Connect with us

World

Does Ukraine really want to go nuclear?

Published

on

Does Ukraine really want to go nuclear?

Ukraine’s Zelenskyy clarified that Ukraine is not pursuing nuclear weapons but stressed the need for NATO membership for security amidst Russian aggression.

ADVERTISEMENT

Apart from joining NATO, Ukraine’s only option would be nuclear weapons, Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the European Council earlier this week while discussing what needs to be done to protect the eastern European country still fending off Moscow’s invasion.

“Who gave up nuclear weapons? All of them? … Ukraine. Who is fighting today? Ukraine,” Zelenskyy said.

As one can imagine, the statement had a ballistic impact.

Later that day, in a meeting with NATO top chief Mark Rutte, Zelenskyy had to explain that Ukraine has never discussed preparing to produce any nuclear weapons or to build a nuclear bomb.

“We are not building nuclear weapons. What I meant is that today there is no stronger security guarantee for us besides NATO membership,” he clarified.

Advertisement

Ukraine’s foreign ministry even issued a statement saying that Kyiv is not planning to develop weapons of mass destruction and remains committed to nuclear non-proliferation. 

“Ukraine is convinced that the NPT (the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) remains the cornerstone of the global international security architecture,” the ministry’s statement said.

“Despite the ongoing Russian aggression, Ukraine continues to comply with the provisions of the NPT and remains a responsible participant in the international nuclear non-proliferation regime.”

Zelenskyy then had to explain further that he was illustrating how dire things were for Kyiv by referring to the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, which saw Ukraine give up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for security guarantees from major nuclear powers, including the UK, the US and Russia. 

From today’s perspective, handing over the nukes was a mistake, and that’s all there is to it.

Advertisement

“Which of these major nuclear powers suffered? All of them? No. (Just) Ukraine,” Zelenskyy said at the EU Council meeting in Brussels on Thursday. 

Despite the assurances to respect and protect Ukraine’s territorial integrity, Moscow has violated Ukraine’s sovereignty twice in the past decade, “leaving Ukraine no choice but to pursue NATO membership for its security,” he said.

What is the Budapest Memorandum, and what did it do for Ukraine?

In December 1994, leaders of the US, the UK and Russia met in Budapest to pledge security assurances to Ukraine in connection with its accession to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear-weapons state. 

Ukraine agreed to relinquish its nuclear arsenal — the third-largest in the world — which it inherited from the Soviet Union, and moreover, to transfer all of around 1900 nuclear warheads to Russia for dismantlement. 

Twenty years later, in 2014, Russia first invaded Ukraine, illegally annexed Crimea and occupied large territories in the east of the country.

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has continued to develop and modernise its nuclear arsenal. In September, Moscow attempted to test its latest intercontinental ballistic missile, the RS-28 Sarmat, also known as Satan II, and proclaimed the “world’s deadliest” nuclear weapon by Russian authorities.

Matt Korda, an associate senior researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), told Euronews Next that the RS-28 is meant to functionally replace the RS-20V Voevoda, a missile created over 30 years ago. 

Like many others from the Soviet intercontinental ballistic missile family, it was originally developed by Pivdenmash, a Ukrainian state-owned aerospace manufacturer in the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.

In many cases, control systems for these missiles were designed by Khartron, formerly Electropribor, a design engineering bureau in Kharkiv. Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in 2022, Russia has regularly attacked Dnipro and Kharkiv with its missiles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Commenting on Zelenskyy’s statement, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that Moscow would not let Ukraine get nuclear weapons and that any move by Ukraine in this direction could not be concealed and would draw an appropriate Russian response.

“Russia will not allow this to happen, no matter what,” Putin told reporters. 

‘We have not become animals’

Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, Andrii Yermak, said on Friday it was Ukraine’s own decision to get rid of nuclear weapons back in 1994 and insisted that Zelenskyy’s statement was misinterpreted.

Advertisement

Yermak said what Ukraine wants is security guarantees and not nuclear weapons.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We want to receive what we have the rights to,” he stated, referring to the Budapest memorandum.

He emphasised that the outcome of the memorandum proved to be unfair for Ukraine, but he assured us that Kyiv would not reciprocate in the same unfair and unjust way.

“All of us in Ukraine are living in this terrible war, many of us lost our relatives, our friends, but the difference is, we have not become animals. This is the difference between us and Russia.”

World

Exclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say

Published

on

Exclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
DeepSeek, the Chinese artificial intelligence lab whose low-cost model rattled global markets last year, has not shown U.S. chipmakers its upcoming flagship model for performance optimization, two sources familiar with the matter said, breaking from standard industry practice ahead of a major model update.
Continue Reading

World

Hundreds of Russian shadow tankers trigger military alarm transiting NATO waters: report

Published

on

Hundreds of Russian shadow tankers trigger military alarm transiting NATO waters: report

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Russian-operated shadow tankers carrying millions of dollars in sanctioned oil are transiting the English Channel, raising warnings of a potential military confrontation in NATO waters, according to reports.

The movements came amid heightened tensions between Russia and NATO, with the Royal Navy stepping up surveillance of U.S.- and allied-sanctioned vessels in one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

A Russian-flagged crude oil tanker Vladimir Monomakh transits the Bosphorus in Istanbul, Turkey. (Reuters/Yoruk Isik, File)

Sky News reported Wednesday that as many as 800 shadow tankers had passed through the channel, and continue to bankroll Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine.

Advertisement

Several Russia-linked oil tankers — including the Rigel, Hyperion and Kousai — have been tracked by VesselFinder and are known to be under Western sanctions.

The outlet reported that three of the vessels were monitored this month as they transited loaded with sanctioned crude.

The Rigel, an 885-foot Suezmax-class tanker sailing under a Cameroonian flag, left the Russian port of Primorsk on Feb. 2, with up to one million barrels of oil, a cargo valued at around $55 million.

US COAST GUARD PURSUES THIRD ‘DARK FLEET’ OIL TANKER AS TRUMP TARGETS VENEZUELAN SANCTIONS EVASION NETWORK

The French navy diverts a suspected Russian shadow fleet tanker to Marseille-Fos port. (Reuters/Manon Cruz)

Advertisement

Sanctioned by the U.K., the EU and Canada, it is barred from using port facilities in those jurisdictions but is still permitted “innocent passage” under maritime law.

The Kousai, sailing under a Sierra Leonean flag, left Ust-Luga on Feb. 2, and was warned by authorities to provide proof of insurance within 24 hours.

The Hyperion, also sanctioned by the U.S., switched flags after delivering oil to Venezuela, to obscure ownership and evade enforcement, according to reports.

Security experts warned of an increased risk of geopolitical escalation in the region.

SEN. KENNEDY DOUBLES DOWN ON VENEZUELA CRACKDOWN, URGES SANCTIONS TO ‘CHOKE OFF’ FUNDS

Advertisement

Hundreds of shadow tankers have passed through the English Channel and European waterways, and continue to bankroll Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine. (Kremlin Press Office / Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)

]Professor Michael Clarke told Sky News that there may come a point when Britain and its allies “get much tougher with these Russian ships,” adding that a “militarized confrontation at sea” this year is a real possibility, in the Channel or the North Sea.

A U.K. Ministry of Defense (MoD) spokesperson said: “Deterring, disrupting and degrading the Russian shadow fleet is a priority for this government.

“Alongside our allies, we are stepping up our response to shadow vessels — and as the Secretary of State set out, we will continue to do so,” the spokesperson said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The MoD said it has requested proof of insurance from more than 600 suspected vessels since October 2024.

The U.S. has also taken a firm stance, seizing at least seven tankers linked to sanctioned oil trades since December 2025, including several in the Caribbean.

Related Article

Second tanker seized near Venezuela as US enforces oil blockade
Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Ukraine in the EU – A question of when or if?

Published

on

Ukraine in the EU – A question of when or if?

Published on

Should Ukraine be given fast-track membership into the European Union?

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

The majority of MEPs seem to think so. Although they may not see eye to eye on the how or the exact when, most MEPs think Ukrainian EU membership would send a strong message of support to Ukrainians and one of defiance to the Kremlin.

Advertisement

To mark four years since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia, this week on The Ring, we are joined by two Lithuanian MEPs: Aurelijus Veryga from the ECR (European Conservatives and Reformists) group and Petras Auštrevičius from the liberal Renew Europe group.

Although from opposing political families, one conservative and the other liberal, both agree that Ukraine belongs inside the European Union. This edition asks the big question: Is enlargement a test of solidarity, a measure of Europe’s strategic power, or both?

When asked about setting a clear accession date, Veryga argues that the target should be ambitious and aims for 2030: “If we say 2027, technically, it won’t happen before 2030, but it adjusts our attempts to speed up.”

For Petras Auštrevičius, “we have pronounced many good promises towards Ukraine. We said Ukraine is a part of Europe. Now we have to deliver. Let’s start moving, the sooner the better.”

This episode of The Ring is anchored by Méabh Mc Mahon, produced by Luis Albertos and Amaia Echevarria, and edited by Vassilis Glynos.

Advertisement

Watch The Ring on Euronews TV or in the player above and send us your views by writing to thering@euronews.com

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending