Connect with us

Wyoming

Family Says Its Ranch Near Wyoming State Line A… | Cowboy State Daily

Published

on

Family Says Its Ranch Near Wyoming State Line A… | Cowboy State Daily


It was 2019 when the Gittleson family members saw the first wolf on the ranch property they lease in northern Colorado roughly 12 miles from the Wyoming state line.

It was a lone female that wandered in from Wyoming. A gray male wolf joined her in 2020. Nobody’s quite sure where he came from, but it was also likely from Wyoming.

At first, it seemed like no big deal, Kim Gittleson told Cowboy State Daily.

“They would bump (startle) the cattle occasionally,” but never took it any further than that, she said.

Advertisement

Then the two wolves had six pups, forming what became known as the North Park pack, Colorado’s first verified established wolf pack in decades.

The adult wolves needed to teach their offspring to hunt, and the Gittleson’s cattle become part of the lesson plan. Since 2021 they’ve lost 11 cattle: three full-grown cows, two yearlings and six calves, Kim Gittleson said.

‘Grocery Store’ For Wolves

The North Park pack eventually broke up, and some of the wolves crossed back over into Wyoming and were shot by hunters. It’s legal to kill wolves year-round in that part of the Cowboy State.

The big, gray male and a younger black-coated male hung around the ranch together for a time, but the younger male split. He’s thought to be off somewhere to the south now.

That left only the older male hanging out on or near the Gittleson ranch.

Advertisement

However, no sooner had the North Park pack effectively disappeared when new trouble apparently started coming up from the south.

In December 2023, the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Department (CPW) released 10 wolves that had been captured in Oregon and transported to the Centennial State. The wolf reintroduction was authorized by Colorado’s Proposition 114. It barely squeaked by voters Nov. 3, 2020, by a margin of 50.91% to 49.09%.

One of the family’s calves was severely mauled by wolves in February, and they are “fairly certain that was done by some of the Oregon wolves,” Kim Gittleson said.

The Gittleson place seems to be in the middle of where wolves are traversing back and forth from both Colorado and Wyoming directions. And they’re also the only outfit in the area that runs cattle during the winter when the predators are at their hungriest.

“They (wolves) come in during the winter, and we’re the only grocery store that’s available,” Kim Gittleson said.

Advertisement

Regaining Trust

On Saturday, the Gittlesons hosted a gathering at the ranch with numerous Colorado politicians, other ranchers and CPW officials, including Director Jeff Davis.

Davis told the crowd that he realizes the CPW has lost a lot of trust with ranchers since the wolves were transplanted from Oregon. And he hopes that trust can be regained.

Repairing the relationship between CPW and ranchers is becoming more pressing. Current plans are to bring in another 15 wolves, this time from Washington state, perhaps before the end of this year.

A lawsuit has been filed in federal court to have that next round of wolf releases at least delayed, if not canceled, said Howard Cooper, a Meeker, Colorado, rancher. The lawsuit was by the Colorado Conservation Alliance, of which he is a member.

During the discussion, other ranchers told Davis that they also would like to see the next round of reintroductions delayed at least until Colorado’s policy on wolf management and control can be revisited.

Advertisement

Since the reintroduction, there have been 24 confirmed livestock losses to wolves, and it’s still not certain how many have involved survivors of the North Park pack verses the newer wolves from Oregon.

  • Northern Colorado rancher Don Gittleson explains “Fox Lights,” or solar-powered, multi-colored flashing lights, intended to deter wolves from attacking cattle on his ranch near the Wyoming state line. (Mark Heinz, Cowboy State Daily)
  • Colorado Parks and Wildlife Department Director Jeff Davis talks Saturday to ranchers who are worried about their cattle being attacked by wolves.
    Colorado Parks and Wildlife Department Director Jeff Davis talks Saturday to ranchers who are worried about their cattle being attacked by wolves. (Mark Heinz, Cowboy State Daily)
  • Northern Colorado rancher Don Gittleson speaks to people gathered Saturday at the ranch his family leases near the Wyoming state line.
    Northern Colorado rancher Don Gittleson speaks to people gathered Saturday at the ranch his family leases near the Wyoming state line. (Mark Heinz, Cowboy State Daily)

Oregon Wolves Bolder?

Some of the transplanted wolves were from packs with a history of attacking cattle in Oregon.

The Oregon wolves also seem bolder than the ones with Wyoming roots, said the Gittlesons and Grand County, Colorado, Commissioner Merrit Linke.

Non-lethal wolf deterrents don’t seem to be as effective on the newcomer wolves, they said.

During the group’s tour of some of the ranch, patriarch Don Gittleson demonstrated “cracker shells.” Those are a small explosive charge fired from a shotgun that, ideally, burst in mid-air and scare wolves away.

He also explained “fox lights,” or solar-powered, multi-colored flashing lights intended to deter wolves at night.

Advertisement

Spread out across the pasture, they didn’t seem to be effective, Don Gittleson told Cowboy State Daily. But bunched up near ranch headquarters, they’ve seem to have stopped wolves from coming clear down around the buildings.

Those things don’t seem to really frighten the wolves from Oregon, said Linke, who also represents the Middle Park Stock Grower’s Association.

Middle Park has also seen numerous livestock losses.

“They’re using fox lights. They’re using cracker shells, and the wolves are basically just flipping them off,” he said.

Don and Kim Gittleson’s son David said the North Park pack wolves rarely like to get closer to humans than about 300 yards.

Advertisement

Linke said that in Middle Park, the wolves transplanted from Oregon have boldly come to within 30 yards of people.

That very well could be because the North Park pack wolves had roots in Wyoming, where wolves are hunted, Linke said. The wolves in Oregon have never been actively hunted.

Where Are Things Headed?

Even in parts of Colorado far from where the wolves have been so far, there’s worry among some about them showing up.

Colorado state Rep. Barbara McLauchlan, D-Durango, told Cowboy State Daily that her district is quite a distance south of anywhere that wolves have been spotted so far.

But many of her constituents think it’s only a matter of time before the wolves start showing up, “and they really don’t want them there,” she said.

Advertisement

However, it’s also adjacent to the sovereign lands of the Southern Ute Tribe, she added. And the Utes don’t want wolves on their land because of the potential threat to their hunting and livestock.

“If those wolves cross onto the Utes’ land, they’ll be killed,” she said.

Kim Gittleson said her family has dealt with other predators, such as bears and mountain lions, for decades. But wolves are turning out to be something different. And so far, non-lethal deterrents such as fox lights and cracker shells have produced mixed results.

“We’ve been ranching for 43 years and lost maybe two or three cattle to bears,” she said. “And in the past few years, we’ve lost 11 to wolves.”

Mark Heinz can be reached at mark@cowboystatedaily.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Wyoming

WHSAA warns of possible changes to statewide athletics and activities following budget cuts

Published

on

WHSAA warns of possible changes to statewide athletics and activities following budget cuts


CASPER, Wyo. — High school athletics in Wyoming could see some drastic changes in the coming years following legislative changes to the state’s education budget, the Wyoming High School Activities Association recently announced in a statement.

According to the WHSAA, Wyoming school districts are facing a projected $3.9 million shortfall in activities funding, forcing officials to consider significant cuts to high school sports and extracurricular programs.

The WHSAA shared details regarding a new “silo” funding model implemented by the Legislature, stating that the recalibrated block grant model reduced funding for student activities and extra-duty responsibilities from $46.3 million to $42.4 million, an approximately 8.4% decrease statewide.

WHSAA Commissioner Trevor Wilson said the restructuring also restricts district access to an additional $76.2 million in previously flexible funding.

“A significant portion of the [April 28 WHSAA Board of Directors] meeting was dedicated to discussing the projected funding shortfall,” Wilson wrote.

Advertisement

The WHSAA is weighing several strategies to address rising costs with fewer resources. Proposed changes include eliminating regional tournaments and reducing the number of teams qualifying for state events from eight to four; limiting wrestling to two classes and restricting track and field state participants to the top 16 marks; making cuts to soccer, indoor track and field, Nordic and Alpine skiing, swimming and diving, spring golf and tennis; and reducing in-person speech and debate events by half and centrally locating All-State Music events to minimize travel. The board also recommended increasing gate admission or implementing student participation fees to offset costs.

While the WHSAA release states that no plans have been finalized and the various changes are currently just possibilities, Natrona County School District 1 Board of Trustees member Mary Schmidt criticized the WHSAA’s handling of the news at Monday’s board meeting.

“I take some issues with this, [including] the sheer fact that we as Board of Trustees members have not talked about that at all,” Schmidt said. “It is not our intent and it has not been brought to us to cut our athletics or activities budget for the upcoming school year. … I take issue with them picking sports and getting the community upset and ginning them up to be upset that this is all going to be cut when that hasn’t been discussed.”

Later in the meeting, Superintendent Angela Hensley clarified that Natrona County School District 1’s athletics and activities budget saw a reduction of roughly $550,000 in the coming year’s budget, but said the local school district does not plan to cut any sports.

“Thank you, Trustee Schmidt, for saying this, because I think people are wondering — we are not planning to cut athletics and activities for next year,” Hensley said. “We do have to take a look at our entire budget as we have talked about, as we learn more about these new rules that come in.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Cheyenne City Council to consider a pause on new data centers

Published

on

Cheyenne City Council to consider a pause on new data centers


Republished with permission from Wyoming News Now, a TV news outlet covering the Cheyenne and Casper areas. 

Cheyenne City Council has introduced a temporary moratorium, or pause, on new data center construction.

“The end goal is to actually have regulations in place, to have really heavy public involvement with this with data centers,” said Councilman Mark Moody.

The proposed ordinance is not a permanent ban on data centers and would not affect data centers currently under construction.

Advertisement

Councilman Moody says this is a bipartisan issue.

“I just want to make this clear, I’m not against data centers. We do need them from a national security perspective,” he said.

He said there needs to be more public input and regulations regarding data centers in Cheyenne.

The ordinance would require city staff to study data center impacts such as electricity usage, electricity tariffs, closed-loop cooling systems, groundwater impacts, agricultural impacts, and land value.

Cheyenne LEADS, the economic development corporation for Cheyenne and Laramie County, reported in November 2025 that there are 12 operational data centers in Wyoming, five under construction and plans for 43 data centers announced across the state.

Advertisement

“There needs to be more public input with this, and also to see how many we can sustain here in this community, cause there are talks of 43, and then another day 70. How many can we sustain here?” said Councilman Moody.

The proposed moratorium will now go to the Public Services Committee on Monday, May 18 at noon in the Municipal Building.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming High School Softball Regional Tournaments 2026

Published

on

Wyoming High School Softball Regional Tournaments 2026


Sheridan will play in the North Regional Tournament at Gillette, while the South Regional Tournament will be played at Rock Springs.


North Regional Tournament at Gillette:

Checking record vs. highest team in the quadrant not involved in the tie, Thunder Basin gets the #1 Northeast seed over Campbell County, because the Lady Bolts went 3-1 vs. Sheridan, whereas the Lady Camels went 2-2.

Friday, May 15th:

Advertisement

(#1 NE) Thunder Basin vs. (#4 NW) Jackson – 11am

(#2 NW) Natrona County vs. (#3 NE) Sheridan – 11am

(#2 NE) Campbell County vs. (#3 NW) Kelly Walsh – 1pm

(#1 NW) Cody vs. (#4 NE) Worland – 1pm

Semi-Finals:

Advertisement

Thunder Basin/Jackson winner vs. Natrona County/Sheridan winner – 3pm Winner qualifies for the state tournament.

Campbell County/Kelly Walsh winner vs. Cody/Worland winner – 5pm Winner qualifies for the state tournament.

Consolation Round:

Thunder Basin/Jackson loser vs. Natrona County/Sheridan loser – 3pm LOSER OUT!

Campbell County/Kelly Walsh loser vs. Cody/Worland loser – 5pm LOSER OUT!

Advertisement

Saturday, May 16th:

TBA vs. TBA – 10am LOSER OUT! Winner qualifies for the state tournament.

TBA vs. TBA – 10am LOSER OUT! Winner qualifies for the state tournament.

2 10am winners vs. each other – 1pm 3rd Place

TBA vs. TBA – 1pm 1st Place

Advertisement

South Regional Tournament at Rock Springs:

Friday, May 15th:

(#1 SW) Laramie vs. (#4 SE) Torrington – 11am

(#2 SE) Cheyenne East vs. (#3 SW) Green River – 11am

(#2 SW) Rock Springs vs. (#3 SE) Wheatland – 1pm

Advertisement

(#1 SE) Cheyenne Central vs. (#4 SW) Cheyenne South – 1pm

Semi-Finals:

Laramie/Torrington winner vs. Cheyenne East/Green River winner – 3pm Winner qualifies for the state tournament.

Rock Springs/Wheatland winner vs. Cheyenne Central/Cheyenne South winner – 5pm Winner qualifies for the state tournament.

Consolation Round:

Advertisement

Laramie/Torrington loser vs. Cheyenne East/Green River loser – 3pm LOSER OUT!

Rock Springs/Wheatland loser vs. Cheyenne Central/Cheyenne South loser – 5pm LOSER OUT!

Saturday, May 16th:

TBA vs. TBA – 10am LOSER OUT! Winner qualifies for the state tournament.

TBA vs. TBA – 10am LOSER OUT! Winner qualifies for the state tournament.

Advertisement

2 10am winners vs. each other – 1pm 3rd Place

TBA vs. TBA – 1pm 1st Place




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending