Connect with us

World

How close are the Western Balkans to joining the European Union?

Published

on

How close are the Western Balkans to joining the European Union?

After the European Union took simply weeks to determine on candidate standing for Ukraine and Moldova, Western Balkan nations – a few of which began their accession path greater than a decade in the past – felt the bloc owed them an indication.

Half of them — Albania, North Macedonia and Serbia — threatened to boycott a summit with EU leaders simply two days earlier than it was meant to happen. 

On the eleventh hour, Bulgaria’s opposition chief introduced that his occasion would raise its veto on North Macedonia accession based mostly on a compromise proposal introduced ahead by the French presidency of the Council.

However this can be the one signal the Western Balkans obtain this week with an EU diplomat stressing on Wednesday that there have been “no conclusions foreseen nor very concrete selections” to anticipate from EU heads of state on Western Balkan enlargement throughout their Council summit on Thursday and Friday. 

That implies that Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, and Kosovo will, as soon as extra, be saved ready.

Advertisement

EU leaders are, nonetheless, broadly anticipated to grant Ukraine and Moldova candidate standing, days after the Fee really useful such a step and weeks after they crammed out all the mandatory paperwork. 

How lengthy have they been making an attempt to get into the EU?

In distinction, Bosnia and Herzegovina utilized to affix the bloc in 2016 and has but to obtain candidate standing regardless of the Fee endorsing the transfer in 2019.

Albania utilized in 2009, acquired candidate standing in 2014 and obtained an all-clear from the Fee to begin negotiations in 2018. However they haven’t but began.

Serbia additionally utilized in 2009, obtained candidate standing in 2012 and began negotiations in 2014. Montenegro has an identical trajectory. It utilized in 2008, secured candidate standing in 2010 and accession negotiations began in the summertime of 2012. 

However the longest-standing bid is North Macedonia’s. The nation of two million inhabitants first utilized in 2005 with the Fee recommending that negotiations begin in 2009. They haven’t but began. 

Advertisement

Kosovo, in the meantime, is a possible candidate however regardless of first signalling it needs to affix the bloc again in 2008, it’s nowhere nearer. That is as a result of its independence just isn’t recognised internationally, and particularly not by Serbia. As a substitute, the EU acknowledged its European perspective, one other symbolic gesture that makes word of its aspiration to change into a member state. 

Why does it take so lengthy?

The Fee emphasised earlier this week because it endorsed granting candidate standing to Ukraine and Moldova that the entire accession course of is “merit-based” and “dynamic”.

Neither Ukraine nor Moldova might be entitled to extra EU funds and it doesn’t suggest that negotiations will begin anytime quickly. 

As a substitute, the Fee and EU leaders will demand they each make progress on reforms to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, media and civil society in addition to impartial establishments that battle towards corruption and cronyism. Solely once they have made vital progress on these circumstances, will precise negotiations be allowed to proceed.

And even after negotiations begin, the entire course of can falter if reform progress does not proceed at tempo, based on the Fee. 

Advertisement

This largely explains the delay for Serbia “as it isn’t in President Vucic’s pursuits to enact reforms that EU membership requires, as these would undermine his patronage system and his maintain on energy,” Luigi Scazzieri, senior analysis fellow on the Centre for European Reform, instructed Euronews. 

EU candidate nations are additionally anticipated to align themselves with the bloc’s insurance policies and programmes and “there’s a severe lack of alignment” from Serbia, an EU diplomat stated. For example, Serbia has condemned Russia’s aggression on Ukraine however has to this point refused to implement any sanctions towards Moscow, a step Brussels historically expects from its companions.

Bosnia and Herzegovina can also be in that class, based on one other EU official who affirmed on Wednesday that “for 2 years we have now seen no reform and no motion from Bosnia” on the 14 priorities the EU outlined it wanted to work on.

Fee vs Council

But, for all of its claims that reforms imply progress, this has not been the case for North Macedonia and Albania.

“The 2 nations have performed every little thing that the EU has requested them to do, so the EU going again on its phrase and refusing to open negotiations because it stated it will undermines its credibility,” Scazzieri defined.

Advertisement

Their bid was first blocked by France and the Netherlands — which argued the enlargement course of wanted to be improved earlier than new nations had been introduced into the fold — after which by Greece over a dispute over the nation’s title which led to a historic deal between the 2 nations in the summertime of 2018. Now it is being blocked by Bulgaria.

Sofia needs formal recognition that North Macedonia’s tradition and language are closely influenced by Bulgaria in addition to stronger protections for the nation’s Bulgarian minority. 

Albania, whose bid is coupled with North Macedonia’s, has been collateral harm. 

However now that the chief of Bulgaria’s opposition, Boyko Borissov, has stated he’s in favour of a French proposal to unblock the scenario, which might entail North Macedonia including an modification to its structure to acknowledge its sturdy historic and cultural hyperlinks with Bulgaria in trade for Sofia backing the negotiation framework, motion might quickly occur.

It’s depending on North Macedonian lawmakers backing it by a two-thirds majority as required for constitutional adjustments.

Advertisement

Will the warfare on Europe’s doorstep speed up enlargement?

The delays for Albania and North Macedonia have had a “unfavourable influence on the credibility of the EU,” the Fee underlined in its newest annual enlargement report. 

For Dimitar Bechev, a visiting scholar at Carnegie Europe, “there are two colleges of thought” on the warfare’s influence on enlargement.

“One is saying that now the EU is unfair as a result of it is paying a lot consideration to Ukraine and letting the Western Balkans slip. But in addition there is a college of thought which works one thing like: there’s momentum behind enlargement, let’s get on the bandwagon and get the Western Balkans on the radar. The general is that there is expectation that the EU must be extra forthcoming,” he instructed Euronews. 

This might additionally open the door to motion for Bosnia and Herzegovina regardless of the dearth of total progress. 

“If Ukraine and Moldova are given candidate standing, the case for granting Bosnia candidate standing as effectively could be stronger, on condition that many EU leaders have stated Ukraine and Georgia are nonetheless a good distance from membership,” Scazzieri on the Centre for European Reform identified. 

Advertisement

“Bosnia’s establishments are nonetheless very dysfunctional. If Bosnia does change into a candidate, it can face a really uphill path,” he stated. 

For Serbia nonetheless, the occasions in Ukraine don’t change a lot, and progress is unlikely “as long as Kosovo is there,” Bechev stated. 

“If there was no sovereignty dispute, you might see Serbia making strides and mainly as a result of it has the executive capability and the scale and every little thing and a few mates within the EU. They might have been simply the subsequent nation to accede to the EU however Kosovo is such an obstacle,” he went on.

Bechev now predicts that Montenegro is the most definitely to affix the EU first.

“It is essentially the most superior within the negotiations, it has no open political points with neighbours, it is very small and it is digestible,” he stated, including that every one that wanted his political will on either side and the nation of 620,000 may very well be a member by the top of the last decade. 

Advertisement

Aware of the concept taking root within the Western Balkans that irrespective of how a lot they reform, their membership bids could not progress accordingly, the EU is now trying right into a European Political Neighborhood to which third nations might dock themselves to and have nearer ties with the bloc.

French President Emmanuel Macron first floated the concept throughout a convention in early Might however has publicly remained gentle on the main points. He has nonetheless reiterated a number of occasions that this might not be a comfort prize and that nations may very well be a part of the neighborhood as they proceed their accession journey.

EU leaders are anticipated to debate the concept throughout their summit on Thursday and an EU diplomat from Western Europe stated their nation may be very open to such an concept, underlining nonetheless that member states must provide you with standards for who might be a part of it. These might embrace, they stated, shared democratic values with the EU which might subsequently exclude counties resembling Belarus beneath its present regime.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Democrats' Post-Harris Election Message: It Could Have Been Worse

Published

on

Democrats' Post-Harris Election Message: It Could Have Been Worse
By Andrea Shalal and Jeff Mason WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Roughly a month after election losses that left Republicans in charge of the White House and both houses of Congress, and saw once-core working class, Latino and women voters slip away, some Democratic officials are trying to explain what …
Continue Reading

World

Israel warns it will go after Lebanon directly if cease-fire with Hezbollah collapses

Published

on

Israel warns it will go after Lebanon directly if cease-fire with Hezbollah collapses

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Israel issued a direct warning to Lebanon on Tuesday and said it will no longer distinguish between Hezbollah and the country should the tenuous cease-fire with the terrorist group collapse.

“There will no longer be an exemption for the state of Lebanon,” Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said, according to the Times of Israel, adding that Jerusalem will “show maximum response and zero tolerance.”

Advertisement

“[Beirut must] authorize the Lebanese army to enforce their part, to keep Hezbollah away beyond the Litani [River] and to dismantle all the infrastructure,” Katz continued in reference to one of the 13-point agreements in the Wednesday cease-fire that said only the Lebanese army will operate in the area south of the landmark river.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz looks on amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, in Jerusalem on Nov. 7, 2024. (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun)

IDF SOLDIERS ACCUSE UN PEACEKEEPERS OF ENABLING HEZBOLLAH TERRORISTS AMID INCREASING CEASE-FIRE VIOLATIONS

“If they don’t do it and this whole agreement collapses, then the reality will be very clear. First of all, if we return to war we will act strongly, we will go deeper and the most important thing they need to know, that there will be no longer be an exemption for the state of Lebanon,” he added.

“Until now we have distinguished between the state of Lebanon and Hezbollah, and between Beirut as a whole and Dahiyeh – which we have struck very hard – this will no longer be,” Katz warned in reference to the Beirut suburb and previous Hezbollah stronghold.

Advertisement

The defense minister’s comments come after Israel fired a wave of strikes Monday evening that, according to The Associated Press, killed 11 people after Hezbollah launched two mortars at the Mount Dov area in the northern Golan Heights a contested area that is still internationally recognized as part of Syria, though which Israel has occupied since 1967. 

The Trump administration recognized Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights in 2019. The Biden administration continued with that policy, reaffirming it again in the summer following a deadly Hezbollah rocket attack on the town of Majdal Shams that killed 12 children.

Lebanon

Members of Imam al-Mahdi scouts clean rubble and debris from damaged buildings in Beirut’s southern suburbs after the cease-fire between Israel and Hezbollah, in Lebanon on Dec. 2, 2024. (REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir)

AMERICAN-ISRAELI IDF PLATOON COMMANDER KILLED IN BATTLE, BODY HELD IN GAZA, IDF SAYS

The terrorist group said it levied the first strike since the cease-fire was signed less than a week ago in response to Israel’s “repeated violations” involving Lebanese airspace, reported the Times of Israel. 

The U.S. and France – which helped broker the truce – on Sunday and Monday also reportedly warned Israel it was violating the new agreement, including by conducting surveillance drone flights over Beirut.

Advertisement

However, despite the tit-for-tat exchange that has drawn into question the strength of the new cease-fire agreement, White House National Security Council communications adviser John Kirby told reporters on Monday the “sporadic” air strikes were to be “expected.”

“You’re talking about a war that’s been raging now for actually many years,” he said.  “If you think about it, certainly since Oct. 7, we went from hundreds of rocket attacks to basically zero by Hezbollah and dozens of airstrikes by Israel to one or two per day.” 

Hezbollah members mourning

Mourners raise their hands and chant slogans during the funeral procession of Hezbollah fighters who were killed in Friday’s Israeli strike, in the southern suburb of Beirut on Saturday, Sept. 21, 2024. (AP)

“There’s been a dramatic reduction in the violence,” Kirby added.

Kirby said that in anticipation of similar strikes like those exchanged on Monday, there are “mechanisms” in place that are working to stop the attacks.

Advertisement

“That mechanism is in full force, and is working,” he added without going into additional detail.

Continue Reading

World

Georgia protests: What’s behind them and what’s next?

Published

on

Georgia protests: What’s behind them and what’s next?

Tens of thousands of demonstrators have clashed with riot police in Georgia over the past five nights in protests against the governing Georgian Dream party’s decision to suspend talks aimed at joining the European Union until 2028. 

Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze, chairman of the populist Dream Party, announced the decision after the European Parliament rejected the results of Georgia’s October 26 parliamentary elections. He accused the European Parliament and “some European leaders” of “blackmail”.

Why are people protesting in the country of 3.7 million people in the South Caucasus? And what could happen next?

Who is protesting in Georgia and why?

Protests erupted on Thursday after Kobakhidze announced that Georgia would suspend talks on accession to the EU for four years.

This announcement came just hours after the European Parliament adopted a nonbinding resolution rejecting Georgia’s parliamentary election results due to “significant irregularities”. The resolution called for new elections to be held within a year under international supervision and called for sanctions on Georgian leaders, including Kobakhidze.

Advertisement

On Sunday, Kobakhidze told reporters parliamentary elections would not be reheld, further intensifying protests. But it is not just voters who have taken to the streets.

“This movement now extends beyond public demonstrations,” Tinatin Akhvlediani, a research fellow in the EU Foreign Policy Unit at the Brussels-based think tank Centre for European Policy Studies, told Al Jazeera.

“Civil servants, including some from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, members of the diplomatic corps and hundreds within the education system have joined the resistance. This signals that Georgians are united in their determination not to abandon their European choice.”

Georgia applied to be part of the EU in March 2022 and became a candidate for EU membership in December 2023. The goal of joining the EU has been enshrined in Georgia’s Constitution since 2017.

According to a poll by the Washington-based nongovernmental organisation National Democratic Institute, which is funded by Western governments and US government organisations, almost 80 percent of people in Georgia said they want their country to become an EU member.

Advertisement

This is not the first time that public discontent with the Dream party has resulted in protests this year.

In May, parliament passed the Dream Party’s “foreign agents bill” with 84 votes among the 150 MPs.

The law requires nongovernmental and media organisations that receive more than 20 percent of their funding from outside Georgia to register as bodies “pursuing the interests of a foreign power”. This sparked rioting in Tbilisi with critics arguing that the law would curb media freedom and jeopardise Georgia’s bid to join the EU. President Salome Zourabichvili, who is independent and not affiliated with any political party, called the law an “exact duplicate” of a bill passed in Russia in an interview with CNN.

Many agreed with her. Akhvlediani said: “That legislation, seen as Kremlin-inspired, was widely perceived as an attack on civil society, independent media and free speech. It exemplifies the ruling Georgian Dream party’s pattern of democratic backsliding, state capture, rigging elections and attempts to undermine Georgia’s European aspirations.”

Salome Zourabichvili, the independent president of Georgia, has been a vocal critic of Georgian Dream’s policies and legislation [File: Foto Olimpik/NurPhoto via Getty Images]

How have Georgia’s authorities responded to the protests?

Kobakhidze

The prime minister has been critical, describing the demonstrations as violent and alleging that they are a product of foreign interference.

Advertisement

“The protests in Tbilisi are not peaceful,” he said during a news conference on Monday.

“We may be dealing with foreign ‘trainers’ organising these violent groups, but this is a matter of investigation,” he added. He also claimed some of the protesters are foreign nationals.

He further claimed that the opposition is trying to create a situation similar to Ukraine’s pro-Europe demonstrations in 2014 in Maidan square. That uprising was followed by Russia’s annexation of Crimea. The largest opposition group in Georgia is the Coalition for Change, which comprises pro-Western liberal parties.

However, at Monday’s news conference, Kobakhidze reaffirmed the government’s commitment to eventually joining the EU.

“We pledge to make every effort for Georgia’s full membership in the EU by 2030,” he said.

Advertisement
Irakli Kobakhidze
Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze, centre, leaves a voting station after casting his vote in parliamentary elections on October 26, 2024, in Tbilisi [Diego Fedele/Getty Images]

Georgian riot police

In footage of the protests, demonstrators can be seen waving large EU flags while facing off against a squad of riot police. The police have used tear gas and water cannon in attempts to disperse the protesters. Videos also show protesters hitting back at the riot police with fireworks.

Prominent opposition leader Zurab Japaridze, a member of the opposition party Girchi (“More Freedom”), was among those arrested.

The Georgia chapter of the Germany-based anticorruption watchdog Transparency International issued a news release saying the protesters detained on Monday were physically assaulted by law enforcement officers.

“Officers were allegedly overheard coordinating to break detainees’ arms or legs, with instructions from their superiors to target the liver and head,” the news release said.

“Riot police reportedly stripped detainees of their shoes, forcing many to walk barefoot to medical facilities. Mobile phones were confiscated, and detainees were coerced into unlocking them.”

Zourabichvili

Zourabichvili, the pro-EU president, was elected for a six-year term in 2018. Her presidency is due to end this month. She has reacted to the government’s introduction of the “foreign agents” law and its crackdown on protesters by refusing to step down.

Advertisement

Zourabichvili is the last president to be elected in Georgia by popular vote.

In 2017, Georgia approved constitutional changes abolishing the direct election of the president. The next president will be elected for a five-year term by a 300-seat electoral college, which includes the members of parliament and is dominated by the Dream party.

The vote for the new president is set to take place on December 14. “On December 29, she will have to leave her residence and surrender this building to a legitimately elected president,” Kobakhidze said on Sunday.

Georgian Dream has picked far-right former football international Mikheil Kavelashvili as its candidate for the largely ceremonial post.

But the current president has refused to step down over doubts about the legitimacy of the October elections. “There is no legitimate parliament. Therefore, an illegitimate parliament cannot elect a new president,” she said in a video on Saturday.

Advertisement

How have EU, Western countries reacted?

The EU released a statement on Sunday saying the union “regrets Kobakhidze’s statement on Georgian Dream’s decision not to pursue the opening of EU accession negotiations and rejecting EU financial support until 2028”.

It added that the decision marks a shift from previous Georgian governments’ enthusiasm for joining the EU. The EU statement read: “The Georgian authorities’ course of actions and democratic backsliding led to the de facto halt of the accession process already in June this year.”

After condemning police violence against pro-Europe protesters, the statement concluded: “The EU stands with the Georgian people and their choice for a European future. The door to the EU remains open and the return of Georgia to the European values and the EU accession path is in the hands of the Georgian leadership.”

The US Department of State also released a statement on Saturday saying: “By suspending Georgia’s EU accession process, Georgian Dream has rejected the opportunity for closer ties with Europe and made Georgia more vulnerable to the Kremlin.”

The statement added: “We reiterate our call to the Georgian government to return to its Euro-Atlantic path, transparently investigate all parliamentary election irregularities, and repeal anti-democratic laws that limit freedoms of assembly and expression.” This referred to laws including the foreign agents bill and an anti-LGBTQ bill that was passed in September.

Advertisement

How has Russia reacted?

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Monday that Russia was not interfering in Georgian politics. “Everything that is happening in Georgia is its internal business,” he said.

Peskov, however, drew parallels between the current protests in Georgia and the Maidan protests in Ukraine.

He said Georgia is “moving rapidly along the Ukrainian path into the dark abyss”, adding that this would end “very badly”.

What will happen next?

“The future is uncertain, but the protests clearly underscore mounting public dissatisfaction with the government’s blunt deviation from Georgia’s European course,” Akhvlediani said.

She added that the government’s crackdown on protests risks “further fuelling resistance and expanding the scale of demonstrations” and the international community’s response to the crackdown on the protests will be “critical”.

Advertisement

“Targeted sanctions against individuals responsible for election rigging and democratic backsliding, as seen in actions taken by the Baltic states, should be considered,” she said. “Such measures would demonstrate solidarity with the Georgian people and pressure the government to respect the will of its citizens.

“The EU, the US and the other Western allies of the country should also continue supporting civil society and free media, which represent the backbone of Georgian democracy.”

Continue Reading

Trending