Connect with us

Business

Hollywood Bets Big on the Bad Entrepreneur

Published

on

Hollywood Bets Big on the Bad Entrepreneur

“I’m not a nasty man,” the Fb founder Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) insists on the finish of “The Social Community,” the 2010 movie that outlined the cultural response to younger tech billionaires. Zuckerberg’s considerate lawyer (Rashida Jones), an invented character who serves largely to adjudicate Zuckerberg’s persona, assures him that she doesn’t suppose he’s a jerk: “You’re simply making an attempt so exhausting to be one.”

Twelve years later, this ambivalence towards tech titans has resolved. The brand new consensus is that there’s certainly one thing improper with these individuals. Contemplate the brand new Showtime restricted collection “Tremendous Pumped,” which charts the rise and fall of the Uber founder Travis Kalanick (Joseph Gordon-Levitt). As Kalanick stomps throughout the tech scene, John Zimmer, the measured founding father of rival Lyft, diagnoses Kalanick’s drawback, and his superpower: “You’re not human sufficient.”

“Tremendous Pumped” (based mostly on the e-book by Mike Isaac, a reporter for The New York Occasions) arrives amid a wave of collection about unhealthy entrepreneurs — figures who exemplify the delusions of start-up hype as they lure buyers to bankroll concepts that turn into silly, evil or fraudulent. In Hulu’s “The Dropout,” Amanda Seyfried performs Elizabeth Holmes, the Theranos founder who dons a black turtleneck and pretends that she has developed expertise that may diagnose illnesses with a single drop of blood. In Apple TV+’s “WeCrashed,” Jared Leto performs Adam Neumann, the weirdly shoeless WeWork founder who hustles a $47 billion valuation for a bunch of co-working areas that he says represent a world consciousness-raising motion.

Even “Inventing Anna,” the Netflix collection from Shonda Rhimes specializing in the SoHo grifter Anna Delvey (Julia Garner), feels sympatico. Delvey, whose actual title is Anna Sorokin, floats via the millennial start-up scene along with her unplaceable European accent, bumping into the pharma bro Martin Shkreli and Billy McFarland, the Fyre Competition fraudster, as she tries (however principally fails) to persuade buyers that she is a German heiress launching an unique membership she has named after herself.

These collection vary from the tedious (“Inventing Anna” makes Delvey’s high-wire deceptions as uninteresting because the bus trip to Rikers Island) to the sublimely weird (when Seyfried confronts a mirror in smeared lipstick, she brings Joker-origin-story vitality to Silicon Valley’s most infamous girlboss). Watching them collectively, they create a shared universe during which scamming and entrepreneurship meet in a chaotic portrait of American decline. Sprinkled via the reveals are film stars enjoying rich weirdos, maximalist title playing cards demystifying monetary transactions, private-jet tantrums, questionable hair makeovers, vomit-marred employees events and plenty of self-aggrandizing comparisons to Steve Jobs.

Advertisement

The businesses’ story traces are all the time spilling into one another. In “The Dropout,” Theranos companions focus on a brand new app that “permits you to pay for a cab in your cellphone”; in “WeCrashed,” Neumann watches on tv as Kalanick is ousted from Uber’s board; in “Inventing Anna,” Delvey’s lawyer operates out of a WeWork.

The central figures usually seem like mirrored pictures: Whereas Kalanick amasses cynical workers who wish to break stuff, Neumann invitations his deluded employees to “construct tomorrow.” And as Holmes artificially lowers her voice to venture a masculine presence, Delvey makes use of a voice-modulating app to impersonate the German supervisor of her nonexistent belief fund. Their arcs all resemble electrified variations of Hieronymus Bosch’s “The Backyard of Earthly Delights,” the place utopian goals give method to wild sprees earlier than devolving into smash.

Most of those topics are already intensely acquainted. Although tales of company extra have lengthy captivated the media and leisure industries, by no means have the headlines been ripped as rapaciously (and as shortly) as they’re now. Since Holmes’s claims have been uncovered as fantasy in The Wall Road Journal in 2015, for instance, her downfall has been restaged in a book-length exposé, a number of podcasts, a feature-length HBO documentary, a web-based market of ironic fan gear, “The Dropout” and, maybe sometime, a film starring Jennifer Lawrence, which stays in improvement.

“The Social Community” lined Fb’s origins in simply two hours, however this new entrepreneur class is being reprocessed via hourlong episodes that drop week after week. Whilst these reveals solid skepticism on speculative tech bubbles, they work to inflate a bubble of their very own, as multiplying streaming providers shovel money into status restricted collection to bait viewers and knock out opponents. They really feel calibrated to sport the market in the identical method: safe examined mental property on a current scandal, recruit very well-known individuals to impersonate the gamers, tempo the story to a limited-series schedule (lengthy sufficient to advertise binge-watching, transient sufficient to lock in busy celebrities and justify budgets), then hope subscribers don’t cancel after the finale.

Whereas HBO’s “Succession” has well imbued its bad-business story with the regenerative powers of a sitcom, toppling and resetting its chess board each season, the restricted collection is beholden to its rigid arc. It tends to proceed like a morality play, with a agency decision signaling a lesson discovered. These reveals course of the identical period in the identical type via the identical zeitgeist, they usually come to comparable conclusions. One is that the road between scammers like Delvey and titans like Kalanick is slim, and entire techniques of energy are implicated of their rise. As one “Inventing Anna” character places it, talking with the cool readability of a Shondaland oracle: “Everybody right here is operating a sport. Everybody right here wants to attain. Everybody right here is hustling.”

Advertisement

However whereas “The Social Community” implies that Zuckerberg was introduced low by the dizzying stakes of the start-up scene, these reveals counsel that some persons are drawn to that scene as a result of they’re ruthless egomaniacs. The system rewards them — “be crazier,” Masayoshi Son, the chief government of SoftBank, advises Neumann — so long as the corporate valuation rises. The difficulty comes solely when the manager’s erratic conduct attracts adverse press consideration and threatens to spook the market and shake stakeholders’ fortunes.

Usually the unhealthy conduct issues the mistreatment of ladies. As Tim Prepare dinner (Hank Azaria) of Apple warns Kalanick (the man who thought it was a good suggestion to say “Boober” to a reporter), girls are “the canary within the coal mine” of company dysfunction. Whereas “The Social Community” argues that Zuckerberg began Fb in a pique of informal (and largely exaggerated) misogyny, rampant sexism is now pitched because the tech trade’s defining high quality — a weak spot that threatens to topple unhealthy males and, typically, carry unhealthy girls. In “The Social Community,” girls are relegated to the position of loopy girlfriend or comely intern, and whereas this will likely mirror the chauvinism of Harvard and Silicon Valley, it additionally reinforces it. A refreshing improvement of those new tales is that girls, too, are allowed to flourish into world-historical narcissists, usually underneath the guise of countering that chauvinism.

Holmes rises by courting the admiration of, per one episode title, “Previous White Males,” but additionally by positioning herself as a feminist triumph who speaks earnestly about girls lifting girls and, laughably, preventing the scourge of “impostor syndrome.” “WeCrashed” provides equal time to Neumann’s woo-woo spouse, Rebekah Paltrow Neumann (Anne Hathaway), who publicizes at an organization retreat that girls should assist males “manifest their calling in life,” then manifests her personal calling via her husband’s firm, firing workers with “unhealthy vitality” and beginning a WeWork faculty for indoctrinating kids into acutely aware entrepreneurship. And the “Tremendous Pumped” model of Arianna Huffington is performed by Uma Thurman as a suspect operator who flatters Kalanick — “Travis and I share a connection that one not often finds on this world males have constructed,” she purrs — and rises increased within the firm as different girls sink.

Uma Thurman as Arianna Huffington within the Travis Kalanick story — that appears like Hollywood phrase salad, however it’s engrossing however. A part of the draw of those reveals is the curiosity hole they create once they assign a film star to a reputation within the information. Although we could also be overly aware of, say, Elizabeth Holmes, we have now not beforehand seen her story interpolated by an actor, and the Hollywoodification guarantees to disclose one thing that journalism can not all the time provide: perception into what, precisely, is improper along with her. Seyfried performs Holmes as earnest, pushed, weak and hypercritical earlier than she turns chilly, manipulative and despotic. I don’t understand how true that portrait is, however I believe that with an actor as perceptive as Seyfried, Holmes might come to appear extra complicated than she actually is.

Just lately the absurdity of enterprise capital has been dwarfed by the spectacle of cryptocurrency, and now crypto tales are being churned into content material even sooner than their predecessors. Inside days of the arrests of Ilya Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan, dubbed the “Bonnie and Clyde of Bitcoin” and accused of a scheme to launder billions, the story had been optioned for a collection. It’s being developed by Forbes Leisure, the manufacturing arm of the monetary journal which till not too long ago allowed Morgan to hold forth on its web site as a ForbesWomen columnist, providing her “knowledgeable recommendation to guard an organization from cybercriminals.” That’s the most recent twist within the Hollywood I.P. gambit: Assist construct the parable, then dramatize the autumn.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Golden Globes Stars Avoided Politics

Published

on

Golden Globes Stars Avoided Politics

Hollywood hoisted a white flag in the culture war on Sunday.

That summation of the 82nd Golden Globe Awards will undoubtedly aggravate some people in the movie capital. Us? Conceding the moral high ground to President-elect Donald J. Trump and his supporters? Never.

They could point — fairly — to the movies that won prizes on Sunday. “Emilia Perez,” honored with four Globes, is a Spanish-language musical about trans identity. “The Brutalist,” which received three, is an epic about immigrant struggles. “Conclave,” the winner of best screenplay, is about the selection of a Mexican, intersex pope. “Wicked,” which was given a newish award for best blockbuster, is about prejudices and the corruption of power.

But the Globes have never been about subtlety. The Globes are where stars supposedly let it rip, where they proselytize for progressive causes and concerns. Sunday’s show was Hollywood’s first megaphone since Mr. Trump was comfortably elected to a second term. And this time, there was barely a peep about it.

In 2017, Meryl Streep tore into Mr. Trump from the Globes stage, firmly throwing down the gauntlet for a new kind of culture war. The next year, the Globes became a de facto rally for the Time’s Up movement, with dozens of actresses wearing black to protest sexual harassment and Oprah Winfrey delivering a barnburner of a speech. In 2020, Michelle Williams gave an impassioned plea for abortion rights, while Russell Crowe called attention to climate change and a bush fire crisis in Australia.

Advertisement

Black Lives Matter, the global refugee crisis and veganism have all been touted from the Globes stage. In 2023, the Globes gave airtime to the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, who gave a speech condemning Russia.

During the official red carpet preshow, hosts kept the conversation bordering on cotton candy: you’re beautiful, I’m beautiful, the weather is beautiful, everything is beautiful. “It’s Sunday afternoon, and the sun is out,” Felicity Jones told an interviewer. “There’s not a lot to complain about.”

During her monologue that opened the show, the comedian Nikki Glaser gently teased the assembled celebrities for not being able to stop Mr. Trump from returning to office. “It’s OK,” she said. “You’ll get ’em next time — if there is one.” She smiled and added, “I’m scared,” before changing the subject to Ben Affleck’s sex life.

The only other political commentary of note came three hours later, when “Emilia Pérez” won the Globe for best musical or comedy. The film’s star, Karla Sofía Gascón, used the moment to speak for trans rights. “You can beat us up,” she said. “But you never can take away our soul.”

“Raise your voice,” she added.

Advertisement

Maybe the lack of politics in Sunday’s show shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. Many of those who oppose Mr. Trump still seem to be sorting out how to push back against him and his administration. And there has even been a gentle drift to the right by Hollywood, to scrub some of the most progressive edges off some shows and select more movies that speak to Mr. Trump’s base.

Ahead of the Globes, some publicists and agents advised clients to keep quiet about Mr. Trump and pointed to Rachel Zegler as a cautionary example. After the election in November, Ms. Zegler, the young star of Disney’s coming live-action “Snow White,” harshly decried Mr. Trump and his supporters in a social media post. The MAGA blowback was severe, and Ms. Zegler was forced to apologize.

And for the people behind the Globes, the silence was probably welcome. Producers who specialize in awards telecasts say research, compiled mainly from Nielsen, indicates that viewers dislike it when celebrities turn a trip to the stage into a political bully pulpit. Minute-by-minute viewership analysis indicates that “vast swaths” of people turn off televisions when celebrities started to opine on politics.

It recalled a time, decades ago, when stars worked at being stars, turning on the charm and saying nothing that might alienate a single ticket buyer. The message came through loud and clear.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Los Angeles man is trapped in circling Waymo on way to airport: 'Is somebody playing a joke?'

Published

on

Los Angeles man is trapped in circling Waymo on way to airport: 'Is somebody playing a joke?'

A Los Angeles man said he recently missed his flight home after getting trapped on his way to the airport in a Waymo that wouldn’t stop making circles in a parking lot.

L.A. tech entrepreneur Mike Johns posted a video three weeks ago on LinkedIn of his call to a customer service representative for Waymo to report that the car kept turning in circles and that he was nervous about missing his flight.

“I got a flight to catch. Why is this thing going in a circle? I’m getting dizzy,” Johns said. “It’s circling around a parking lot. I got my seat belt on. I can’t get out of the car. Has this been hacked? What’s going on? I feel like I’m in the movies. Is somebody playing a joke on me?”

The customer service representative told Johns to open his Waymo app and that she would try to pull the car over but seemed to struggle with getting the vehicle to stop.

Johns was returning home from Scottsdale, Ariz., according to a CBS report, which also noted that Johns “nearly” missed his flight.

Advertisement

On his social media post, Johns, who also works on AI initiatives, according to his LinkedIn profile, said Waymo had not followed up with him after the experience.

“You’d think by now Waymo would email, text or call for a follow-up,” he wrote.

A Waymo spokesperson wrote in an email to The Times on Sunday that the incident occurred in mid-December and that the rider was delayed by roughly five minutes, then driven to his destination.

At the time of the incident, however, Johns wrote on LinkedIn, “Mind you I was on my way to the airport and now missed my flight.”

The spokesperson said the software glitch had since been resolved and that Johns was not charged for the ride. They added that the company had since tried to follow up with him via voicemail.

Advertisement

The company’s autonomous cars have been a common sight on San Francisco streets for years, and Waymo recently opened its services to all riders after first rolling out a pilot program to select users. The robotaxis launched in L.A. last fall.

Waymo’s goal is to reduce traffic injuries and fatalities through autonomous-driving technology, and riders and proponents of the service have lauded it as a safe and easy alternative to human drivers.

But there have also been tech glitches and safety concerns during the company’s rollout of its robotaxis in several cities.

A man in downtown L.A. on Thursday allegedly attempted to hijack a Waymo and drive away. Police took the man into custody after they eventually got him out of the car.

There have also been reports of riders experiencing harassment by pedestrians who block the car’s path and stall the vehicle.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Amazon Prime Will Release a Melania Trump Documentary

Published

on

Amazon Prime Will Release a Melania Trump Documentary

Amazon said on Sunday that its Prime Video streaming service would release a “behind the scenes” documentary about Melania Trump’s life.

The film will head to movie theaters and stream on Amazon Prime in the second half of this year, the company said in a statement. Mrs. Trump will be an executive producer of the documentary, which started filming in December, the month after her husband, Donald J. Trump, won the presidential election.

Amazon said it was “excited to share this truly unique story.”

The company and its founder, Jeff Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post, had a rocky relationship with Mr. Trump during Mr. Trump’s first presidential term. But in recent months, Amazon and Mr. Bezos have taken steps to repair it. The tech giant said last month that it would donate $1 million to the president-elect’s inaugural fund, joining Meta and executives of some other Silicon Valley companies in writing checks to the inaugural committee. Mr. Bezos has said he is “very optimistic” about Mr. Trump’s new term in office and is eager to work with his administration on reducing regulation.

During his first presidential term, Mr. Trump criticized Mr. Bezos because of his newspaper’s political coverage and questioned whether the U.S. Postal Service was charging Amazon too little for shipping. Amazon, in turn, accused Mr. Trump of using “improper pressure” on the Pentagon to deny the company a cloud-computing contract.

Advertisement

Amazon now appears to be eager to turn the page.

In October, The Post said it would stop endorsing presidential candidates, a decision made by Mr. Bezos, and did not publish an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris that had already been drafted. Mr. Bezos defended his decision, saying newspaper endorsements “create a perception of bias.”

Last week, Ann Telnaes, a Post cartoonist, said she was resigning after the paper’s opinion section rejected a cartoon that showed Mr. Bezos and three other technology executives bending the knee to a statue of Mr. Trump while offering the president-elect bags of money. David Shipley, The Post’s opinion editor, said the cartoon was rejected because the section had published a column on the same subject and had already scheduled another one for publication. He said he had asked Ms. Telnaes to rescind her resignation, saying, “The only bias was against repetition.”

Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the efforts by the company and Mr. Bezos to forge closer ties to Mr. Trump. The Trump transition team also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mrs. Trump has recently shown more willingness to share details about her life with the public. Last year, she published a memoir that described her career as a model, marriage to Mr. Trump and time in the White House. It became a No. 1 New York Times best seller. Her role as executive producer of the documentary suggests that she will have some influence over how it depicts her life.

Advertisement

Brett Ratner, a director and producer behind movies like “Rush Hour” and “The Revenant,” will direct the documentary. Mr. Ratner has kept a lower profile in recent years after questions were raised about his behavior. In 2011, he resigned as co-producer of the Oscars broadcast after he used an anti-gay slur at a public event. In 2017, Mr. Ratner was accused of sexual misconduct by six women in an article published by The Los Angeles Times, claims that he denied.

Amazon, which will have exclusive rights to the movie about Mrs. Trump, said it would reveal more details on the project as filming progressed and it completed release plans.

Continue Reading

Trending