A multimillion-dollar mission meant to be the guts of Utah’s inland port seems to be having hassle getting off the bottom, but it surely’s making large bucks for the location’s property proprietor.

Utah Inland Port Authority officers introduced plans a 12 months in the past to construct a transloading facility, which might repackage freight from rail to vehicles and vice versa. Few particulars in regards to the mission have trickled to the general public within the months since, aside from the ability can be constructed south of a Union Pacific intermodal hub close to 5500 West and paid for with a portion of a $150 million public infrastructure district bond.

“We count on to interrupt floor in April or early Might on the primary constructing,” Jill Flygare, the port’s chief working officer, wrote in a Feb. 11, 2022, e mail obtained by The Salt Lake Tribune.

Not solely has the port authority not moved a shovel load of filth for the mission, but it surely additionally has but to disclose any constructing designs or development plans for the ability.

“It retains getting pushed again as a result of we received a brand new board,” Jack Hedge, the port authority’s outgoing government director, mentioned in an interview final month. “… We hope to do a groundbreaking hopefully this summer time.”

There doesn’t appear to be any inside settlement about how a lot the transloading facility will value. Hedge mentioned it can have a price ticket of round $52 million for “full build-out in three phases.” However Flygare instructed The Tribune it was a determine she had by no means heard earlier than.

“We don’t know that,” Flygare mentioned in an interview Wednesday. “… I used to be taken off guard once I noticed that quantity.”

One factor that does appear clear is that the proprietor of the proposed transloading website stands to make thousands and thousands for the foreseeable future.

Who’s making the most of the port’s mission?

The Utah Inland Port Authority will fee and function the transloading facility. However it received’t personal the land beneath it, or, doubtlessly, the constructing itself.

Salt Lake County data present the property consists of two parcels owned by an organization known as “BOYER 1100 SOUTH INDUSTRIAL, LC; ET AL.”

In a data request looking for all correspondence, contracts and different paperwork regarding the transloading facility, the port authority supplied a floor lease settlement with “1100 South Industrial, LLC” for a 30-year time period. That lease started Jan. 8, 2021, and its present month-to-month fee is $120,221. By the tip of this month, the Utah Inland Port Authority could have paid practically $2.8 million in hire for a mission that has but to be constructed, in line with the contract. The port authority can also be liable for property taxes.

(A survey included with the lease signifies the property beforehand was owned by Metropolis Creek Reserve, an actual property arm of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, as not too long ago as 2020.)

Jono Gardner, a companion with the true property funding agency Gardner Batt, is listed as the owner contact for the property. Nathan R. Boyer, president of The Boyer Co., signed the lease because the property’s supervisor.

It seems the property house owners can even be accountable for development, each time it begins.

“We’re beneath contract with Boyer/Gardner,” Flygare’s Feb. 11 e mail famous, “who will construct the transloading facility to our specs.”

That development contract was not included within the paperwork The Tribune requested, which Flygare confirmed (the newspaper has since filed an attraction to get a replica of it). Flygare additionally confirmed the settlement is with the identical firm that owns the parcel.

“They’ve a three way partnership of the property,” Flygare mentioned.

The port authority signed the build-to-suit deal round February of this 12 months, Flygare added. As soon as the transloading facility is full, the port authority both should buy the constructing “based mostly on development plus a growth charge,” or it may well lease the constructing.

“I can’t offer you a quantity at this time,” Flygare responded when requested how a lot the ability will value, “as a result of that evaluation, we’re nonetheless going via. We count on to have that full evaluation executed within the subsequent two weeks.”

The port authority secured a $150 million bond final October. Of these funds, $80 million is put aside in a restricted account, Flygare mentioned, and awaiting a choice from the Utah Supreme Courtroom in a lawsuit filed by Salt Lake Metropolis.

One other $33 million, Flygare mentioned, “is on the market for the port authority to attract down and use for tasks.”

Does the transloading facility create unfair competitors?

It’s not fully clear why the inland port wants a transloading facility in any respect. Salt Lake Garfield and Western Railway, a short-line rail firm not too long ago acquired by Patriot Rail, already gives transloading providers in Salt Lake Metropolis’s northwest quadrant.

What’s extra, Salt Lake Garfield and Western affords transloading to 2 of the nation’s main rail carriers — Union Pacific and BNSF — whereas the inland port authority’s facility would have entry solely to Union Pacific trains.

(BNSF didn’t reply to a request for remark on the time of publication.)

Requested whether or not the port was creating an unfair benefit for one rail firm over one other, Flygare mentioned it as an alternative would permit for higher market competitors.

“Having [the port authority] put a transloading facility the place we’re is the other of making an unfair benefit,” Flygare mentioned. “Having [the port authority] personal the ability is definitely opening up entry to extra customers as a result of when you’ve got a single proprietor or an organization proudly owning a transloading facility, you restrict entry.”

Union Pacific will not be fully on board, nevertheless, with being a companion to the transloading mission. Scott Wolford, the port authority’s director of expertise and enterprise coverage, revealed final month the rail provider had declined to permit direct entry to its intermodal hub, that means the port authority should use the identical gate as every other cargo hauler.

“Now we have had a number of discussions with the Utah Inland Port Authority in reference to direct entry between the proposed transload facility and our Salt Lake Metropolis intermodal ramp,” a Union Pacific spokesperson wrote in a press release. “Now we have not closed the door on any request. We stay up for additional dialogue as this mission strikes ahead and extra info comes accessible for Union Pacific to contemplate.”

Editor’s notice • This story is on the market to Salt Lake Tribune subscribers solely. Thanks for supporting native journalism.