Connect with us

Health

Fauci’s masking message amid rising COVID cases has doctors sounding off: ‘Will not reduce the spread’

Published

on

Fauci’s masking message amid rising COVID cases has doctors sounding off: ‘Will not reduce the spread’

Dr. Anthony Fauci in an interview on Saturday spoke about the potential for a return to mask-wearing in America in light of a seasonal uptick in COVID cases and hospitalizations.

Now, doctors reached by Fox News Digital are sharing reaction to the comments by the former White House chief medical adviser. 

“I am concerned that people will not abide by [masking] recommendations,” Fauci said in the interview.

FAUCI ‘CONCERNED’ PEOPLE WON’T COMPLY IF MASKING RECOMMENDATIONS RETURN: ‘I HOPE’ THEY ‘ABIDE’

“I would hope that if we get to the point that the volume of cases is such and organizations like the CDC recommends – CDC does not mandate anything – recommends that people wear masks, I would hope that people abide by that recommendation and take into account the risks to themselves and their families,” the doctor told CNN.

Advertisement

Fauci fell just short of calling for a return to mandates, however.

Dr. Anthony Fauci spoke out a few days ago about the potential for a return to mask-wearing in America in light of a seasonal uptick in COVID cases and hospitalizations. Some doctors pointed to the “limited efficacy data” for mask wearing, “particularly regarding the large-scale spread of the disease.” (Getty Images)

“We’re not talking about mandates or forcing anybody, but when you have a situation where the volume of cases in society gets to a reasonably high level, the vulnerable, the elderly, those with underlying conditions, are going to be more susceptible, if they do get infected, of getting severe disease leading to hospitalization,” Fauci also said.

Masks are ineffective against ‘large-scale spread,’ says Florida neurosurgeon 

Dr. Brett Osborn, a board-certified neurosurgeon in West Palm Beach, Florida, is also the founder of a preventative health care and anti-aging facility, Senolytix. 

CITING RISING COVID CASES, THESE US HOSPITAL SYSTEMS HAVE NOW REINSTATED MASK MANDATES

Advertisement

In response to Fauci’s comments defending masking, Osborn pointed to “limited efficacy data” for masks — “particularly regarding the large-scale spread of the disease, as was the case during the pandemic,” he told Fox News Digital. 

“Let’s face it, regardless of mask usage, the population en masse will be exposed to SARS-COV-2, and its variants, as is the case with influenza,” Osborn went on. 

“This is inevitable and independent of quarantines, lockdowns and other measures that only cultivate a sense of false security,” he also said.

Dr. Brett Osborn

Dr. Brett Osborn, a board-certified neurosurgeon in West Palm Beach, Florida, is also the founder of a preventative health care and anti-aging facility, Senolytix. He shared his thoughts about the use of masks today. (Dr. Brett Osborn)

Osborn noted that masks may offer a “low level of protection” for individuals who consistently wear them, “although this is supported by only two randomized controlled trials to date.” 

Said Osborn, “This limited efficacy, in conjunction with the typical antigenic drift of RNA viruses to a less pathogenic strain, does not justify another round of mask mandates, especially since the CDC numbers are in line with increasing hospitalization rates (and their subsequent fall) this past February.” 

Advertisement

“Regardless of mask usage, the population en masse will be exposed to SARS-COV-2 – and its variants — as is the case with influenza.”

“This intermittent fluctuation is the new norm, so expect it — as COVID-19 is here to stay,” he added.

For those who have a fever or symptoms of COVID and have not yet been screened, Osborn said they may consider wearing a mask to protect any at-risk people from infection. 

mask mandate public transportation

For those who have a fever or symptoms of COVID and have not yet been screened, Dr. Osborn of Florida said they may consider wearing a mask to protect any at-risk people from infection.  (iStock)

“I would make a case for simply avoiding contact and washing your hands, though,” he said. 

“These are time-tested measures that actually work to reduce the spread of other flu-like illnesses.”

Advertisement

Masks are ‘disruptive’ to kids, says Arizona physician

In response to Fauci’s commentary, Dr. Shana Johnson, a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician in Scottsdale, Arizona, expressed concern about the potential for a return to in-school masking.

“Masking mandates disproportionately affect and disrupt the education of children, especially those with autism,” Johnson told Fox News Digital. 

CITING RISING COVID CASES, THESE US HOSPITAL SYSTEMS HAVE NOW REINSTATED MASK MANDATES

“In my experience, schools have had a very ‘black and white’ policy when under mask mandates,” she said.

“I observed disciplining and shaming of neurodivergent as well as typically developing children in elementary and middle schools when they have difficulty wearing a mask.”

Advertisement

Not all children on the autism spectrum can tolerate masks due to sensory sensitivities, Johnson also noted. 

FILE: Kindergarteners wear masks while listening to their teacher amid the COVID-19 pandemic at Washington Elementary School on Jan. 12, 2022, in Lynwood, Calif.

“Masking mandates disproportionately affect and disrupt the education of children, especially those with autism,” Johnson told Fox News Digital.  (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File)

“If they are disciplined, forced to wear a mask or sent home from school due to poorly tolerating a mask, it is systematically discriminating against them due to their disability,” she said.

Although mask-wearing may slow the spread of COVID-19, Johnson said, “given the mild nature of COVID-related illness in most children, the heavy enforcement of masks on school children is not reasonable.”

Masks should be a personal choice, says Tennessee physician

Dr. Laura Purdy, a board-certified family medicine physician in Brentwood, Tennessee, pointed out that COVID is now a fixture of the cold and flu season.

“We’re going to see COVID cases because this is the time of year when people catch and transmit viruses more easily,” she told Fox News Digital. “I think that people will do exactly what they did during the original pandemic.”

Advertisement

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER ‘SEPARATED’ FOR REFUSING COVID VACCINE CHAMPIONS FREE CHOICE: ‘I KNOW WHO I AM’

The doctor said she doesn’t believe there is “much of a point” of the government deciding to mandate masks again, “but, of course, they may recommend it.”

Purdy added, “If people feel like they want or need to wear a mask, then they will do it — and if they don’t, then they won’t.”

Masking will not reduce spread, says California infectious disease expert

Dr. John W. Ayers, PhD, vice chief of innovation in the Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health at the University of California San Diego, noted that pre-pandemic, masking was discouraged by experts because the evidence then was negative about the protective effects for the wearer. 

family wearing masks on walk

“Fauci’s claims about masking policies, which includes reusable cloth masks and surgical masks, will not reduce the spread of COVID-19,” said Ayers of California. (iStock)

“For instance, a randomized study of health care providers who wore cloth masks for four weeks in 14 hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam, during 2011 found they experienced higher rates of respiratory illness, laboratory-confirmed viral infection and influenza-like illness than controls — who followed usual practice while working,” he told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

“Guidance by the World Health Organization in January 2020 stated that ‘cloth (e.g. cotton or gauze) masks are not recommended under any circumstance.’”

“Fauci’s claims about masking policies, which includes reusable cloth masks and surgical masks, will not reduce the spread of COVID-19.”

That changed early in the pandemic, he said, when there was an “abundance of uncertainty.”

“Community masking using cloth or reusable surgical masks was encouraged in the hope that despite the lack of supporting real-world evidence, there may be a community benefit if we all mask,” Ayers went on.

Dr. Anthony Fauci

“I am concerned that people will not abide by [masking] recommendations,” Fauci said in a recent interview — sparking a great deal of discussion. (Getty Images)

“It’s important to note that this is contrary to what Fauci is arguing,” the doctor said. “He now says you mask to protect yourself, which the evidence never supported — and says the benefits of community masking on the population is null.”

Advertisement

Said Ayers, “Fauci’s claims about masking policies, which includes reusable cloth masks and surgical masks, will not reduce the spread of COVID-19.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

While some observational studies have supported the idea that community masking would reduce the spread, Ayers pointed out that those types of studies are “biased” and that randomized trials are the “gold standard.”

“The NIAID and Fauci did not fund any trials on community masking in the USA despite a substantial budget,” he said. 

“It really doesn’t make sense that we did no trials. When it came to masking, we refused to gather robust evidence to support or discourage their use.”

Advertisement

“As stated, Fauci’s claims about masking policies, which include reusable cloth masks and surgical masks, will not reduce the spread of COVID-19,” Ayers said.

“A child sent home from school for not wearing a mask is harmed more by the policy than 1,000 years of masking.”

“However, the collateral harm from future mask mandates will certainly eclipse their fictitious benefit,” the doctor also said. 

“For instance, a child sent home from school for not wearing a mask is harmed more by the policy than 1,000 years of masking.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Health

Treating Other Diseases With Ozempic? Experts Weigh In | Woman's World

Published

on

Treating Other Diseases With Ozempic? Experts Weigh In | Woman's World


Advertisement


Treating Other Diseases With Ozempic? Experts Weigh In | Woman’s World




























Advertisement






Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

FDA bans red food dye due to potential cancer risk

Published

on

FDA bans red food dye due to potential cancer risk

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has officially banned red dye — called Red 3, or Erythrosine — from foods, dietary supplements and ingested medicines, as reported by the Associated Press on Wednesday.

Food manufacturers must remove the dye from their products by January 2027, while drug manufacturers will have until January 2028 to do so, AP stated. 

Any foods imported into the U.S. from other countries will also be subject to the new regulation.

RED FOOD DYE COULD SOON BE BANNED AS FDA REVIEWS PETITION

Advertisement

“The FDA is taking action that will remove the authorization for the use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs,” said Jim Jones, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for human foods, in a statement. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has officially banned red dye — called Red 3, or Erythrosine — from foods, dietary supplements and ingested medicines (iStock)

“Evidence shows cancer in laboratory male rats exposed to high levels of FD&C Red No.3,” he continued. “Importantly, the way that FD&C Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats does not occur in humans.”

      

The synthetic dye, which is made from petroleum, is used as a color additive in food and ingested drugs to give them a “bright cherry-red color,” according to an online statement from the FDA.

Advertisement
Red cough syrup

Food manufacturers must remove the dye from their products by January 2027, while drug manufacturers will have until January 2028 to do so. (iStock)

The petition to ban the dye cited the Delaney Clause, which states that the agency cannot classify a color additive as safe if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals.

The dye was removed from cosmetics nearly 35 years ago due to potential cancer risk.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“This is a welcome, but long overdue, action from the FDA: removing the unsustainable double standard in which Red 3 was banned from lipstick but permitted in candy,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, director of the group Center for Science in the Public Interest, which led the petition effort, as reported by AP.

Red Jello

Nearly 3,000 foods are shown to contain Red No. 3, according to Food Scores, a database of foods compiled by the Environmental Working Group. (iStock)

Dr. Marc Siegel, clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News senior medical analyst, applauded the FDA’s ban.

Advertisement

“It was a long time coming,” he told Fox News Digital. “It’s been more than 30 years since it was banned from cosmetics in the U.S. due to evidence that it is carcinogenic in high doses in lab rats. There needs to be a consistency between what we put on our skin and what we put into our mouths.”

“There needs to be a consistency between what we put on our skin and what we put into our mouths.”

Siegel said he believes the FDA’s decision could be tied to the incoming new head of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“They knew it would have happened anyway under RFK Jr.,” he said. “It is already banned or severely restricted in Australia, Japan and the European Union.”

Kid eating sugary cereal

The food additive also “drew kids in” to a diet of empty calories and ultraprocessed foods, one doctor stated. (iStock)

The food additive also “drew kids in” to a diet of empty calories and ultraprocessed foods, Siegel added.

Advertisement

“It has also been linked to behavioral issues in children, including ADHD.”

Nearly 3,000 foods are shown to contain Red No. 3, according to Food Scores, a database of foods compiled by the Environmental Working Group.

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

The National Confectioners Association provided the below statement to Fox News Digital.

“Food safety is the number one priority for U.S. confectionery companies, and we will continue to follow and comply with FDA’s guidance and safety standards.”

Advertisement

The petition to remove Red No. 3 from foods, supplements and medications was presented in 2022 by the Center for Science in the Public Interest and 23 other organizations and scientists.

Continue Reading

Health

How Yvette Nicole Brown Lost Weight and Got Her Diabetes Under Control

Published

on

How Yvette Nicole Brown Lost Weight and Got Her Diabetes Under Control


Advertisement


Yvette Nicole Brown’s Weight Loss and Diabetes Management | Woman’s World




















Advertisement














Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.

Advertisement


Use escape to exit the menu.

Continue Reading

Trending