Connect with us

Colorado

The story behind the founding of Colorado College, 150 years ago | Cronin and Loevy

Published

on

The story behind the founding of Colorado College, 150 years ago | Cronin and Loevy


This spring marks the 150th anniversary of the founding of Colorado College in Colorado Springs in 1874. Few are aware that the initial motivation for the founding was to create a memorial to a 14-year-old girl who died of tuberculosis the previous year.

Here is an early account of the founding, written in the flowery and overstated writing style of the time:

“The first organized college in Colorado is the memorial of a beautiful American girl, who lost her life (and her) love of learning. She came as a young consumptive to (Colorado) Territory in the spring of 1873 and died the next autumn at the age of 14.”

Advertisement

“When visiting General (William J.) Palmer’s residence one day and looking at the eagles on the rocks and in the air, she suggested the founding of a school nearby.”

It would be a place “where youth inclined to pulmonary diseases might learn to soar, as light of heart and strong of wing as old Glen Eyrie’s king of birds, whose life among the cliffs and flight above the clouds symbolized her own aspiring hope and faith.”

The young girl was named Florence Haskell. Her family had moved to the cool air and high elevation of Colorado in hopes it might cure her lung ailment.

Soon after the death of Florence Haskell, her father, the Rev. Thomas Nelson Haskell, a Congregational minister and recently a professor at the University of Wisconsin, proposed to the Colorado Conference of the Congregational Church, meeting in Boulder, his daughter’s hopes of starting a college in Colorado.



Advertisement




Thomas Nelson Haskell

Thomas Nelson Haskell was the father of Florence Edwards Haskell. He was a Congregational minister and had also worked as a college professor at the University of Wisconsin.  






Haskell specified that the new college would be “open to both sexes and all races.”

At a subsequent meeting of the Conference, in Denver, on Jan. 20, 1874, the group gratefully accepted the offer from Palmer, of Colorado Springs, of 10 acres of land for the college campus, 70 acres of residential lots in the city that could be sold to raise money, and $10,000 cash to get the college started.







General William J. Palmer

Gen. William Jackson Palmer founded Colorado Springs in 1871. He attracted Colorado College by offering a free 10-acre site for the campus and a gift of $10,000 to get the college started.  

Advertisement






In addition, Palmer, a Quaker, had banned the sale of alcohol in his new city, and that made Colorado Springs appear particularly desirable to Rev. Haskell.

On Feb. 9, 1874, a certificate of incorporation for the new college was filed with the Territory of Colorado in Denver. On Feb. 17, the certificate of incorporation was filed in El Paso County, where Colorado Springs had been founded just three years earlier.

A Board of Trustees was appointed. The board was required to have “a majority of Christian men to keep the college evangelical, nonsectarian, and in sympathy with the progress of the age.”

The trustees met at once and named the school Colorado College. Thomas Nelson Haskell set to work soliciting funds and selecting a faculty. Under the direction of the Rev. Jonathan Edwards, the first classes were taught on May 6, 1874, in a building at the northwest corner of East Pikes Peak Avenue and North Tejon Street.

For years, that location was the site of the First National Bank building, then Chase Bank. Today, the offices of The Gazette are nearby.

Advertisement

The date of the first classes, May 6, 1874, has traditionally been recognized as the birthday of Colorado College.

The Gazette made this comment on the opening of Colorado College: “We have secured the location of the college here, and that will be no small aid to the growth of our town, if we go to work and make the best of it. The cooperation of our people is needed to give the enterprise a good start, and that cooperation should be given heartily and ungrudgingly.”

Typical of colleges at that time, Colorado College began with both preparatory and college-level classes. Due to the inadequacy of high school education in those days, many of the incoming students needed to take preparatory classes before they were ready for college level work.

The Gazette reported on May 9, 1874, that “the Preparatory Department of Colorado College was opened Wednesday last, and 20 students have already been enrolled. Most of these are from our town, but it has been signified that several more from other places, in this Territory, may shortly be expected.”

Faculty began to come on board. Professor E.N. Bartlett, formerly of Olivet College, in Olivet, Mich., was hired to teach Latin and Greek. Sanford C. Robinson, an Oberlin College graduate, was to assist in mathematics and physics.

Advertisement

Women served on the faculty from the start. Minna Knapp, of Germany, instructed in German and music. Mary MacKenzie and Emma Bump also were teaching.

By July 18, 1874, Edwards announced that student enrollments were going so well there were students from 10 states in addition to those from the Colorado Territory. Now, 150 years later, Colorado College regularly enrolls students from nearly every state and about two dozen other countries.

Thomas Nelson Haskell was the founder of Colorado College. At every point in the organizing process, he was the “lever” that kept the process going. It was Palmer’s gift of land and money, however, that brought Haskell’s new college to Colorado Springs.







Haskell gravesite

Florence Edwards Haskell was buried in Fairmount Cemetery in Denver. Her father, Thomas Nelson Haskell, and her mother are buried next to her in unmarked graves.

Advertisement






Haskell House, the campus house where students majoring in French live together, is named in honor of Haskell. It is located at the southwest corner of Uintah Street and North Cascade Avenue.

But the inspiration for Colorado College was Florence Haskell, the ailing 14-year-old girl who, in her last days, wished for a college at a healthful high elevation that would provide a place for students with lung diseases to study and learn.

Your morning rundown of the latest news from Colorado Springs and around the country

Success! Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.



Source link

Colorado

Greer, Wooten combine for 20, Colorado women advance in Big 12 Tournament with 55-48 win over Kansas

Published

on

Greer, Wooten combine for 20, Colorado women advance in Big 12 Tournament with 55-48 win over Kansas


KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Logyn Greer and Desiree Wooten both scored 10 points in No. 6 seed Colorado’s 55-48 win over No. 11 seed Kansas on Thursday night to advance to the quarterfinals of the Big 12 Conference Tournament.

Greer shot 4 for 7 from the field and drained both her attempts from 3-point range from the Buffaloes (21-10). She had six rebounds and four blocks. Wooten added four assists.

Colorado was in foul trouble early, racking up seven fouls in the first quarter. A 9-0 run in the second quarter broke the game open for the Buffaloes and they entered halftime up 26-18. Their defense held Kansas to 36% (19 of 53) from the field and 15% (2 of 13) from 3-point range.

Kansas (19-13) was led in scoring by S’Mya Nichols, who put up 14. Her and Sania Copeland scored the only 3-pointers for the Jayhawks.

Advertisement

Colorado: Will play No. 3 seed Baylor on Friday. The Lady Bears are ranked No. 20 in the country.

Kansas: Will wait for an invitation into a postseason tournament.

___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP women’s college basketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-womens-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/womens-college-basketball



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Deen: Avalanche Solve Roster Needs. What’s Next? | Colorado Hockey Now

Published

on

Deen: Avalanche Solve Roster Needs. What’s Next? | Colorado Hockey Now


The trade deadline is less than 24 hours away and the Avalanche have already made the three moves that had been clear-cuts needs for the team.

They needed to improve their third pair. They did that by swapping Samuel Girard for Brett Kulak.

They needed to replace the recently departed Ilya Solovyov with a more capable No. 7 option on the blueline. That was accomplished with Wednesday’s trade for Nick Blankenburg.

Most importantly, the Avs needed a third-line center. On Thursday, they paid a hefty price to acquire Nicolas Roy from the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Advertisement

These are all things that had to be done. Now? They have nearly $7 million in available cap space (with Logan O’Connor on LTIR), with an opportunity to improve on the roster they have. This is the part of the trade deadline where general manager Chris MacFarland can bolster the team, find those luxury additions, and maximize his team’s chances and winning a Stanley Cup.

So what could that look like?

Most of the season has seen Ross Colton, Victor Olofsson, and even Gavin Brindley occupy the wings on the third line. With Roy expected to settle into that 3C role, there’s an opportunity to build on the wing. Elliotte Friedman mentioned last week that the Avs could move on from Colton. If so, that would give them a lot more cap space and a valuable asset they can use on the trade market to bring in a solid middle-six winger. Perhaps someone like Blake Coleman.

Olofsson has chemistry with Roy dating back to last season with Vegas, but you have to wonder if they’d be looking to upgrade on his position, too.

That leaves Jack Drury on the fourth line, centering Parker Kelly and Joel Kiviranta. Brindley slots down to the No. 13 forward (when everyone is healthy), while Zakhar Bardakov is the 14th option.

Advertisement

If O’Connor returns before the postseason, he instantly rejoins the fourth line. That would push Kiviranta out, and he’d be the 13th forward just like he was last year. Even in that scenario, I do wonder if the Avs decide to improve on Bardakov. He’s a young centerman who has impressed in limited minutes but has struggled to gain the full trust of the coaching staff.

There’s also the option to add another depth defenseman. Right now, an injury to Kulak or Devon Toews would again force Colorado to have five right-shot defensemen in the lineup. Blankenburg, who also shoots right, would be an ideal fill-in if an injury were to strike on the right side.

But what about another depth option? Colorado won the Cup in 2022 with both Ryan Murray and Jack Johnson on the outside looking in. After Girard’s injury, Johnson stepped in. But it didnd’t hurt to have multiple depth options just in case.

Could the Avs target another depth blueliner? If so, will they go for a bigger body? I’ve seen the name Urho Vaakanainen floated around. He would be the type of left-shot defenseman who could fill that role as an extra. Albeit his $1.55 million cap hit might be too large to take on without retention for such a limited role.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado Parks and Wildlife advances controversial fur ban petition during packed meeting

Published

on

Colorado Parks and Wildlife advances controversial fur ban petition during packed meeting


A contentious fight over fur stole the show at day one of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission March meeting. The drama centered around a citizen petition to prohibit the sale of some wild animals furs.

The public meeting was packed with hunting advocates and animal rights groups. A total of 120 people signed up to speak during public comment at the hours-long meeting, not including those who submitted written or virtual comments.

An image from the heavily-attended meeting at the DoubleTree Denver-Westminster on Wednesday

Advertisement

CBS


The turnout was so big that Colorado Parks and Wildlife increased security. The meeting was held at the DoubleTree Denver-Westminster. CPW said they conducted security checks at the entrance at the hotel’s request to enforce the venue’s ban on weapons.

Ultimately, the commission voted 6-4 to move a proposed fur ban into the rulemaking phase.

It’s a win for the animal rights groups that submitted the petition.

While the commission did not all-out adopt the petition as it was submitted. They chose to initiate a rulemaking process for a potential ban to be approved down the line.

Advertisement

When the motion was advanced, it was met by jeers and some cheers from an audience full of hunters, trappers and advocates.

“We were hoping that there would be an opposition to moving the petition forward for the variety of reasons,” said Dan Gates, executive director of Coloradans for Responsible Wildlife Management. “It’s kind of frustrating that you sit there that long and you go through that much back and forth. On so many different levels. So it’s kind of disappointing.”

“This is a win. So it’s a good day,” said Samantha Miller, the senior carnivore campaigner for the Center for Biological Diversity.

Miller submitted the petition, which sought to ban the for-profit sale of fur from Colorado wildlife known as furbearers.

Those are 17 species including fox, bobcat, beaver, raccoon and coyote.

Advertisement

fox.jpg

CBS


“Right now, furbearers are hunted and trapped in unlimited numbers in the state of Colorado, they also don’t enjoy the same protections against commercial markets that other big game species do enjoy, and in a time of biodiversity crisis and climate change, it’s critical that we up our management levels, modernize them, to reflect the crises we’re facing at the time, and ally for align for rare management with other species,” Miller said.

Colorado law already bans the commercial sale of big game.

As submitted, the petition would not limit the trapping or hunting of furbearers, just the sale of their furs and other parts, including hides, pelts, skins, claws and similar items. The sale of furs from farmed animals or wild animals killed outside Colorado would not be impacted.

Advertisement

The petition proposes exceptions, including fishing flies, western hats and scientific or educational materials.

The petition argues that commercial wildlife markets historically contributed to severe wildlife declines in North America and that modern conservation under the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation calls for eliminating markets for wildlife products.

“So what we’re saying is, let’s at least take this commercial piece off the table. We don’t allow this for any other wild animals, and let’s move forward with this petition,” Miller said.

Public comment speakers who supported the petition urged CPW to put compassion for animals ahead of commercial profits.
While the majority of speakers spoke against the proposed ban, saying the existing science-based wildlife management is working, and pointing out the Coloradans who rely on this industry for their livelihood.

Many pointed out that Denver voters rejected a similar fur ban in 2024.

Advertisement

“As a personal furbearer harvester over the course of the last 50 years, and a wildlife control operator and the president for the Colorado Trappers and Predator Hunters Association as well. We can adamantly say that we are for science-based wildlife management, and there’s been no indication whatsoever from the science-based wildlife managers that there’s a problem with any one of the 17 furbearers in the state of Colorado,” Gates said.

CPW staff recommended denial of the petition, saying the division does not have solid evidence that commercial fur sales are leading to unsustainable harvest levels of these animals.

Staff also worried about potential enforcement issues with proposed exemptions, and that the petition contradicts a state law allowing landowners to hunt, trap, and sell furs from furbearers causing damage to property.

“Colorado Parks and Wildlife laid a very good synopsis down when they were putting that recommendation for denial together, and some of these things will play out, and we’ll just have to see how it does,” Gates said.

The commission’s vote to initiate rulemaking leaves the door open for those concerns to be addressed.

Advertisement

“Rulemaking will clear up all of those misalignments that they have found or identified and make sure that it goes forward to the letter of the law and honoring the intent of the visit of the petition,” Miller said. “It’s a good day, I think, for wildlife to bring our regulations consistent and to start modernizing our furbearer management.”

“It seemed today that the vote was more social minded, more personal preference or ideological minded, as opposed to looking at the science and the data that was given by the agency,” Gates said.

See the petition below:



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending