MADISON, Wis. — Three hours before the Wisconsin Badgers were set to practice on a Tuesday afternoon in late January, the best coach in the history of women’s college hockey was telling a story about a deer.

“I’d like to get in the mindset of a deer,” Mark Johnson said during a coaches meeting inside the team offices at LaBahn Arena.

He talked for several minutes, trying to empathize with the deer that had jumped in front of his car — and then ran off — while Johnson was driving home from the rink a few days prior. He couldn’t quite figure out why the deer did what it did.

Johnson, 67, is always trying to see things from another perspective, whether it’s a deer on the road or the people around him.

“We’ve got these hockey players and we’re trying to figure them out,” he said.

That goal — trying to understand his players’ mindset — never leaves the foreground for Johnson and his coaching staff.

On that Tuesday, coming off a 2-2 tie against St. Cloud State — one of only three games the Badgers failed to win in regulation all season — Johnson decided not to break down video with the team. “Look ahead,” he urged them. The coaching staff planned drills with their next opponent, the University of Minnesota Duluth, in mind. And knowing it had been a long season with the most important hockey still to come, Johnson said the team would play several mini-games to end practice on a fun — yet competitive — note.

“He wants to make (practice) the best part of their day,” said Dan Koch, an associate coach at the University of Wisconsin. “If coming to the rink feels like work, or they’re getting bored, we’re not going to get anything out of it. … He has a great feel for (what the players need).”

It’s just one of the trademarks of a coach who has built one of the greatest women’s hockey programs the sport has ever seen.

In 22 years as head coach of the Badgers, Johnson has become the winningest coach in NCAA Division I women’s hockey history and the only coach to eclipse 600 wins. No program has won more than Wisconsin’s seven national championships, all celebrated with Johnson behind the bench.

And this year’s roster is one of the deepest and most skilled in the program’s history, with four players nominated for the 2025 Patty Kazmaier Award, given to the best women’s hockey player in the nation. The Badgers lost only one game in regulation this season — against the reigning champion Ohio State Buckeyes — and are coming off another WCHA conference title with a 4-3 win over the Minnesota Golden Gophers.

Now, the Badgers enter the NCAA Tournament, which begins on Thursday afternoon, as the No. 1 team in the nation — and the favorite to win another national title. Can they deliver on expectations?

The program’s rise to dominance begins with Johnson.

The son of legendary coach “Badger Bob” Johnson — who built the Wisconsin men’s hockey program and led the Pittsburgh Penguins to their first Stanley Cup — Mark grew up in Madison and is one of the all-time greatest players to ever suit up for the Badgers.

He’s well known for winning a gold medal at the 1980 Olympics and scoring two goals in the “Miracle on Ice” semifinal game against the Soviet Union. He went on to play 11 seasons in the NHL before retiring in 1992. By 1996, after a few high school coaching stints, Johnson was back in Madison as an assistant coach for the Badgers.

After six years, the head coaching job opened up. Johnson applied, but the job went to one of his former teammates, Mike Eaves, instead. Johnson had a decision to make: He could continue as an assistant for one of his friends, or he could return to the NHL to work as an assistant in the top professional league.

“I had kids at the time, and had been traded a few times in the NHL,” he said. “I didn’t want to go back to that lifestyle if I had a choice.”

As it turned out, there was an opening for the upstart Wisconsin women’s hockey program that had just played its first season in 1999. At the time, the job was considered something of a risk. If Johnson left the men’s game, would he be able to cross back over?

Johnson’s desire to keep his family in Madison and run his own program won out; he was named head coach of the women’s hockey team ahead of the 2002-03 season.

“It was this leap of faith,” he said. “Like, I’m going to take this jump and I don’t know where I’m going to land.”

At an introductory news conference, Johnson laid out his vision for the program and promised to provide stability for a team that had gone through two coaches in its first three seasons. Skeptics didn’t believe that a legendary men’s player would stick in the women’s game; they assumed Johnson would jump at the first job at a men’s program or an NHL team.

Only a few months into the job, Colorado Avalanche coach Tony Granato offered Johnson a position as an assistant, which he declined. There have been other opportunities over the years, too, but since 2002, Johnson has been all in.

Over the first few years, Johnson mostly laid the foundation of the program. He established a team-first culture and a strong, relatively simple on-ice identity.

“He’s a teacher of the game,” said Koch. “He’s somebody that feels if you can skate, pass, shoot, stick handle better than the other team, your percentages of winning are going to go up.”

Johnson continued recruiting and developing the talent he had inherited, such as future Canadian Olympic defender Carla MacLeod, U.S. Olympian Molly Engstrom and Meghan Hunter, who is now an assistant GM of the Chicago Blackhawks. He also challenged the school’s administration to move the team from a community rink in the suburbs to the Kohl Center — home of the men’s hockey team — until LaBahn Arena opened in 2012.

“He just came in and provided stability,” said assistant coach Jackie Crum. “You had this startup program and this legendary Badger came in, everyone respected him, he knows hockey, and his style of coaching just fits for a female hockey player.

“He’s not a yeller, he’s not a screamer. He’s not a swearer. He’s not berating. You watch those inside the NHL documentaries and they’re all ‘bleeps’ and ‘bleeps’ and that’s not him. Nor do I think that would work for 18- to 22-year-old females.”

The Badgers made their first NCAA tournament appearance in Johnson’s third season (2004-05), and won back-to-back national titles in 2006 and 2007 — the first DI program not in the state of Minnesota to win an NCAA women’s hockey championship.

Wisconsin quickly became a destination for elite hockey players, including future Hockey Hall of Fame inductees Meghan Duggan, Hilary Knight and Brianna Decker, who all won championships with the Badgers. It helps the Badgers that so many influential alumni have passed through the halls. Young players who look up to Knight or Duggan might want to chart the same path that leads through Madison.

But if you ask the players, it all goes back to the head coach.

“(Mark has) built that program to where it is,” said Knight. “It’s a dynasty.”

If you get to a Badgers women’s hockey game an hour before puck drop, you’re already late. At least if you want one of the best seats in the house.

At LaBahn — with general admission seating — the die-hard fans arrive hours in advance to secure their favorite spot.

“Sometimes they get here before I do,” said Edwards.

After games, when players go to see their friends or family, they’ll mingle with the fans who are waiting in the concourse.

“It’s the most special thing,” said captain Casey O’Brien. “It gives you something more to play for. You want to do well for them because they invest so much in us and we kind of want to pay it back.”

The Badgers have averaged the top attendance in NCAA women’s hockey this season with around 3,500 fans per game — including a massively attended double-header with the men’s team at Wrigley Field in January. Outside of the University of Minnesota, no other program’s fan base is close.

Wisconsin has hosted the six most-attended women’s college hockey games ever, including a record 15,359 at a “Fill the Bowl” game hosted at the Kohl Center in 2017.

The fan base is just one part of the Wisconsin experience. The $34 million LaBahn Arena was built to provide professional-level facilities for its sports teams. And when it was built in 2012, it was only the second women’s hockey specific rink built in the country after Ridder Arena in Minnesota.

The Wisconsin women’s hockey facility has a big locker room, training facilities, therapy pools — hot tub, cold tub and sauna — and a team lounge, which serves as a central spot for players to hang out between class and practices. Lately, the team has gotten into watching “Deal or No Deal.”

“I don’t know why, but game shows are always on,” said O’Brien. “And we get way too into it.”

At Wisconsin, the resources match what can be expected for a Big Ten sports school that has a self-sufficient athletic department, which means it funds its operation through its own revenue rather than relying on university money. This season, the athletics budget was set at over $170 million, a record high for the department.

LaBahn is adjacent to the Kohl Center, which recently underwent around $48 million in renovations. The two buildings are connected through a series of hallways, which give players direct access to more shared facilities with the men’s hockey, basketball and volleyball teams, such as study rooms, cafeterias and a brand-new 10,000 square-foot gym.

“The facilities are second to none here,” said defender Caroline Harvey.

And then there’s the appeal of playing for a highly decorated coach whose style extends beyond his even-tempered demeanor. Wisconsin does well to recruit elite players, and Johnson allows them to shine on the ice.

“He’s hands off, but not too hands off to a point where we’re a mess,” said Edwards. “His job, as he’s taken it on, is giving us the systems, trust and confidence and just letting us go out and play.”

The top team in the land.

The #Badgers are the No. 1 seed in the @NCAAIceHockey Women’s Tournament! pic.twitter.com/b2MbLgWL3Q

— Wisconsin Hockey (@BadgerWHockey) March 9, 2025

That coaching style has worked well for the 2024-25 Badgers roster that is full of talent up and down the lineup.

“It plays a lot into our playing style,” said Harvey. “If he was more rigid, we’d probably be holding our sticks too tight. … You’re able to expand and grow and try new things here, and you’re not punished for that or any (mistakes).”

Naturally, none of the 2024-25 Badgers were alive when Johnson was scoring big goals on the international stage. But it helps that his players know Johnson has “been there and done that” at every level. That Crum was in their shoes, playing for Johnson’s Badgers, helps players too, giving them an older sister figure who knows exactly what they’re going through. Not to mention, the trio of Crum, Koch and Johnson are in their 15th year coaching the program together.

“Everything that happens with the team, we’ve been there, we’ve done it,” said Crum. “We’ve been around the block. I know where they go on a Friday night because I was there once too.”

Edwards and Harvey were freshmen the first time they experienced winning at Wisconsin in 2023. Last season, the Badgers lost 1-0 to Ohio State in the championship game.

“We want to win it all,” said Harvey, now a junior. “We don’t want to be in the same position we were last year.”

The 2024-25 Badgers are the tournament favorites. They are four lines deep, with great defenders and solid goaltending. Five players have been named to the U.S. national team for the upcoming women’s world championships. And on Wednesday, three players (O’Brien, Harvey and Edwards) were announced as the finalists for the Patty Kazmaier.

Mark Johnson, famous for his role in the “Miracle on Ice,” could win his eighth national championship with the Badgers this month. Last year, Wisconsin lost to the Ohio State Buckeyes 1-0 in the championship game. (Mark Stewart / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel / USA Today Network)

O’Brien, Edwards, Kirsten Simms and Harvey are four of the top five scorers in the NCAA. The last time the Badgers dominated the rankings like this was the 2010-11 national championship team with Duggan, Decker and Knight going 1-2-3 in scoring.

Still, Knight calls this current roster a “super team.” And coaches will agree.

“Going off of the skill, it’s probably the deepest we’ve ever been,” said Crum.

O’Brien in particular is putting together a masterful season in her final year on campus. She has scored a nation-leading 83 points in only 38 games and is the favorite to win the Patty Kazmaier Award. Last week, she had three points in the conference championship and was named player of the tournament. She also became the all-time leading scorer in Badgers hockey history (men’s or women’s) with her 269 career points.

“She’s been good for us for a long time,” said Johnson after the WCHA Final, calling her “the best player in college hockey this year by far.”

With so much talent, the expectation for the Badgers, like most years, is to win. But Ohio State is ranked No. 2 and is building its own dynasty under head coach Nadine Muzerall, who has won two national titles in the last three years. No. 4-ranked Minnesota will have home-ice advantage as tournament host.

Some veterans on this year’s Badgers, such as Edwards and Harvey, have experienced the highs and lows of winning and losing in the final game. Others, such as O’Brien, are trying to win a third championship. And sophomores, such as Cassie Hall or Kelly Gorbatenko, will try to erase the sting of a loss.

“They’re on a mission,” said Johnson.

If the team wins, it will be Johnson’s eighth national championship and his fourth in six seasons. He said he’s still motivated by the challenge of building and coaching winning rosters, especially this year.

“The team is talented, it’s deep, but how do you keep them hungry? How do you keep them motivated?” he wondered. “Those types of challenges are why I get up and enjoy coming to the rink.”

There will come a time when Johnson won’t be at the rink to run a practice or stand behind the bench. He doesn’t know exactly when he’ll retire, but he has been considering what the next chapter of his life might look like.

Johnson and his wife, Leslie, are planning to open a therapeutic horse ranch in Verona, a suburb of Madison. The couple, who have been married for over 40 years, hope it can be a place of healing for children and families.

For now though, Johnson’s focus is on the path to winning another national championship. As the No. 1 seed, the Badgers won’t play on the opening day of the tournament on Thursday, but will await their Saturday afternoon opponent for the regional final.

With a win — against the winner of Clarkson vs. Boston University — the Badgers will head to their third straight Frozen Four, which begins March 21 in Minneapolis.

“We definitely have the group to win,” said Edwards. “But it doesn’t mean we’re going to. There’s still work to be done.”

(Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; Gil Talbot / NCAA Photos / Getty, Dave Kallmann / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel / USA Today Network via Imagn Images)

The chief executive of the BLT restaurant group is “Jewish and kept kosher and he loved to show up at the restaurant with a wad of bills so thick it actually hurt to watch him.” The food guide pioneer Tim Zagat is, without explanation, “rotund, grotesque.” It’s the early aughts and Williamsburg, Brooklyn, is repulsive, the farm-to-table movement a sham, and Colleen, a manager at Bar Americain with “straight and oily” hair who fires Selinger for texting during work, “the kind of restaurant lifer who hated people like me — newbies, people who fit in seamlessly for no good reason.”

“Cellar Rat” feels at times like a charmless mix of Joris-Karl Huysmans, M.F.K. Fisher and Regina George. A blurb describes the book as “brutally honest,” but there’s a thin line between brutal honesty and glib brutality. These are lessons I wish Selinger could have had a chance to pick up from Tony Bourdain, and ones Woolever certainly did.

Selinger’s foundational trauma is a problematic sexual encounter with the pastry chef Johnny Iuzzini. She renders the episode in explicit, outraged detail but also with a frustrating veil of vagueness.

The difficulty for the reader, however sympathetic, is that the incident doesn’t occur until halfway through the book, by which point our outrage meter has been somewhat decalibrated by so much relentless flippancy — and if this is what cemented or changed her attitudes, that’s not clear, either.

To make matters more confusing, each chapter ends on a recipe. For instance, “Chapter 5: Fourplay,” which contains the Iuzzini episode, finishes with a recipe for Bittersweet Chocolate Cream Pie. It’s not quite as bad as Batali’s mea culpa with accompanying recipe for pizza dough cinnamon rolls, but it’s equally baffling.

Unbelievably, Selinger ends her book by dedicating it to the people of Gaza. “This book is yours too,” she writes. But, quite frankly, I doubt they would want it.

CARE AND FEEDING: A Memoir | By Laurie Woolever | Ecco | 342 pp. | $28.99

CELLAR RAT: My Life in the Restaurant Underbelly | By Hannah Selinger | Little, Brown | 294 pp. | $29

Manchester City are having a bad season, there is no doubt about that. But there is a difference of opinion when it comes to deciding why this is the case.

Your more casual observer might put it down to Rodri’s absence with a long-term knee injury, and of course there is a lot of truth in that.

Perhaps you are pitching it somewhere in the middle, nodding sagely about several factors. Yes, Rodri’s injury was the first domino to fall but it exposed an “old” midfield — in Pep Guardiola’s words — and a defence completely blighted by injuries.

But there is another school of thought, one that looks beyond City’s borders. What if Guardiola’s entire playing style is becoming outdated?

This is a theory that has gone mainstream over the past couple of months, warranting a discussion on popular debate show The Overlap and an in-depth article on the BBC Sport website.

“Today, modern football is the way that Bournemouth play, that Newcastle play, Brighton play, Liverpool have always been like that, like we were,” Guardiola said himself in an interview with TNT at the end of last year. “It is modern football. Modern football is not so positional.”

Positional, of course, neatly describes Guardiola’s entire approach — ‘juego de posicion’, as it is known in Spanish — and that comment was the one picked up for the conversation on The Overlap: here is Guardiola suggesting that modern football is moving away from his style, so maybe that is why City have struggled so much over recent months, losing 15 of their last 30 matches.

That was the theme of the BBC article following City’s tepid performance at the Santiago Bernabeu, where it was suggested that their issues this season — injured, ageing players, underperforming stars, low confidence — were symptoms, not causes.

During discussions about this subject online, it was highlighted that City’s style of play is very different to the rest of the league. And it is. But here’s the thing: it always has been.

In previous seasons, their very different approach compared to the rest of the league has been held up as a reason for their dominance. Their slower style has been seen as part of the reason why they control games. As the chart above shows, City’s style this season is certainly not an outlier in the Guardiola era.

So it feels a little reductive to say the style is no longer working now that City are not doing well. Given there are so many obvious factors — injuries, low confidence, stalwarts like Kevin De Bruyne, Bernardo Silva and Ilkay Gundogan playing well below their best — is it not reasonable to say that those things have made the style less effective, in the same way that any team, playing any style, would probably be struggling as well?

And this was Guardiola’s point in that TNT interview, not that the league is getting away from City.

“We have to rise to the rhythm unbelievably,” he also said, “and we could not, simply we could not because we didn’t have the players.”

He goes on to reference the amount of injuries at clubs around Europe and finally offers a solution to the problems facing his side this year… and it did not relate to playing style.

“I reflect that in the future we have to (have) a longer squad,” he said. “I always believed (it has to be done) with few players, but with that the team cannot survive.”

Only last season he did indeed say he would “rather not be a manager” than to have a big squad but that has changed this season, and while he did discuss the changing face of the Premier League in that interview, he feels that the solution is not to rip up his style, but to firstly get his players back fit and secondly to ensure they stay fit by having more options.

The message is clear: take the injuries out of the equation and his style would still work.

Oscar Bobb has been a major loss for Guardiola this season (Stu Forster/Getty Images)

He may be wrong about the continued effectiveness of his own style, and he would probably not admit it even if he felt it, but it would be wrong to suggest, based on what he said at the end of last year, that he thinks City are being left behind.

The discussion has also seemingly disregarded City’s own evolution over the past couple of years, which was something else that Guardiola talked about in that interview.

When giving examples of other teams’ direct approach, he also included City: “Like we were”.

He was asked about this recently, too, and he spoke at length about the changes in the league, as well as those same two points: that the injuries have undermined City’s season and that they have been evolving with the times anyway.

“I saw personally that more teams like playing more man-to-man, more aggressive in your build-up, a few of them play like this,” he said. “In terms of being more direct, English football has been more direct (forever), it has always been, ‘Don’t play much in the middle and play long balls’.

“But in the last years a lot of teams play from behind, Tottenham is an example and many, many other teams.”

He then highlighted a process that City went through in 2022-23; initially that season when they struggled against teams that pressed them man-to-man, but they gradually became more effective because they embraced long balls to Erling Haaland. Something that has been seen this season, too, most notably against Chelsea in January.

Guardiola is confident his team can return to the top (Michael Regan/Getty Images)

“Normally, when you make a positional game against man-to-man it’s completely different but we handled ourselves really well against teams who play man-to-man, we are not concerned about that,” he continued, and then he got to the biggest issue with this season, in his eyes.

“It’s more… always we have the regret this season, I said many times, ‘What would have happened with (only) one, two, three muscular injuries during the season, three or four weeks out?’ But we have central defenders (who are) eight, 10 weeks out, we don’t have Rodri for six or seven months, Oscar (Bobb) is five, six months out.

“I can imagine we would have been more competitive than we have been, but when we have the squad we can play in that way. We can do it.

“While I am the manager, we are going to adjust something depending on the quality of the players or the problems that the opponents (pose) but I think we are going to try to play the way that defined the team for many years, that had success.

“The only difference is that there are more teams that (do) man-marking in our goal kick, they are more aggressive. Before they were more cautious. Now teams are so brave, that is a little bit different. I would say that is the only one, the rest… if you had your team you could compete and you could play the way we have played in the past.”

Rodri’s long-term absence continues to cast a shadow over City’s season (Michael Regan/Getty Images)

It is something City have adapted to, even as they maintain their overall more patient, slower approach in most games. The change may not put them closer to the other teams in the graphics because the majority of opponents still sit deep against City, and when they do that, Guardiola instructs his players to “take a coffee”, to make more passes and be more patient, to avoid counter-attacks.

That approach has been enough to win the title in the past four seasons, so why would it have suddenly stopped? Is it because it is no longer effective, or because the players — for myriad reasons — have not been able to implement it properly?

(Header photo: Justin Setterfield/Getty Images)