Connect with us

Business

Fed Governor Michelle Bowman Is Trump’s Pick for Wall Street’s Top Cop

Published

on

Fed Governor Michelle Bowman Is Trump’s Pick for Wall Street’s Top Cop

President Trump has tapped Michelle W. Bowman, a Federal Reserve governor, to be the next vice chair for supervision at the central bank, according to a White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly.

The position was vacated at the end of last month by another Fed governor, Michael S. Barr, who stepped down from the role to avert a protracted legal fight in the event that the president followed through on threats to fire him.

Ms. Bowman, whom Mr. Trump appointed to the Fed’s seven-seat Board of Governors during his first term, was long seen as the top contender for the position. Because Mr. Barr stayed on as a governor — his term expires in 2032 — Mr. Trump’s selection for vice chair was limited to the policymakers currently on the board.

If confirmed by the Senate Banking Committee, Ms. Bowman is likely to usher in a more hands-off approach to financial regulation than that of her predecessor, who was appointed during the Biden administration.

In recent years, Ms. Bowman, a former state bank commissioner of Kansas, has positioned herself as a prominent voice at the central bank calling for less onerous oversight of Wall Street.

Advertisement

She voted against Mr. Barr’s proposal to raise capital requirements on lenders such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs — a plan that the biggest banks and industry lobbyists ferociously opposed. She has also aligned with their calls to make the stress tests that the Fed imposes on lenders to evaluate their ability to withstand crises much more transparent. The central bank is working on meeting those demands after U.S. banking lobbying groups sued it.

Ms. Bowman, who worked in community banking and as an adviser in the Department of Homeland Security during the George W. Bush administration, has also become more vocal on monetary policy matters.

In September, she was the sole dissenter when the central bank decided on a larger-than-usual half-point interest rate cut; she feared that such a big move would look like a “premature declaration of victory” on inflation. It was the first time since 2005 that a governor had voted against a rate decision.

Since then, Ms. Bowman has stuck to her stance that the Fed should be cautious about additional interest rate cuts until it is more certain that inflation is heading back to its 2 percent goal. In remarks last month, she warned that there were “greater risks to price stability, especially while the labor market remains strong,” suggesting that she will not support a rate cut anytime soon.

Unless a governor steps down, Mr. Trump will not have the opportunity to shape the top ranks of the Fed until early next year, when Adriana D. Kugler’s term expires. In May next year, Jerome H. Powell’s term as chair will also end, but he can remain a governor into 2028.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Here’s How Much More You’re Spending on Gas Because of the Iran War

Published

on

Here’s How Much More You’re Spending on Gas Because of the Iran War

Since the war with Iran broke out, the average American household has spent an extra …

$190.47 on gasoline.

For many households, that is the equivalent of a month’s electricity bill.

Advertisement

Or a week’s worth of groceries for a couple.

The gasoline calculation is part of an analysis conducted by researchers at Brown University as they and others try to assess the economic costs of the prolonged fighting.

Advertisement

Calculating the cost of war — a skipped meal or a drive not made — is an imperfect science. But these estimates can offer a sense of how fighting far away can change behaviors large and small each day, disrupting American life.

Discomfort has not been spread evenly. As the price of gasoline has shot up, the national average is now …

Advertisement

$4.55 a gallon

In Illinois, it is more expensive …

$4.99 a gallon.

In California, it’s …

Advertisement

$6.13 a gallon.

Diesel, which is used to power factories and move most goods around the country, also quickly climbed.

Taken together, the amount of extra money Americans have collectively spent on gasoline and diesel since Feb. 28, when the United States and Israel attacked Iran, is staggering:

Advertisement

$0.0 billion

Hunting for cheaper gas, Americans are going to Costcos and Sam’s Clubs more often to fill up their tanks.

Advertisement

Drivers visited Sam’s Club gas stations 18 percent more in the last week of April than the same time last year.

They are filling their tanks with less gas.

One gallon fewer at a time.

Advertisement

They are riding more subways and commuter trains.

They are using bike shares more often.

Advertisement

People rode more buses in March than before the war:

45 million more rides.

People are spending less on essentials.

Advertisement

More than 40 percent of people in a recent poll said they were spending less on groceries and medical care.

They are putting less into savings.

Advertisement

Richer households are spending a relatively small share of their income on gas:

2.7%.

Poorer households are spending far more:

4.2%.

Advertisement

This is not the first time in recent years that the economy has been shocked by war.

After Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, oil prices spiked, sending gasoline soaring. At its peak, the national average was …

$5.02 a gallon.

Advertisement

Where things go this time around is anyone’s guess. When the war does end, it will still take weeks or months for energy supplies to level off.

Advertisement

Nearly three out of four goods move across the country by truck.

Many of those trucks are powered by diesel, making them much costlier to drive, and what’s inside them costlier for consumers.

Last month, a tomato cost …

Advertisement

40% more

than it did the same time last year.

More expensive fuel isn’t the only culprit for rising costs. Extreme weather, tariffs and other factors have forced prices up for many industries. Gasoline also becomes more expensive as the summer approaches.

Advertisement

But inflation last month rose at its fastest pace in nearly three years, and gasoline was among the fastest rising categories.

Continue Reading

Business

Another California tech company lays off thousands

Published

on

Another California tech company lays off thousands

The layoffs bludgeoning the tech industry continued this week as artificial intelligence reshapes the industry.

Mountain View-based Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, on Wednesday said it was laying off 17% of its workforce, or about 3,000 employees, as part of its restructuring to cut costs and invest in artificial intelligence.

The company said it had slowed down due to “too many organizational layers” and the cuts will simplify the organization to become a “faster, leaner, more focused company.” Intuit said it will close its offices in Reno and Woodland Hills and incur an estimated $300 million to $340 million in restructuring charges.

“We believe we can serve more customers and deliver breakthrough products that fuel our customers’ success by reducing complexity and simplifying our structure,” Sasan Goodarzi, chief executive of Intuit, said in a memo shared with employees.

Intuit announced the layoffs on the same day it reported its third-quarter results, in which revenue jumped 10% from a year earlier, to $8.56 billion.

Advertisement

Intuit adds to the count of more than 114,000 tech-sector employees laid off this year, according to Layoffs.fyi.

Meta laid off 8,000 workers on Wednesday, as the company cuts costs to ramp up investment in AI agents and infrastructure. The ever-expanding list of tech companies that have cut jobs includes Coinbase, Amazon, LinkedIn and more. Some have cited productivity gains enabling fewer workers to accomplish more with AI, while others pointed out restructuring and cost-cutting to prepare for the AI disruption.

In an earnings call, Intuit‘s chief financial officer, Sandeep Aujla, said the cuts were intended to make the organization leaner, and weren’t tied directly to Intuit’s AI use.

“AI is an important part of how we’re evolving as a company, but these decisions were not driven by AI replacing employees,” an Intuit spokesperson reiterated in an email .

Best known for its TurboTax platform, Intuit has branched into accounting with QuickBooks, credit scoring through Credit Karma and email automation via Mailchimp. Facing increased competition for AI-driven tax solutions, the company is integrating AI across its entire portfolio.

Advertisement

“Our AI agents are delivering value at scale, with our accounting AI agents powering recommendations across more than 50 million transactions each week, and business tax AI agents identifying millions of dollars in deductions,” Goodarzi said in the earnings call.

The restructuring will reduce overlapping roles in TurboTax and Credit Karma as the company integrates both into a single team.

A deep sense of anxiety has settled in the tech job market, propelled by consecutive layoffs and coding tasks being automated by AI.

Tech leaders have portrayed the role of human software engineers as a human in the loop, overseeing and verifying AI agents that do the work of coders.

By 2027, software developers are expected to see a 3% job contraction due to AI coding capabilities, according to Labor Automation Forecasting Hub by Metaculus, a popular website where forecasters predict how AI will reshape the workforce.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Older AC and fridge chemicals amp up climate change. Trump just rolled back limits on them

Published

on

Older AC and fridge chemicals amp up climate change. Trump just rolled back limits on them

President Trump on Thursday announced that grocery stories and air conditioning companies will be allowed to keep using high-polluting refrigerants for longer than they would have under a law he signed during his first administration.

“This was a tremendous burden, a tremendous cost,” said Trump, surrounded in the Oval Office by executives from supermarket chains including Kroger, Fairway, Neimann Foods and Piggly Wiggly. “It was making the equipment unaffordable, and the actual benefit was nothing.”

The move loosens rules meant to restrict hydroflourocarbons, a class of climate-damaging chemicals used in cooling equipment. HFCs are known as “super pollutants” because their impact on climate change can be tens of thousands of times greater than carbon dioxide during their shorter lifespans.

In the move Thursday, the Environmental Protection Agency extends the deadline for companies to comply with a 2023 rule transitioning refrigerators and air conditioners off HFCs and onto new cooling technologies. Reducing these chemicals and moving to cleaner refrigerants has long been a bipartisan issue.

Trump is also proposing exemptions from a rule requiring leak repairs on large-scale refrigeration systems.

Advertisement

The administration framed the changes as part of its effort to bring down high grocery costs. EPA administrator Lee Zeldin said the actions will save $2.4 billion for Americans and safeguard 350,000 jobs.

“Americans who wanted to be able to fix their equipment were instead being required to buy far more costly new equipment and that just doesn’t make any sense,” said Zeldin.

David Doniger, senior attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the move will not only harm the climate, but U.S. competitiveness in global refrigerant markets as well.

“The EPA is catering to a small group of straggling companies by derailing the shift away from these climate super-pollutants,” he said. “The industry at large supports the HFC phasedown and has already invested in making new refrigerants and equipment, currently installed in thousands of stores.”

Danielle Wright, executive director of the North American Sustainable Refrigeration Council, an environmental nonprofit, said any perceived near-term savings from the rollbacks will be outweighed by the future costs.

Advertisement

“Business owners are far more worried about the escalating cost of keeping aging, high‑global-warming-potential equipment running than they are about the cost of installing new, compliant systems,” she said.

Trump dismissed the climate concerns, saying his changes “are not going to have any impact on the environment.”

He said he wants to get rid of the technology transition rule entirely in the future.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending