Midwest
Sanctuary city lawyers plot to help illegal migrants evade ICE in exposed group email
EXCLUSIVE – Leaked emails to and from certain Minneapolis-area lawyers show attempts to actively thwart efforts from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to apprehend illegal immigrant defendants in the sanctuary city.
The emails were sent on Feb. 6 on a private listserv, or email list, that goes out to several hundred members of the Minnesota Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (MACDL), according to a member who spoke to Fox News Digital on the condition of anonymity.
The same day, progressive Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison issued a formal legal opinion that state law “prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies from holding someone based on an immigration detainer if the person would otherwise be released from custody,” a press release from the AG’s office states.
“ICE at the PSF,” one subject line states, possibly referring to the Public Safety Facility. “LRC just got word that plain clothes ICE officers have been spotted at the Hennepin County PSF today. Let’s do all we can to keep our clients safe in these difficult times,” the corresponding email reads.
‘SANCTUARY’ CITY MAYOR CONFRONTED AFTER GANG MEMBER ALLEGEDLY ASSAULTS FEDERAL OFFICERS
ICE at the PCF email screenshot (Handout)
Numerous responses from other attorneys ensued, with many suggesting lawyers request Zoom hearings for illegal immigrant defendants so that they do not have to appear in court in person and can therefore avoid ICE officers.
Various sanctuary city officials have made concerted efforts to push back against the Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration since he took office in January. President Donald Trump has signed a slew of executive orders aiming to streamline efforts by ICE and other law enforcement agencies to carry out the detention and removal process.
A recent Department of Homeland Security (DHS) directive rescinds the previous Biden administration’s guidelines preventing ICE and Customs and Border Protection officers from enforcing the law in “sensitive” areas.
CHICAGO PD SAYS IT ‘WILL NOT ASSIST’ WITH UPCOMING ICE DEPORTATIONS
“This action empowers the brave men and women in CBP and ICE to enforce our immigration laws and catch criminal aliens – including murderers and rapists – who have illegally come into our country. Criminals will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest,” a DHS spokesperson said in a Jan. 21 statement. “The Trump Administration will not tie the hands of our brave law enforcement, and instead trusts them to use common sense.
Nearly 1,000 people were arrested on Jan. 27, according to the ICE. (ICE)
“The Biden-Harris Administration abused the humanitarian parole program to indiscriminately allow 1.5 million migrants to enter our country. This was all stopped on day one of the Trump Administration. This action will return the humanitarian parole program to its original purpose of looking at migrants on a case-by-case basis,” the spokesperson added.
RED STATE LEADER CALLS FOR STATES TO STAND BEHIND TRUMP’S BAN ON FUNDING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
Ronnie Santana with Tamburino Law Group replied, “I was thinking we may want to have a conversation within the organization about pooling together [a]nd asking to convert hearings to [Z]oom for clients that we think would be targeted by ICE.” (Handout)
On the Minnesota email list, Ronnie Santana with Tamburino Law Group said, “I was thinking we may want to have a conversation within the organization about pooling together [a]nd asking to convert hearings to [Z]oom for clients that we think would be targeted by ICE.”
Santana did not respond to an inquiry from Fox News Digital.
JaneAnne Murray with Murray Law LLC said in the email thread that she “called the court’s clerk and orally requested a [Z]oom appearance.”
“I explained the immigration circumstances and why I don’t want to lay them all out in a motion that may get reviewed by ICE. Shortly thereafter, I got an email authorizing my client to appear by [Z]oom (I must appear in person). Prosecutor was copied on the email but not consulted on the request,” Murray said.
Murray did not respond to an inquiry from Fox News Digital.
DENVER MAYOR GRILLED OVER AREA’S TREN DE ARAGUA PROBLEM AS GOP LAWMAKER SAYS POLICIES TO BLAME
Murray later followed up on her email and said she “called the court’s clerk and orally requested a [Z]oom appearance.” (Handout)
Barry Cattadoris with the Third Judicial District Public Defender’s Office said “select judges in the Third Judicial District Court proactively reached out to the PD’s office,” possibly referring to the public defender’s office, “to state that they encourage [Z]oom requests on any cases with immigration issues for State and Defense in light of ICE showing up at courthouses and that requests will be ‘liberally’ granted.”
“So ask for Zoom!!!!!” Cattadoris wrote.
Cattadoris noted that while he hasn’t “practiced in Hennepin in over 10 years,” he recalled that emails “are not always scanned and put in a formal court file.” He noted in a later email that the illegal immigrants he has seen detained in the Third Judicial District “since January 20th have been 1) No lawful status and 2) facing more serious charges.”
“But have seen folks with no convictions and just pending serious charges,” Cattadoris added.
YOUNG FATHER KILLED BY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT HIGHLIGHTS ‘BETRAYAL’ OF SANCTUARY CITIES, SAYS REPUBLICAN
Cattadoris did not respond to an inquiry from Fox News Digital.
Barry Cattadoris with the Third Judicial District Public Defender’s Office said “select judges in the Third Judicial District Court proactively reached out to the PD’s office,” possibly referring to the public defender’s office, “to state that they encourage [Z]oom requests on any cases with immigration issues for State and Defense in light of ICE showing up at courthouses and that requests will be ‘liberally’ granted.” (Handout)
One attorney suggested that it is “probably best to find a reason to request remote that doesn’t explicitly state immigration issues.” Another recommended “saying it’s an interpreter case and interpreters are more effective on [Z]oom.”
CLICK HERE FOR MORE IMMIGRATION COVERAGE
ACLU attorney Alicia Granse wrote, “Speaking of ICE… We at ACLU-MN are interested in protecting people from their presence at courthouses and at jails.”
ICE is conducting flights to remove illegal immigrants from the U.S. and back to their home countries. (ICE Seattle)
“At minimum, no official should be holding someone based simply on an ICE detainer – they need a judicial warrant based on probable cause,” Granse continued. “If you have clients who have ICE holds and county officials or other law enforcement are honoring them, please email me… We might like to sue the crap out of them.”
CHICAGO ALDERMAN SAYS MAYOR BRANDON JOHNSON CAN’T DEFEND SANCTUARY CITY POLICIES
“Previous cases we got good settlements for people and there’s even a permanent injunction against Nobles County for holding someone for ICE,” Granse said.
Granse did not respond to an inquiry from Fox News Digital.
ACLU attorney Alicia Granse wrote, “Speaking of ICE… We at ACLU-MN are interested in protecting people from their presence at courthouses and at jails.” (Handout)
Local officials are under no obligation to coordinate with federal officials insofar as holding illegal immigrants based on a detainer.
A January memo from ICE states that “generally, ICE’s immigration enforcement actions in our near courthouses include actions against targeted aliens,” including gang members, national security or public safety threats, those with prior criminal convictions, those who have been ordered to be removed from the United States “but have failed to depart,” and those who illegally re-entered the country after being previously deported.
ICE agents, along with other federal law enforcement agencies, attend a pre-enforcement meeting in Chicago on Jan. 26, 2025. (Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
George Washington University law professor and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley told Fox News Digital the “emails suggest that the sole reason for converting hearings into virtual appearances is to evade ICE enforcement,” which “will raise a serious legal question over the proper use of court resources and orders.”
“There is a legitimate debate over whether ICE should target those seeking judicial review in their cases,” Turley said. “Few immigrants will want to risk a hearing if they will be detained as a cost of appearing. However, if ICE has a right to access, the use of virtual hearings to prevent federal authorities could cross the Rubicon for some judges as an improper use of state authority to deter federal enforcement.”
“If there is a legal impediment for ICE to appear at hearings, the parties should ask for a court order of protection and allow the matter to be reviewed by appellate courts,” Turley added.
Jonathan Turley told Fox News Digital the MACDL emails “will raise a serious legal question over the proper use of court resources and orders.” (Fox News)
As of publication, officials have not taken any legal action stemming from the emails on the grounds that the correspondence represents an active effort to frustrate law enforcement, and none of the MACDL members who sent the aforementioned emails have been charged with any crime.
A subsection of Title 8 makes it illegal to harbor illegal immigrants. Specifically, Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) “makes it an offense for any person who – knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation.”
Another subsection of the same law “expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of” harboring an illegal immigrant.
Additionally, 18 U.S.C. § 1346 makes it an offense to “scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.” Honest services fraud involves “the misuse of an individual’s position or authority for personal gain or advantage,” according to Eisner Gorin LLP. “It can be committed by public officials, corporate officers, and private individuals with fiduciary duties to another person or entity.”
The Department of Homeland Security logo is seen during a news conference in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
In 2019, charges were filed against Massachusetts Judge Shelley Joseph, who was accused of impeding the federal arrest of an illegal immigrant defendant in her courtroom. Prosecutors dropped the charges in 2022 after Trump left office, but the scrutiny did not end there. The Massachusetts Judicial Conduct Commission filed an ethics complaint against Joseph in 2024, according to Reuters.
While none of the MACDL members who sent the emails responded to Fox News Digital, the association sent an email to members following Fox’s inquiries, stating: “The author(s) of the email(s) did not consent to having their statements or advice disseminated beyond our organization and are now being asked for comment for a story. We are angered and feel betrayed on behalf of the impacted people.”
Trump’s recent immigration-related executive orders include declaring a national emergency at the border, halting refugee resettlement, ordering a removal process without asylum and border wall reconstruction, and deploying the military to the border.
As of Jan. 31, ICE has arrested 7,412 illegal immigrants and placed nearly 6,000 ICE detainers on individuals believed to be in the country illegally.
Read the full article from Here
Illinois
DOJ seeking Illinois voter data to purge suspected noncitizens, documents suggest
Article Summary
- The U.S. Department of Justice is suing Illinois for access to its complete, unredacted voter registration database.
- Documents filed in federal court suggest the agency wants the information so it can purge the names of suspected noncitizens using a federal database that many have criticized for being inaccurate.
- Similar suits have been filed in 29 other states and Washington, D.C. Judges in six states have granted motions to dismiss the suits. No judge has yet ruled in favor of DOJ’s request.
This summary was written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.
SPRINGFIELD — The Trump administration’s lawsuits seeking access to sensitive voter registration data in Illinois and dozens of other states is one part of a broader effort to purge state voter rolls of suspected noncitizens, according to documents filed recently in federal court in Springfield.
Those documents were filed Thursday, April 30, by attorneys representing the Illinois AFL-CIO and other groups that have intervened in the case seeking to prevent the Department of Justice from obtaining the information. They say it proves the agency’s stated reasons for seeking the data — to determine whether Illinois is complying with voter list maintenance requirements — is only a pretext and the agency’s suit against the state should be dismissed.
Read the filing
Several former DOJ attorneys who have worked in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division filed an amicus brief in the case in March, arguing the agency has no statutory authority to seek the information to conduct its own list maintenance program or to identify noncitizens.
The new documents filed Thursday include internal DOJ emails that the attorneys say were made available “in response to a public records request lawsuit.”
One of those was a June 16, 2025, email from Michael Gates, who was then a deputy assistant attorney general in DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, to his superior, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, who oversees that division. In that email, Gates states that the division is seeking access to the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, database.
“This will be helpful to us because it will allow us to compare this SAVE database against states’ voter rolls, which we will get directly from states under the (National Voter Registration Act),” Gates wrote.
The next month, on July 28, DOJ sent its first letter to the Illinois State Board of Elections seeking access to Illinois’ complete, unredacted statewide voter registration list, indicating that it was part of DOJ’s efforts to enforce voter list maintenance provisions of NVRA. The letter was signed by Gates. It also bore the name of Maureen Riordan, acting chief of the Voting Section within the Civil Rights Division.
Gates has since left the Justice Department. He is currently a Republican candidate for California attorney general in that state’s upcoming June 2 primary.
SAVE database
The SAVE database was originally set up to help states verify the citizenship and immigration status of people applying for public benefits such as Medicaid and SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Some states also use it to verify people’s eligibility to vote.
But the program has also been the target of criticism because of its tendency to misidentify people as noncitizens due to its use of incomplete or inaccurate data.
On April 21, the watchdog groups Common Cause and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, filed a lawsuit against DOJ in federal court in Washington, D.C., alleging the agency wants to use state voter registration lists and the SAVE database to conduct what they call “a sprawling new voter surveillance and purging apparatus that endangers millions of Americans’ fundamental voting and privacy rights.”
A second document filed last week in the Illinois case is a Nov. 18, 2025, email from the acting chief of the Civil Rights Division’s Voting Section, Eric Neff, that appears to suggest how the agency should conceal its intentions when asked why it is seeking states’ voter registration databases.
“I believe our reply should always be: ‘We will use the data in a manner consistent with Federal law’ and say nothing more,” Neff wrote to fellow DOJ lawyers Jesus Osete and Matt Zandi. He also said of the Help America Vote Act, the Civil Rights Act and NVRA, “none of them require (us) to give the states information about what we are going to do with the data. No judge will have authority to limit us beyond a promise of Federal law compliance.”
Illinois lawsuit
Illinois has refused to hand over an unredacted voter registration list. Instead, it has provided DOJ with electronic copies of partially redacted files that do not include sensitive information such as dates of birth, driver’s license numbers or partial Social Security numbers.
In December, DOJ filed suit in the Central District of Illinois seeking access to the unredacted files. It also filed similar suits in 29 other states and Washington, D.C.
The Illinois AFL-CIO, Common Cause several and other groups have intervened as codefendants in the case.
Attorneys for the state and the intervening parties have filed motions to dismiss the DOJ lawsuit. Judge Colleen Lawless has not yet ruled on the motion. Similar suits have already been dismissed in six other states. No court has yet ruled in favor of DOJ’s request for access to the unredacted voter files.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
Indiana
Man dies in 2-vehicle crash on WB I-64 in Southern Indiana
A man is dead following a May 4 collision on westbound Interstate 64 west of Corydon, Indiana, according to a news release from the Indiana State Police.
ISP Sgt. Carey Huls said the two-vehicle crash occurred around 5:45 a.m. when Zachary Burdin, 31, was traveling westbound on I-64, and his vehicle collided with the back of a truck with a trailer full of paving equipment.
Burdin was pronounced dead at the scene by the Harrison County Coroner. There were no other injuries reported. Officials do not attribute the crash to any weather conditions.
Huls said the crash was cleared from the highway by about 9 a.m., and there are no current issues.
Iowa
Iowa gas prices rise above $4 per gallon for first time since 2022
DES MOINES, Iowa (KCRG) – Iowa gas prices have topped $4 per gallon for the first time since 2022, averaging $4.11 a gallon.
According to GasBuddy, prices jumped 15 cents from Sunday night to Monday, up from $3.84 on Wednesday. Prices have risen 61 cents in the past month.
Iowa gas prices are $1.18 higher than a year ago. The highest recorded average in Iowa was $4.77 per gallon in June 2022.
Nationally, Georgia has the lowest average gas price at $3.85 per gallon, while California has the highest at $6.08.
Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.
-
Georgia5 minutes ago
Could Georgia baseball win the SEC for the first time in almost 20 years?
-
Hawaii11 minutes ago2026 Hawaii (HHSAA) High School Baseball Playoffs: Brackets, Schedules – May 6
-
Idaho17 minutes agoAs Automated Tech Rises, Idaho Eliminates Registration Tags
-
Illinois23 minutes agoDOJ seeking Illinois voter data to purge suspected noncitizens, documents suggest
-
Indiana29 minutes agoMan dies in 2-vehicle crash on WB I-64 in Southern Indiana
-
Iowa35 minutes agoIowa gas prices rise above $4 per gallon for first time since 2022
-
Kentucky46 minutes agoOp/Ed: It was a Great Kentucky Derby Day, but Not Without a Sour Note as CAW Players Feasted on Regular Joes
-
Louisiana53 minutes agoCivil rights groups say Purcell principle prevents Louisiana from suspending elections when votes have already been cast