Connect with us

South Dakota

Legal marijuana advocates call opponents' ad “false and deceiving”

Published

on

Legal marijuana advocates call opponents' ad “false and deceiving”


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) — The election is just 26 days away, and the rhetoric is heating up around Measure 29, which would legalize recreational marijuana in South Dakota.

A similar measure passed in 2020 before being struck down by the state’s Supreme Court a year later. Then, another similar measure failed in 2022.

Now, one side is calling out the other for the claims made in a commercial.

Matthew Schweich is the president of South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws, leading the charge for Measure 29.

Advertisement

In both a press release and a Wednesday morning press conference he called, Schweich claimed an ad produced and funded by Protecting South Dakota Kids is “demonstrably false and deceptive” — and called on the opposing group to take down the ad.

“The intent of this ad is obvious. It is intended to deceive South Dakota voters into thinking Measure 29 legalizes or decriminalizes hard drugs,” Schweich said.

In the commercial, both the announcer and the text on the screen state that Measure 29 “wouldn’t just legalize marijuana.“ The next statement the announcer makes is that the measure would “cultivate a whole new generation of meth, fentanyl and opioid abusers.” But, the words on the screen only read “Measure 29, Meth, Fentanyl and Opioid Abusers.”

Schweich said that many voters who see this ad in digital form on Facebook or streaming platforms like Hulu-Plus will see them without sound, and will only see this — “Measure 29, Meth, Fentanyl, Opioid Abusers.”

When consumed on those platforms, Schweich called the ad “digital misinformation,” but when aired on over-the-air television stations, he called it a violation of FCC law and called for any local TV station that airs to stop doing so.

Advertisement

“We don’t allow banks or car dealerships or other businesses to run ads that are patently false or deceptive,” Schweich said. “Why should the rules be any different for a political campaign?”

Schweich called for Protecting South Dakota Kids to pull the ad.

“I’m here to urge our opponents to hold themselves to a very basic level of honesty,” Schweich said. “However, based on their behavior during this campaign, I do not expect them to do the right thing. They seem incapable of resisting the urge to lie to voters in order to maintain prohibition.”

The president of Protecting South Dakota Kids denied that the ad lies or is intended to deceive voters.

“To suggest that we’re unclear or that it is confusing or that it is newsworthy or a news flash to suggest that the use of marijuana, or use of any illegal drug, contributes to the further use of other substances is really a surprise to me,” Kinyon said.

Advertisement

When asked about the possibility that a viewer that consumes the ad without sound and sees the words “Measure 29, Meth, Fentanyl, Opioid Abusers” could draw the conclusion that Protecting South Dakota Kids is claiming that Measure 29 would also legalize those other drugs, Kinyon said this:

“We didn’t put it on a soundless medium,” said Jim Kinyon. “We used it on a medium that has sound and we can’t be responsible for everything that can happen with the information we share.”

Kinyon said that Schweich is “stretching” in claiming the ad is intentionally misleading voters and that he found it “entertaining that the marijuana industry is fact-checking us, when they’re making claims out there like legalizing marijuana will lead to $100 million in tax revenue.”

Schweich said that South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws has never made the specific claim that the passing of Measure 29 would directly generate new tax revenue, but that the group has pointed out that if the measure passes, the legislature is likely to pass an implementation bill that will generate revenue.

But Schweich said he “wouldn’t dare” claim a specific amount, like $100 million.

Advertisement

“You’re asking me if I feel okay about being fact-checked by a drug pusher,” Kinyon said. “I can only say to you I am sorry he doesn’t like our ad, and I understand he would prefer to live in the darkness.”

Kinyon called Schweich’s press conference and the claims that the Protecting South Dakota Kids ad is false and deceiving “an excuse to have free media.”

“We’ve been at this for two years now,” Kinyon said. “Every time we put out an ad, I guarantee you he’s going to call a press conference.

“Matthew is a very slick attorney. He’s been doing this for decades — passing the use of marijuana from one state to another. I’m sure he’s pretty frustrated because this is the fifth time that this has been pushed on the state of South Dakota. I don’t know what part of ‘no’ that industry won’t listen to.”

South Dakota did have recreational marijuana measures on the ballots in 2006, 2010, 2020, and 2022, with amendments failing at the polls each time except 2020, when it passed with 54 percent of voters approving.

Advertisement

About a year later, led by the urging of Gov. Kristi Noem, the South Dakota State Supreme Court upheld a lower-court decision and overturned the vote, saying the wording of the measure was unconstitutional.

Two years later, a similar amendment failed, with 53 percent of voters saying “no.” On Wednesday, Schweich repeated what he told Dakota News Now last May — that a higher voter turnout in a presidential election year will flip the result, as it did in 2020.

In that May DNN story, Kinyon mentioned, as most anti-recreational marijuana activists have, that other states that have recreational cannabis have higher youth usage rates and higher crime rates as a result. He mentioned that again in his Wednesday interview with Dakota News Now.

“I don’t want to be Denver,” Kinyon said. “I don’t want to be Chicago. I don’t want to be San Francisco. I don’t want to be Washington, D.C. I prefer our parks the way we have them. They’ll promise you they’ll line the streets with gold. In reality, what they do is line it with tent cities. That’s not what South Dakotans stand for.”

In May’s interview with DNN, Schweich called Protecting South Dakota Kids’ messaging “sensationalist, over-the-top, doom-and-gloom tactics” and today called it “fear-mongering.”

Advertisement

Wednesday at the press conference, Schweich distributed a nine-page report called “IM-29 Myth Busters: Challenging the Dishonesty and Deception of South Dakota Prohibitionists.”

The report counters some of Protecting South Dakota Kids’ claims about what recreational marijuana leads to in states that have it. Schweich mentioned how PSDK continues to mention an increase in marijuana use by people aged 12 and over, but cited a Colorado Department of Health study that showed a downward trajectory of use in youths, which is part of the SDBML report.

“So, they cherry-pick and intentionally do stuff,” Schweich said. “Unfortunately, they’ve gotten looser and looser with the facts over the years.”

“Fear works in politics, unfortunately, and that’s their strategy. Our strategy is to point out that this policy is working in every other state that has adopted. In 24 states that have adopted it, not a single state, not one, has repealed the policy,” Schweich continued.

To review, both sides are claiming the other side is making false claims. Both sides see a bigger picture beyond Schweich’s contesting of this ad.

Advertisement

“He’s complaining about a group setting off a firework when he’s dropping a bomb. A huge bomb,“ said Ed Moses, a former Missouri highway patrol officer and volunteer for the Protecting South Dakota Kids campaign who joined Kinyon’s interview with Dakota News Now.

Kinyon called Moses a ”national expert” on what recreational marijuana leads to.

Asked what he meant by Schweich dropping a “bomb,” Moses brought up what he said he has seen in Missouri since that state’s legalization of recreational cannabis in 2022.

“We’re having more people killed on the highway from people under the influence of marijuana than alcohol,” Moses said.

A report from the Missouri Coalition of Roadway Safety on impaired driving in 2023 found that “drug-impaired driving contributed to 7% of all 2023 Missouri traffic fatalities,” but that report did not specify what percentage of deaths were alcohol-related, nor what percentage were marijuana-related.

Advertisement

Another report about 2023 highway deaths specifically in southwest Missouri counties said “The latest stats do not include driving impaired related to marijuana use because it’s hard to make that determination at the scene of a crash with no equivalent of a breathalyzer test.”

The South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws “IM-29 Myth Busters” report noted that “driving under the influence of cannabis remains illegal under Measure 29.”

But the bigger picture for Schweich on Wednesday, he said, went well beyond the effects of recreational marijuana.

“As a state, as a country, we cannot just give up on the idea of facts in our democracy, in our political system,” Schweich said. “It seems we’re on a downward spiral right now, and I just think we have to hold ourselves to a certain standard.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

Carbon pipeline company formally asks SD regulator to recuse herself • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

Carbon pipeline company formally asks SD regulator to recuse herself • South Dakota Searchlight


The company proposing a carbon dioxide pipeline has formally requested that a South Dakota regulator recuse herself from the project’s permit application, citing an alleged conflict of interest.

In a letter sent Thursday, Iowa-based Summit Carbon Solutions asked Public Utilities Commissioner Kristie Fiegen to disqualify herself. That would allow the governor to appoint another state official to fill in for Fiegen during the three-member commission’s consideration of the application.

Summit wants to construct a $9 billion, five-state pipeline to capture and transport some of the carbon dioxide emitted by 57 ethanol plants to an underground storage area in North Dakota. The project would capitalize on federal tax credits incentivizing the prevention of heat-trapping carbon emissions into the atmosphere.

Regulator stays on new carbon pipeline case after prior recusal, with no explanation this time

Advertisement

This is Summit’s second application in South Dakota, after the Public Utilities Commission rejected the first application in 2023. Fiegen recused herself from those proceedings and was replaced by State Treasurer Josh Haeder. 

At the time, Fiegen wrote a recusal letter saying she had a conflict because the pipeline “would cross land owned by my sister-in-law (my husband’s sister) and her husband.” Fiegen also recused herself from an earlier, separate crude oil pipeline permit application for a similar reason.

Fiegen has not recused herself from the new application, but Summit said the same conflict exists.

“As with your previous decisions,” said the company’s new letter to Fiegen, “the facts and established South Dakota law support a decision that you should step aside.”

Neither Fiegen nor the Public Utilities Commission responded to South Dakota Searchlight messages about Summit’s letter. 

Advertisement

Public Utilities Commission spokesperson Leah Mohr previously said “ex parte” rules bar Fiegen from discussing the matter. Those rules prohibit direct communication with commissioners about dockets they’re considering.

The Summit letter drew criticism from an attorney representing landowners opposed to the pipeline, Brian Jorde, of Domina Law Group in Omaha, who disputed the allegation that Fiegen has a conflict of interest.

“From my viewpoint she never had a conflict that rises to the level of recusal and certainly doesn’t now,” Jorde wrote. “The isolated fact that she is related by marriage to a trustee of a trust that owns land that signed an easement with Summit is not a direct conflict.”

The alleged conflict

The commission’s rejection of Summit’s first application was partly due to the route’s conflicts with several county ordinances. Those ordinances mandate minimum distances between pipelines and existing features. Summit’s new route includes some adjustments.

This map shows a portion of the proposed Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline route where it would cross McCook County land owned by the Jeffrey A. Ordal Living Trust, of which Jean Fiegen-Ordal and Jeffrey Ordal are trustees. The couple also formerly owned land in Minnehaha County, not shown here, that would be crossed by the pipeline. Jean Fiegen-Ordal is the sister-in-law of South Dakota Public Utilities Commissioner Kristie Fiegen. (Map by South Dakota Searchlight)
Advertisement

The original pipeline route crossed three parcels in Minnehaha County owned by Fiegen’s sister-in-law and her husband, Jean Fiegen-Ordal and Jeffrey Ordal, and three parcels in McCook County owned by the Jeffrey A. Ordal Living Trust, which lists the couple as trustees. 

Summit said it paid a total of $175,000 for easements and future crop damages on that land, including $88,000 to the Ordals. Summit declined to tell Searchlight where the remainder of the money went, but public records show the Ordals sold their Minnehaha County land after signing the easement documents in 2022. 

The new pipeline route would cross the same parcels — the Minnehaha County land that the Ordals no longer own, and the McCook County land that’s still owned by the Ordals’ trust.

Summit: Litigation possible

Summit’s new letter said the logic that motivated Fiegen’s prior recusal remains unchanged. The company said her involvement risks violating South Dakota law, which the company said bars officials from participating in matters where conflicts of interest exist. 

The letter said Fiegen’s failure to recuse herself could lead to litigation, an appeal of the commission’s eventual permit decision, and delays in the permitting process. 

Advertisement

“Because your family has a direct interest in the approval or denial of the permit, and because you previously recused yourself in two dockets based on the same facts, a court almost certainly would find it inappropriate for you to participate in this docket,” the letter says. 

The Public Utilities Commission will host a series of public input meetings Jan. 15-17 in eastern South Dakota cities near the pipeline route. The project has a storage permit in North Dakota and route permits in North Dakota, Iowa and Minnesota, while Nebraska has no state permitting process for carbon pipelines. The project also faces litigation from opponents in multiple states. 

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Oscar Cluff goes off as South Dakota State hammers Denver in Summit opener

Published

on

Oscar Cluff goes off as South Dakota State hammers Denver in Summit opener


BROOKINGS — In 15 non-conference games, Oscar Cluff made clear he’ll be a handful this year for South Dakota State’s opponents.

In Thursday’s Summit League opener against the Denver Pioneers, Cluff sent a definitive message to the conference. He’ll be more than a handful. He’ll likely be one of the most unstoppable big men the league has ever seen.

Cluff had 30 points and 19 rebounds to lead the Jacks to a 91-70 rout of the Pioneers, going 11-of-14 from the floor and 7-of-8 at the line, even hitting his only 3-point attempt of the night.

That offensive dominance from the 6-foot-11 Australian helped the Jacks put this one on ice early, as a 21-4 run helped SDSU take a 42-19 lead into the break. Denver briefly got hot in the second half to cut a 27-point deficit to 12, but it was too little too late as the Jackrabbits start their conference slate at 1-0.

Advertisement

“There’s a lot of talk around the Summit League — what teams are gonna be good or bad,” Cluff said. “I think today was a statement game for us. We’re trying to let everyone know who we are.”

Oscar Cluff slams it home during SDSU’s win over Denver on Thursday, Jan. 2, 2025 at First Bank & Trust Arena.

Dave Bordewyk, SDNMA

Owen Larson added 12 points and Matthew Mors and Stony Hadnot 11, as the Jacks outshot Denver 52 percent to 35 and had a gargantuan 53-24 edge on the glass.

Advertisement

The Pioneers were just 6-of-30 from the floor in the first half, shooting themselves out of it. The Jacks defense certainly had a hand in the bricklaying.

“We kept ’em out of the paint and we were challenging them on the arc,” said Jacks coach Eric Henderson. “Their guards are dynamic and we did a great job of keeping them out of the pint and making them shoot challenged shots. And then we got first-shot rebounds, which enabled us to play with great pace.”

010225-Garry2.jpg

Kalen Garry works the ball inside against Denver on Thursday, Jan. 2, 2025 at First Bank & Trust Arena.

Dave Bordewyk, SDNMA

Advertisement

Meanwhile SDSU’s offense faced little resistance as Cluff controlled the middle.

“He was incredible,” Larson said of Cluff. “We knew we had a height advantage and they had a couple bigs out, so he really got after it and right from the get-go he was terrific. When you’ve got him down low you can go to him and if they double him he’ll share it, because he’s very unselfish. And if it’s 1-on-1 he’s gonna get a bucket.”

The supporting cast was strong as well. Larson was 4-of-6 from 3-point range and had five rebound and four assists, while Joe Sayler had eight points and 10 rebounds and Kalen Garry had nine points and four assists. In 13 minutes off the bench, Damon Wilkinson had eight points and five boards.

010225-Lindsey.jpg

SDSU’s Isaac Lindsey drives the basket against Denver on Thursday, Jan. 2, 2025.

Dave Bordewyk, SDNMA

Advertisement

Nicholos Shogbonyo had 18 points for Denver while Sebastian Akins had 17.

The Jacks (10-6, 1-0) are off this weekend, with their next game set for Wednesday at St. Thomas. The Tommies defeated North Dakota State on Thursday in Fargo. A big win for them, but Cluff will certainly present them with a unique challenge.

010225-Mors1.jpg

SDSU’s Matthew Mors skies for a rebound against Denver on Thursday, Jan. 2, 2025 at First Bank & Trust Arena.

Dave Bordewyk, SDNMA

Advertisement

“His efficiency is off the charts,” Henderson said of Cluff. “He didn’t even play 25 minutes and did what he did. He impacts the game in big ways. He’s a physical presence, obviously, but the skill he has is very much underrated. He makes everyone around him better, he’s unselfish and tonight he was amazing.”

Matt Zimmer

Matt Zimmer is a Sioux Falls native and longtime sports writer. He graduated from Washington High School where he played football, legion baseball and developed his lifelong love of the Minnesota Twins and Vikings. After graduating from St. Cloud State University, he returned to Sioux Falls, and began a long career in amateur baseball and sports reporting. Email Matt at mzimmer@siouxfallslive.com.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Local authorities warn attack like in New Orleans could happen anywhere

Published

on

Local authorities warn attack like in New Orleans could happen anywhere


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – Local South Dakota authorities are warning that an attack like what happened in New Orleans on New Year’s Day could happen anywhere.

For any major event in Sioux Falls, the city’s police department plays a key role in keeping people safe.

Public Information Officer Sam Clemens with the Sioux Falls Police Department said they participate in the planning of those events. A committee of different departments in the city comb over any areas of concern, and work with organizers to put on safe events.

“There’s an incredible amount of resources that goes into planning, and trying to make sure that everybody’s going to be safe,” Clemens said.

Advertisement

But that doesn’t mean people still shouldn’t be paying attention at all times. Nationally, Tom Mynsberge, the president of Critical Incident Management, said people need to be aware at all times of their surrondings, especially if they’re at an outdoor event.

“You can make yourself a victim by not being aware of your surroundings, what might be coming up behind you, and not being able to hear it because you had your noise-canceling earphones in, that’s what they’re for. Not really a good idea anymore in public areas when you’re out there and exposed. Give yourself a defensive posture, or at least a chance when something like this happens,” Mynsberge said.

Clemens said even though they put that much time and resources into planning for major and crowded events, he said that doesn’t mean they can stop everything from happening.

“We can do the planning on our side. We can set up barricades, we can have officers stationed at different areas. That doesn’t mean it can’t happen. We’re just trying to prevent it from happening, trying to mitigate it. But we still want people to have a plan, and have an idea of what to do in case there’s an issue,” Clemens said.

He said the one thing the public can do to keep things safe is to come up with an exit plan in case anything happens. That means identifying exits and talking to the people you’re with where to meet up.

Advertisement

“Just because things are going fine and you’re having fun, whatever the event may be, doesn’t mean that something bad couldn’t happen. So if people just kind of have a plan, what to do, where to go, just making sure that things are the way they seem. If they see something out of the ordinary, we want people to call police or call 911 right away,” Clemens said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending