Connect with us

World

Spain faces €8 billion in renewable legal claims over past solar boom

Published

on

Spain faces €8 billion in renewable legal claims over past solar boom

When work began on Andasol in 2008, it was the most important photo voltaic vitality plant on this planet and its black panels stretched over sufficient land to cowl 70 soccer pitches within the south of Spain close to Granada.

Fourteen years later, the 51-hectare plant which produces a complete of 495 GW-h of energy per 12 months, is embroiled in a multi-million-euro worldwide authorized battle between the Spanish authorities and a collection of traders.

However this is only one of 51 claims totalling €8 billion that Spain’s left-wing coalition authorities is combating in opposition to.

The coalition authorities has made championing renewable vitality a key coverage however faces claims from traders over an earlier inexperienced vitality growth that they’re owed tens of millions over state incentives that had been later withdrawn by Madrid.

The claims had been filed beneath the Power Treaty Constitution (ECT), a multilateral treaty signed by 53 international locations which has been in pressure since 1994. Traders within the vitality sector take pleasure in particular safety beneath the treaty.

Advertisement

A number of European international locations, together with Spain, have just lately introduced plans to withdraw from the ECT, as they are saying it threatens their local weather targets by permitting vitality firms to sue governments.

The treaty has a sundown clause meaning any nation that leaves will stay topic to litigation for 20 years.

Up to now, 28 of those claims have been resolved, 21 in favour of the traders and Madrid has been ordered to pay €1.2 billion in compensation for circumstances it has misplaced. Spain has not paid out any of those claims.

Spain has contested these awards and has requested worldwide arbitration organisations to annul them, claiming in some circumstances the tribunals had been partial.

In different circumstances, Madrid has mentioned if it paid the cash which tribunals mentioned it owed, it might be construed as state assist, which was forbidden by the European Fee.

Advertisement

Why is Spain dealing with authorized claims?

In 2007, Spain applied a number of regulatory measures with the aim of stimulating funding within the burgeoning renewable vitality sector.

Initially, the system was an enormous success, attracting curiosity from home traders and worldwide firms.

Nonetheless, after the growth, got here the bust.

After the 2008 monetary disaster, Spain was now not in a position to assure the preliminary incentives and between 2012-2014, the federal government retrospectively eliminated them, prompting authorized claims by the traders.

One in all these claims began in 2013, when Infrastructure Companies Luxembourg S.A.R.L and Energia Termosolar B.V, filed an arbitration declare in opposition to Spain with the Worldwide Centre for Settlement Funding Dispute (ICSID), alleging it breached its obligations beneath the Power Constitution Treaty as a result of it eliminated incentives.

Advertisement

The businesses claimed €196 million in damages. Spain denied the declare. One other investor concerned in the identical plant has additionally claimed damages.

Six years later, the tribunal dominated in favour of the businesses and awarded €101m.

Spain has filed an software to annul the award, saying it might be construed as state assist.

Attorneys for the traders mentioned they are going to pursue Spanish investments all over the world to make sure fee.

“It’s not simply distinctive however deeply unlucky that Spain, a outstanding member of the worldwide sovereign neighborhood, is selecting to not pay (this) award, regardless of a ultimate arbitration award in opposition to it, and in doing so is refusing to honour its worldwide ECT obligations,” Nick Cherryman, accomplice at Kobre & Kim, which acts for the 2 firms within the Andasol case, instructed Euronews.

Advertisement

“The state of affairs is much more extraordinary given the geopolitics on this planet and the expectation that sovereign (states) ought to respect worldwide legal guidelines and obligations and doubly ironic given the Spanish authorities’s avowed need to encourage funding in renewable vitality tasks.”

The Spanish authorities mentioned in 2013 it accepted a legislation which diminished the anticipated profitability from “quite a few” renewable installations.

Six years later, it granted these firms a 7.39% profitability till 2031, which diminished the variety of claims dramatically.

“Of the 51 claims, tribunals have made choices on 28 circumstances. One was annulled, the others are awaiting choices. Three different claims have been discontinued. The tribunal choices have diminished the quantities claimed considerably. In different circumstances, Spain is interesting to annul the claims,” a spokesman for the Setting Ministry mentioned.

A G20 state, Spain has been positioned second on this planet by way of international locations which default on money owed, after Venezuela, in keeping with a current report by Nicos Lavranos, an arbitration professional.

Advertisement

What does it imply for Spain’s renewable future?

Regardless of the authorized motion which Spain faces, a current report by the consultancy EY prompt it was among the many high ten international locations on this planet for funding within the renewable sector.

Spain’s current local weather change legislation mentioned that by 2050, the Spanish economic system should be carbon impartial and by 2030, there needs to be a 23% minimize in greenhouse gasoline emissions in comparison with 1990.

By 2030, at the very least 42% of all nationwide vitality should additionally come from renewable sources.

Lucia Barcena, a researcher from Transnational Institute, a global advocacy organisation, wrote a report along with her colleague Fabian Flues on the authorized battle known as From Photo voltaic Dream to Authorized Nightmare.

Advertisement

She mentioned regardless of the raft of litigation dealing with Spain, she believes this is not going to affect its modern-day push to develop into a renewable vitality powerhouse.

“It has been political and coverage modifications, not funding arbitration circumstances, which have been in a position to enhance the state of affairs for renewable traders in Spain,” she instructed Euronews.

She mentioned usually traders weren’t even conscious that the rights provided by funding treaties just like the Power Constitution Treaty result in a rise in funding and sometimes traders are unaware of treaties after they resolve to place cash into a rustic.

After the 2007 renewables growth, she mentioned smaller traders had discovered it exhausting to compete with bigger worldwide traders who might afford to take their circumstances to worldwide tribunals.

Spain’s Supreme Courtroom had dominated in opposition to these smaller firms, saying the federal government provision for these firms was ample.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Chrystia Freeland, Justin Trudeau’s ‘Minister of Everything,’ Enters Race to Replace Him

Published

on

Chrystia Freeland, Justin Trudeau’s ‘Minister of Everything,’ Enters Race to Replace Him

Chrystia Freeland, Canada’s former deputy prime minister, whose sudden resignation in December helped set the stage for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to step down, said on Friday that she was running to replace him.

She posted her announcement on X with a six-word sentence: “I’m running to fight for Canada.”

Ms. Freeland, 56, once a close ally of Mr. Trudeau who was often called his “minister of everything,” had served as deputy prime minister since 2019, and had long been viewed as a possible successor.

But the two had a bitter rift when Mr. Trudeau moved to demote her over a Zoom call in December, offering her a minister-without-portfolio role. Instead, she opted to resign and delivered a strong rebuke of Mr. Trudeau’s leadership as Canada prepares to deal with President-elect Donald J. Trump. Mr. Trump has threatened to apply a tariff on Canadian exports to the United States.

Her stinging departure destabilized Mr. Trudeau’s shaky grip on power. Three weeks later, on Jan. 6, he announced he would step down as Liberal Party leader and as prime minister once a new leader was in place.

Advertisement

Candidates for the leadership post will campaign ahead of a national vote among party members in March. The new Liberal Party leader will also become Prime Minister of Canada and lead the party in a general election expected to take place in the spring.

Ms. Freeland said she would officially launch her campaign in person on Sunday, which could take place in Toronto, the electoral district she represents in Parliament. She will face a stiff challenge persuading Canadians that she is the candidate best suited to take on the Conservative Party and its leader, Pierre Poilievre.

The Conservatives, who have a 25 percentage point lead over the Liberals in polls, have sought to portray Ms. Freeland as part of the problem given her once-close relationship with Mr. Trudeau and her key role in his governments since 2015, when he first became prime minister.

Mr. Trudeau’s popularity has nose dived in recent years as Canadians have become increasingly frustrated with persistently high cost-of-living on everything from housing to grocery bills.

Many Canadians have also started pushing back against the government’s immigration policy, which has resulted in 2.3 million people arriving in the country in the past two years. While the government said migrants were necessary to help fill gaps in low-skilled jobs, many Canadians say the new arrivals have contributed to rising housing costs and strains on the public health care system.

Advertisement

Ms. Freeland had accused Mr. Trudeau of engaging in political gimmickry after her ministry clashed with his office about a temporary sales-tax break during the end-of-year holidays.

The government estimated that the tax break, which covered items like restaurant bills and some toys and clothing, would cost about 1.6 billion Canadian dollars, or $1.1 billion, which Ms. Freeland said that Canada could “ill afford” at a time when Mr. Trump is raising the specter of tariffs.

“We need to take that threat extremely seriously,” Ms. Freeland said in her resignation letter. “That means keeping our fiscal powder dry today, so we have the reserves we may need for a coming tariff war.”

Ms. Freeland was born and raised in Alberta and is of Ukrainian ancestry. She has been a staunch supporter of Ukraine on the global stage, denouncing Russia’s invasion.

She attended Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar, and worked as a journalist and newsroom leader at a number of news organizations, including the Financial Times and Reuters, before joining the Liberal Party in 2013. She is married to a reporter on the Culture desk of The New York Times and has three children.

Advertisement

During Mr. Trump’s first term, Ms. Freeland steered Canada’s renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement with the United States and Mexico, portraying steely confidence during the tense talks with the odd moment of levity. (Ms. Freeland was photographed arriving in Washington in 2018 wearing a white T-shirt that read “Keep Calm and Negotiate NAFTA.”)

But she also angered Mr. Trump during the negotiations and his animosity has apparently not waned.

When Ms. Freeland resigned in December, Mr. Trump posted triumphantly: “Her behavior was totally toxic, and not at all conducive to making deals which are good for the very unhappy citizens of Canada. She will not be missed!!!”

Ms. Freeland, in an opinion piece published on Friday, hinted that Canada would retaliate in “the single largest trade blow the U.S. economy has ever endured.”

As finance minister, she spearheaded popular government programs to reduce the cost of day care for parents and to tackle childhood poverty.

Advertisement

Her announcement on Friday marks the second entry of a top contender in the Liberal Party leadership race. She will face off against Mark Carney, a former head of the central banks in Canada and England, who declared he was running on Thursday.

Mr. Carney is close friends with Ms. Freeland and is the godfather to one of her three children. He was being recruited by Mr. Trudeau’s team to take Ms. Freeland’s place in the government in December, but declined the job.

Continue Reading

World

Pakistani court sentences ex-PM Imran Khan and his wife to 14 and 7 years in prison in graft case

Published

on

Pakistani court sentences ex-PM Imran Khan and his wife to 14 and 7 years in prison in graft case

A Pakistani court on Friday sentenced the country’s already-imprisoned former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife to 14 and seven years in jail after finding them guilty of corruption, officials and his lawyer said.

It’s yet another blow for the former premier who has been behind the bars since 2023.

The couple are accused of accepting a gift of land from a real estate tycoon in exchange for laundered money when Khan was in power.

Prosecutors say the businessman, Malik Riaz, was then allowed by Khan to pay fines that were imposed on him in another case from the same laundered money of 190 million British pounds ($240 million) that was returned to Pakistan by British authorities in 2022 to deposit with the national exchequer.

6 DEAD AS PROTESTS ERUPT IN PAKISTAN OVER JAILED FORMER PRIME MINISTER IMRAN KHAN

Advertisement

Former Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan addresses the media in Lahore, Pakistan.  (AP Photo/K.M. Chaudary, File)

Khan has denied wrongdoing and insisted since his arrest in 2023 that all the charges against him are a plot by rivals to keep him from returning to office.

According to Khan’s legal team, Khan laughed and his wife, Bushra Bibi, smiled when judge Nasir Javed read the verdict.

Later, Khan and Bibi were taken into custody by prison officials after the announcement of the verdict, according to officials. She had earlier served a prison sentence in another graft case until she was freed on bail by a court in October. She recently led a rally to demand her husband’s release.

Later, a post from Khan’s account on the X platform urged his supporters not to panic over the verdict, under which the al-Qadir University built by his wife’s charity will also be taken over by authorities in the Punjab province.

Advertisement

“I will never accept this dictatorship and I will stay in the prison cell for as long as I have to in the struggle against this dictatorship, but I will not compromise on my principles and the struggle for the true freedom of the nation,” Khan wrote. Khan’s family has said such posts are shared with his consent.

Faisal Chaudhry, a defense lawyer, said the court verdict could be challenged in the superior courts.

Shortly after the announcement of the verdict, lawmakers from Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, or PTI, party rallied outside the parliament in the capital, Islamabad, saying the former premier had been wrongly punished.

INDIA STEPS UP DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH THE TALIBAN AS RIVAL PAKISTAN LOSES INFLUENCE IN AFGHANISTAN

Security standing guard in front of a vehicle.

Guards protecting a vehicle outside of a compound in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. (AP Photo/W.K. Yousufzai)

“This is a bogus case, and we will approach an appeals court against this decision,” said Omar Ayub Khan, a senior party leader who is not related to the former premier.

Advertisement

Imran Khan was ousted in a no-confidence vote in parliament in April 2022, had previously been convicted on charges of corruption, revealing official secrets and violating marriage laws in three separate verdicts and sentenced to 10, 14 and seven years respectively. Under Pakistani law, he is to serve the terms concurrently — meaning, the length of the longest of the sentences.

Some of Khan’s supporters were also present outside the Adiala prison in the city of Rawalpindi, and they chanted slogans against the government, demanding the release of their leader.

On Thursday, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar told reporters in Islamabad that there was “irrefutable evidence” against Khan and his wife in the “mega corruption scandal.” Tarar said that Khan even did not tell his own Cabinet members about the money that was returned to Pakistan by Britain.

Tarar also claimed that Khan built a new sprawling house in the eastern city of Lahore after giving benefits to the business tycoon, and that he was unable to prove that from where he got the money from to build it.

The latest development came a day after Khan’s PTI party held a crucial round of talks with representatives of the government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to demand the release of all political detainees, including Khan and other party leaders.

Advertisement

Sharif became prime minister following the February 2024 election, which PTI claims was rigged.

Continue Reading

World

Commission claims slashing of foreign offices still under negotiation

Published

on

Commission claims slashing of foreign offices still under negotiation

The European Commission said that ‘reflections are ongoing’ over the downsizing of the international hubs under the department for international partnerships.

ADVERTISEMENT

The European Commission said that ‘reflections are ongoing’ over the downsizing of the international hubs under the department for international partnerships.

Plans to slash EU international partnerships from more than four in five hubs worldwide  revealed today by Euronews remain under negotiation, a Commission spokesperson said today.

Euronews reported that Directorate-General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) presence in 100 delegations worldwide is set for reduction to 18 hubs on the basis of an internal planning document seen by this news service.

“Reflections are ongoing within the Commission and no decision has been taken [on the issue],” European Commission spokesperson for Foreign Affairs Anitta Hipper said when asked for details of the savings and staff moves that the plans entailed, declining to comment further on the document.

Hipper insisted that the EU presence on the ground in foreign offices would be maintained, and said that work is ongoing to see how effectively delegations can deliver on all EU policies, taking into account “budget realities and political priorities”.

Advertisement

DG INTPA is planning slashing more than four in five of its hubs worldwide – reducing from around 100 delegations to 18 hubs – according to a document seen by Euronews. 

The DG will maintain 18 hubs in Africa, Asia and Latin American/Caribbean, according to the document, in strategic areas for the institution. You can see in this map where these hub offices will be located in detail:

“It is essential to move to portfolios that are more strategic and less fragmented and an optimised resource allocation across multiple countries,” the document said.

“The current INTPA operating model is based on the de-concentration process of 25 years ago, whereby INTPA staff are distributed across ‘cooperation sections’ within 100 Delegation worldwide,” the document said, adding: “This model no longer meets the needs for increased strategic focus and operation agility.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending