Connect with us

Illinois

Debunking tripledemic misconceptions with an Illinois immunologist

Published

on

Debunking tripledemic misconceptions with an Illinois immunologist


CHICAGO (CBS) — March 2023 will mark three years since well being officers declared COVID-19 a pandemic. 

Now, excessive case numbers of each flu and RSV are within the combine, creating what some persons are calling a “tripledemic.”

As a result of misinformation can unfold so rapidly on social media, we sat down with an skilled to debunk some widespread misconceptions about this “tripledemic.” Dr. Jessica Brinkworth is an immunologist and assistant professor on the College of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 

Immunity debt 

Advertisement

A type of ideas is immunity debt. This concept was first utilized in an editorial opinion piece first in Could 2021. The time period has been used to explain the concept that COVID-19 mitigations such because the lockdown interval in 2020 within the U.S. in addition to masking and social distancing weakened folks’s immune techniques. Subsequently, now, there are extra instances of COVID-19, RSV and flu.

Dr. Brinkworth says this time period can’t be utilized to the state of affairs that we’re in. 

“There’s a bunch of causes to not apply immunity debt to this specific state of affairs, the primary one being that RSV does not set off any longstanding immunity of any type,” she stated, “and so for that cause alone, as a result of the idea of immunity that depends on this notion of immune reminiscence, it does not apply.”

The second cause is that immunity debt doesn’t think about vaccines.

“There is a lengthy, good physique of labor that demonstrates that the extra influenza vaccines you might have over the course of your lifetime for no matter strains can be found, the extra probably you might be to have the ability to fend off incoming influenza,” Brinkworth stated, “and influenza immunity usually lasts fairly a very long time.”

Advertisement

So then, why are there extra instances of respiratory viruses? The reply is absolutely advanced, Dr. Brinkworth says.

Increased case numbers at surprising instances

A part of the reply is that RSV has been on the rise for years, even earlier than the pandemic. In 2019, there have been 100,000 deaths in youngsters below the age of 5 in RSV from RSV worldwide, in accordance with knowledge from the CDC. 

rsv-graph.jpg

CDC

Advertisement


This yr, each RSV and flu instances are a lot increased and peaked at surprising instances.

“Each time we see shifts in flu patterns, we are inclined to see shifts in different seasonal pathogens,” Brinkworth stated.

Early flu hospitalizations hit a decade excessive in 2022. In keeping with Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention knowledge, the final time was in 2009 with the H1N1 pandemic.

Between 2016 and 2020, RSV and Flu seasons considerably started to overlap. Then in the summertime of 2021 with the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions, the flu season pushed far forward. 

flu-graph.png

Advertisement

CDC


Though we have now some knowledge on how RSV and flu work together, we’re nonetheless studying extra about how COVID-19 interacts with these two viruses.

Well being specialists do know that co-infections do happen and having one virus makes somebody extra inclined to contracting different viruses. This will increase the possibilities of mortality, says Brinkworth.

There’s new analysis from the CDC that discovered that youngsters below 5 who had been hospitalized with COVID, and examined optimistic for a second virus, usually tend to be admitted to the ICU. 

RSV

Advertisement

One other widespread false impression concerning the tripledemic, Brinkworth tells us, is that RSV solely impacts youngsters.

“One of many issues that I feel has been missed within the story of RSV this yr is that additionally it is a vital pathogen for at-risk adults. So that features frail and aged folks; people who find themselves immunocompromised,” she stated. About 78 p.c of RSV-related deaths are amongst folks 65 years and older. “It has been stated to trigger this actually massive illness burden that is no less than as corresponding to ailments like influenza,’ Brinkworth stated.

RSV’s incubation interval, or the time between getting contaminated and exhibiting signs, is 4 days. There’s additionally proof that exhibits that contracting RSV does not give the immune system a lot immunity, or reminiscence on the way to shield towards reinfection. 

XBB.1.5

XBB.1.5 is the official identify for the most recent COVID-19 variant. It was first detected within the U.S. in October 2022, and as of Jan. 14, it already accounts for over 40 p.c of U.S. instances.

Advertisement

“The Kraken” has caught on as a nickname for XBB1.5, and Brinkworth says, “It is a good illustration of how fearful specialists are that it will trigger numerous injury.”

XBB1.5. Is a mix of different Omicron variants. It’s the most transmissible variant of concern to this point and is healthier at moving into cells. 

A Washington-based lab that research the evolution of viruses predicted this pressure round a yr in the past.

Bloom Lab regarded on the sequences of accessible strains on the time and stated that, ‘Listed below are

the amino acids that I’d change in these protein sequences, given what I do know the perform is that if I needed to be unbeatable,” Brinkworth stated. 

Advertisement

Safety

Though there are not widespread mitigations enacted, Dr. Brinkworth emphasizes they’re one of the best ways to guard your self and others.

“My strongest suggestion is at all times to masks and restrict indoor closed time with giant teams of individuals,” she stated.

The newest COVID-19 booster particularly targets Omicron strains. Receiving vaccinations towards COVID-19 and influenza helps shield towards extreme sickness and dying. 

Advertisement





Source link

Illinois

Hemp regulation bill stalls amid Democratic infighting; Pritzker criticizes Welch over no vote

Published

on

Hemp regulation bill stalls amid Democratic infighting; Pritzker criticizes Welch over no vote


SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — A bill that would have imposed regulations on new types of intoxicating substances derived from hemp stalled in the Illinois House Tuesday, dealing a political setback to Gov. JB Pritzker after he strongly supported the legislation.

“I was tremendously disappointed,” Pritzker said at an unrelated news conference Tuesday, after it became clear the bill would not be called for a vote in the House. “This is a demonstration, from my perspective, of the power of special interests and the money that they spread around to thwart health and safety of the public.”

But the bill also created rifts within the House Democratic caucus. According to several sources, the hemp regulation bill was the focus of a three-hour closed-door caucus meeting Monday that some House members described afterwards as “spirited” but others described as “raucous.”

Pritzker also called Democratic House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch’s decision not to call the bill “irresponsible,” saying he believed it would have passed with a bipartisan majority had he done so. And he criticized House Democrats for the treatment of members of his staff who appeared at Monday’s caucus meeting.

Advertisement

But Welch’s spokesperson noted that he is a cosponsor of the bill and would continue working to pass it in the new legislative session that begins Wednesday.

“A lengthy caucus discussion found that the bill in its current form did not have enough support within the House Democratic Caucus,” the spokesperson said. “He is committed to continuing discussions so that when the bill ultimately passes, it is the best possible piece of legislation for the state of Illinois.”

‘Intoxicating’ hemp

The bill targeted a new category of products that have so far been able to bypass the regulatory framework Illinois set up when it legalized industrial hemp in 2018 and recreational marijuana the following year.

The two crops are closely related biologically. Both are classified as a form of cannabis but the major distinction between them is the amount of the intoxicating chemical THC they contain.

Hemp is defined as having a THC content not more than 0.3% by weight. It is primarily used to make a variety of consumer products, such as CBD oils, that are thought to have health benefits. The plant can also be used to make a variety of industrial products such as textile fabrics and building materials.

Advertisement

Both the hemp and marijuana industries are heavily regulated by the state, from the planting and growing of the crops to the transportation and processing of plants into various products. In addition, marijuana and related cannabis products can only be sold through licensed dispensaries.

In recent years, however, a new category of intoxicating products has emerged in what some people call a “gray market” that lies just outside the existing regulatory framework. Those products are made using THC that is extracted or synthesized from hemp plants and are often sold in gas stations and convenience stores, sometimes in packaging that closely resembles candy, snacks or other products commonly sold to children.

“And I talked to a mother of a daughter who took one of these packages, didn’t understand how intoxicating the package was, and ended up passed out, ended up in the hospital, has been in and out of the hospital now for eight months as a result of just this product that looked, in all respects, as if it were candy,” Pritzker said.

House Bill 4293, known as the Hemp Consumer Products Act, would have closed the existing loophole by defining any product meant for human or animal consumption with a THC content greater than that of consumer CBD products as “cannabis.” It would have done so regardless of where the THC came from or how it was derived, and it would have subjected those products to all the regulations that apply to the cannabis industry.

That bill passed the Senate during the regular 2024 session in May by a vote of 54-1. But the House did not consider the bill during the final days of the spring session, nor did the bill come up for a vote during the fall veto session in November.

Advertisement

Industry concerns

In December, Pritzker held a news conference and issued a news release announcing his support for the bill while urging lawmakers to pass it during the upcoming lame duck session in January.

But the bill ran into stiff opposition from some hemp-related businesses argued the bill would cast too wide of a net over the industry, putting small, independent businesses and farms at risk while cutting off consumers’ access to health products like CBD oil.

“This bill, as currently written, would wipe out thousands of jobs and criminalize CBD products to the benefit of billion-dollar cannabis corporations,” the lobby group Illinois Healthy Alternatives Association said in a statement Jan. 5.

But other industry advocates disagreed, arguing the new regulations were needed to close a regulatory loophole in Illinois law that allows certain businesses to sell products that are essentially cannabis, without going through the state’s cannabis regulatory process.

“What these guys are trying to do is that they’re trying to cement themselves in a separate category that allows them to sell the exact same product at a whole different rate because they don’t have to follow any of the regulations,” Ted Parks, a licensed cannabis transporter and executive director of the Illinois Third Party Carriers Association, told Capitol News Illinois in an interview.

Advertisement

Democratic rift

Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Pritzker openly complained that officials from state agencies that would be involved in the regulatory process were verbally abused by Democratic lawmakers, and he specifically blamed Welch for not intervening.

“There was a raucous meeting of the Democratic House caucus, in which there was a lot of yelling at staff by people who were opposed to the bill that the speaker did not intervene about,” Pritzker said. “And you shouldn’t let staff get berated like that. You just shouldn’t.”

A spokesperson for Welch issued a statement later Tuesday saying he expects House members to conduct themselves with “proper decorum and respect, especially on contentious topics amidst tight deadlines.”

“Speaker Welch spoke individually with certain members immediately following the discussion yesterday, as well as to the entire Caucus today, reiterating these expectations,” the spokesperson said. “It is his understanding that at least one member has reached out to offer an apology to the Governor’s staff, and has also apologized to members of the Democratic Caucus.”

The bill did not come up for a vote Tuesday, the final day of the lame duck session, due to an unwritten procedural rule in the House commonly known as the “rule of 60,” which says no bill can advance to final action on the House floor unless at least 60 members of the majority caucus have signed on to support it.

Advertisement

Sixty is the minimum number of votes needed to pass legislation in the House. Democrats currently hold 78 of the House’s 118 seats.

“It came up a few votes short,” Rep. Bob Rita, D-Blue Island, said in an interview. “We’re in the lame duck (session) and this is a time when there are a lot of things going on, but it’s a measure that we need to address as we go into the 104th General Assembly. I believe this is going to be at the forefront of one of the agenda items.”

Chicago concerns

Some House members speculated that Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who was known to oppose the bill, may have been a factor in some Democrats’ refusal to support the bill, but Pritzker said he doubted that was the case.

“My impression is he didn’t have much to do with this,” he said. “There’s a powerful lobby that has been working against this bill for quite some time. This was not an easy bill. If it had been, it would have passed last May.”

Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Legislature approves bill to prioritize family members in foster care; heads to Pritzker's desk

Published

on

Legislature approves bill to prioritize family members in foster care; heads to Pritzker's desk


SPRINGFIELD — A bill soon heading to Gov. JB Pritzker’s desk would direct foster care officials in Illinois to prioritize placing children with relatives.

The House voted unanimously on Monday to pass the Kindship in Demand Act, or KIND Act. House Bill 4781 puts an obligation on the Department of Children and Family Services to use a “kin-first approach” when placing children in foster care settings. Lawmakers and advocates said it’s better for children to be placed with a family member or another person close to the child when possible.

“If we can stabilize 10 or 12 kids, we’re going to change somebody’s community,” Rep. Marcus Evans, D-Chicago, told the House Adoption and Child Welfare Committee on Sunday.

Pritzker previously voiced support for the idea at a news conference in December.

Advertisement

The approach ultimately will allow the state more access to federal funds, Nora Collins-Mandeville from the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois told the committee Sunday. Currently, the state reimburses family members for care costs, but once they become certified under the new bill, the state can get more federal funding to cover those expenses.

Like most other state agencies, DCFS faced challenges during a two-year budget impasse that ended in 2017 and strained the system’s funding and ability to promptly place children in care settings.

The Pritzker administration has ramped up funding for the agency, but former DCFS director Marc Smith was found by a Cook County judge in contempt of court multiple times in 2022 for failing to find adequate placements for foster care children, some of whom were residing in psychiatric hospitals beyond medical need. An appellate court later vacated the contempt citations.

Rep. Steve Reick, R-Woodstock, said Monday that state lawmakers and DCFS’ new director, Heidi Mueller, have taken a different approach in recent years.

“I don’t think we would’ve seen this two years ago because there’s a new way of looking at child welfare,” he said.

Advertisement

Nearly 10,000 children in DCFS care live with family members, but more than 60% of those families are not eligible for monthly foster care payments, clothing vouchers, or foster care support groups, according to the ACLU.

Kin-first foster systems have decreased risk of abuse and give a higher chance of achieving permanency, according to Casey Family Programs – the nation’s largest foundation focused on foster care.

DCFS reduced the number of children and young adults in its care from 50,000 in 1995 to 16,000 in 2023. The number, however, has risen in the past year to 18,000.

Illinois’ foster care system ranked in the bottom third of states in 2019 for children placed in permanent homes, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Between 2017 and 2021, the number of children who were placed in a permanent home decreased by 7.8%, according to the 2021 Child Welfare Outcomes Report to Congress.

“We know that placing youth in the child welfare system with relatives lessens the trauma associated with family separation, reduces the number of times a child is moved, enhances permanency options if youth cannot be reunified, results in higher placement satisfaction for youth in care, and delivers better social, behavioral, mental health, and educational outcomes for youth than when they are placed in non-kin foster care,” Collins-Mandeville said in a statement.

Advertisement

Under the KIND Act, there would also be different criminal background criteria for relatives and foster parents. The federal government allows DCFS to waive “non-safety-related licensing” for relative caregivers on a case-by-case basis. Relatives would be subject to a personal analysis assessing their criminal record and its potential impact on the child. The bill would allow DCFS to consider, for example, the overrepresentation of minorities in the prison system, especially for minor drug felonies.

Courts would also have a larger role in family-finding efforts like monitoring whether DCFS complies with notifying relatives that a child has been removed from its parents’ custody within 30 days.

Amalia Huot-Marchand is a graduate student in journalism with Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications, and a Fellow in its Medill Illinois News Bureau working in partnership with Capitol News Illinois.

Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of print and broadcast outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Tiffany Henyard misses Thornton Township and Dolton, Illinois meetings on same day

Published

on

Tiffany Henyard misses Thornton Township and Dolton, Illinois meetings on same day


Tiffany Henyard misses Thornton Township and Dolton, Illinois meetings on same day – CBS Chicago

Watch CBS News


As a result, many have been left wondering what Henyard’s next move will be as the primary election draws near. Jermont Terry reports.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending