Connect with us

World

Case vs. Paul Haggis joins month of Hollywood #MeToo trials

Published

on

Case vs. Paul Haggis joins month of Hollywood #MeToo trials

NEW YORK (AP) — Jurors obtained their first look Wednesday at a lawsuit that pits Oscar-winning moviemaker Paul Haggis towards a publicist who alleges that he raped her, the most recent in a lineup of #MeToo-era trials involving Hollywood figures this fall.

Opening statements within the civil case towards Haggis started Wednesday in a New York state court docket. The federal court docket subsequent door is housing a trial in a lawsuit accusing Oscar-winning actor Kevin Spacey of sexual assault. In Los Angeles, former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein and “That ’70s Present” actor Danny Masterson are preventing felony rape prices at separate trials down the corridor from one another (Weinstein is already serving a 23-year sentence on a New York conviction). The entire males deny the allegations.

The confluence of trials is a coincidence, nevertheless it makes for one thing of a #MeToo second 5 years after allegations towards Weinstein triggered a dam break of sexual misconduct accusations in Hollywood and past and catalyzed an ongoing motion to demand accountability.

“We’re nonetheless very early on on this time of reckoning,” stated Debra Katz, a Washington-based lawyer who has represented many sexual assault accusers. She isn’t concerned in any of the 4 trials.

Within the case towards Haggis, publicist Haleigh Breest claims that the “Crash” and “Million Greenback Child” screenwriter compelled her to carry out oral intercourse and raped her after she reluctantly agreed to a drink in his condominium after a 2013 film premiere. She had been tasked with greeting him and different movie star company.

Advertisement

Due to Haggis was effectively linked of their business, she was afraid to inform police or her boss what had occurred, however she knowledgeable a number of pals within the subsequent days and months, her lawyer Zoe Salzman stated in her opening assertion.

“He was so tough and aggressive. By no means, ever once more,” Breest texted one buddy the day after the alleged assault, in line with her lawyer. ”And I stored saying no.”

Jurors may also hear from 4 different girls who’ve accused Haggis of sexually assaulting them, or making an attempt to take action, in separate encounters between 1996 and 2015.

“Mr. Haggis used his storytelling abilities and his fame to prey on, to control and to assault weak younger girls within the movie business,” Salzman informed jurors. “He doesn’t cease when girls say no.”

Choose Sabrina Kraus received’t enable any point out, nevertheless, of Haggis’ detention in Italy for about two weeks this summer season as authorities investigated a sexual assault allegation, which he denied.

Advertisement

Haggis’ legal professionals are attributable to give their opening assertion later Wednesday. He has maintained that his encounter with Breest was consensual, and his legal professionals have stated he has by no means raped anybody.

In an uncommon flip, each Haggis’ case and Masterson’s have develop into boards for scrutinizing Scientology, although from totally different views.

Haggis’ attorneys have urged that the church ginned up false accusations to discredit him after he cut up with the church and have become a distinguished detractor. The church denies any involvement, and Breest’s legal professionals have known as the notion a baseless conspiracy idea and a smokescreen meant to obscure Haggis’ conduct.

“Scientology has nothing to do with this case,” Salzman informed jurors.

Haggis says he was Scientologist for 3 many years earlier than leaving the church in 2009. He slammed it as “a cult” in a 2011 New Yorker article that later knowledgeable a e book and an HBO documentary, and he foreshadowed that retribution would come within the type of “a scandal that appears prefer it has nothing to do with the church.”

Advertisement

The church has repeatedly stated that Haggis lied about its practices to seize the highlight for himself and his profession. The church didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Masterson’s lawyer, in the meantime, is asking jurors to ignore the actor’s affiliation with Scientology, although prosecutors say the church discouraged two of his three accusers from going to authorities. All three are former members.

In 1950, science fiction and fantasy writer L. Ron Hubbard wrote “Dianetics: The Trendy Science of Psychological Well being,” which turned a foundational textual content for the Church of Scientology. The faith, which has gained the next of celebrities akin to Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Kirstie Alley, is a system of beliefs, teachings and rituals targeted on non secular betterment.

Born and raised in Canada, Haggis obtained his Hollywood begin as as TV author and moved on to films together with “Million Greenback Child” and “Crash,” which received back-to-back Academy Awards for finest image within the mid-2000s. He additionally directed and was a producer of “Crash,” which garnered him and Bobby Moresco the very best authentic screenplay Oscar in 2006.

In a sworn assertion final 12 months, Haggis stated his profession nosedived and his funds cratered after Breest sued him in 2017.

Advertisement

The Related Press doesn’t often title folks alleging sexual assault except they arrive ahead publicly, as Breest has finished. She is searching for unspecified damages.

World

TVLine Items: My Life With the Walter Boys Adds 5, Carrie Underwood Concert Special and More

Published

on

TVLine Items: My Life With the Walter Boys Adds 5, Carrie Underwood Concert Special and More


‘My Life With the Walter Boys’ Season 2 Cast Adds 5 Actors



Advertisement





















Advertisement






Advertisement

Advertisement

ad



Advertisement






Advertisement


Quantcast



Continue Reading

World

Putin signs revised doctrine lowering threshold for nuclear response if Russia is attacked

Published

on

Putin signs revised doctrine lowering threshold for nuclear response if Russia is attacked

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised nuclear doctrine on Tuesday stating that any attack on Russia supported by a country with nuclear power could be grounds for a nuclear response.

Putin signed the new policy on the 1,000th day of the war with Ukraine and the day after President Biden authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia.

The doctrine also states that Russia could respond to aggression against its ally Belarus with nuclear weapons, The Associated Press reported.

Though the doctrine doesn’t specify that Russia will definitely respond to such attacks with nuclear weapons, it does mention the “uncertainty of scale, time and place of possible use of nuclear deterrent” as key principles of deterrence.

BIDEN AUTHORIZES UKRAINE TO USE US LONG-RANGE MISSILES TO STRIKE INSIDE RUSSIA

Advertisement

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised doctrine stating that an attack on Russia supported by a country with nuclear power could potentially trigger a nuclear response during a Nov. 18 meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow. (Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

When asked if the updated doctrine comes in response to Biden’s decision to ease restrictions on how Ukraine can strike Russia, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told the AP that the doctrine was published “in a timely manner.” 

Peskov also said Putin told the government to update it earlier this year so that it’s “in line with the current situation” – the Russian president led a meeting in September to discuss these proposed revisions to the doctrine.

Joe Biden with his arm around Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelenskiy

The Kremlin said the revision was published “in a timely manner” when asked if it was done in response to President Biden authorizing Ukraine to use U.S. long-range missiles in Russia. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque )

TRUMP ALLIES WARN BIDEN RISKING ‘WORLD WAR III’ BY AUTHORIZING LONG-RANGE MISSILES FOR UKRAINE

Revealed in September, the doctrine now officially states that an attack on Russia by a nonnuclear power with the “participation or support of a nuclear power” will be seen as a “joint attack on the Russian Federation.”

Advertisement
Russian intercontinental ballistic missile

A Yars intercontinental ballistic missile is test-fired from the Plesetsk launchpad in northwestern Russia in October 2024. (Russian Defense Ministry Press Service via AP)

It also contains a broader range of conditions that would trigger the use of nuclear weapons, noting that they could be used in response to an air attack involving ballistic and cruise missiles, aircraft, drones and other flying vehicles.

The previous document threatened the use of Russia’s arsenal if “reliable information is received about the launch of ballistic missiles targeting the territory of Russia or its allies.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Damage to underwater cables was 'sabotage', German minister says

Published

on

Damage to underwater cables was 'sabotage', German minister says

Two underwater fibre-optic communications cables running between Finland and Germany were discovered cut on Monday, an incident both countries said was under investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius has said that damage done to two underwater data transmission cables running between Germany and Finland was deliberate.

“No one believes that these cables were accidentally cut,” Pistorius said in remarks made on the sidelines of a meeting of EU defence ministers in Brussels.

“We also have to assume, without knowing it yet, that it is sabotage,” he declared, adding that neither Germany nor Finland yet knows who was responsible for damage.

Germany and Finland announced on Monday that they had discovered a severed fibre-optic undersea data cable between the two countries, and that an investigation into the incident is underway.

In a joint statement, they said they did not know who was responsible for the damage, but that the incident came at a time when “our European security is not only under threat from Russia‘s war of aggression against Ukraine, but also from hybrid warfare by malicious actors”.

Advertisement

Pistorius also pointed to so-called “hybrid actors” as being potentially responsible for the damage.

“We have to state, without knowing specifically who it came from, that it is a ‘hybrid’ action” Pistorius said — implying that Russia, often considered responsible for acts of “hybrid warfare”, could be at least in part to blame for the incident.

Both Germany and Finland said that it was important that “critical infrastructure” such as data cables can be safeguarded.

“The fact that such an incident immediately raises suspicions of intentional damage speaks volumes about the volatility of our times,” the two countries said in their joint statement.

Finnish state-controlled data services provider Cinia said the damage to the data cable, which runs almost 1,2000 kilometres from the Finnish capital Helsinki to the German port of Rostock, was detected on Monday.

Advertisement

The incident is not the first to involve damage to underwater infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. On Sunday morning, a 218-kilometre internet link running between Lithuania and Swedish island of Gotland also lost service, according to a Swedish telecommunications company.

In 2022, Nord Stream gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea exploded, leading to several conspiracy theories around who could be responsible for the attack. Unconfirmed rumours have variously said that the US, Ukraine and Russia could have all played a role.

Continue Reading

Trending