Connect with us

Culture

In Sam Darnold, Seahawks got a younger, cheaper QB. It won’t matter unless they support him

Published

on

In Sam Darnold, Seahawks got a younger, cheaper QB. It won’t matter unless they support him

The Seattle Seahawks have their Geno Smith replacement in Sam Darnold. Now they need to get him some help.

Seattle’s agreement with Darnold is a three-year, $100.5 million contract with $55 million guaranteed, according to The Athletic’s Dianna Russini.

On paper, it’s essentially the same deal Baker Mayfield signed with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers last offseason after a resurgent 2023 season. When accounting for the rise in the salary cap since then, however, Darnold’s deal looks more like an updated version of the three-year, $75 million contract Smith signed in March 2023 after his breakout season in 2022.

By average annual salary, Darnold’s contract is one of the lowest among veteran starting quarterbacks. Justin Fields’ two-year, $40 million contract with the New York Jets — also agreed to on Monday — is currently the lowest. The rankings could change depending on what happens with Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson.

But regardless, the Seahawks are acquiring Darnold for a bargain relative to the rest of the veteran quarterback market, and probably for $7 million to $12 million less per year than Smith’s expected extension with the Raiders.

Advertisement

Seattle is banking on getting the best version of Darnold, who before last season had just one season in which he threw for more than 3,000 yards and completed at least 60 percent of his passes (2019 with the Jets). At his best, Darnold is an athletic, strong-armed quarterback who can make big-time throws. There’s a reason he had the sixth-highest touchdown rate in the league at 6.4 percent, just a few points behind Joe Burrow (6.6) and well above the league average of 4.8 percent (all stats provided by TruMedia) in 2024.

Seattle saw some of Darnold’s best work up close in Minnesota’s Week 16 win at Lumen Field.

The Vikings were able to get that version of Darnold last season by giving him a capable offensive line — albeit one that struggled late in the year — a very good scheme that was heavy on play-action dropbacks, and one of the best wide receiver tandems in the league. But acquiring a younger, cheaper option at quarterback won’t matter if the Seahawks can’t give him that same level of support, starting with the offensive line.



Advertisement

Seattle is expected to sign former Ravens offensive lineman Josh Jones on a one-year deal worth up to $4.75 million, according to a report Monday from Ian Rapoport of NFL Network. Jones has started multiple games at guard and tackle since entering the league as a third-round pick of the Cardinals in 2020. He’s likely to be a do-it-all depth piece on the line and perhaps a replacement for swing tackle George Fant, who was released as a cap-saving measure last week.

Seattle should still actively search for more bodies up front. The first day of free agency wasn’t a busy one for veteran centers, but a couple of the best options came off the board. The Chicago Bears agreed to terms with The Athletic’s top-ranked center, Drew Dalman, on a three-year, $42 million contract that makes him the second-highest-paid center by average annual salary. Chicago entered this offseason with the same interior offensive line needs as Seattle, and the price the team paid to protect quarterback Caleb Williams speaks to how expensive it can be to upgrade the front line.

Chicago traded a 2026 fourth-round pick to Kansas City for All-Pro guard Joe Thuney, who has a 2025 base salary of $15.5 million but is due for a contract extension ahead of his age-33 season. The Bears also traded a 2025 sixth-round pick to the Rams for 28-year-old guard Jonah Jackson, who is due $17.5 million this season.

Seattle general manager John Schneider has expressed apprehension about making those sorts of commitments. He has made exceptions in the past, such as the three-year, $22.5 million deal he signed 30-year-old Gabe Jackson to after trading a fifth-round pick in 2021. The move appeased quarterback Russell Wilson, who publicly complained about his pass protection, but it was a deviation from Schneider’s typical player acquisition strategy. Jackson was useful for only the first year of the deal.

All of this ties into why the Seahawks were mostly dormant on the first day of the negotiating period. Schneider wants to take calculated risks in free agency, but that can be tough to do when Seattle is one of many teams needing interior offensive upgrades.

Advertisement

One of those other needy teams is Minnesota, which agreed to terms with center Ryan Kelly, The Athletic’s third-ranked center, on a two-year, $18 million contract ($9 million guaranteed). This Seahawks free-agency plan listed Kelly as a fallback option in the event the Seahawks couldn’t land Josh Myers, The Athletic’s second-ranked center. At this point in free agency, a Myers signing would be Seattle’s best path to upgrading the center spot, which is critical in Klint Kubiak’s offense.

The beginning of free agency was a good one for guards, and the next few days might produce more of the same. The following deals were agreed to on Monday, according to multiple reports:

  • Aaron Banks, Green Bay Packers — four years, $77 million
  • Patrick Mekari, Jacksonville Jaguars — three years, $37.5 million
  • James Daniels, Miami Dolphins — three years, $24 million
  • Ben Bredeson, Tampa Bay Buccaneers — three years, $22 million
  • Evan Brown, Arizona Cardinals — two years, $11.5 million

There are still multiple players available from The Athletic’s top 150 rankings, including the top-ranked guard, Will Fries, No. 14 on the list. The others are Mekhi Becton (No. 26), Teven Jenkins (No. 33), Brandon Scherff (No. 51), Kevin Zeitler (No. 58), Will Hernandez (No. 79), Shaq Mason (No. 115) and Dalton Risner (No. 147).

The structure of Darnold’s deal will reveal more about Seattle’s available cap space, but the team hasn’t otherwise made much of a dent with its other signings. Linebacker Ernest Jones IV and defensive tackle Jarran Reed have Year 1 cap hits of $5.2 and $5 million, respectively, according to Over the Cap. Seattle has the cap room to add multiple impact players up front on the second day of free agency.

If Banks’ deal is any indication, Fries is due for a major payday, although the broken leg that ended his 2024 season could limit his market somewhat. Seattle might have to sweeten its proposal with more years, guaranteed money or both to pry him away from another guard-needy team, such as Minnesota. (Update: Fries agreed to a five-year, $88 million deal with Minnesota on Tuesday, a league source told The Athletic’s Dianna Russini.)

Scherff or Zeitler would be nice backup plans who make the Seahawks better, but since they’re 33 and 35, those two former Pro Bowlers would obviously be temporary solutions.

Advertisement

Seattle needs to be active in the wide receiver market, too, but the offensive line should be the priority. Once that is settled, Seattle can pursue receivers such as Demarcus Robinson, Marquez Valdes-Scantling or even Cooper Kupp, who is expected to be released by the Rams (it’s worth noting the Seahawks have former Rams assistant coach Jake Peetz on staff as the passing game coordinator).

An intriguing fullback option has also emerged, as the 49ers are expected to release veteran Kyle Juszczyk, according to The Athletic’s Jeff Howe.

But Day 2 of free agency needs to be about ensuring the Seahawks have a much better run game than they’ve had in recent years, and that Darnold isn’t constantly dodging pass rushers the way he was in the wild-card loss to the Rams. That game looked like many of Seattle’s outings with Smith, who was one of the most pressured quarterbacks in the league last season.

The only way to justify swapping Smith for Darnold in the name of youth and cap savings is to reallocate those funds to the position group most responsible for helping the quarterback be at his best.

(Photo of Sam Darnold, left, and Seahawks outside linebacker Boye Mafe: Steph Chambers / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

Published

on

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries, by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.


For those of us in the national memory-keeping business, anniversaries hold near-totemic power. Satisfyingly round units of time, ideally bearing fancy, Latin-derived names, serve as the overburdened pegs on which to hang think pieces and museum exhibits, revisionist documentaries and maudlin public ceremonies. The arbitrary nature of such occasions is precisely what gives them their charge, inviting us to set aside complacency and submit to a comprehensive check-in.

In his new book, “America, U.S.A.,” Eddie S. Glaude Jr. presents an intriguing variation on the genre, seeing the country’s 250th birthday as an anniversary of anniversaries: 50 years since the malaise-ridden, schlock-heavy Bicentennial. A century since the subdued Prohibition-era Sesquicentennial. A century and a half since telegraphed reports of George Armstrong Custer’s defeat by the Lakota and Cheyenne at Little Bighorn rudely interrupted the Gilded Age Republic’s 100th birthday party.

If an anniversary offers a snapshot of a moment, the core of Glaude’s book is an old-timey photo album, a collection of notable episodes from earlier national reckonings, long-ago glances in the mirror. An estimable scholar of Black history, politics and religion at Princeton — best known for “Begin Again,” his 2020 meditation on James Baldwin’s relevance for our times — Glaude focuses, as his subtitle puts it, on “how race shadows the nation’s anniversaries.”

Such celebrations, he contends, have never really been the moments for honest self-reflection they are often advertised to be. Instead, the nation usually shatters the mirror, refusing to accept what it prefers not to see. “American anniversaries are often moments to turn a blind eye to the evils of the past and the present,” Glaude writes, “to suppress the fact of America’s divided soul.”

Advertisement

It’s a clever concept, and, needless to say, perfectly timed. Last year, Glaude notes, the Trump administration executed a hostile takeover of the government’s studiously bipartisan 250th anniversary planning. It is now preparing a program that is certain to conceal more than it reveals about the country ostensibly being celebrated.

Glaude, in no mood for celebration, argues that such omissions and evasions also defined commemorations in the past. In 1875, Frederick Douglass predicted “one grand Centennial hosannah of peace and good will to all the white race of this country.” He was right: The nation reached 100 years old at a crucial moment in the post-Civil War fight over racial equality, with white Northerners ready to give up on Southern Reconstruction. The occasion would help the once-warring sections to reunite around a shared commitment to white supremacy. On May 10, 1876, at the opening of the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, the police tried to bar Douglass from the grandstand, until a white politician vouched for him.

The 150th anniversary came soon after a resurgent Ku Klux Klan successfully pushed for a restrictive immigration law aimed at keeping America a “Nordic” nation. At the lavishly funded, lightly attended celebrations in Philadelphia, Black veterans of World War I were excluded from marching in the opening parade. A writer with The Associated Negro Press wondered “what was in the breast of those black men who fought to make America safe for Democracy and on Monday stood on the sidelines, forgotten, as the Nordic strode by in all his vain pride.”

By 1976, when the nation marked its Bicentennial, the violence of the ’60s had destroyed any semblance of consensus. Vietnam and Watergate had eroded trust in the government. The commission initially tasked with organizing the anniversary was disbanded amid reports of corruption. Corporations filled the vacuum, Glaude explains, with “star-spangled whoopee cushions; patriotic toilet seats; Liberty hamburgers; red, white and blue beer cans.” The author, around 8 years old at the time, dimly remembers donning a pair of tricolor trousers.

A half-century later, Glaude is refreshingly honest about the depths of his despair. “I do not love America, and never have, especially now,” he writes in one of the more startling opening sentences I’ve read in some time. He dismisses this year’s Semiquincentennial as reaching back “to a storybook America that requires either the banishment of Black people from view or the reduction of our role in the country’s history, so as to affirm America’s ongoing quest to be a more perfect union.”

Advertisement

Undoubtedly true. But Trump doesn’t own the country, at least not yet, nor the 250th anniversary of one of the most radically liberatory and confusingly contradictory events in world history — an inspiration, as Glaude shows, even to critical observers of the American experiment, like Douglass. Far from the revanchist MAGA-palooza in Washington, I suspect this summer’s unasked-for invitation to national soul-searching may surprise us yet.

Despite his despair, Glaude concludes that “the past still offers resources for us to freedom-dream.” So, too, does this book.


AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries | By Eddie S. Glaude Jr. | Crown | 270 pp. | $31

Continue Reading

Culture

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Published

on

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Moore is a dependable ingredient in any summer reading soufflé. Her airy novels accomplish what they came to do: entertain and transport, without the pyrotechnics of, say, books that eschew quotation marks. In “Down With the Shipmans,” three sisters, laden with baggage, converge on their late mother’s beach cottage, only to learn that their father and his much younger wife are planning to sell the place.

The stakes are high, the drama is juicy and the views are sublime. Moore even provides two beach dogs — Leo (an unruly pit bull mix) and Cinnamon (“golden retriever, red bandanna, long pink tongue”) — to keep things lively. (Comes out June 2)

Continue Reading

Culture

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Published

on

Video: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

new video loaded: The A.I. threat to audiobooks

Artificial intelligence has made pirated audiobooks faster to make and harder to detect. Our reporter Alexandra Alter tells us about the latest threat to the publishing industry.

By Alexandra Alter, Léo Hamelin and Laura Salaberry

May 20, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending