Connect with us

Illinois

Illinois assault weapons ban penalizes lawful gun owners

Published

on

Illinois assault weapons ban penalizes lawful gun owners


We must look at violent gun crime as a whole before we begin celebrating successes. The opinion piece titled “Illinois ban on assault weapons is working” warrants a response. Stating the ban has fulfilled its promise cannot take place in a silo.

The author and I can agree that today, Illinoisans cannot purchase certain weapons, magazines and switches. We can also agree that any reduction in mass shootings is good news. However, the author only paints a partial picture of how Illinois is (or isn’t) addressing gun violence.

According to the most recent data published by the Pew Research Center, only 3% of firearms murders during the year of the study were committed by individuals using assault weapons and other “non-assault-style” rifles, as compared to 59% of murders that were committed by criminals using handguns. The FBI’s Crime Data Explorer backs up this data. The vast majority of gun crimes in Illinois involve handguns, not assault weapons, and certainly the author, whose life’s work is to prevent gun violence, knows this.

The author also fails to mention how the Protect Illinois Communities Act is silent on the straw purchases that provide the vast majority of weapons used in crimes. The Gun Violence Archive puts Chicago at the very top of the list for mass shootings last year. Gun crime, primarily in Black and Brown communities, continues to destroy neighborhoods and families.

Advertisement

The author is also silent on the fact that Gov. J.B. Pritzker and legislators she speaks so highly of have done absolutely nothing to strengthen penalties against those who commit these heinous crimes and refused to extend a law that mandated high-end criminal penalties for the worst of the worst repeat felony gun offenders.

The day before this op-ed was published, a mother and her three daughters were killed in a domestic violence incident in Tinley Park, and a lone gunman shot and killed seven individuals in Joliet before turning the gun on himself. The weapons used in these mass shootings were handguns. On Jan. 26, in broad daylight in the Loop, two CPS students were shot and killed while walking down the street.

On Jan. 31, two more shootings: one of three CPS students in Edgewater, and a second mass shooting with at least six victims in south suburban Dolton. Early Sunday, Feb. 11, a mass shooting in Little Village injured seven people.

If we are to truly address gun crime, we must come at it from every angle, and we absolutely must make sure criminals know they will face stiff penalties, including the certainty of prosecution in Cook County, if they commit gun crimes. Simply passing an “assault weapons” ban that is ignored by criminals who get their guns illegally, yet places new mandates on lawful gun owners, is not the answer.

State Sen. Craig Wilcox (R-Woodstock), 32nd District

Advertisement

SEND LETTERS TO: letters@suntimes.com. To be considered for publication, letters must include your full name, your neighborhood or hometown and a phone number for verification purposes. Letters should be a maximum of approximately 375 words.

Let noncitizens vote in Chicago school board elections

We write in response to your recent editorial, “Legislators should move ahead on plan for an elected Chicago school board.” While we appreciated that it was insightful, we respectfully disagree with your stance that non-citizens should be denied the right to vote in Chicago school board elections.

As a city, it is past time we acknowledge and respect the significant role that non-citizen parents play in our education system.

Organizations such as Kids First Chicago, supported by parents and community members, have advocated for allowing any Chicago parent, regardless of immigration status, to vote in school board elections. Their position is supported by most Chicagoans surveyed in a fall 2023 Kids First Chicago poll, which revealed that roughly seven in ten respondents are in favor of this approach.

The momentum for such change is not confined to Chicago. San Francisco has already set a precedent by winning a court ruling that grants non-citizen parents the right to vote in school board elections. The issue has gained traction in Springfield as well, with a bill currently in the Senate, although further changes to the state constitution and Chicago voting laws may be required.

Advertisement

The importance of this issue has been recognized by Mayor Brandon Johnson, who campaigned on and included in his transition report a commitment to collaborate with Gov. J.B. Pritzker and state legislators to extend voting rights in school board elections to noncitizens.

The involvement of noncitizens in local school councils, in which they are already permitted to vote and serve, exemplifies the positive impact of inclusive electoral practices. Extending these rights to Chicago school board elections is a rational and necessary step toward ensuring that all families have a voice in decisions that directly affect their children, schools and communities.

The rationale for allowing noncitizen parents to participate in school board elections is simple: their children are enrolled in our schools, and they contribute to the tax base that funds these schools. These families have a vested interest in the quality of education and deserve a say in decisions that affect their children’s future.

Hal Woods, chief of policy, and Jessica Cañas, senior manager of community partnerships, Kids First Chicago

About those lead pipes …

I have lived in Galewood for a decade now, and over these 10 years I have seen the city’s water department repair at least a dozen main water pipes that were leaking on residents’ parkways (including my own). Because the city has a plan to eventually replace all the lead water pipes, wouldn’t it make sense to replace the lead pipes while they are repairing the leaks? The parkways have already been dug up and all the equipment and crews are there. It would be more cost effective and efficient. Just a thought.

Advertisement

Michael DiDominicis, Galewood

Trump knows something about dodging bills

What irony that Donald J. Trump is demanding our NATO allies “pay their bills.” Yes, that very Donald J. Trump whose penchant for dodging his own debts for decades and decades is well-established.

“Do as I say, not as I do” comes to forehead-smashing mind!

Dwain Thomas, River North





Source link

Advertisement

Illinois

Missed the lunar eclipse? See when the next one will be over Illinois

Published

on

Missed the lunar eclipse? See when the next one will be over Illinois


play

Millions across the United States who woke up early Tuesday were treated to a “blood moon,” the only total lunar eclipse occurring in North America in 2026, according to NASA.

Advertisement

Illinois residents who missed it will be waiting some time for the next total lunar eclipse to shine above the U.S. — several years, in fact. But a partial lunar eclipse is coming sooner.

When is the next total lunar eclipse in Illinois?

After March 3, Illinois’ next visible total lunar eclipse won’t happen again until June 2029, writes Time and Date. There is a partial lunar eclipse coming sooner, however.

Others are reading: Free Full Moon Queso at Qdoba. How to get in Illinois

When is the next lunar eclipse?

A partial lunar eclipse will be visible in Illinois on Aug. 27-28, shining over the Americas, Europe, Africa and parts of Asia, according to NASA.

Provided you’re willing to stay up late to see it, the partial lunar eclipse will be at its maximum around 11:12 p.m., Thursday, Aug. 27, in Illinois.

Advertisement

Until then, here’s what people in parts of the U.S. were seeing Tuesday morning.

See photos of the March 3 total lunar eclipse

Calendar of upcoming eclipses

When is the next solar eclipse?

The next solar eclipse will be visible to roughly 980 million people on Aug. 12, 2026, writes Time and Date.

A total solar eclipse will occur over Greenland, Iceland, Spain, Russia and a small area of Portugal, while a partial eclipse will be visible in Europe, Africa, North America, the Atlantic Ocean, Arctic Ocean and Pacific Ocean, NASA reports.

Advertisement

Need help finding stars, planets and constellations? Try these free astronomy apps

The following free astronomy apps can help you locate stars, planets, and constellations.



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Illinois lawmakers consider tightening DUI law to 0.05 BAC

Published

on

Illinois lawmakers consider tightening DUI law to 0.05 BAC


COLLINSVILLE, Ill. (First Alert 4) – Right now, in Illinois, Missouri and most of the country, drivers must be at or over 0.08 to get a DUI. A proposal in the Illinois Statehouse would lower that threshold.

“Make it as safe as you possibly can out there,” said John Sapolis.

Collinsville resident John Sapolis said while lowering Illinois’ DUI threshold would not affect him, as he rarely drinks, he likes the idea of getting drinkers off the road.

“It’s bad enough out there driving around with people who are not drinking,” said Sapolis.

Advertisement

If a bill passes in the Illinois House of Representatives, the blood alcohol limit would be lowered, meaning fewer drinks could put somebody over the line for a DUI.

Two Chicago-area lawmakers propose lowering the threshold from 0.08 to 0.05.

“Your body still is not in a proper state to really be behind the wheel,” said Erin Doherty, Regional Executive Director for Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Doherty said even at 0.05, drivers are less coordinated and cannot track moving objects as well as when they are sober.

Utah is the only state in the country to have the 0.05 limit, and Doherty said one in five drivers there changed their behavior.

Advertisement

“There are so many other options before getting behind the wheel,” said Doherty.

Sara Floyd used to live in Utah and now calls Collinsville home.

“The Midwest people like to have a few beers while they watch their Little League games

“In Utah, you can barely get alcohol at a gas station,” said Floyd.

She said the culture in Utah is very different and thinks there should be some wiggle room for drivers.

Advertisement

“If one person had a beer within an hour period and then drove, they shouldn’t get a DUI for one drink,” said Floyd.

Doherty said they do not recommend driving even after a single drink.

“You really should not get behind the wheel when you’re any kind of impaired, one drink, five drinks, whatever that looks like, just don’t drive,” said Doherty.

While each body processes alcohol differently, according to the National Library of Medicine, in a two-hour period it takes a 170-pound man three to four drinks to reach 0.05, and it takes a 137-pound woman two to three drinks to reach the same state.

April Sage said she does not think this law would work, saying instead it would help more if the state added more public transit.

Advertisement

“I could have three beers and get a ride home safely,” said Sage.

First Alert 4 reached out to a spokesman for the Illinois Department of Transportation to see if they had any comments on this bill. The spokesperson said they are not going to comment because it is pending legislation.

According to the Illinois Department of Public Health, fatal crashes involving one driver who had been drinking increased 4% from 2019 to 2022, despite multiple studies showing fewer Americans are drinking.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Voters had no choice in nearly 9-in-10 primary elections

Published

on

Voters had no choice in nearly 9-in-10 primary elections



Illinois voting data shows voters had no choice of candidate in nearly 9-in-10 Democratic and Republican primaries for state and federal office in 2024.

Voters had no choice of candidate in nearly nine out of every 10 Republican and Democratic primary elections for state and federal office in 2024.

Analysis of Illinois voting data shows Democrats ran one or no candidate in 135 of the 155 primary elections for the U.S. House, Illinois Senate and Illinois House. That left voters with a choice between candidates in just 20 races.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Republicans only ran one or no candidate in 137 of the 155 primary elections last year for non-judicial state and federal positions, giving voters of a choice in just 18 races.

In total, there were 155 primaries for the U.S. House of Representatives, Illinois Senate and Illinois House in 2024. Democrats did not run a candidate in 28 of these races while Republicans failed to run a candidate in 50.

And in the 107 Democratic primaries and 87 Republican primaries were only one candidate ran for the position, those candidates secured their spot on the general election ballot with a single primary vote.

To get on the primary ballot for Illinois Senate, the Illinois General Assembly mandates established party candidates to get 1,000 petition signatures from district party members. Illinois House candidates need 500 signatures. For U.S. House, either party’s candidates need signatures from 0.5% of all primary voters from their party in the district.

Advertisement

This lack of choice between candidates for Democratic and Republican party primaries also left general election voters with fewer choices on the ballot.

In the 2024 election cycle, 65 of the 155 non-judicial state and federal general elections had only one candidate on the ballot. That means in 65 districts, it only took one vote for a candidate to win a seat representing the entire district.

Illinoisans already suffer from a lack of choice in candidates. Research shows an average of 4.7 million Illinois voters had no choice in their state representative between the 2012 and 2020 election cycles.

Research shows more choice drives voter participation and makes legislators less susceptible to the influence of lobbyists and special interests. Lightly contested elections also tend to skew policies in favor of powerful special interests.

Illinois should consider reforms that will give voters more choices at the ballot box, such as making it easier for independents to enter the general election like they do in Iowa, Wisconsin and Tennessee.

Advertisement

Until that happens, Illinoisans will continue to see elections with too few choices and too much influence handed to those already in power.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending