Connect with us

Indiana

National recruiting analyst logs crystal ball for Langdon Hatton to Indiana

Published

on

National recruiting analyst logs crystal ball for Langdon Hatton to Indiana


A notable national recruiting analyst has logged a crystal ball projection for Bellarmine transfer Langdon Hatton to choose Indiana.

Travis Branham of 247Sports logged the projection on Sunday, May 5 for Hatton to commit to Indiana.

A native of Georgetown, Indiana who played at North Harrison, Hatton began his college career at William & Mary before transferring to play for Scott Davenport at Bellarmine for the last two seasons.

The 6-foot-10, 240-pound forward averaged 10.5 points, 7.1 rebounds, and 1.3 assists last season for the Knights. He shot 48 percent from the field, 33.3 percent from the 3-point line and 67.5 percent from the free-throw line.

Advertisement

Hatton has one season of eligibility remaining. He’s started 43 of the 94 career college games he’s played in.

Over his three seasons, he’s averaged 6.1 points, four rebounds and is a 49.1 percent shooter from the field. At Indiana, he would fill a vital role as a backup to Malik Reneau and Oumar Ballo.

Hatton has yet to visit Bloomington but is expected to be on campus soon.

At North Harrison, Hatton was named an IBCA senior all-state selection in his final prep season and was invited to Hoosier Basketball Magazine’s top 60 workout.

According to reports, Hatton has drawn significant interest in the transfer portal with Louisville, Ohio State, Cincinnati, and Xavier among the lengthy list of schools in contact.

Advertisement

Indiana has two scholarships open for next season’s roster.

(Photo credit: Bellarmine University Athletics)

Filed to: Langdon Hatton, Transfer portal





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Celtics-Pacers: 4 things to look for in Game 4 of East Finals

Published

on

Celtics-Pacers: 4 things to look for in Game 4 of East Finals


Pascal Siakam’s playoff-friendly midrange game has added an expected source of offense for the Pacers.

• Download the NBA App

INDIANAPOLIS — No team in NBA history has come back from a 3-0 deficit to win a best-of-seven playoff series. But four have come back to force a Game 7, with the last being the Boston Celtics, who did it a year ago in the Eastern Conference Finals.

In these Eastern Conference Finals, the Celtics are the team with the 3-0 lead, and they know the job is not done.

Advertisement

“It’s a way different feeling, obviously,” Derrick White said on Sunday about being up 3-0. “But you just understand that anything can change after one game. So you can’t relax.”

Here are some things to keep an eye out for as the Celtics try to close out the Indiana Pacers in Game 4 on Monday (8 p.m. ET, ESPN).


1. How Haliburton’s absence changes the Pacers … defensively

Game 2 of this series was the one that wasn’t close. And it wasn’t close because the Celtics had their most efficient offensive performance (126 points on 94 possessions) of the playoffs.

It was as purposeful of an offensive performance as we’ve seen from the Celtics, who relentlessly attacked the weaknesses in the Indiana defense. Those weaknesses began with Tyrese Haliburton, who was consistently put into screening action involving Jayson Tatum or Jaylen Brown.

Advertisement

With Haliburton out in Game 3, the Pacers switched more screens, and the Celtics had to find other ways to gain advantages and create good shots. They certainly attacked other weaknesses, namely Doug McDermott and Ben Sheppard. Boston also made Myles Turner work a little more, with Al Horford setting 23 ball screens, the most he’s set in the playoffs and tied for the second most he’s set all season in 78 total games.

“Everything depends on the coverage and the matchup,” Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla said Sunday. “The way you attack and the type of spacing that you have and the reads you have are going to be different because the coverage is different.

“It’s more about that, finding the advantage and making sure we can exploit it as a team.”

Haliburton was listed as questionable on the initial injury report for Game 4. If he plays, it’s unlikely he’ll be at 100 percent, making him more of a target for the Celtics’ defense than he was in Game 2. If he doesn’t play, the Celtics also know what to do.


2. Do the Pacers have any more midrange magic?

Advertisement

Midrange shots (those that come between the paint and the 3-point line) accounted for just 11% of total field goal attempts this season. That’s half the midrange rate from just seven years ago (22% in 2016-17) and one third the rate from 16 years ago (33% in 2007-08).

But the midrange shot is not dead. It’s a key reason why the Pacers are still playing, and why two of the three games in this series have been close.

Over their 16 playoff games, the Pacers have taken 15% of their shots from midrange, the highest rate (by a healthy margin) among the four teams still playing and up from 10% (21st) in the regular season.

While the Pacers didn’t shoot a lot from midrange in the regular season, they were the first team in the last 27 years to make more than half (50.5%) of their shots from between the paint and the 3-point line. And they’ve been even better (52.4%) in the playoffs.

That includes a four-game stretch — Game 6 of the conference semis through Game 2 of this series — in which the Pacers shot an incredible 50-for-81 (61.7%), with those 81 attempts accounting for 23% of their total shots from the field.

Advertisement

The were still better than average (7-for-15) in Game 3, but that wasn’t enough. One possession before he had the ball stolen by Jrue Holiday, Andrew Nembhard missed a 13-foot pullup that would have given the Pacers back the lead with a little more than 30 seconds left.

If they’re going to take this series back to Boston for a Game 5, the Pacers may need a little more midrange magic on Monday.


3. Celtics’ small ball hasn’t worked

Game 4 will be the 10th straight game that Kristaps Porzingis has missed with the calf strain he suffered in Game 4 of the first round. That injury has pushed Al Horford into the starting lineup, and that lineup has been much better in the playoffs (plus-18.1 per 100 possessions in 195 minutes) than it was in the regular season (plus-2.7 in 311 minutes).

With Horford in the starting lineup, Luke Kornet was the backup center until he sprained his wrist in the first half of Game 2.

Advertisement

With Kornet out, the Celtics initially went to small lineups — with Tatum or Oshae Brissett at center — when Horford sat down. But those lineups haven’t been good:

Celtics in conference finals

Bigs on floor MIN OffRtg DefRtg NetRtg +/-
Two 6 133.3 108.3 +25.0 +3
One 121 122.1 112.2 +9.9 +28
Zero 21 129.7 147.4 -17.6 -8

OffRtg = Points scored per 100 possessions
DefRtg = Points allowed per 100 possessions
NetRtg = Point differential per 100 possessions
Doesn’t include a couple of minutes of Game 2 garbage time

So Xavier Tillman has been getting some minutes as the backup center, including more than six minutes alongside Horford in Game 3 (all of the two-big minutes in the table above).

In the second half on Saturday, the only time there were zero bigs on the floor was the last seven seconds of the third quarter). The bigs were missed in those seven seconds, because the quarter ended with McDermott getting a tip-in over Payton Pritchard to put the Pacers up nine.

Advertisement

Horford and Porzingis (when he returns) allow the Celtics to play big without sacrificing spacing on offense. Kornet (who’s listed as questionable for Game 4) and Tillman, not so much. But the latter’s minutes were critical in Game 3, and we may not see much more small ball going forward.


4. More numbers to know

Some other notes regarding the Celtics and Pacers:

  • This series is a huge contrast in ball movement, with the Pacers having averaged 400 passes per 24 minutes of possession and the Celtics having averaged just 276 per 24.
  • Celtics opponents have made just 19 corner 3-pointers over their 13 playoff games. That’s as many as the Wolves made in their four-game sweep of the Suns in the first round.
  • Though Boston is a plus-51 from 3-point range in this series, the Pacers have outscored them by three total points from the field. But Boston is a plus-27 at the free throw line.
  • After committing just 11.6 turnovers per 100 possessions through the first two rounds (lowest among teams that won a series), the Pacers have committed 16.4 per 100 in this series. Boston has won the possession battle, committing 14 fewer turnovers over the three games.
  • The Celtics’ Sam Hauser and the Pacers’ Ben Sheppard were a combined 33-for-72 (45.8%) from 3-point range through the first two rounds of the playoffs. They’re a combined 0-for-18 in the conference finals.

* * *

John Schuhmann is a senior stats analyst for NBA.com. You can e-mail him here, find his archive here and follow him on X. 

The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA, its clubs or Warner Bros. Discovery.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

How to watch Caitlin Clark: Time, TV for Indiana Fever vs Los Angeles Sparks on 5/28/24

Published

on

How to watch Caitlin Clark: Time, TV for Indiana Fever vs Los Angeles Sparks on 5/28/24


play

The Indiana Fever are 1-6 on the season after a 99-80 loss to the Las Vegas Aces on Saturday.

Caitlin Clark averages a team-leading 15.4 points as they host the Los Angeles Sparks (1-3), which is the only team Indiana has beaten this season. Kelsey Mitchell, who was slowed by injury to start the season, has scored at least 16 in each of the past four games. Aliyah Boston is coming off a game where she put up 12 points, six rebounds and four assists against the Aces on Saturday. Temi Fagbenle has provided help off the bench (12.3 points over the past four games).

Advertisement

Los Angeles is led by Dearica Hamby, who averages 21 points 13.3 rebounds and 3.8 assists per game. Cameron Brink, the second pick in the 2024 WNBA draft, has put up 8.3 points, 6.8 rebounds and 3.3 blocks this season.

Sign up: Subscribe to our Caitlin Clark Fever newsletter

Indiana Fever vs Los Angeles Sparks start time, date

7 p.m. ET Tuesday, May 28, 2024, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indiana.

How to watch Caitlin Clark, Indiana Fever vs Los Angeles Sparks

TV: NBA TV

Streaming: Fubo (FREE)

Advertisement

‘I’m excited to go home’: Indiana Fever finish gauntlet of opening road schedule.

Caitlin Clark stats

Through 7 games: 15.4 points, 6.3 assists, 5.4 rebounds, 31.6% 3-point shooting.

Get Caitlin Clark and Indiana Fever jerseys, gear

Indiana Fever and Caitlin Clark jerseys, shirts, sweatshirts and hats from Fanatics can be found here.

Tickets to see Caitlin Clark, Indiana Fever

Tickets for Fever games are available here.

This is the Indiana Fever 2024 schedule, with TV info; all times are ET; ^-preseason.

Advertisement
Date, day place, opponent Time, TV/results
May 3, Fri. at Dallas^ L, 79-76
May 9, Thurs. vs. Atlanta^ W, 83-80
May 14, Tues. at Connecticut L, 92-71
May 16, Thurs. vs. New York L, 102-66
May 18, Sat. at New York L, 91-80
May 20, Mon. vs. Connecticut L, 88-84
May 22, Wed. at Seattle L, 85-83
May 24, Fri. at Los Angeles W, 78-73
May 25, Sat. at Las Vegas L, 99-80
May 28, Tues. vs. Los Angeles 7 p.m., NBA TV
May 30, Thurs. vs. Seattle 7 p.m., Prime, WTHR
June 1, Sat. vs. Chicago* 1 p.m., NBA TV, WALV
June 2, Sun. at New York* 7 p.m., NBA TV, WALV
June 7, Fri. at Washington* 7:30 p.m., Ion, WTHR
June 10, Mon. at Connecticut* 7 p.m., NBA TV, WTHR
June 13, Thurs. vs. Atlanta* 7 p.m., WTHR
June 16, Sun. vs. Chicago Noon, CBS
June 19, Wed. vs. Washington 7 p.m., NBA TV
June 21, Fri. at Atlanta 7:30 p.m., Ion
June 23, Sun. at Chicago 6 p.m., NBA TV, WALV
June 27, Thurs. at Seattle 10 p.m., Prime, WALV
June 30, Sun. at Phoenix 3 p.m., ESPN
July 2, Tues. at Las Vegas 10 p.m., ESPN
July 6, Sat. vs. New York 1 p.m., CBS
July 10, Wed. vs. Washington Noon, NBA TV, WTHR
July 12, Fri. vs. Phoenix 7:30 p.m., Ion
July 14, Sun. at Minnesota 7 p.m., ESPN
July 17, Wed. at Dallas 8 p.m., ESPN
Aug. 16, Fri. vs. Phoenix 7:30 p.m., Ion
Aug. 18, Sun. vs. Seattle 4 p.m., ABC
Aug. 24, Sat. at Minnesota 8 p.m., NBA TV
Aug. 26, Mon. at Atlanta 7:30 p.m., NBA TV, WTHR
Aug. 28, Wed. vs. Connecticut 7 p.m., NBA TV
Aug. 30, Fri. at Chicago 7:30 p.m., Ion
Sept. 1, Sun. at Dallas 4 p.m., NBA TV
Sept. 4, Wed. vs. Los Angeles 7 p.m., CBS SN, WALV
Sept. 6, Fri. vs. Minnesota 7:30 p.m., Ion
Sept. 8, Sun. vs. Atlanta 4 p.m., WTHR
Sept. 11, Wed. vs. Las Vegas 7 p.m., NBA TV
Sept. 13, Fri. vs. Las Vegas 7:30 p.m., Ion
Sept. 15, Sun. vs. Dallas 3 p.m., WALV
Sept. 19, Thurs. at Washington 7 p.m., Prime, WTHR

*-Commissioner’s Cup games

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Locked on Pacers: Indiana blows another game late in Game 3 against Boston Celtics

Published

on

Locked on Pacers: Indiana blows another game late in Game 3 against Boston Celtics


The Indiana Pacers had this game in hand but let it slip away. It’s an all-too-familiar story for them in this playoff series against the 1-seed Boston Celtics.

After being up 8 with 2:38 remaining, the Pacers were unable to get enough stops and unable to get the ball in the basket and ended up losing by a final score of 114-111.

Change one or two plays in the series and the Indiana Pacers are up 2-1 in the Eastern Conference Finals but instead they are facing a hole in which no team in NBA history has been able to dig themselves out.

I joined Locked on Pacers with SI.com’s Tony East to discuss the latest brutal defeat for the blue and gold. You can watch the podcast below or listen via any of your typical podcast providers.

Advertisement

We touch on a multitude of topics in this one including the following:

  • How close the Pacers are to having a lead in this series. Does it matter? Inexperienced team showing kind of showing n
  • Carlisle’s frustrations and whether or not he should have called a timeout before the Jrue Holiday game-sealing steal. The creative final play to give Aaron Nesmith a chance to to hit a game-tying jumper.
  • Referencing Dark Matter, a sci-fi show on AppleTV+ that maybe 12 people will appreciate, and having a wish to be able to examine the roads not taken with Carlisle seeing what the future would have held with a pair of timeouts.
  • The best game of Andrew Nembhard’s career, him being visibly down during his press conference. 32 points and 9 assists
  • The quartet of Nembhard, McConnell, Turner, and Siakam all playing well with over 20+ points but the Pacers couldn’t find a 5th guy to contribute with every player with 4 points or less.
  • Doug McDermott having a positive impact on the game with the highest plus/minus on the team, added a big tip in basket to end the third quarter and a one possession stop on Jayson Tatum on a play where for some reason he ended up on Tatum. What the hell do I know?
  • The five stages of grief all getting their runtime over the course of this series.
  • The usual banter and thinking out loud.

I’ll have more written coverage on Nembhard and others before Game 4. Stay tuned.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending