Connect with us

Utah

Utah leaders presented federal officials with a ‘wish list’ of national park changes. Here’s what was on it.

Published

on

Utah leaders presented federal officials with a ‘wish list’ of national park changes. Here’s what was on it.


Utah state and county leaders pushed federal officials and park superintendents for expanded access and increased visitation at the state’s national parks in a closed-door meeting on Monday, according to those who attended.

The meeting covered a wide array of topics, including the federal government shutdown, timed entry systems at Arches and Zion National Parks, trails, roads and off-highway vehicle use, according to reports from city, county and state officials.

“It really was just a whole day of wish lists” from county and state officials, said Barbara Bruno, mayor of Springdale, a gateway community to Zion National Park.

The state’s Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office convened the meeting, which included leading federal and state officials such as Interior Department Deputy Secretary Karen Budd-Falen and Lt. Gov. Diedre Henderson, according to city and state officials. Representatives from Utah’s outdoor recreation, state parks and tourism offices were also present, as well park superintendents, county leaders and mayors of national park gateway communities.

Advertisement

Grand County Commissioner Trisha Hedin, who attended the meeting, criticized the “top down” approach and said the overarching theme of the meeting was about increasing access to the parks and getting “as many people in there as possible.”

“I thought it was really backward, and so it made people very weary and leery,” Hedin said. “I think it could have actually been a really productive meeting, but when you go in with your hackles up, it doesn’t feel good.”

The meeting sparked some concerns that this may be another move by Utah to seize control of federal public lands after three failed attempts earlier this year. The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance called the meeting the state’s “latest effort to undermine and dismantle the nation’s public lands system” in a news release on Tuesday.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) A billboard along Interstate 80 for the state’s “Stand for our Land” campaign against the Bureau of Land Management to regain control of public lands in Utah, is pictured on Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024.

The state dismissed such claims. “This was not about the state taking over management of the national parks. We are the Public Lands Policy Coordinating Office, so we coordinate with all of our federal partners, and we do it on a regular basis,” said Redge Johnson, the office’s director.

Advertisement

While county and state leaders often meet with Interior and the National Park Service, Johnson did acknowledge it’s “unique” for the state to convene representatives from all the parks in one meeting.

“It was not a full-on land grab or anything like that,” said Bruno, “but it was clearly an opportunity to start talking about some of the things that the state would like to see happen with those parks.”

The wish list

Throughout the meeting, county and state officials presented their desires for Utah’s national parks, monuments and recreation areas. The reservation systems at Arches and Zion National Parks were a major topic of discussion.

Washington County and Kane County expressed their opposition to a timed-entry system at Zion, Bruno said. The park is currently developing its visitor use management plan, and a reservation system is a possible path forward. State and county leaders said earlier this year that they want a timed-entry system off the table, raising concerns that it could turn visitors away and hurt the local economy.

Bruno was not invited to present, despite representing the gateway community most affected by park crowds. She still shared how high visitation affects her community from the audience, though, she said.

Advertisement

“When [visitors] arrive on Labor Day weekend at 9 a.m. and they’re in a line, they’re in a line that’s on the one road in and out of our town, and our folks don’t get home, and we don’t get mail delivery at our homes, and we don’t get to the post office,” she said in an interview with The Tribune.

Bruno said she wants the planning process to continue so the park can figure out the best path forward to accommodate growing crowds. Zion was the second most visited national park in the country last year.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) The parking lot at The Windows is full in Arches National Park, Monday, May 15, 2023. In April 2023, Arches National Park implemented a timed entry system to pace visitors’ arrival times to alleviate overcrowding and congestion among some 1.8 million visitors a year.

For Arches, Grand County Commissioner Brian Martinez presented a proposal a majority of county commissioners would like included in the park’s visitor use planning process, the Access and Capacity Enhancement Alternative, according to Hedin. The proposal includes a package of non-reservation ideas to manage crowds, such as expanded parking, new trail connections and greater use of real-time traffic and visitation data.

For the past four years, Arches has been testing a timed-entry pilot system. The system has drawn mixed reactions locally. Some county officials like Martinez are concerned it may be hurting the economy.

Advertisement

Moab Mayor Joette Langianese doesn’t want timed entry to go away, though, and expressed her support of the system during the meeting on Monday, she told The Tribune. “We’re not seeing any kind of economic impact to the city of Moab from the timed-entry,” she said.

She said the conversation around Arches felt “balanced” and she was grateful that mayors were included in the meeting. “It was really good to meet the deputy secretary and have her hear our perspective on what’s happening at Arches and Canyonlands National Park,” she said.

Deputy Secretary Budd-Falen shared that the Interior Department is currently working on a mobile application that would help park visitors find nearby attractions, such as hikes outside the parks or restaurants in nearby communities, as they’re waiting for their reservation slot or turned away because of long lines, according to Langianese.

Other ideas discussed include opening more areas to off highway vehicle use in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Capitol Reef National Park, as well as paving the entirety of the Burr Trail in Capitol Reef, according to a report from Hedin that was published in the Grand County Commission meeting agenda Tuesday.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) A car drives past the sign for Capitol Reef National Park near Torrey on Saturday, June 7, 2025.

Advertisement

The state would also like to see park areas that close seasonally open more, according to Hedin’s report, including Rainbow Point Road in Bryce Canyon National Park, the visitor center at Hovenweep National Monument and the North Rim of the Grand Canyon, which is in Arizona but near southwest Utah towns such as Kanab.

“The overarching theme was … more access and getting as many people in there as possible, which is discouraging,” Hedin said.

Bruno noted that environmental concerns were absent from the discussion. “It was all about how these properties are economic drivers for the state. … Nobody talked about preserving the natural resources,” she said.

That focus is “extremely concerning” and is drifting from the reasons parks were protected, Cory MacNulty, southwest regional campaign director with the National Parks Conservation Association, told The Tribune.

“They seem to be really focused on short term economic gain with a willingness to sacrifice long term park planning, park resources, as well as the visitor experience,” MacNulty said.

Advertisement

Collaboration going forward

The meeting also covered how the state, national parks and Interior Department work together going forward, particularly during a government shutdown.

The state spent $336,000 to keep visitor centers open at parks across Utah during the recent shutdown, according to Anna Loughridge, communications director for the Utah Office of Tourism.

“I’d like to say we’ll never have another shutdown, but that’s probably not likely, so if and when that happens again, we just wanted to talk about a way that we could do that more smoothly,” Johnson, PLPCO’s director, said.

Officials also discussed maintenance backlogs at parks and how the state may be able to help with those costs, Johnson said. This year, the state helped cover the costs of a new sewer line in Zion National Park to replace a failing septic system.

Cuts to the Park Service’s staff and budget were not discussed at the meeting, according to both Hedin and Langianese. The National Park Service has lost 25% of their staff since the beginning of 2025, and the Trump administration has proposed massive cuts to the agency’s budget.

Advertisement

(Erin Schaff | The New York Times) Park Rangers assist visitors at Zion National Park, Aug. 15, 2025. The mandate to keep the parks open coupled with insufficient staff has forced employees to take on multiple roles.

“They asked for more people to be allowed into the parks,” MacNulty said. “They asked for OHVs to be allowed on roads. They asked for roads to be paved and a number of other things, but they did not ask for the restoration of adequate staffing and funding for the park service.”

State, county and federal officials did not come to any final agreements on future collaboration during shutdowns or park maintenance costs during the meeting on Monday, Johnson said. Deputy Secretary Budd-Falen said she’d follow up with park superintendents on topics discussed, according to Langianese.

“There was nothing earth shattering,” Johnson said, “and no decisions were made.”



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah’s bottom-up approach to clean energy

Published

on

Utah’s bottom-up approach to clean energy


Like many utilities in the Trump era, Rocky Mountain Power is pulling back on its renewable energy plans. But more than a dozen Utah communities are taking matters into their own hands.

About 300,000 homes and businesses will soon be part of a novel, bottom-up program to bring new clean power to the state’s fossil-fuel-heavy grid. The Utah Renewable Communities initiative allows city and county governments to offset their electricity use with 100 percent renewable power, backed by a $4 monthly bill surcharge.

“There’s no other program available to our residents that is this affordable or this impactful to Midvale’s environmental and economic future,” said Dustin Gettel, mayor of the Salt Lake City suburb of Midvale.

Advertisement

Midvale is set to vote Tuesday on whether to join 15 other communities that have signed up ahead of an enrollment deadline next week. Three other eligible communities have opted out, although one may reconsider.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

15-acre wildfire threatens structures north of Birdseye in Utah County

Published

on

15-acre wildfire threatens structures north of Birdseye in Utah County


A wildfire burning north of Birdseye in Utah County is threatening structures, according to Utah Fire Info.

The fire was estimated at 15 acres Thursday afternoon. The Anderson Point Fire has since grown to 40 acres, according to Utah Fire Info.

A helicopter and multiple fire engine crews responded.

Information about the cause of the fire was not immediately available.

Advertisement
Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

The world’s largest data center was supposed to run on 100% natural gas. Utah’s Republican governor says ‘never.’

Published

on

The world’s largest data center was supposed to run on 100% natural gas. Utah’s Republican governor says ‘never.’


This coverage is made possible through a partnership between Grist and The Salt Lake Tribune, a nonprofit newsroom in Utah.

A sprawling, 40,000-acre data center planned for northern Utah has stirred up controversy across the state over the past month, partly because of the pollution it’s expected to contribute to a region that already struggles with smog.

Officials with the quasi-governmental Military Installation Development Authority, or MIDA, which approved the project and created tax incentives to spur its development, have become de facto cheerleaders for the data center campus, called the Stratos Project. They say Kevin O’Leary, the Canadian TV personality and the main backer of Stratos, specifically selected a remote valley north of the Great Salt Lake because a gas pipeline runs through it.

The plant that will generate electricity for the data complex would be powered “100 percent off the Ruby Pipeline,” a MIDA official said in April. 

But after weeks of protests, reams of comments against the project, and disgruntled Utahns digging into state leaders’ finances and family businesses, the state’s Republican governor has now asserted the project will “never” be solely powered by natural gas.

Advertisement

“That’s never going to happen,” Governor Spencer Cox told The Salt Lake Tribune last week. “The very first phase will be natural gas, but the other phases should not be. They should be nuclear, and they should be geothermal, and solar and other technology.”

The proposed Stratos Project is light on details so far. O’Leary has said that at full build, it will be one of the biggest data centers in the world, as large as Washington, D.C. Scientists, environmental advocates and some residents have raised alarms about the impact that the project — and the possibility of a massive natural gas plant to power it — could have on air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and water supplies near the shrinking Great Salt Lake.

According to some estimates, a 9-gigawatt power plant entirely powered by natural gas could raise Utah’s carbon emissions by 64 percent. Although it’s still unclear how much water the facility would need, the project’s developers have said they’re working to secure 13,000 acre-feet in Hansel Valley and the surrounding area, which is mostly agricultural. That’s enough water to meet the needs of more than 20,000 households in Utah.

The north end of the Great Salt Lake and Hansel Valley, the planned site for the Stratos Project.
Trent Nelson / The Salt Lake Tribune

Opposition to the proposal has been intense. A water right filed to support the data center and power plant received nearly 4,000 letters of protest this month. Opponents held a rally at Utah’s Capitol last week and delivered a letter to Cox with more than 6,000 signatures urging him to take “binding action” to preserve the Great Salt Lake instead of issuing platitudes over social media.

During a news conference on Wednesday announcing a geothermal partnership with the neighboring states of Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico, Cox acknowledged problems with the rollout of the Stratos Project in Box Elder County, saying future decisions like it should involve his office and elected representatives.

Advertisement

“There’s no question, the process was not good,” Cox told reporters. “It’s something I’ve worried about for a long time with that entity that made that decision.” 

Cox appeared to be referring to MIDA, a development authority ostensibly meant to fund projects to support the military. Its biggest developments in recent years, however, include a hotel at the Deer Valley luxury ski resort and a swanky ski village. MIDA officials and other Stratos supporters have called the project a matter of national security.

“That was not a decision that was made by me or the Legislature,” Cox said. “In the future, those are decisions that should be made by us, so that we can do these types of things ahead of time to make sure people understand what’s actually happening out there. That did not happen, and it should happen.”

When he made his comments, Cox was hosting the final workshop in his “Energy Superabundance” initiative as chair of the Western Governors Association, part of a broader push that complements his “Operation Gigawatt” goal to more than double Utah’s energy production over the next decade.

Electricity use across the country has held relatively steady for decades, but a surge in demand for artificial intelligence computing and data centers is putting a strain on the electric grid. That’s left Western states scrambling to build new energy supplies.

Advertisement

At the same time, public skepticism toward large data center developments appears to be growing, particularly over concerns involving water use, noise, energy costs, and pollution.

“It feels like the future is here,” Cox said during his opening remarks at the workshop. “It’s coming quicker than people asked for, and there are so many amazing things that can come from that future, and some pretty awful ones as well.”

Read Next
A protestor holds a sign at a meeting
Utah’s fragile desert could feel like the Sahara if America’s biggest data center gets built

Cox has also pushed for faster permitting timelines for large energy and infrastructure projects, arguing that environmental review processes often take too long. “This whole idea of being rushed — I’m so tired of our country taking years to get stuff done,” he said in April. “It’s the dumbest thing ever. We think that taking time makes things better or safer. It absolutely does not.”

Advertisement

Last week, Cox struck a more measured tone as criticism of the project continued to mount. “One of the things people are worried about, and rightfully so, is air quality,” he said in a brief interview as he left the workshop. “That’s a yearlong [permitting] process. … We’re not speeding those up. Those are really important, and we want to make sure that things are done the right way.”

Earlier this month, O’Leary, who was featured on the reality show “Shark Tank,” also seemed to suggest that renewables could help power the Stratos Project. He described other technological advances — such as turbines cooled with air rather than water — before turning to the natural gas power causing a stir.

“We can also put a percentage of the power generation through solar, wind, and batteries, because the battery technology is 10x more efficient than it was just five years ago,” O’Leary posted on X on May 5. “So that’s very helpful, because it makes the cost of energy lower.”

But he stopped short of fully endorsing renewables for his project.

Logan Mitchell, a climate scientist and analyst with Utah Clean Energy, calculated that a 9-gigawatt natural gas power plant will produce around 35 million metric tons of carbon emissions each year. By comparison, the entire state of Utah generates 55 million metric tons annually, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. So the Stratos Project could raise Utah’s emissions by about 64 percent.

Advertisement

“That’s massive,” Mitchell said. But it could be even more, because his estimate didn’t account for “any additional methane leakage” from piping and using the natural gas, he said.






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending