Connect with us

Business

Insurers won’t be forced to offer home coverage after measure dropped

Published

on

Insurers won’t be forced to offer home coverage after measure dropped

An initiative that would have required California insurers to offer policies to homeowners who fireproof their houses has been withdrawn after the backer of a competing industry measure similarly did so.

The mutually agreed-upon move means the consumer protections offered by California’s landmark Proposition 103 will remain unchanged. The 1988 measure established an elected insurance commissioner with authority to reject insurer requests for rate hikes.

Consumer Watchdog, the Los Angeles advocacy group that proposed the Insurance Policyholder Bill of Rights, acknowledged it didn’t have the money to pursue the ballot measure, even though it said it deserved to become law.

“There is still a huge need for many of the other protections in the ballot measure, including the right to be guaranteed an insurance policy if homeowners meet state wildfire mitigation standards,” the group stated.

Advertisement

Three Consumer Watchdog officials, including founder Harvey Rosenfield — also the author of Proposition 103 — submitted the measure for the November 2026 ballot in September after Elizabeth Hammack, a Roseville, Calif., insurance broker, had submitted her measure.

The broker’s initiative — the California Insurance Market Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2026 — would have allowed insurer premium hikes to take effect before any rate review, though they could be suspended later if the insurance commissioner determines the market is not “reasonably competitive.”

Insurers would have to provide premium credits to policyholders who take steps to reduce fire dangers on their property.

The measure also would have abolished another core element of Proposition 103, by banning payments to “intervenors” such as Consumer Watchdog, which involve themselves in the rate-review process and typically seek to block or reduce increases — a provision that has irked the industry since its inception.

Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara in October proposed his own regulations that would tighten reimbursements and other rules governing intervenors. He contends the process slows legitimate rate hikes while enriching intervernors.

Advertisement

Consumer Watchdog dubbed the decision to withdraw the competing ballot measures an “armistice” and vowed to spend next year building support for a mandate requiring insurers to sell policies in “higher risk areas.”

Hammack, owner of Panorama Insurance Associates, said she met with Consumer Watchdog at the secretary of state’s office in Sacramento on Tuesday to file papers to withdraw the measure, which she thought was given a misleading title and summary for the ballot.

“I wrote this measure to fix what I saw was broken, as an insurance agent and concerned California citizen, and to strengthen oversight, increase transparency, and restore stability to California’s collapsing insurance market,” she said. “Unfortunately, now, California consumers will continue to be burdened by costly outdated regulations.”

The issue over whether insurers should be required to offer policies to homeowners in fire-prone neighborhoods has gained significance over the last several years as many insurers have either dropped customers or stopped writing new policies after a series of catastrophic wildfires.

A plan by Lara to encourage insurers to write such policies by offering them various concessions has so far failed to depopulate the California FAIR Plan, where homeowners can obtain policies when they cannot get them on the regular market.

Advertisement

The Los Angeles-based insurance pool, operated and financially backed by the state’s licensed home insurers, offers limited policies that typically cost more than those offered by commercial insurers.

The plan’s active policies grew 93% from September 2021 to September 2024, and then grew an additional 39% in the next 12 months. As of September, the plan had about 625,000 active dwelling policies, exposing it to about $647 billion of risk.

Business

Helped by ‘Stranger Things’ finale, Netflix lands strong fourth quarter

Published

on

Helped by ‘Stranger Things’ finale, Netflix lands strong fourth quarter

Netflix reported a strong finish to its fiscal year Tuesday, with revenue climbing 18% in the fourth quarter to just over $12 billion compared with a year ago.

The streaming giant’s profits during the same period reached $2.4 billion, or 56 cents a share, up from $1.87 billion, or 43 cents a share, a year earlier, the company reported.

The results were slightly ahead of Wall Street estimates and driven by growth in the company’s advertising business, higher prices and increases in paid memberships, which surpassed the 325-million mark, Netflix said in a letter to shareholders.

Netflix said total engagement on its platform, meaning the amount of time its users spent watching content, rose 2% in the second half of the year.

The company got a big boost in the quarter from the final season of its hit series “Stranger Things,” among other popular shows, documentaries and movies, including Guillermo del Toro’s “Frankenstein” and “Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery.”

Advertisement

Netflix said “KPop Demon Hunters” broke records as its most-watched movie with 482 million views in the last half of 2025. Users wanted to sing along with “KPop Demon Hunters Lyric Videos,” which scored 32 million views.

The streamer’s top series was the second season of “Wednesday,” which pulled in 124 million views. The first season of the series also popped with 47 million more.

For the year, the Los Gatos-based company reported revenue of $45.2 billion, up 16% from 2024.

The latest earnings report follows news earlier Tuesday that Netflix modified its offer to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, making it an all-cash bid. The companies agreed on the deal, valued at $82.7 billion, in December.

The agreement between the most successful streaming platform and the storied movie studio behind “Casablanca,” Harry Potter and “Batman” has its share of supporters and detractors. Netflix shares have been on a decline since the December announcement.

Advertisement

“Investors will ponder whether Netflix becoming HBO faster than HBO became Netflix serves their interest,” said Emarketer senior analyst Ross Benes. “So far, markets have not responded kindly to the acquisition.”

Rival bidder Paramount has made clear it will continue its hostile takeover attempt for Warner Bros., despite some setbacks. It has given the company’s investors a Jan. 21 deadline to tender their shares. It remains to be seen whether Paramount opts to extend that deadline.

Warner Bros. has rejected Paramount’s overtures multiple times in recent months, while expressing its preference for its deal with Netflix.

The results were released after markets closed. Netflix shares ended the day at $87.05, down 1% on Tuesday.

Times staff writer Meg James contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Netflix amends Warner Bros. deal to all cash in bidding war

Published

on

Netflix amends Warner Bros. deal to all cash in bidding war

Netflix has amended its proposed $72-billion purchase of Warner Bros. and HBO, converting it to an all-cash offer in hopes of defusing criticisms from rival bidder, David Ellison’s Paramount.

Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery approved the change Monday, according to a regulatory filing. Warner board members previously had accepted Netflix’s $27.75-a-share cash-and-stock proposal for Warner’s Burbank studios and HBO streaming operations.

Paramount has complained that its $30-per-share offer for the entire company was higher, and thus, should be the winning bid. Paramount is appealing directly to Warner stockholders, asking them to sell their shares to Paramount by Wednesday.

Netflix stopped short of raising its bid above $27.75 a share, but the Los Gatos streaming giant agreed to pay the full amount in cash should it ultimately win Warner’s legendary studios behind such blockbusters as “Batman,” “The Matrix” and “The Big Bang Theory.” Netflix is not interested in Warner Bros. basic cable channels, which are scheduled to be spun off into a separate company.

Advertisement

Netflix said the change “simplifies the transaction structure, provides greater certainty of value for WBD stockholders, and accelerates the path to a WBD stockholder vote.”

The move was prompted, in part, because Netflix’s stock price has taken a major hit, eroding value in its proposal for Warner Bros.

The new terms neutralize one of Paramount’s primary criticisms: that the stock portion of the Netflix offer makes its bid inferior. Netflix’s shares have lost 29% since its pursuit of Warner Bros. came to light. Paramount shares have also declined about 29% over that time.

Warner Bros. Discovery board members have stuck with Netflix’s proposal — valued at $82.7-billion, including some debt — despite persistent overtures by Ellison’s Paramount.

Warner Bros.’ board “continues to support and unanimously recommend our transaction, and we are confident that it will deliver the best outcome for stockholders, consumers, creators and the broader entertainment community,” Ted Sarandos, co-CEO of Netflix, said in a statement Tuesday.

Advertisement

Warner Bros. Discovery said it would schedule a shareholder meeting. The vote could be held in April.

If the Netflix deal is approved, Warner shareholders would also receive stock in the new company, Discovery Global, which will be made up of Warner’s cable channels, including CNN, TBS, HGTV and Food Network. The spinoff is expected to be completed this summer, but the value of the channels is in doubt, giving Paramount ammunition to claim that its $30-a-share tender offer for the entire company was more lucrative.

Paramount, which has been pursuing the prized assets since September, has sued Warner in Delaware courts to obtain information about how Warner board members came up with a value for the cable channels.

Last week, a Delaware judge refused Paramount’s request for expedited proceedings.

On Tuesday, Warner Bros. separately addressed that Paramount criticism by outlining how it values its cable networks.

Advertisement

Warner Bros.’ advisors value the cable networks from as little as 72 cents a share to as much as $6.86 a share, according to the filing. Paramount has claimed those properties have no value even though cable networks account for most of Paramount’s own sales and profit.

The new company, Discovery Global, would have $17 billion of debt as of June 30, 2026. That would decrease to $16.1 billion by the end of the year. Warner and Netflix also tweaked the agreement so that Discovery Global will have $260 million less debt than initially planned as a result of stronger-than-expected cash flow last year.

The filing projects Discovery Global’s 2026 revenue would reach $16.9 billion and adjusted earnings of $5.4 billion before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

In Tuesday’s announcement, Netflix touted its “strong cash flow generation,” which it said supported the revised all-cash transaction “while preserving a healthy balance sheet and flexibility to capitalize on future strategic priorities.”

Warner Bros. Discovery board members have cited Paramount’s highly leveraged proposal as a weak point, giving it another reason to award the company to the stronger firm, Netflix.

Advertisement

Paramount would need to come up with more than $94 billion in equity and debt to finance the deal.

The battle for Warner Bros. is one of the biggest media deals in the last decade and is expected to reshape the entertainment industry. Netflix emerged as a surprise suitor, entering the fray after Warner Bros. put itself up for sale in October.

Netflix has turned to Wall Street banks to help finance its deal. The company now has $42.2 billion of bridge loans in place, according to a filing Tuesday, a type of facility that is usually replaced with permanent debt like corporate bonds.

Netflix is scheduled to report fourth-quarter financial results on Tuesday after markets close.

Bloomberg News contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Video: Has Trump Delivered on His Economic Promises?

Published

on

Video: Has Trump Delivered on His Economic Promises?

new video loaded: Has Trump Delivered on His Economic Promises?

President Trump made a number of economic promises on the campaign trail. Now that we’re one year into the Trump administration, our chief economics correspondent, Ben Casselman, looks at key economic data to see what Trump was able to accomplish, and where he has so far failed to deliver what he promised.

By Ben Casselman, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, Thomas Vollkommer and Joey Sendaydiego

January 19, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending