Connect with us

World

Does Ukraine really want to go nuclear?

Published

on

Does Ukraine really want to go nuclear?

Ukraine’s Zelenskyy clarified that Ukraine is not pursuing nuclear weapons but stressed the need for NATO membership for security amidst Russian aggression.

ADVERTISEMENT

Apart from joining NATO, Ukraine’s only option would be nuclear weapons, Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the European Council earlier this week while discussing what needs to be done to protect the eastern European country still fending off Moscow’s invasion.

“Who gave up nuclear weapons? All of them? … Ukraine. Who is fighting today? Ukraine,” Zelenskyy said.

As one can imagine, the statement had a ballistic impact.

Later that day, in a meeting with NATO top chief Mark Rutte, Zelenskyy had to explain that Ukraine has never discussed preparing to produce any nuclear weapons or to build a nuclear bomb.

“We are not building nuclear weapons. What I meant is that today there is no stronger security guarantee for us besides NATO membership,” he clarified.

Advertisement

Ukraine’s foreign ministry even issued a statement saying that Kyiv is not planning to develop weapons of mass destruction and remains committed to nuclear non-proliferation. 

“Ukraine is convinced that the NPT (the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons) remains the cornerstone of the global international security architecture,” the ministry’s statement said.

“Despite the ongoing Russian aggression, Ukraine continues to comply with the provisions of the NPT and remains a responsible participant in the international nuclear non-proliferation regime.”

Zelenskyy then had to explain further that he was illustrating how dire things were for Kyiv by referring to the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, which saw Ukraine give up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for security guarantees from major nuclear powers, including the UK, the US and Russia. 

From today’s perspective, handing over the nukes was a mistake, and that’s all there is to it.

Advertisement

“Which of these major nuclear powers suffered? All of them? No. (Just) Ukraine,” Zelenskyy said at the EU Council meeting in Brussels on Thursday. 

Despite the assurances to respect and protect Ukraine’s territorial integrity, Moscow has violated Ukraine’s sovereignty twice in the past decade, “leaving Ukraine no choice but to pursue NATO membership for its security,” he said.

What is the Budapest Memorandum, and what did it do for Ukraine?

In December 1994, leaders of the US, the UK and Russia met in Budapest to pledge security assurances to Ukraine in connection with its accession to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear-weapons state. 

Ukraine agreed to relinquish its nuclear arsenal — the third-largest in the world — which it inherited from the Soviet Union, and moreover, to transfer all of around 1900 nuclear warheads to Russia for dismantlement. 

Twenty years later, in 2014, Russia first invaded Ukraine, illegally annexed Crimea and occupied large territories in the east of the country.

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has continued to develop and modernise its nuclear arsenal. In September, Moscow attempted to test its latest intercontinental ballistic missile, the RS-28 Sarmat, also known as Satan II, and proclaimed the “world’s deadliest” nuclear weapon by Russian authorities.

Matt Korda, an associate senior researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), told Euronews Next that the RS-28 is meant to functionally replace the RS-20V Voevoda, a missile created over 30 years ago. 

Like many others from the Soviet intercontinental ballistic missile family, it was originally developed by Pivdenmash, a Ukrainian state-owned aerospace manufacturer in the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.

In many cases, control systems for these missiles were designed by Khartron, formerly Electropribor, a design engineering bureau in Kharkiv. Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in 2022, Russia has regularly attacked Dnipro and Kharkiv with its missiles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Commenting on Zelenskyy’s statement, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that Moscow would not let Ukraine get nuclear weapons and that any move by Ukraine in this direction could not be concealed and would draw an appropriate Russian response.

“Russia will not allow this to happen, no matter what,” Putin told reporters. 

‘We have not become animals’

Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, Andrii Yermak, said on Friday it was Ukraine’s own decision to get rid of nuclear weapons back in 1994 and insisted that Zelenskyy’s statement was misinterpreted.

Advertisement

Yermak said what Ukraine wants is security guarantees and not nuclear weapons.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We want to receive what we have the rights to,” he stated, referring to the Budapest memorandum.

He emphasised that the outcome of the memorandum proved to be unfair for Ukraine, but he assured us that Kyiv would not reciprocate in the same unfair and unjust way.

“All of us in Ukraine are living in this terrible war, many of us lost our relatives, our friends, but the difference is, we have not become animals. This is the difference between us and Russia.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Pope Leo XIV flags AI impact on kids' intellectual and spiritual development

Published

on

Pope Leo XIV flags AI impact on kids' intellectual and spiritual development

ROME (AP) — Pope Leo XIV warned Friday that artificial intelligence could negatively impact the intellectual, neurological and spiritual development of young people as he pressed one of the priorities of his young pontificate.

History’s first American pope sent a message to a conference of AI and ethics, part of which was taking place in the Vatican in a sign of the Holy See’s concern for the new technologies and what they mean for humanity.

In the message, Leo said any further development of AI must be evaluated according to the “superior ethical criterion” of the need to safeguard the dignity of each human being while respecting the diversity of the world’s population.

He warned specifically that new generations are most at risk given they have never had such quick access to information.

“All of us, I am sure, are concerned for children and young people, and the possible consequences of the use of AI on their intellectual and neurological development,” he said in the message. “Society’s well-being depends upon their being given the ability to develop their God-given gifts and capabilities,” and not allow them to confuse mere access to data with intelligence.

Advertisement

“In the end, authentic wisdom has more to do with recognizing the true meaning of life, than with the availability of data,” he said.

Leo, who was elected in May after the death of Pope Francis, has identified AI as one of the most critical matters facing humanity, saying it poses challenges to defending human dignity, justice and labor. He has explained his concern for AI by invoking his namesake, Pope Leo XIII. That Leo was pope during the dawn of the Industrial Revolution and made the plight of workers, and the need to guarantee their rights and dignity, a key priority.

Toward the end of his pontificate, Francis became increasingly vocal about the threats to humanity posed by AI and called for an international treaty to regulate it. Francis said politicians must take the lead in making sure AI remains human-centric, so that decisions about when to use weapons or even less-lethal tools always remain made by humans and not machines.

___

Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Missiles hit hospitals, homes and families: Inside Israel's terrifying Iranian bombardment

Published

on

Missiles hit hospitals, homes and families: Inside Israel's terrifying Iranian bombardment

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

CENTRAL ISRAEL – At least six people were seriously wounded Thursday morning when an Iranian ballistic missile struck Be’er Sheva’s Soroka Medical Center, part of a broader barrage that also scored direct hits on Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, and Holon.

“We are hitting nuclear targets and missile targets precisely, and they are hitting the pediatric ward of the hospital. That says it all,” said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while surveying the damage at the hospital.

The attacks on Israel have left many homeless and lucky to be alive. Ariel Levin-Waldman is one such person. He was at his in-laws’ home in Rishon LeZion, where he and his family had been staying for several months during renovations to their own house—when an Iranian missile struck the residential neighborhood. The attack killed two people and injured dozens; a third victim died during an earlier wave of Iranian strikes.

IRAN STRIKES MAJOR ISRAELI HOSPITAL AFTER CLAIMING ISRAEL HIT ITS ARAK HEAVY WATER REACTOR

Advertisement

Smoke rises from a building of the Soroka hospital complex after it was hit by a missile fired from Iran in Be’er Sheva, Israel, Thursday, Jun. 19, 2025.  (AP Photo/Leo Correa)

“At around 5 a.m., I got the same missile alert everyone in the country gets,” Levin-Waldman told Fox News Digital. “I grabbed my phone, ran downstairs with my wife and kids, and we made it to the shelter. My mother-in-law joined us.”

Then the missile hit the building.

“There was a flash of light, and everything went dark. We were choking, struggling to breathe,” Levin-Waldman said. Realizing help might not arrive in time, he continued, “I couldn’t wait to be rescued. We were suffocating, and I was afraid we’d be buried alive.”

Levin-Waldman tried to survey the damage inside the shelter, but the thick cloud of dust made it nearly impossible to see. All he could make out was that his arms and legs were still intact. The floor had become uneven, and the walls were damaged from the force of the blast.

Advertisement

It was at that moment he realized the explosion had propelled a book cabinet across the shelter, hitting his mother-in-law in the head.

Rescuers dispersed amongst rubble

Rescue personnel work at an impact site following missile attack from Iran on Israel, in Rishon LeZion, Israel, Jun. 14, 2025.  (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun)

“She was bleeding heavily, and I realized she had been calling out ‘save us’ in Hebrew, but her voice was faint,” he recalled. “I managed to lift the cabinet off my mother-in-law, and when I did, I saw a potential escape route. I cleared the way so my wife, Tali, and our two-and-a-half-year-old, Renana, could get through. I had Ayala, my seven-week-old baby, on my shoulders as I made the opening. It was just enough to get them out.”

As they emerged, firefighters guided them to safety onto the street. In front of Levin-Waldman stood a wall of rubble where his car had once been, and his feet were cut by glass from the explosion.

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT AYATOLLAH ALI KHAMENEI, SUPREME LEADER OF IRAN

Unable to climb over the debris with his younger child on his shoulders, he handed her to a paramedic. Once he climbed over himself, he looked around—only to realize Ayala was no longer in sight.

Advertisement

“Here I was, covered in dust and blood, almost naked, wandering the street screaming, ‘Where is my child?” he recalled. Some people thought the worst. It took about 30 minutes to find her.”

Amid the chaos on the street, Levin-Waldman became separated from the rest of his family. They were transported to Sheba Medical Center in two different ambulances and later reunited in the emergency room, where they received initial medical care along with social and psychological support.

Ariel Levin-Waldman's baby Ayala carried by a police officer taking her to safety right after the house they lived in Rishon LeZion was hit by an Iranian missile attack.

Ariel Levin-Waldman’s baby Ayala carried by a police officer taking her to safety right after the house they lived in Rishon LeZion was hit by an Iranian missile attack. (Photo courtesy: Dvir Mor )

Only 20 hours after Levin-Waldman survived the attack, another Iranian missile struck a building across from the hotel where he was staying in Rehovot. “The blast shattered the windows, and the entire building shook. We had a whole floor of people from our neighborhood traumatized, reliving the experience,” he told Fox News Digital.

“The hardest part is confronting how fragile we are and how close we came to disaster,” he said.

Since the conflict began on June 13, Iranian missile attacks have killed 24 Israelis and wounded over 800.

Advertisement

The missiles do not discriminate—neither between men and women, children and the elderly, nor between Jew and Arab. That reality was tragically underscored over the weekend when four women were killed by a ballistic missile that scored a direct hit on their home in the predominantly Arab town of Tamra, just north of Haifa.

These terror missiles also make no distinction between the political left and right.

Shattered glass on street after drone attack

Large windows are shown shattered after what was believed to be a drone attack Thursday night. (Trey Yingst)

Israeli Opposition Leader Yair Lapid dodged a tragedy on Monday when his son’s house in Tel Aviv suffered damage from the aftershock of a direct missile impact that left many residents of the central metropolis homeless. 

“My one-year-old granddaughter’s bed was covered in glass from an explosion caused by an Iranian missile. It is horrific to think what would have happened if she had been in bed,” Lapid told Fox News Digital.

“This is the enemy we are facing—a regime dedicated to our destruction and aiming to kill as many innocent children as possible. We have to remove the nuclear threat and the missile threat—for the safety of Israel and the world,” he added.

Advertisement

Coalition lawmaker Hanoch Mildwisky, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud Party, lives across the street from a building in Petah Tikva–located 6.5 miles east of Tel Aviv–which sustained damage in an Iranian attack that killed four people.

“There were dislodged windows and cracks in the walls,” Mildwisky told Fox News Digital. “In the building that was hit, there were unfortunately casualties. It was a very large missile, carrying nearly a ton of explosives, so the blast was massive and caused significant damage even hundreds of meters away from the impact site.”

TUGBOATS, CRUISE SHIPS AND FLIGHTS: ISRAEL BEGINS EMERGENCY EVACUATION OF CITIZENS AMID IRAN WAR

Zaka volunteer in Israel

Zaka volunteer Jamal Waraki pulling Israelis out of the rubble in the aftermath of Iran’s missile attacks. (ZAKA )

Mildwisky emphasized that Iran must not be allowed to possess atomic bombs or the capability to develop them—particularly given the regime’s repeated declarations of intent to destroy the Jewish state.

As long as the threat remains, he said, Israel will be forced to continue its military operations.

Advertisement

Jamal Waraki, a Muslim volunteer with the ZAKA emergency service, had just completed a rescue mission—pulling an 80-year-old man from the rubble—when he returned home at 7:00 a.m. on Sunday to find his own house destroyed.

“That night, there was a missile impact in Rehovot. We tended to the building that had sustained a direct hit. Once we finished, I went home and discovered that my place too had been struck,” Jamal told Fox News Digital.

Thankfully, no one was home at the time. Jamal’s family had been staying with his mother-in-law in Eilat, where they still are. While awaiting the finalization of new housing arrangements, Jamal has been sleeping in his car.

Israel under attack

The building in Lihi Griner’s complex which was hit by an Iranian missile attack.   (Lihi Griner )

Lihi Griner is well known in Israel due to her appearance in the local spinoff of the Big Brother reality TV show. She was in her safe room with her husband and three children when the Iranian missile struck Petah Tikva, in the same neighborhood as lawmaker Mildwisky. Griner resides in a complex with four residential buildings, one of which was directly hit. 

“There was a huge boom,” she told Fox News Digital. “The kids were shocked, they started to cry, and we kept telling ourselves that there was an impact, but we’re alive. It was surreal. I couldn’t believe it happened to me.”

Advertisement

After receiving the all-clear to leave the safe room, she opened the door and found everything was completely destroyed. “Our windows were blown out of the walls, the doors were broken in half, the walls were damaged with big cracks, and all the balconies in the front of the building were demolished,” said Griner.

Initially, residents were sent to a school across the street, where authorities offered hotel options at no cost. Soldiers later escorted Griner’s family back to their apartment so they could retrieve their belongings. While the residence is now safe, they can’t sleep there due to the lack of windows.

“I live day by day. I’m just happy we’re alive. It gives us time to figure out what comes next,” Griner said.

For Levin-Waldman, what came next was an unexpected phone call from the Rishon Lezion municipality on Wednesday. To his relief, another member of the family had been found alive and unharmed four days after the attack: their dog, Zvika.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Why do Europeans still believe a nuclear deal with Iran is possible?

Published

on

Why do Europeans still believe a nuclear deal with Iran is possible?
ADVERTISEMENT

Europe hopes to use diplomacy to avoid the threat of all-out war in the Middle East, amid fears that the conflict between Israel and Iran could engulf the wider region.

On Friday, the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom, together with the EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, will hold talks with representatives of the Tehran regime in Geneva.

The meeting aims to de-escalate the fighting between the two Middle Eastern powers, which began when Israel launched airstrikes against Iran and killed some of its top military commanders last Friday.

The Europeans seek to initiate a form of shuttle diplomacy between Israel, Iran, Washington and the main European capitals.

They would like to reestablish a security dialogue with Tehran, similar to the one interrupted in 2018 when the first Trump administration unilaterally withdrew from the Iranian nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Advertisement

The JCPA, which was signed by Iran along with China, the EU, France, Germany, Russia and the UK in 2015, stipulated an easing of Western sanctions against the Middle Eastern country in exchange for Tehran’s commitment to a drastic reduction of Uranium stockpiles and centrifuges at its nuclear facilities.

Such sites are now being targeted by Israeli missile attacks, including those at Natanz and Isfahan.  

Europe’s lost illusions?

In 2018, despite the UN nuclear agency saying that Tehran was progressively adopting the restrictions required by the agreement, Trump’s administration withdrew from the JCPOA, effectively rendering it null and void.

By walking back on the JCPOA, the US put an end to one of the main achievements of European foreign policy.

David Rigoulet-Roze, an author and associate research fellow at IRIS, a French foreign policy institute, said the cancellation of the Iranian nuclear deal of 2015 was a hasty act.

Advertisement

“The agreement had the merit, despite all its imperfections, of existing, of serving as a basis, including for the possible subsequent renegotiation of something more binding”, said Rigoulet-Roze. “Even though, the Europeans were not in control of the process”.

Trade and power miscalculations

The accord represented an opportunity for the EU to reopen trade relations with Iran after decades of US and Western sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

However, after the JCPOA’s demise, the regime in Tehran stigmatised the EU for the failure of the agreement.

“Somewhat wrongly, because we obviously didn’t provoke the cancellation of the accord and we have also suffered the consequences of what is known as the extraterritoriality of American law”, Rigoulet-Roze said.

He noted the capacity of the US to impose sanctions on a global scale, particularly secondary sanctions, “which are formidable and which have obviously curbed Europe’s desire to develop trade relations that were authorised after 2015”.

Advertisement

Iran has been a party to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty since the time of Shah Reza Pahlavi, who was the original founder of Iran’s nuclear programme. Therefore, Tehran has been obliged to open up its sites for inspection by UN agencies.

This motivated Brussels to treat Iran as a potentially rational actor despite its puzzling decisions and smoke and mirrors regarding its nuclear programme.

Years ago, Tehran ended its highly enriched uranium production, yet it continued developing its military conventional ballistic capabilities and financing Middle Eastern proxies, including Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen.

“This was a kind of matter of national pride as far as the Iranians were concerned. So I don’t think that they, and this is in retrospect, ever planned to negotiate it away,” senior British diplomat and adviser Robert Cooper told Euronews.

A strategic nuclear force, Cooper explained, “was going to mark them out as one of the most important powers in the Middle East. And as an international power beyond the Middle East as well.” 

Advertisement

The Iranian nuclear programme and the existence of uranium enrichment equipment and heavy water facilities were officially made public by then-president Mohammad Khatami, a reformist who persuaded France, Germany and the UK to reach a deal that was meant to oblige Tehran to stop the uranium enrichment.

Javier Solana, the EU foreign and security policy chief at the time, attended the negotiations in Tehran. The Spanish diplomat was one of the deal’s key architects, who believed that a deal is better than any conflict, and that the EU is best poised to broker it.

“Solana was fascinated by Iran, and you know, we had a certain admiration for it. Our aim at the time was to persuade the Iranians that a military nuclear programme would make them a target,” Cooper recalled.

Continue Reading

Trending