Connect with us

World

How does the UK’s Erasmus replacement work and has it been a success?

Published

on

How does the UK’s Erasmus replacement work and has it been a success?

The UK’s post-Brexit substitute for Erasmus+ promised the world to British college students, fairly actually.

Known as the Turing Scheme, it was imagined to open up alternatives throughout the globe, far past Europe, with the central purpose of bettering social mobility.

So, a yr because it started, how is the scheme performing and the way does it evaluate to the Erasmus+ pupil trade programme it changed?

What’s the Turing Scheme?

The UK authorities calls the Turing Scheme “a worldwide mobility programme” for college kids at a wide range of establishments – universities, faculties and schools.

It was launched in March 2021 to interchange Erasmus+ and the primary Turing college students went overseas in September final yr. 

Advertisement

London has assured funding for the scheme till 2025.

How does Erasmus work?

Erasmus, the EU’s flagship programme, has facilitated and funded college and college exchanges, in addition to work placements since 1987. 

The newest model is known as Erasmus+, which was launched in 2014 and encapsulates all of the EU’s training, coaching, youth and sports activities programmes. 

The reciprocal nature of Erasmus+ meant that price variations between universities collaborating have been ignored, which made the prospect of finding out within the UK, the place charges are excessive, “enticing” for overseas college students, in response to Professor Seán Hand, the College of Warwick’s Professional Vice Chancellor for Europe.

How is the Turing Scheme completely different from Erasmus?

Not like Erasmus+, the Turing Scheme shouldn’t be set as much as create reciprocal preparations. 

Advertisement

Which means that, in impact, European college students are unable to return to the UK for a examine placement except the swap is organized by particular person universities exterior of the scheme. 

Prof Hand predicts that the variety of European college students coming to the UK will fall over time, given they’ll now be anticipated to pay a lot larger charges than earlier than.

For British college students, there are additionally a number of notable variations between Turing and its European predecessor. 

Firstly, not like Erasmus+, which was principally centred round Europe, Turing affords funding to college students to go additional afield. 

Prof Hand stated Turing has been marketed as a “worldwide scheme” and that “for a lot of college students, this greater map will be enticing, and america, Canada, Hong Kong, and so forth have been widespread early locations”.

Advertisement

Secondly, the UK Authorities promised Turing would “**enhance social mobility**, focusing on college students from deprived backgrounds and areas”. 

Prof Hand explains that “the assertion was made that Erasmus+ mirrored the non-discretionary social and financial habits of middle-class college students and that Turing would take this into consideration with a top-up amount of cash, a shorter period, and a quota for widening entry locations”. 

So, how a lot cash do Turing college students obtain in comparison with Erasmus+?

That depends upon the place you’re going and for the way lengthy. Places are divided based mostly on the price of residing, into excessive, medium and low-cost classes. 

So, if you happen to journey to a chosen “high-cost” place, similar to Australia, Canada or Switzerland, you’ll obtain extra money than for a “medium-cost” place, similar to France or Sweden.

In concrete phrases, a pupil going to a high-cost nation for between 4 and eight weeks will obtain £136 (€157) per week, or£380 (€439) per thirty days for greater than eight weeks. Beneath Erasmus, Sweden and Scandinavian international locations have been positioned within the “high-cost” class.

Advertisement

There’s additionally a top-up accessible for individuals from deprived backgrounds. A pupil from a deprived background going to a high-cost nation for between 4 and eight weeks will obtain £163.50 (€189.10) per week, or £490 (€566) per thirty days in the event that they have been to be based mostly there for greater than eight weeks. 

Universities also can apply for further assist with further prices, similar to visas and passports, nonetheless, there are restrictions upon which establishments will obtain this further funding, so not each pupil classed as “deprived” will have the ability to entry this assist.

Nevertheless, not like Erasmus+, which units out budgets for six or seven years at a time, Turing members should apply for funding on an annual foundation, which means that the variety of college students an establishment can ship overseas every year will fluctuate – that is inflicting “uncertainty” and in some instances “disappointment” for college kids and workers, in response to Prof Hand, who’re unable to plan quite a lot of months forward. 

How’s the method working for universities?

The College of Warwick solely discovered about their Turing funding in mid-August – simply weeks earlier than their college students are supposed to move overseas, in response to Prof Hand.

He stated Warwick obtained its “headline figures”, the whole quantity they’d obtain, in mid-July.

Advertisement

The Division for Training refutes this and says “each profitable college had its grant funding confirmed in June”.

Prof Hand says that they are now going by the method, like different related establishments, to find out learn how to distribute the funds, however the last-minute nature of this data is inflicting a number of uncertainty for college kids. 

For college students from deprived backgrounds, this sluggish timeline is more likely to influence whether or not they’ll have the ability to take up placements, given the prolonged visa course of which requires cash and proof of lodging within the receiving nation upfront.

Prof Hand stated that “the primary years of any new scheme are when it creates its personal new norms” however that the annual nature of making use of for funding has produced extra work and uncertainty in comparison with Erasmus+, a scheme the federal government determined to go away, regardless of being “established, appreciated, supported and productive”. 

How is Turing working for college kids?

On the bottom, some college students are reporting that they nonetheless have no idea in the event that they’ll obtain Turing funding, or how a lot, regardless of having already needed to apply for visas and prepare flights for placements starting this month — and this uncertainty is placing some plans in jeopardy. 

Advertisement

Victoria Ruck, a contemporary languages and cultures pupil on the College of Durham, is travelling to Spain for an internship in the beginning of September, but has nonetheless not obtained affirmation of funding, which mixed with visa paperwork is inflicting “various stress”.

Ruck plans to check in Italy after her internship, due to this fact determined to not apply for a Spanish visa to chop down on prices, which means she is restricted to simply 90 days in Spain.

Not like earlier than Brexit, college students with a British passport should apply for a long-term visa to stay in a Schengen state for greater than 90 days in a 180-day interval, an often-costly course of requiring proof of financial solvency, which many college students shouldn’t have.

She stated: “There are such a lot of stuff you don’t contemplate — the flights, connections, the price of visas, and I really feel just like the Turing funding is an additional little bit of assist.

“From my perspective, it’s solely being supplied to individuals from working-class backgrounds, which is nice as a result of we want it essentially the most, but in addition, everybody’s background is completely different, and never everybody goes to have dad and mom that can assist them out with funds.”

Advertisement

So, one yr on, how is the Turing Scheme doing?

The UK authorities says an estimated 38,000 college students are set to go overseas, of whom round 20,000 are deprived college students from faculties, schools and universities. 

In comparison with the 18,300 Erasmus+ placements for British college students in 2018-19, Turing is projected to allow extra college students to go overseas. 

However Prof Hand stated the size of placements can fluctuate dramatically from two weeks to 12 months, with many college students doing shorter placements.

It’s tough, due to this fact, to check these provisional Turing outcomes to Erasmus+, which was constructed primarily to go well with an educational time period or yr.

Prof Hand additionally worries that the extra prices of finding out in Europe that didn’t exist earlier than Brexit will not be totally addressed by the scheme. They embrace visa appointments and prices, the necessity to reveal you find the money for to stay within the nation – generally requiring proof of hundreds of euros in a checking account –,  and the actual fact entitlement to free healthcare has modified.

Advertisement

Whereas the federal government says there may be funding accessible for this, in actuality not all functions for assist will likely be authorized, because of the tight restrictions on which establishments can apply, which means some college students who can not afford visa prices will likely be left dissatisfied, stated Prof Hand.

“Such actual points should work in opposition to the final purpose of widening entry,” he added.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

South Africa's ANC support around 42% days before election, poll finds

Published

on

South Africa's ANC support around 42% days before election, poll finds
Support for South Africa’s governing African National Congress (ANC) has settled around 42% in the days leading up to Wednesday’s election, an opinion poll showed, suggesting that an increase in support seen earlier this month has fizzled out.
Continue Reading

World

Operating company of Fukushima to use robot to remove melted nuclear fuel from destroyed reactor

Published

on

Operating company of Fukushima to use robot to remove melted nuclear fuel from destroyed reactor
  • A company demonstrated a remote-controlled robot for retrieving melted fuel debris at Japan’s destroyed Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
  • The plan involves deploying an extendable pipe robot into the reactor to begin debris removal by October.
  • Approximately 880 tons of highly radioactive melted nuclear fuel remain in the three damaged reactors.

The operator of Japan’s destroyed Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant demonstrated Tuesday how a remote-controlled robot would retrieve tiny bits of melted fuel debris from one of three damaged reactors later this year for the first time since the 2011 meltdown.

Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings plans to deploy a “telesco-style” extendable pipe robot into Fukushima Daiichi No. 2 reactor to test the removal of debris from its primary containment vessel by October.

That work is more than two years behind schedule. The removal of melted fuel was supposed to begin in late 2021 but has been plagued with delays, underscoring the difficulty of recovering from the magnitude 9.0 quake and tsunami in 2011.

DRONE AIMS TO EXAMINE JAPAN’S DAMAGED FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR REACTOR FOR THE FIRST TIME

During the demonstration at the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries’ shipyard in Kobe, western Japan, where the robot has been developed, a device equipped with tongs slowly descended from the telescopic pipe to a heap of gravel and picked up a granule.

Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, also known as TEPCO, the operator of Japan’s wrecked Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, reveals a robot to be used to retrieve debris at the power plant in Kobe, western Japan, on May 28, 2024. (Kyodo News via AP)

Advertisement

TEPCO plans to remove less than 1 ounce of debris in the test at the Fukushima plant.

“We believe the upcoming test removal of fuel debris from Unit 2 is an extremely important step to steadily carry out future decommissioning work,” said Yusuke Nakagawa, a TEPCO group manager for the fuel debris retrieval program. “It is important to proceed with the test removal safely and steadily.”

About 880 tons of highly radioactive melted nuclear fuel remain inside the three damaged reactors. Critics say the 30- to 40-year cleanup target set by the government and TEPCO for Fukushima Daiichi is overly optimistic. The damage in each reactor is different, and plans must accommodate their conditions.

Better understanding the melted fuel debris from inside the reactors is key to their decommissioning. TEPCO deployed four mini drones into the No. 1 reactor’s primary containment vessel earlier this year to capture images from the areas where robots had not reached.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

What happened when Israel attacked Rafah?

Published

on

What happened when Israel attacked Rafah?

Thirteen out of 21 people killed by Israel in an air strike on the so-called “safe area” of al-Mawasi were civilian women and girls, Al Jazeera’s Hind Khoudary reported on Tuesday.

This was the second attack since Sunday, with a horrifying strike on Sunday night setting displaced people’s shelters ablaze not too far from Tuesday’s strike.

The world had watched, aghast, on Monday as displaced Palestinians were forced to dig through smouldering remains with their bare hands – looking for bodies, or injured people, or in some cases, a few scraps of food they could salvage to keep their families going a bit longer.

As reports further clarify what happened on Tuesday, here are the details of Sunday’s attack:

When and where was this attack?

The attack happened at night on May 26.

Advertisement

It was inflicted on an encampment of makeshift shelters just north of Rafah city, in an area called Tal as-Sultan

It came after United States President Joe Biden said a “major offensive” by Israel on Rafah would be a red line.

Palestinians search through burning debris after an Israeli strike on a displacement camp in Rafah on May 27, 2024 [Mohammed Salem/Reuters]

What happened in the attack?

Many shelters burst into flames with their occupants still inside.

The Gaza Government Media Office said Israel dropped seven 900kg (2,000-pound) bombs as well as missiles on the displacement camp.

The Israeli army said it targeted Rafah with “precision munitions”, and that a nearby fuel tank led to the subsequent fire.

Advertisement

Horrific videos emerged of the aftermath – the most notable was of a man holding up the corpse of a young child without a head.

Al Jazeera’s Sanad Verification Agency was able to obtain images of fragments believed to be of the weaponry used in this attack. The photos the agency obtained show the tail of a GBU-39/B small-diameter bomb, which is made by Boeing. The GBU-39/B includes a jet engine taken from the M26 unguided missile.

Who were the people killed?

Thousands of civilians had been sheltering in the Tal as-Sultan area, seeking some minimal protection from the continuous Israeli attacks across Gaza.

The Israeli government had not issued any orders to evacuate the area before it attacked.

Palestinians flee the area of Tal al-Sultan in Rafah
Palestinians flee Tal as-Sultan following Israeli strikes on May 28, 2024 [Eyad Baba/AFP]

How many people died?

Israel killed at least 45 people in the offensive.

The total number of injured people is hard to determine, as the hospital where casualties were taken has closed after a subsequent Israeli drone attack on its entrance that killed two members of staff.

Advertisement

How did they die?

Some people died from the impact of the bomb.

Some people “reportedly burned to death”, according to Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA).

Smoke rises following Israeli strikes
Smoke rises after Israeli strikes in Rafah, May 28, 2024 [Hatem Khaled/Reuters]

What were they doing when they died?

Accounts from Rafah say that many of the dead were preparing to go to sleep when the attack occurred.

Why is Israel doing this?

Initially, the Israeli army claimed it had struck “a Hamas compound in Rafah in which significant Hamas terrorists were operating”.

It added it was “aware of reports indicating that as a result of the strike and fire that was ignited several civilians in the area were harmed”.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has since said the attack was “a tragic mistake.”

Advertisement

“Despite our best effort not to harm those not involved, unfortunately a tragic error happened last night. We are investigating the case,” Netanyahu said.

The attack came two days after the ICJ ordered Israel to halt its offensive on Rafah.

Palestinians prepare to flee
Palestinians prepare to flee Tal as-Sultan after Israeli strikes on May 28, 2024 [Eyad Baba/AFP]

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is set to convene an emergency meeting over the attack on Rafah.

To date, the United States has vetoed every UNSC proposal aimed at holding Israel accountable.

Continue Reading

Trending