Connect with us

Washington

Uber and Lyft drivers in Washington state gain access to unemployment and paid leave under newly signed law

Published

on

Uber and Lyft drivers in Washington state gain access to unemployment and paid leave under newly signed law


Tens of thousands of ride-hailing drivers in Washington state will be the first in the nation to be entitled to unemployment insurance and paid family and medical leave under a bill signed by the governor this week.

The legislation Gov. Jay Inslee signed into law expands on other benefits — guaranteed wages and paid sick leave — that the state’s transportation-network company drivers gained last year from a bill backed by Uber Technologies Inc.
UBER,
-1.84%
and Lyft Inc.
LYFT,
-3.51%.

“We know the nature of work is evolving, and so must the programs and policies that support workers and their families,” Inslee said during a bill-signing ceremony Monday.

The ride-hailing companies, which are trying to protect their business models, are advocating a “third way” in labor law that gives drivers some benefits that other employees receive but doesn’t classify them as employees.

Advertisement

When the legislation was passed in mid-April, an Uber spokesperson called the bill “a true compromise between state lawmakers, labor leaders and transportation network companies to afford drivers historic new benefits while protecting the independence and flexibility they say they want.”

“This is another historic win for drivers in Washington state and is a continuation of the progress made last year,” a Lyft spokesperson said.

Peter Kuel is president of the Drivers Union in Washington, which is affiliated with Teamsters Local 117, which backed the bill.

“Finally, Uber & Lyft drivers in Washington state will no longer have to make the choice between caring for a sick family member and earning the money that allows them to provide for that family,” Kuel said. “For-hire drivers deserve the same rights as every other worker in this country.”

But Veena Dubal, a law professor at UC College of the Law in San Francisco who advocates for gig workers, said she is “concerned that this bill further entrenches the companies’ business model and legalizes the fiction that these workers are not employees.”

Advertisement

The law will go into effect in July 2024.

Ride-hailing drivers get paid for what the companies have referred to as “engaged time,” or the time between when they accept a ride request and complete the ride. A legislative report with specifics of the bill calls that “passenger platform time.” The hours on which unemployment insurance eligibility will be based is double the passenger platform time, which the ride-hailing companies will be required to report to the state.

For the purposes of the paid family or medical leave, a driver must have worked at least 820 hours in Washington during either the first four of the past five quarters, or the last four quarters before submitting for leave. The total hours worked will be calculated by taking total earnings and dividing by the state’s minimum wage. Drivers will have to pay premiums into the program and will be reimbursed by the ride-hailing companies.

Individuals who are considered employees pay into their states’ disability and leave systems along with their employers, and employees’ contributions are automatically deducted from their paychecks. Because drivers are not considered employees, they are being considered self-employed for the purposes of paid leave, and must pay the premiums up front.

See: Seattle becomes first city to give delivery drivers permanent paid leave benefits

Advertisement

State Rep. Liz Berry, who wrote the legislation, explained in an email to MarketWatch that “this complexity is why the Paid Family & Medical Leave portion of this bill is structured as a pilot with an additional report, to gain more insight into user behavior and develop a permanent policy.”

The pilot expires in 2028, but Berry said that in the meantime, the reimbursement process will allow drivers to be eligible for paid leave by paying into the system and being compensated by the companies, “where otherwise the cost of coverage would be solely theirs.”

Berry said in a tweet that the signing of her bill is “an incredible win for workers of Washington!”

From the archives (May 2022): Seattle OKs minimum wage for gig workers at delivery companies

Advertisement



Source link

Washington

Blair business, Washington County discuss preparing for looming flood threat

Published

on

Blair business, Washington County discuss preparing for looming flood threat


BLAIR, Neb. (WOWT) – With officials on alert for rising waters on the Missouri River, 6 News checked in with Blair.

Staff with the Cottonwood Cove Marina and RV Resort, which is right along the river, said they have been keeping an eye on conditions since Friday, and that the National Weather Service has been doing a good job keeping staff up to date.

Owner Mike Lupardus told 6 News they began having people move their more than 130 RVs to the higher campground Friday, and he expects them to finish that by Sunday. He said that was affecting 300 people.

Lupardus said they were there for the 2019 floods, and that did more than $800,000 in damage.

Advertisement

But he feels that was a different animal from what they’re preparing for now.

“It sounds like our crest here is going to be around Wednesday, so we’ve got some time to continue to make preparations for this high water,” Lupardus said. “It looks like it’s going to be a quick event—an up and down—where ‘19, you know, it lasted months and months.”

The Washington County Sheriff’s Office said so far, they’ve only set barricades at the wayside for when they would use them to close off roads in the event of a flood.

6 News also reached out to Washington County Emergency Management. We’ll bring you updates once we hear about their plans.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Netanyahu again claims the US is withholding arms shipments, days after Washington denies it

Published

on

Netanyahu again claims the US is withholding arms shipments, days after Washington denies it


TEL AVIV – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his Cabinet on Sunday that there had been a “dramatic drop” in U.S. weapons deliveries for Israel’s war effort in Gaza, doubling down on a claim that the Biden administration has denied and underscoring the growing strains between the two allies.

Netanyahu told his Cabinet that the drop had occurred four months ago, without specifying which weapons, saying only that “certain items arrived sporadically but the munitions at large remained behind.”

The spat highlights how high tensions have surged between Israel and Washington over the war in Gaza, particularly surrounding the Israeli military’s conduct in the beleaguered territory and the harm to civilian life there. President Joe Biden has delayed delivering certain heavy bombs since May over those concerns, but his administration fought back last week against Netanyahu’s charges that other shipments had also been affected.

Netanyahu told the Cabinet that he was driven to release a video in English last week after weeks of unsuccessful pleas with American officials to speed up deliveries. He said a resolution appeared close.

Advertisement

“In light of what I have heard over the past day, I hope and believe that this matter will be solved soon,” he said, without elaborating.

Netanyahu’s video last week sparked an uproar among critics in Israel and was met with denial and confusion from White House officials. White House national security spokesman John Kirby said the U.S. was “perplexed” by Netanyahu’s claims. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, “We generally do not know what he’s talking about.”

His remarks came hours after Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant traveled to Washington for meetings with senior officials. A statement from Gallant’s office said he would discuss “maintaining Israel’s qualitative edge in the region” but made no mention of the weapons issue.

The war in Gaza, which was sparked by Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on southern Israel, has tested the U.S.-Israel relationship like never before. While the U.S. has staunchly supported Israel’s aims of freeing hostages taken into Gaza and defeating Hamas, it has grown increasingly concerned over the rising Palestinian death toll and the humanitarian crisis created by the war.

Biden has felt pressure from progressive Democrats to take a tougher line against Israel, and he has sharpened his warnings to Netanyahu over military tactics in the Gaza Strip. But after threatening to impose a more sweeping ban on arms transfers over an assault on Rafah, the administration has avoided any suggestion that Israel’s expanding push into the southern Gaza city has crossed a red line.

Advertisement

During an election year, Biden is also facing critics on the right who say he has moderated his support for an essential Mideast ally.

For Netanyahu, the growing daylight with the U.S. also poses political risks and opportunities. His critics see the public spats as the result of a leader prepared to wreck important alliances and tarnish Israel’s image in the world for political gain.

But the rift grants the long-serving leader a chance to show his base that he isn’t beholden to the U.S. and that he is putting Israel’s interests first.

Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Advice | Carolyn Hax: Mom worries about daughter’s family plans with polyamorous couple

Published

on

Advice | Carolyn Hax: Mom worries about daughter’s family plans with polyamorous couple


Dear Carolyn: For the last three years, my adult daughter has been in a polyamorous relationship with a married couple. They live in another state, and I’ve met the couple only twice. I like the wife more than the husband. She’s similar to my daughter. Both women hold well-paying jobs with potential for advancement. The husband puts in his 40 hours at a mediocre job, then plays video games while his wife and my daughter take care of the house.

But here’s where things have gotten really difficult for me. The couple recently decided to have a baby. My daughter announced this by telling me out of the blue, “You could be a grandmother soon.” I hate to be shallow, but any baby this couple has will not feel like my grandchild.

After I processed the information for a few days, my daughter and I had a long talk. I expressed my feelings, that the baby would have two sets of doting biological grandparents and I would just be some woman they saw every once in a while. I also asked my daughter if she was ready for the many changes a baby would make to their lives.

My daughter said she understood. Well, suddenly, she tells me she will adopt the baby as a “third parent.” (The wife is not yet pregnant.) I asked her if she fully understood all that adoption entailed. If she and the couple ever broke up, she would still be the child’s legal parent. I asked her why she felt the need to adopt the child and advised her to see an attorney before making any decision.

Advertisement

I’m worried she’s planning to adopt because of my remark about not feeling a grandmotherly connection. Also, could they be using my daughter as a cash cow to finance their dream? I’m confused and losing sleep. Do I keep my mouth shut or give my honest opinion when asked? I love my daughter dearly and would hate to drive a wedge between us.

Struggling Mom: I have a bunch of opinions right now, and I doubt “wouldn’t feel like a real grandmother” would be foremost among them if I were in your position. Though none of us knows how we will feel until we get to a situation ourselves.

This I do know: Your daughter’s domestic arrangements are not for you (or me) to fix for her, and your feelings are not for your daughter to fix for you.

Some part of your daughter’s life will always confuse you — that’s in a kid’s job description. But you can go a long way toward easing your mind if you keep those basic lines clear. Her home life is hers, and your feelings are yours.

Your responses so far to her news have blurred these lines. (In a food-processor kind of way.) Unless she asked your opinion, your warnings and concerns were incursions into her business. Well-meaning, for sure, but incursions nonetheless. A would-be grandmother is no more entitled to weigh in on an adult’s family planning than anyone else.

Advertisement

Plus, um, the thing you carefully composed as, “Are you sure you’re ready for the big life changes?” always comes out as, “You shouldn’t have a baby!” Always. Ask anyone who has been on the receiving end.

Your daughter is still communicating with you after this, so that’s good. You two are strong, I’m guessing.

Meanwhile, it is not her job to make life choices that help her parent feel better. Adults get to have or not have children as they are able to and see fit to. If you want to feel like a grandmother, then make the best of the opportunities — the grandchildren — you’re given. What else can I say? What else can you do?

I don’t mean to sound unfeeling. As I said at the outset, I have plenty of thoughts of my own here; they’re simply not relevant to the math of the situation. Which is:

· Your daughter will do what your daughter will do.

Advertisement

· You do not have a meaningful say in what that is.

· Your choice is to embrace your daughter, as is, misgivings and all, and any baby if there ever is one, or to distance yourself.

· If this choice comes with feelings you feel unable to manage or contain, then don’t expect your daughter to help you with that. Seek help from outside your shared family circle.

· If she asks your advice on X, ask how she feels about X and proceed from there.

· And if you already feel more distant from your daughter than you would like, then now beats later as the time to try to remedy that.

Advertisement

You were right to make one point, even if she already knew it: lawyer. Laws and families are evolving. Plus, the wise leave neither their hearts nor their children’s custody to chance.

Last thing, for you: If you ever think there’s no place for you amid younger generations because they’ve changed too much, then the mistake is yours. Adapt, or don’t; not one digit of that math has changed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending