Finance
Empower Finance Buys Petal. What’s That Mean for Petal Credit Card Users?
Key takeaways
- Empower Finance, best known as a cash-advance app, is buying credit card issuer Petal.
- Petal touted its credit cards as a solution for those with less-than-stellar credit but came under fire last year when it downgraded some customers to annual-fee cards.
- Cardholders can wait and see if an influx of money improves benefits or apply for a new card before changes come.
Empower Finance is buying Petal, the credit card issuer that originally made a splash with the promise of helping customers build their credit inexpensively but ended up downgrading some of those same customers to cards charging numerous fees.
When it launched in 2016, Petal credit card company touted itself as an affordable way to access credit for anyone with a less-than-stellar credit history. Its approval process used alternative data like banking information instead of just credit scores and credit history.
And unlike some credit-builder cards, Petal doesn’t charge a security deposit. Plus, you could earn 1% to 10% in cash back — depending on the card you were approved for — a rarity for a credit-builder card with no annual fee.
But the company stumbled amid financial woes with users reporting issues that included some customers being downgraded to a version of the card that charged an annual fee.
If you’re a current Petal cardholder or are interested in using one of this company’s cards to boost your credit, here’s what the acquisition could mean for you.
Who is Empower Finance?
Empower Finance is best known as a cash-advance app (it is not affiliated with Empower, which offers investment and retirement planning services). A cash advance is basically a short-term loan you can access without having to apply for a loan through a bank or online lender. Depending on where you borrow from — like a predatory lender — cash advances can charge sky-high interest rates.
Empower doesn’t charge interest or late fees on its cash advances, but you must subscribe to its app, which costs $8 per month. Instead of your credit history, Empower says it uses your income and spending habits to determine how much you can borrow, up to $250. The amount borrowed is deducted from your bank account on your scheduled repayment date.
Empower Finance also offers other financial products and money management tools on its app, including a credit product called Thrive, as well as credit monitoring and savings and budgeting tools.
Empower plans to complete its acquisition of Petal by the end of June and is expected to integrate both companies’ offerings into one product experience, although it’s unclear how that might play out.
What does this mean for Petal cardholders?
Petal customers could potentially benefit by getting access to all of the Empower Finance products and money management tools. But it could also mean they get charged Empower’s $8-per-month subscription fee.
And while Empower’s cash advances offer potential value, if borrowers need more time to repay, they might be tempted to use the Thrive credit service instead, said Jason Steele, credit card expert and CNET expert review board member.
“Empower advertises cash advances with no interest or fees, but if you choose your repayment date instead of the default or select a split payment option, then you’ll incur interest at an annual percentage rate of 35.99%,” he said. “This isn’t as predatory as some payday loans, but it’s higher than many credit cards.”
Despite users’ dissatisfaction with Petal’s downgrading practices, the credit card company is still well-known for its cash flow underwriting technology, offering an alternative for people who either have no credit or have poor credit reports and scores, according to credit expert John Ulzheimer, formerly of FICO and Equifax.
Petal’s technology appears to align with Empower’s underwriting business that assesses consumers using nontraditional data rather than credit histories.
“While it’s unknown what Empower will maintain from their Petal acquisition, it seems to make sense to fold in their cash flow tech to existing underwriting practices,” Ulzheimer said.
Credit cards typically charge an upfront fee for cash advances, and they come with a higher interest rate — typically 24.99% to 29.99% or higher — than a card’s standard APR.
What happened to Petal last year?
The acquisition was announced earlier this month, nearly a year after the Petal card brand came under fire for downgrading customers to an annual-fee card. Some customers who had either the Petal® 1 “No Annual Fee” Visa® Credit Card* or Petal® 2 “Cash Back, No Fees” Visa® Credit Card, both of which have no annual fee, reported that the company had downgraded them to the new Petal 1 Rise* card, which charges a $59 annual fee and has a higher variable APR than the other two cards.
The Petal 1 Rise also included a 3% cash-like transaction fee with a $10 minimum (cash-like transactions include money orders, person-to-person cash transfers like Venmo or CashApp, lottery tickets and gift card purchases), a late fee of up to $40 and a returned payment fee of up to $29.
For a company that promoted itself as an inexpensive way to build credit, the new terms were much different than the previous Petal cards. Users who signed up for one card were ultimately forced into an ultimatum: They could either accept the new terms and pay the annual fee, which could be difficult on a limited budget, or cancel their card, which could damage their credit score.
What’s more confusing is that both the Petal 1 and Petal 2 cards are still available with no annual fee. And while both cards are still great credit building options for users, CNET no longer recommends them since there’s no guarantee you won’t be downgraded to the lower-tier Petal Rise.
What happens next?
For now, Petal cardholders will likely not see much change immediately, but the new influx of money from an acquisition could change users’ experience, according to Steele.
“Petal has been struggling as a company and its acquisition could offer it new resources, or it could result in a significant change to its business model,” Steele said.
In the meantime, current Petal cardholders can wait it out to see if there are positive improvements or find a new credit card altogether.
If you decide to close your Petal account and apply for a card from a different issuer, consider keeping your Petal account open during the application process so your current credit line can help demonstrate your creditworthiness.
Card alternatives for Petal users
If you’re looking to trade in your Petal card because of the downgrade or acquisition and your credit score is still low, you may want to consider applying for a secured credit card, which typically requires a security deposit.
“I strongly recommend those with fair or poor credit consider a secured card with no annual fee, rather than an unsecured card with numerous fees,” Steele said.
Specifically, Steele recommends cardholders with fair or poor credit get a secured credit card like the Capital One Platinum Secured Credit Card* or the Discover it® Secured Credit Card*. The Capital One Platinum Secured Credit Card lets users begin building credit with a security deposit as low as $49 and no annual fee. The Discover it® Secured Credit Card has a credit limit range of $200 to $2,500 that is directly proportional to the deposit amount. It doesn’t charge an annual fee, and it lets users earn cash-back rewards.
If you’re a Petal cardholder who’s been using your card responsibly for at least a year, you may qualify for an unsecured credit card with no annual fee. If you’re going this route, Steele recommends applying for a simple card from your bank or credit union.
*All information about the Petal 1 “No Annual Fee” Visa Credit Card, the Petal 1 Rise, the Capital One Platinum Secured Credit Card and the Discover it Secured Credit Card has been collected independently by CNET and has not been reviewed by the issuer.
Recommended Articles
The editorial content on this page is based solely on objective, independent assessments by our writers and is not influenced by advertising or partnerships. It has not been provided or commissioned by any third party. However, we may receive compensation when you click on links to products or services offered by our partners.
Finance
Southport takes ‘each day at a time’ as state investigation continues
Southport communities and families continue to seek for recreational activities as state investigators keep probing into the city parks and recreation department.
It’s been more than two weeks since the State Bureau of Investigation began its investigation into Southport’s Parks and Recreation Department and the city remains unsure as to what will happen after the investigation.
Southport Police Chief Todd Coring on March 11 requested the State Bureau of Investigation to assist with investigating a financial discrepancy within the city, SBI Public Information Director Chad Flowers said.
At 4:45 p.m. on March 11, the city of Southport published a news release announcing four unnamed employees from its parks and recreation department were placed on paid administrative leave due to an “appearance of financial irregularities.” The announcement also stated parks and recreation programs and facilities were on shutdown.
The “appearance” of financial irregularities was discovered after a forensic accounting investigation, according to the release.
Though approximately 13 children participated in the parks and recreation programs, Public Information Officer ChyAnn Ketchum said, the community used the facilities for events, activities, sports and classes.
Asked how often the facilities were used by the community, Ketchum was unable to provide a response.
“We are still working on gathering data, so I am not able to provide even an estimate right now,” Ketchum said.
What has happened since the shutdown?
Program Director Maureen “Cookie” Moore resigned March 12, Ketchum confirmed.
The city’s parks and recreation before and after-school programs have been suspended indefinitely and all parks and recreation facilities and buildings remain closed, and events cancelled until further notice.
The city’s community relations department has tried to help by temporarily taking over reservations of the Jaycee Building to honor existing reservations and hosting an Easter egg hunt.
Since the parks and recreation department matter has been turned to the SBI for further review, agents with the SBI’s coastal division are actively working to handle the case, Flowers previously told the StarNews.
What’s next for the case and the city of Southport?
The case remains ongoing and active, Flowers said. No new information is being released at this time.
“Financial crimes cases normally take longer due to the number of documents and records involved,” Flowers said.
When it comes to how the city will move forward after the investigation closes, Ketchum is unsure.
“Because it is still an active investigation, we have to take each day at a time,” Ketchum said.
STAY CONNECTED: Keep up with the area’s latest Brunswick County news by signing up for the Brunswick Today newsletter and following us on Facebook and Instagram.
Savanna Tenenoff covers Brunswick County for the StarNews. Reach her at stenenoff@usatodayco.com.
Finance
State to appoint fiscal monitor over NOLA-PS, citing ‘significant’ financial management issues
NEW ORLEANS (WVUE) – Louisiana’s Department of Education has informed the Orleans Parish public school district that it will install a monitor to oversee its financial management, citing a pattern of “significant deficiencies” over the past two years.
State superintendent Dr. Cade Brumley delivered the news in a letter sent Friday (March 27) to NOLA-PS superintendent Dr. Fateama Fulmore.
“Due to repeated accounting miscalculations within the Orleans Parish School System (NOLA-PS), schools have faced multiple years of financial uncertainty,” Brumley wrote. “This letter serves as formal notice that, as a result of these errors, the Louisiana Department of Education will appoint a fiscal risk monitor for your school system.
“The purpose of this appointment is to provide enhanced oversight of tax revenue accounting and reporting by NOLA-PS. This will include special engagement conducted by an independent certified public accountant over the next year.”
NOLA-PS did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox 8.
Brumley cited a list of alleged “deficiencies” by the New Orleans school district, including:
- Failure to adhere to fundamental accounting principles
- Classification in the LDOE Fiscal Risk Assessment “Monitor” category, reflecting a high level of concern, including designation under a Critical Situation during the fiscal year
- Negative impacts on budgeting decisions for school systems across the state
- Provision of inaccurate financial information to NOLA-PS schools
- Potential violation of state law due to failure to provide accurate financial data to LDOE
The appointed monitor will be tasked with reviewing the financial practices of the district, ensuring it takes corrective measures, and reporting back to the LDOE about changes made and ongoing risks. It is believed to be the first state intervention into the Orleans Parish school system since it was restructured in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
Nyesha Veal has served as the chief financial officer for NOLA-PS since 2024. Brumley’s letter did not mention her by name, but alleged a pattern of accounting errors and financial mismanagement over the past two years, including the recent underreporting of approximately $13 million in sales tax revenue in the last annual financial report.
Brumley wrote that the LDOE was notified of this problem by “school leaders,” and that the NOLA-PS CFO was questions about the disparity.
“During that discussion, the CFO acknowledged that the STR data submitted to LDOE was incorrect and had been underreported by approximately $13 million. The CFO further indicated that the omission of June 2025 sales tax revenue from the AFR, as well as the delayed submission of tax data, had no impact.
“This assertion is incorrect. The omission and delay have had material consequences, including impacts on statewide funding calculations and local budget planning. This reflects a concerning lack of understanding regarding the importance of accurate and timely financial reporting by NOLA-PS. … This is not an isolated incident of concern within the financial management of the system that can be overlooked as a simple mistake. Instead, this is a repeated pattern and must be addressed immediately.”
See a spelling or grammar error in our story? Click Here to report it. Please include the headline.
Subscribe to the Fox 8 YouTube channel.
Copyright 2026 WVUE. All rights reserved.
Finance
Car finance saga: Millions of motorists to find out how they will be compensated
Millions of motorists who were mis-sold a car loan will find out how they will be compensated, as the finance watchdog shares its final plans for an industry-wide scheme.
Final decisions on the long-awaited programme will be published by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on Monday afternoon.
The regulator set out draft plans last year but it is likely to make several changes after receiving more than 1,000 responses to its consultation.
Under the latest proposals, the scheme will cover car finance agreements taken out between April 6 2007 and November 1 2024.
The FCA estimated that around 14 million deals, or 44% of all those made since 2007, were unfair and therefore eligible for compensation.
Consumers were estimated to be compensated an average of £700 per agreement, but it will be more or less depending on individual cases.
This was expected to come at a total cost of £11 billion to the industry, including the total payouts and the operational costs of running the scheme.
Craig Tebbutt, a financial health expert for Equifax UK, said: “It has previously been estimated that average compensation levels could be in the region of £700 per agreement but the final details around the scale, scope and timelines are expected to be confirmed on Monday.
“However, there is nothing to stop consumers checking their paperwork now and getting their details ready in the meantime.”
He said research by the credit reporting firm found that “many consumers don’t know how to check their eligibility and expect the process to be a hassle, with old or missing paperwork being a real barrier”.
Equifax has launched a car finance checker within its new app that lets people see a list of their past agreements and copy the details, with motorists encouraged to send a complaint to their lender using a template on the FCA’s website if they think they’re eligible for a payout.
Lenders and car finance providers had been challenging the FCA’s proposals with some raising concerns that the expected amount of compensation is too high and does not accurately reflect what customers lost.
On the other side, some consumer groups and MPs have argued that many motorists will be short-changed under the current plans.
The FCA has already announced some changes that it is making to the process since the proposals were unveiled last year.
This includes giving lenders more time to contact motor finance customers from when the scheme is officially launched.
But it is also aiming to streamline the process by allowing those due redress to accept it immediately without waiting for a final determination.
It thinks that this means million of people would receive compensation in 2026.
-
Sports1 week agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
Miami, FL4 days agoJannik Sinner’s Girlfriend Laila Hasanovic Stuns in Ab-Revealing Post Amid Miami Open
-
New Mexico1 week agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Politics1 week agoSchumer gambit fails as DHS shutdown hits 36 days and airport lines grow
-
Tennessee7 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Minneapolis, MN4 days agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Science1 week agoRecord Heat Meets a Major Snow Drought Across the West
-
Politics1 week agoTrump gives Iran 48-hour ultimatum to reopen Strait of Hormuz or face strikes on power plants