’s dispensaries, told the committee that his customers talk of being denied because their condition doesn’t qualify for a medical cannabis card under state law, but that “it’s all anecdotal.”

Department of Health spokesperson Tia Kafka did not immediately respond to a Searchlight question on why the number of cardholders is dropping.

The number of practitioners approved to write pot prescriptions, however, has continued to increase. More practitioners have been added to the state’s list every month since December of 2022.

This story was first published by South Dakota Searchlight.

Medical Marijuana Improves Chronic Pain And Mental Health Symptoms While Reducing Prescription Drug Use, Study Shows

Advertisement

Photo courtesy of Chris Wallis // Side Pocket Images.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.





Source link

South Dakota

South Dakota State University launches interdisciplinary Ph.D. in social science

Published

on

South Dakota State University launches interdisciplinary Ph.D. in social science


South Dakota State University is expanding its graduate offerings with the launch of a new social science Ph.D. program, an interdisciplinary program designed to address complex challenges facing rural communities and society at large.

Approved by the South Dakota Board of Regents in April 2025 and the Higher Learning Commission shortly after, the program will welcome its first cohort of students in fall 2026.

The program is housed in the School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies within the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Rather than focusing on a single discipline such as sociology or psychology, the new Ph.D. brings together faculty expertise from across SDSU’s colleges — including nursing, natural sciences, agriculture, pharmacy and allied health professions — to train scholars equipped to tackle today’s “wicked problems.”

Paul Markel

“The world’s complex issues require interdisciplinary teams,” said Paul Markel, professor and director of the School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies.

Advertisement

The launch of the social science Ph.D. program also marks a new chapter for SDSU’s historic tradition in graduate social science education. The university’s sociology program dates back to 1925, once producing nearly a quarter of all doctorates on campus during its peak. Admissions to the previous sociology Ph.D. were suspended in 2020 due in part to faculty staffing and shifting academic focus.

Rather than simply reviving the former program, faculty and administrators chose to reimagine it. The resulting social science Ph.D. program addresses the current, complex research needs of the university in alignment with Pathway to Premier 2030 and the “R1 Our Way” initiative — SDSU’s commitment to reaching high research activity designation. The program not only advances interdisciplinary research but also increases the number of research doctorates SDSU produces, a key benchmark in the journey toward R1 status.

“The interdisciplinary approach allows complex problems to be taken seriously and explored in depth, so that you can come up with real practical solutions in a way that no single discipline could do alone,” Markel emphasized.

The program’s creation involved a working group of faculty representing multiple disciplines and colleges, including:

  • Abigail Tobias-Lauerman, School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies
  • George Tsakiridis, School of American and Global Studies
  • Heidi Mennenga, College of Nursing
  • James Amell, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions
  • Jason Zimmerman, College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences
  • Jennifer Zavaleta Cheek, Department of Natural Resource Management
  • Kimberly Johnson Maier, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences
  • Londa Nwadike, College of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences
  • Shola Aromona, School of Communication and Journalism
  • Stephanie Hanson, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions
  • Tyler Miller, School of Psychology, Sociology and Rural Studies

Members met regularly to design curriculum, define core requirements and develop the program’s first two proposed specializations: 1) environmental and rural development and 2) rural well-being.

“At one point we had rural sociology on our campus,” Markel said. “So even with this program, both specializations represent a rural theme, specifically rural development and rural well-being. It’s honoring and rejuvenating our rural studies roots.”

Advertisement

The program’s structure allows students to ground themselves in social science theory while applying research methods to practical challenges like sustainable land management or rural health disparities. It also aims to revive SDSU’s historic partnership with SDSU Extension through renewed attention to rural vitality, echoing SDSU’s land-grant mission.

“The rural environment is very complex, and there are incredible challenges in the rural space,” Markel explained. “When we identify a problem in a rural community, whether it’s health care, access to food, education or workforce development, it’s not enough for any one discipline to focus on the problem because we really need to bring in teams and have multiple disciplines looking at the same problem to make a difference.”


From concept to approval, the Ph.D. in social science moved with rare speed in higher education. The initial proposal, written by Markel in collaboration with faculty such as School of Communication and Journalism Director Josh Westwick, School of American and Global Studies Director Christi Garst-Santos and MaryJo Benton Lee, adjunct faculty member and evaluation specialist, was submitted to Dean David Earnest of the College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences in September 2024. By December, the curricular paperwork was complete, and the program received final Board of Regents approval by April 2025.

The program is now included in SDSU’s Graduate Catalog, with recruitment and marketing underway for the first cohort’s admission in fall 2026. An advisory council composed of faculty from across participating colleges will oversee program evolution and ensure continued interdisciplinary collaboration.

The social science Ph.D. program positions South Dakota State University as one of the few institutions in the nation — alongside models like Syracuse University and Johns Hopkins — to offer an interdisciplinary social science doctorate.

Advertisement
Dennis Hedge

“I am excited about the impact that the social science Ph.D. program will have on our local communities and university,” SDSU Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs Dennis Hedge said. “While providing a significant boost to our university’s Carnegie R1 designation pursuit, this interdisciplinary Ph.D. program will importantly provide graduating students with a solid foundation of perspectives and methods in the social sciences that will serve as a framework for addressing complex issues faced by communities in our state and region. By doing such work, our communities will ultimately be stronger.”

Markel summarized the program’s aim this way: the doctoral training will ground students in social science theory and research methods while requiring them to work with interdisciplinary advisory committees and teams so their research and solutions are applied and relevant to an ever-changing, complex world.

“We want to be able to take the research that comes out of this program and apply it in meaningful ways to the people of South Dakota and the region who are living in rural environments,” Markel said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Abelman and Northern Arizona host South Dakota State

Published

on

Abelman and Northern Arizona host South Dakota State


Associated Press

South Dakota State Jackrabbits (4-4) at Northern Arizona Lumberjacks (4-2)

Advertisement

Flagstaff, Arizona; Wednesday, 8 p.m. EST

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Jackrabbits -2.5; over/under is 149.5

BOTTOM LINE: Northern Arizona faces South Dakota State after Ryan Abelman scored 20 points in Northern Arizona’s 79-72 victory over the Southeast Missouri State Redhawks.

The Lumberjacks have gone 4-0 at home. Northern Arizona scores 81.2 points and has outscored opponents by 5.5 points per game.

The Jackrabbits are 0-2 in road games. South Dakota State ranks seventh in the Summit League shooting 30.9% from 3-point range.

Advertisement

Northern Arizona makes 47.9% of its shots from the field this season, which is 7.5 percentage points higher than South Dakota State has allowed to its opponents (40.4%). South Dakota State averages 71.6 points per game, 4.1 fewer than the 75.7 Northern Arizona allows.

TOP PERFORMERS: Zack Davidson is shooting 62.1% and averaging 16.8 points for the Lumberjacks. Abelman is averaging 2.5 made 3-pointers.

Jaden Jackson is averaging 12.1 points and 1.5 steals for the Jackrabbits. Joe Sayler is averaging 11.1 points.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Advertisement

What did you think of this story?




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota’s lean fiscal budget sees ‘flat’ revenues, sales tax dip

Published

on

South Dakota’s lean fiscal budget sees ‘flat’ revenues, sales tax dip


PIERRE — Gov. Larry Rhoden’s first budget address as governor is in the books.

And it was a “straightforward” budget without many surprises, as multiple lawmakers told the Argus Leader.

Rhoden presented his recommended budget Dec. 2 for South Dakota’s fiscal year 2027 at the State Capitol Building.

Advertisement

The Republican governor asked lawmakers to budget $7.44 billion in state fiscal year 2027, up from the $7.28 billion recommended by former Gov. Kristi Noem for FY2026. FY2027 is split between about 34% state funds, 42% federal funds and 23% funds marked as “other.”

Rhoden is also leaving about $14 million for lawmakers to divvy up during the upcoming Legislative Session in January. And an additional 135 full-time staff have been recommended for the next fiscal year, up from a budgeted 14,095 in FY 2026.

But Rhoden, who is only serving a partial term as governor after having taken over the reins from Noem last January and now faces reelection in 2026, is taking on the state’s fiscal goals and ambitions amid slim revenue projections and realities.

“I won’t sugarcoat it: Revenues have been pretty flat – only rising slightly,” Rhoden told lawmakers during his address. “But we have to keep the context in mind. We’re coming off some of the strongest years in our state’s history – or in any state’s history. Our economic growth may have slowed, but we’re comparing that to the fastest growth that South Dakota has ever seen.”

Advertisement

Ongoing sales and use tax collections suffered in FY25 before bounce back

More than half of the state’s overall revenue picture is made up of an ongoing sales and use tax, which saw a fiscal year-to-year decrease.

South Dakota FY2025 collected about $1.43 billion from the state sales and use tax — a 1.5% decrease compared with FY2024. Data from the state’s Bureau of Finance & Management indicates several months measured in FY2025 saw dips in sales and use tax growth.

The Rhoden budget estimates the FY2026 collections will reach about $1.5 billion and $1.56 billion in FY2027.

State sales and use tax revenue has seen month-to-month growth since June, with a more-than-8% increase in October.

“We’ll be getting November numbers any day now,” Rhoden said. “Year-to-date, we’re about where we want to be. 4% to 5% growth is pretty typical for South Dakota, but it also means we don’t have a ton of headroom.”

Advertisement

South Dakota’s farm sector sees impacts of Trump tariffs; Rhoden says to ‘pray for rain’

Recent data shows the Midwest has seen economic swings in the agriculture and commodity markets — and Rhoden had to acknowledge it, at least in part.

According to a recent study by The Dakota Institute, a nonprofit economic research firm, South Dakota saw its real gross domestic product (GDP) shrink by 3.1% in Q1 of 2025 — neighboring states saw similar impacts.

It later rebounded in South Dakota with 5.2% annualized growth in Q2 of 2025. But President Donald Trump’s tariff strategy and an international trade war underlined the volatile nature of in the state’s corn, soybean and wheat prices, which have dropped since to lowest prices in years, while U.S. beef cattle prices are at record highs.

“The weakness reflected ongoing pressures from trade disruptions through the implementation of tariffs and a mass renegotiation process of multiple trade agreements,” The Dakota Institute’s study indicated. “This volatility — contraction followed by robust recovery within six months — underscores both the region’s vulnerability to external shocks and its capacity to bounce back when conditions stabilize.”

“When ag does well, the state does well,” Rhoden said. “But when ag struggles, our growth tends to slow down … Historically, there’s been a correlation between our sales tax collections and farm income. So let’s pray for rain and for President Trump to be successful in his trade negotiations.”

Advertisement

Medicaid spending overtakes K-12 dollars in FY27

Medicaid, one of South Dakota’s largest fiscal responsibilities, has grown “far faster than any other area of the budget,” Rhoden said.

“In fact,” Rhoden added, “for the first time in state history, Medicaid is a bigger share of the general fund than K-12 education.”

According to the BFM, the state’s Medicaid budget has grown by $360 million since 2020 to $758 million. Rhoden budgeted $725 million for K-12 education.

The state’s share of the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, which determines matching each state’s federal match, now represents $105 million. South Dakota’s coverage share went up by 0.86%, from 48.47% to 49.33%.

State employees won’t see budgeted raises in next fiscal year

Breaking from his predecessor, who pushed for state employee raises during her tenure as governor, Rhoden revealed that employees for the state won’t see a baseline raise to their salaries in FY2027.

Advertisement

Rhoden said the state budget includes a “modest investment in our State Employee Health Plan,” specifically a $3 million investment in health plan reserves. The Republican governor added there are also “plan changes” in the works to prevent employees’ healthcare costs from going up, “since we won’t be able to give them a raise this year.”

But Eric Ollila, executive director and lobbyist for the South Dakota State Employees Organization, told the Argus Leader following the budget address that Rhoden’s budget picture doesn’t account for healthcare deductibles.

Ollila also said the “plan changes” that Rhoden teased were too vague for his liking. He later expressed concern that the changes would be passed through to state employees.

“What it’s not going to do is save employees 100% of the healthcare costs,” Ollila said.

Rhoden recommends raising reserve allocation to 12.5%

Rhoden plans to increase the state’s budget reserve from 10% to 12.5%

Advertisement

The governor attributed his desire to raise reserves based on “continued slower revenue growth and weakness in the farm sector.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending