Connect with us

World

Ukraine war: Did Eastern Europe’s Russia warnings fall on deaf ears?

Published

on

Ukraine war: Did Eastern Europe’s Russia warnings fall on deaf ears?

For years, political leaders throughout central and jap Europe have warned concerning the quick risks posed by Russia and now — amid Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine — some blame western Europeans for not heeding these warnings.

A day after Russia attacked, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy lashed out on the obvious lack of western assist offered to his authorities, regardless of Russian troops massing on Ukraine’s borders for months.

“This morning we’re defending our state alone. Like yesterday, the world’s strongest forces are watching from afar,” he mentioned. “Did yesterday’s sanctions persuade Russia? We hear in our sky and see on our earth that this was not sufficient.”

The next day, Zelenskyy accused a number of western European governments of “egotism,” “vanity” and “appeasement” of their response to the Russian army buildup.

A number of central and jap European leaders, who for years have been warning concerning the risks posed by Russia, have been equally scathing.

Advertisement

“There is no such thing as a time right now for the type of unyielding egoism that we see in sure Western international locations, together with right here in Germany sadly,” Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki mentioned in Berlin final week forward of a gathering with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.

‘I odor Munich right here’

Ever since Russia started massing its troops on Ukraine’s borders in November, the go-to analogy for analysts and politicians was the Munich settlement, when in 1938 France and Britain tried to keep away from battle with Nazi Germany by ceding the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia.

“I hope I’m mistaken however I odor ‘Munich’ right here,” Marko Mihkelson, head of the overseas affairs committee in Estonia’s parliament, mentioned final December.

The frustration felt by some central and jap Europeans isn’t new.

For years, they’ve thought-about themselves ignored inside EU conferences and remoted in calling for a stronger NATO. Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, Lithuania and Romania are among the 10 NATO states — out of 30 — that really spend the mandated 2% of GDP on defence.

Advertisement

A number of states, not least Hungary, have been accused of undermining European solidarity and splitting the bloc with their relations with Moscow and Beijing, but central and jap Europeans level out that western European international locations are the principle buying and selling companions with Russia and China.

Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic states have been dedicated opponents of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline — which straight connects Russia to Germany, the principle European purchaser of Russia’s pure gasoline exports. But successive German governments continued with this deliberate power undertaking, regardless of it massively growing German reliance on Moscow.

Final week Scholz moved to droop the certification of Nord Stream 2 following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

There was little in the best way of European solidarity after the Czech Republic final yr expelled greater than a dozen Russian officers after Czech intelligence companies linked Russian army brokers to an enormous ammunition depot explosion close to Vrbetice in October 2014, the “largest explosion on European soil for the reason that Yugoslav wars,” in keeping with an analyst.

‘Soul-searching and accusations’

There’s additionally frustration on the “persistently futile makes an attempt” by French President Emmanuel Macron, to mediate central and jap European issues with Russia, added Kevin Curran, of the Affiliation for Worldwide Affairs, a Prague-based assume tank.

Advertisement

“On all of those factors and extra, many central and jap European leaders and residents will really feel compelled to brag about their warnings that fell on deaf ears for thus a few years. In lots of respects, that is justified,” Curran added.

Richard Q. Turcsányi, of Palacky College Olomouc, described the Russian invasion as having stunned many analysts. “What is obvious, nonetheless, is that those that have been warning about Russia as a safety risk could have their second – a lot of them being central and jap European international locations,” he mentioned.

“International locations in western Europe used to have a extra cooperative angle [towards Russia], which is able to clearly change loads now,” Turcsányi mentioned, noting that the German authorities was fast final week to postpone the Nord Stream 2 pipeline undertaking. Defying some expectations, Western democracies additionally agreed final weekend to exclude various Russian banks from Swift, a global cost system.

“There’ll naturally be some soul-searching and accusations of who was proper and mistaken on a regular basis, however I don’t assume it is a significantly helpful avenue of considering,” Turcsányi added.

Different central and jap European commentators are in settlement.

Advertisement

“The indecisiveness of the West and the unwillingness to punish Russia for its earlier aggression is actually the rationale why Vladimir Putin felt it (would) be believable to assault Ukraine,” mentioned Veronika Víchová, head of the Kremlin Watch Programme on the European Values Centre for Safety Coverage, a think-tank.

For years, Putin has turn out to be bolder and bolder, and the West stored signalling that it’s going to not be placing enough prices on such aggressive behaviour, she added.

However “a blame recreation” is not going to remedy the state of affairs proper now,” Víchová mentioned. “It’s as much as the transatlantic democratic world to understand that Russia will not be fascinated with forthcoming diplomacy and that solely strictly focused and impactful sanctions have an opportunity to make a distinction.”

Not all jap and central states have been cautious of Russia

Curran, of the Affiliation for Worldwide Affairs, famous that it can’t be forgotten that the likes of Serbia, Hungary, and Slovakia have in current historical past discovered themselves to be fairly supportive of Russian narratives.

“We can not revise central and jap European narratives to have been universally cautious of Russia,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

Certainly, the narrative that western Europe was too mushy on Russia, and didn’t hearken to warnings from central and jap Europe, is extra advanced.

Hungary’s autocratic prime minister, Viktor Orban, has been a key ally of Putin’s. Milos Zeman, the Czech president, has been recognized for taking pro-Russia positions since his election in 2013.

Concerning the Russian annexation of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, Zeman later described it as “irreversible” and referred to as for European governments to finish their sanctions on Moscow.

Zeman questioned his personal nation’s intelligence companies after they mentioned final yr that they believed Russian actors have been behind the Vrbetice explosion, stating that his nation ought to keep away from “hysteria” and “hypothesis” over Russia’s alleged involvement.

One other regional politician who has usually taken a pro-Russia agenda is the previous Slovakian prime minister, Robert Fico, who additionally opposed sanctions on Moscow after the 2014 annexation of Crimea.

Advertisement

It isn’t simply political elites. A survey printed late final month by Focus, a pollster, discovered that 44% of Slovaks believed the US and NATO have been liable for the rising rigidity in Ukraine, and solely 34% believed Russia was accountable. Outcomes differed massively by age teams, nonetheless, with extra Slovaks aged 25-34 blaming Russia than NATO and the US, whereas these 65 and over have been much less more likely to maintain Russia accountable.

Ukraine invasion may change their thoughts

Analysts reckon it may now be a lot tougher for central and jap Europe’s pro-Russian politicians to maintain up their stance. “I count on a few of them would double-down of their positions, however some would change their thoughts,” mentioned Turcsányi, of Palacky College Olomouc.

On 24 February, simply hours after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Czech President Zeman referred to as Russia’s actions “an unprovoked act of aggression” and a “crime towards peace”, and demanded not simply phrases however deeds from the Czech authorities.

He additionally admitted he had been mistaken about Moscow. “Just a few days in the past, I mentioned that the Russians weren’t loopy and that they might not assault Ukraine. I admit I used to be mistaken.

“The irrational determination of the management of the Russian Federation will trigger vital injury to the Russian state itself,” he was quoted saying.

Advertisement

Extra shocking, Hungarian Prime Minister Orban was fast to sentence Moscow.

“Russia attacked Ukraine this morning with army pressure,” Orban mentioned in a video on Fb final Thursday. “Along with our European Union and NATO allies, we condemn Russia’s army motion.”

Orban’s overseas minister, Peter Szijijarto, added that “Hungary’s place is obvious: we stand by Ukraine, we stand by Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty.”

The governments of virtually all central and jap European states, together with Bulgaria and Romania, have now explicitly condemned Putin’s invasion. Even Aleksandar Vucic, the Serbian president, a really shut Moscow associate, described Russia’s violation of Ukraine’s territorial integrity as “very mistaken,” though Belgrade opposes sanctions on Moscow.

“It’s from this {that a} extra united voice will be capable to emerge throughout Central and Jap Europe,” Curran mentioned.

Advertisement

“This voice, now in unison, will certainly be heard throughout Western Europe. In my estimation, these voices should not return in time to brag over earlier warnings, however as a substitute flip to the vital subsequent steps.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Trump homeland secretary joins ICE in New York as immigration crackdown intensifies

Published

on

Trump homeland secretary joins ICE in New York as immigration crackdown intensifies
President Donald Trump’s top homeland security official joined officers as they carried out an immigration arrest in New York City on Tuesday, the latest effort to promote Trump’s nationwide crackdown as enforcement has intensified in recent days.
Continue Reading

World

Incoming UK ambassador walks back comments on ‘danger’ of Trump: ‘Ill-judged and wrong’

Published

on

Incoming UK ambassador walks back comments on ‘danger’ of Trump: ‘Ill-judged and wrong’

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

EXCLUSIVE – Newly appointed U.K. ambassador to the U.S., Lord Peter Mandelson, is readying himself to take up the top job of preserving the “special relationship” long championed by London and Washington, but first he’s looking to set the record straight. 

In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Mandelson, when asked about previous comments he made regarding the recently re-elected president, including in 2019 when he said President Donald Trump was “a danger to the world,” said his opinion of the president had changed.

Advertisement

“I consider my remarks about President Trump as ill-judged and wrong,” he said. “I think that times and attitudes toward the president have changed.”

Peter Mandelson, former Labour MP and European commissioner, speaks to the media following the result of the EU referendum, in London, June 24, 2016. (Reuters/Stefan Wermuth)

TRUMP’S WORLD LEADERS CLUB: WHO’S IN AND WHO’S LOOKING TO SALVAGE TIES

“I think that he has won fresh respect,” he added in reference to Trump’s second election as president. “He certainly has from me, and that is going to be the basis of all the work I do as His Majesty’s ambassador in the United States.”

The incoming ambassador’s comments come amid reports that the U.K.-U.S.’s “special relationship” could be put to the test, and Mandelson’s appointment may be blocked by the White House. 

Advertisement

Mandelson rejected these claims and said, “I’ve heard nothing from the president or the White House or anyone working for him that suggests that there’s going to be any difficulty about my appointment.”

But speculation on the reliability of the U.S. in that trans-Atlantic relationship remains high following comments made by officials from Trump’s campaign, as well as by close ally and tech titan Elon Musk.

Musk, who engaged in a social media spat leveled at British Prime Minster Keir Starmer earlier this month, is not in Trump’s Cabinet, but he has been charged with overseeing the new Department of Government Efficiency.

Despite the negative social media banter by those who have Trump’s ear, the president and Starmer engaged in an apparently friendly phone call over the weekend – suggesting Trump may look to prioritize the U.S.-U.K. partnership.

Donald Trump speaking with Elon Musk

Elon Musk speaks with former President Donald Trump during a campaign event, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pennsylvania. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

AS UK REPRESENTATIVE, I WANT TO MAKE OUR ALLIANCE WITH THE US GREAT AGAIN

Advertisement

“They’re not Siamese twins, President Trump and Prime Minister Starmer, but they’re both pragmatic people. They know where each is coming from, they want to find common ground,” Mandelson said. “I feel very optimistic. I feel very upbeat about the relationship that they’re both going to have.”

Mandelson is the first non-career diplomat to take up the job as chief U.K.-U.S. liaison in over half a century. That could prove beneficial for Mandelson when up against Trump, who has long strayed from engaging in traditional diplomacy.

“The president isn’t a career diplomat, and I’m not a career diplomat,” Mandelson said. “I came into politics to change things for the better for people, and so did he.

“We share a similar, if not identical, outlook on the world and motivation in politics. But I think above all, we believe in something which is really special between our countries,” he added, pointing to the enduring relationship between the U.S. and U.K.

Mandelson said his chief priorities will be to work with the U.S. on trade, technological developments and defense partnerships – particularly in the face of adversarial powers like China.

Advertisement

“I think that the United States and Britain, working together, can outsmart and keep ahead of the curve as far as China is concerned,” the incoming ambassador said. “[Trump] wants a dialogue with China, he wants to do deals with China. But he’s also not going to be naive about China. 

British PM Keir Starmer

Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer addresses members at the Labour Party in Liverpool, England, on Tuesday. (AP)

“We face a challenge together from China, and we’ve got to make sure that we are able to deter that challenge or that threat when they’re having aggressive intents toward us,” he added. 

Mandelson championed the trilateral alliance shared by the U.S., the U.K. and Australia, established with the intent of countering China’s aggression in the Indo-Pacific. 

“Security in the Euro-Atlantic area depends on making sure that China is kept at bay in its own region,” he said. “China has the right to prosper, to generate higher standards of living for its own people, but not at the expense of others.”

Advertisement

Mandelson argued that despite international apprehensions over certain security uncertainties under the Trump administration, the U.K. does not share in these concerns.

“There are so many threats and challenges the world is facing at the moment. It takes courage, somebody, sometimes, who’s prepared to be argumentative and, indeed, disruptive, not just take business as usual,” he detailed.

“Frankly, I think President Trump could become one of the most consequential American presidents I have known in my adult life,” Mandelson said. 

Continue Reading

World

Doomsday Clock is now 89 seconds to midnight, what does that mean?

Published

on

Doomsday Clock is now 89 seconds to midnight, what does that mean?

The Doomsday Clock is a symbolic timepiece showing how close we are to ‘destroying our world with dangerous technologies of our own making’.

For the first time in three years, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS) moved the Doomsday Clock forward by one second to 89 seconds before midnight, signalling a heightened risk of global catastrophe.

“It is the determination of the science and security board of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists that the world has not made sufficient progress on existential risks threatening all of humanity. We thus move the clock forward,” Daniel Holz, chair of the organisation’s science and security board, said during a livestreamed event on Tuesday.

Ongoing threats from nuclear weapons, climate change, bioweapons, infectious disease, and disruptive technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) have brought the clock to its latest time in 78 years.

Advertisement

What is the Doomsday Clock?

The Doomsday Clock is a symbolic timepiece showing how close we are to “destroying our world with dangerous technologies of our own making”, according to BAS, a Chicago-based nonprofit organisation that controls the clock.

It describes it as “many things all at once: It’s a metaphor, it’s a logo, it’s a brand, and it’s one of the most recognisable symbols in the past 100 years.”

The closer it moves to midnight, the closer humanity is to the end of the world.

Apocalyptic threats could arise from political tensions, weapons, technology, climate change or pandemics.

How is the clock set?

The hands of the clock are moved closer to or farther away from midnight based on the scientists’ reading of existential threats at a particular time.

Advertisement

BAS updates the time annually. A board of scientists and other experts in nuclear technology and climate science, including 10 Nobel laureates, discuss world events and determine where to place the hands of the clock each year.

“The Bulletin is a bit like a doctor making a diagnosis,” the BAS website says.

“We look at data, as physicians look at lab tests and x-rays, and also take harder-to-quantify factors into account, as physicians do when talking with patients and family members. We consider as many symptoms, measurements, and circumstances as we can. Then we come to a judgment that sums up what could happen if leaders and citizens don’t take action to treat the conditions,” it adds.

Has the clock ever turned back?

Yes, the most notable event was in 1991 when US President George HW Bush and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev signed the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) to reduce the number of their countries’ nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.

This brought the clock back by seven seconds. The furthest the clock has been from midnight was 17 minutes.

Advertisement
Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev and US President George Bush talk appear at a news conference in 1991
Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev and US President George HW Bush laugh as there was a slight mix-up with the simultaneous translations during their news conference in London, July 17, 1991 [Boris Yurchenko/AP Photo]

When was the Doomsday Clock created?

The clock was created in 1947 by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which was founded two years earlier by scientists Albert Einstein, J Robert Oppenheimer and Eugene Rabinowitch along with University of Chicago scholars.

During that time, the clock was set at seven minutes to midnight. But after the Soviet Union successfully tested its first atomic bomb in 1949, Rabinowitch, who was then the bulletin’s editor, moved the clock to three minutes to midnight.

According to the University of Chicago, until recently, the closest it had ever been set was at two minutes to midnight: in 1953 when the US and the Soviet Union tested thermonuclear weapons and in 2018 because of “a breakdown in the international order, of nuclear actors, as well as the continuing lack of action on climate change”.

The Doomsday Clock is placed in the BAS offices at the University of Chicago.

INTERACTIVE-nuclear_weapons

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending