New Mexico
Venezuelan refugees detained in NM fearful of more deportations to Mexico • Source New Mexico
A man from Venezuela who said he fled kidnapping and torture in his home country has been held in federal immigration custody in New Mexico for nearly six months.
Now, he’s watching Immigration Customs and Enforcement agents deport other Venezuelan asylum seekers — not to their home country but to places in Mexico that are potentially dangerous for people migrating. The man already experienced violence in that country and fears more if he is forced back to a place where human rights advocates have documented many other refugees who have faced kidnapping, torture and assaults.
Trapped between the fear of violence and persecution in their home countries, the treacherous journey through Central America, and a Biden administration policy that some experts say effectively bans asylum in the United States, he and hundreds of other people are being held in administrative detention for prolonged periods without knowing their future.
The Biden administration published a rule in May that created a presumption of ineligibility for asylum, which means people can be denied entry into the country if they passed through another country on the way without applying for asylum in that country.
Advocates sometimes refer to the regulation from Biden as an “asylum ban” because of how hard it is for people to overcome the presumption.
Nearly six weeks ago, immigration attorney Sophia Genovese said she and her team of four law students won the release of some Venezuelans from the Cibola County Correctional Center in Milan, N.M.
However, in late March, deportation officers in Cibola told the rest of the men still held there that the ICE El Paso Field Office would not release any more Venezuelans from custody into the United States, according to emails shared with Source New Mexico. Instead, the federal government had plans to start deportations to Mexico, the emails show.
The officers handed the Venezuelans forms in English asking whether they would be afraid of being deported to Mexico. Source New Mexico reviewed a redacted copy of the form.
Two immigration attorneys, Sophia Genovese and Zoe Bowman, said that without access to a translator, some asylum seekers said yes, feeling left without a choice and wanting to get out of detention. Some said no, refusing to go back to Mexico.
“A lot of people are desperate because it’s not easy here, it’s very difficult,” the asylum seeker said of the conditions inside Cibola County Correctional Center. “A lot of them are taking their chances, risking their lives to be deported.”
Genovese, who represents the asylum seeker, said the people who are going to be deported to Mexico aren’t receiving information about what happens afterward.
Source New Mexico interviewed the asylum seeker by telephone through an interpreter, and granted him anonymity in order to protect him from possible retaliation in his asylum case for sharing his story.
He’s not the only Venezuelan refugee who refuses to be deported to Mexico. On March 29, when deportation officers at Cibola started informing Venezuelan asylum seekers they intended to deport them to Mexico, 145 of them wrote a letter to ICE to state their abuses and fear of removal to Mexico.
“This is unjust. We suffered greatly in Mexico when we traveled to the USA to seek asylum,” they wrote. “To send us back to Mexico is to send us back to danger and death.”
Deportation to Mexico is only one potential outcome for the asylum seekers, but ICE has not confirmed what will happen to them. ICE is processing removals before any release requests, Genovese said.
ICE did not answer questions about the deportations from the Cibola County Correctional Center sent by Source New Mexico on April 8. We will update this story if and when we hear back.
‘No end in sight’
Some Venezuelan asylum seekers who have received orders by a federal judge to be deported are being held for prolonged and indefinite periods of time in detention facilities in New Mexico, Colorado and Louisiana. This is according to emails from Genovese and another immigration lawyer to high-ranking ICE officials in March and April.
Genovese, managing attorney at the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center, and Sirine Shebaya, executive director of the National Immigration Project, explained in the emails to ICE “there is no end in sight to the detention of Venezuelan nationals” because of a diplomatic dispute between the U.S. and Venezuela.
In January, Venezuela announced it would “stop accepting repatriation flights from the U.S.” after the U.S. imposed oil sanctions in response to Venezuelan courts’ decision to uphold a ban blocking a leading opposition candidate for the presidency.
That same month, the U.S. State Department went a step further and declined to renew an oil and gas relief license with Venezuela due to political repression of opposition party members by the Venezuelan government. That license expires Thursday.
The Migration Policy Institute reports that the U.S. and Venezuela were negotiating cooperation in accepting returnees, but the deal fell apart in February.
“This political situation between the United States and Venezuela makes removal to Venezuela impossible in the reasonably foreseeable future,” the lawyers wrote to ICE. “These individuals should not be detained while their deportation is impracticable. We therefore request that ICE take immediate steps to release them from detention.”
Since then, 65 Venezuelan asylum seekers have been deported from Cibola County to Mexico, according to Genovese. The first group included 15 people deported on April 1, and a second group of 50 people on April 5, she said.
Around a dozen Venezuelan asylum seekers are also stuck in limbo at the Otero County Processing Center in Chaparral and the El Paso Service Processing Center, according to Bowman, who meets with asylum seekers and has clients in both facilities.
“It’s not because they have ongoing court proceedings, or there’s anything they can do with their immigration cases,” said Bowman, who is the supervising attorney with the Detained Deportation Defense team at Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center. “They’re just sitting there because ICE doesn’t know what to do with them.”
The asylum seeker said men still held in Cibola spoke with some of those who were deported, who told them they were put onto a plane to Tapachula near the border with Guatemala, and released “in a very dangerous area.”
Genovese said based on what the first group experienced, and through communications with people still held at Cibola, they were dropped off in the southern part of Mexico near the border with Guatemala, and not given any immigration paperwork, “essentially stranded.”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
New Mexico
New Mexico AG Wants to Know Where Epstein Records Are
New Mexico’s top prosecutor says federal officials are slow-walking key Jeffrey Epstein files, and it may be costing the state its chance to build a case. In a sharply worded June 30 letter released on Thursday, Attorney General Raul Torrez accused the Justice Department of blocking access to unredacted records tied to Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, warning that evidence degrades and witnesses disappear with each passing day, reports CNN. The agency’s refusal to release the files “is causing real and escalating harm,” Torrez wrote in a letter last week to acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche, per the New York Times.
The state reopened its criminal probe in February after the federal release of millions of Epstein-related documents, including an unverified tip about two foreign girls allegedly buried near the property at the behest of Epstein and a “Madam G.” The DOJ says it responded to New Mexico last month and stands ready to assist if the state uncovers possible federal crimes, notes Reuters.
Torrez counters that his office has made six attempts since February to secure documents or at least an in-person meeting, calling the more than 130-day delay “unreasonable,” per CNN. The dispute unfolds as lawmakers condemn heavy redactions in the Epstein files and an internal DOJ watchdog reviews the process. Zorro Ranch, near Santa Fe, has been named by multiple survivors, including Chauntae Davies and the late Virginia Giuffre, as a site of sexual abuse.
New Mexico
NM Delegation Demands Answers On Reports Of DEA Declining To Seize Massive Fentanyl Shipments, Calls For Immediate Reforms
U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), and U.S. Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.) sent a letter demanding answers from U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole on why the DEA allowed large quantities of fentanyl to circulate unseized in New Mexico communities.
Trafficking of fentanyl and other opioids poses one of the most severe — and often deadly — public health threats facing New Mexico and the nation. Illicit fentanyl, a Schedule I controlled substance, is an exceptionally potent synthetic opioid that can be fatal even in extremely small quantities. Illicitly manufactured fentanyl has been the primary driver of the overdose epidemic in the U.S.
Whistleblower complaints allege that Albuquerque-based DEA agents declined to interdict at least 1.8 million fentanyl pills between 2023 and 2025 in hopes of taking down a larger supply chain.
“We unequivocally assert that allowing fentanyl to go unseized creates an unconscionable risk to New Mexicans,” the lawmakers wrote to DEA Administrator Cole.
In 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and DEA established “Fentanyl Protocols” directing agents to “seize or otherwise prevent the distribution” of fentanyl “as soon as practicable” to protect public safety. In 2024, the DOJ revised those protocols to provide law enforcement with greater discretion, allowing agents to weigh public safety risks against “the benefits to be achieved through preserving the investigation.” A 2024 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigative summary further states that the U.S. Attorney’s Office acted reasonably in allowing certain drugs to remain unseized and concluded that doing so posed no “specific danger to public health and safety.”
“We adamantly disagree with this internal assessment, and we urge your agency to immediately revert fentanyl protocols to the 2017 standard of seize or otherwise prevent the distribution of fentanyl as soon as practicable,” the lawmakers underscored. “We will be taking all necessary actions in Congress to better ensure the safety of New Mexicans and expect that you will stand with us in those efforts.”
The lawmakers concluded their letter by demanding responses to a request for written documentation on all instances where the DEA declined to interdict fentanyl, and the following questions on the DEA’s fentanyl interdiction policies, investigative protocols, and enforcement practices:
- Provide comprehensive written documentation of all individual instances, occurring in New Mexico since January 2017, including dates, locations and amount of suspected contraband, during which DEA has declined to interdict fentanyl in the course of a Title III or electronic surveillance investigation. Please also indicate the extent to which fentanyl involved in these investigations was ultimately recovered.
- What are DEA’s current internal directives and guidelines dictating how federal agents manage active drug-trafficking investigations involving fentanyl? Specifically, what protocols instruct agents on whether to seize a shipment of fentanyl immediately or allow it to pass temporarily under surveillance?
- What internal DOJ or DEA documentation determines, or may supersede, official fentanyl interdiction and operational protocols both as a matter of agency-wide policy and also with regards to individual drug-trafficking investigations? How are these changes to operational protocols communicated to agents in the field? Please provide all such documentation since January 2017.
- Under what circumstances are DEA agents permitted to exercise discretion, abandoning any presumption of interdiction, allowing a fentanyl transaction to proceed without immediate seizure? What safeguards are in place to protect communities when fentanyl shipments are allowed to continue as part of an ongoing investigation?
- Must agents possess a guaranteed, continuous ability to seize the substance immediately if the operational environment changes? How is the likelihood of losing operational surveillance, and the potential number of lives impacted if the substance enters the illicit supply chain, measured against the benefits of a successful investigation?
- What circumstances mandate when fentanyl must be safely interdicted, or swapped for a controlled delivery with a substituted substance, before it is allowed to advance within the supply chain? What levels of approval within your command structure are required to bypass immediate interdiction?
- What other tactics such as controlled deliveries, enhanced surveillance, contraband substitution are available to your agency to facilitate long-term, high-level investigations without an unacceptable risk to public safety? What resources can we provide to make these tactics of more common use to your agency?
- What is the reassignment status of DEA personnel based in New Mexico to out-of-state enforcement efforts since January 2025? During the same period, have DEA agents in New Mexico maintained their primary focus on drug-trafficking investigations or have any participated in joint immigration enforcement operations not limited to ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations?
For more information on the N.M. Delegation’s work to tackle the opioid crisis, click here.
The full text of the letter is here and below:
Related
New Mexico
Isolated storm chances continue for parts of New Mexico this weekend
Josh’s Friday Night Forecast
Drier air and hotter temperatures have continued to spread across northern New Mexico today. This has brought very fewer thunderstorms to northern and northwestern parts of the state this afternoon. A few storms across northeastern New Mexico have become strong this afternoon, while isolated storms have developed across southern and southeastern New Mexico.
Temperatures will remain just as hot Saturday afternoon. Rain and thunderstorm chances will increase across the eastern half of the state, while much of western, northern, and central New Mexico stays mostly dry.
High temperatures will cool a few degrees Sunday and Monday as a large area of high pressure remains well north of New Mexico. This will also allow a surge of monsoon moisture to move in from the east and southeast. While low-level moisture will increase across the state, forecast models have trended drier in the mid and upper levels of the atmosphere. Storms are still expected to develop Sunday and Monday afternoon, but coverage may not be as widespread as earlier forecasts suggested. Storms will also begin moving from east to west during the afternoon and evening. This pattern is expected to continue through the middle of next week, with drier air returning in the mid-levels and potentially limiting thunderstorm coverage.
-
Los Angeles, Ca1 hour ago19-year-old arrested, accused of distributing marijuana to minors across Riverside County
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoPhillies end the Tigers’ winning streak at 6 with a 4-2 victory
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoGiants select Barry Bonds’ nephew Peyton in third round
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoMark Cuban takes legal action against the Dallas Mavericks ownership over proposed arena deal
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoSouth Florida businesses report economic boom, as FIFA officials estimate a billion dollar economic impact
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoForecast: Looking ahead to toasty temps next week
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoDenver weather: Warming trend continues this weekend and into next week
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoTech Investor Vinod Khosla to Acquire the NFL’s Seattle Seahawks for $9.6 Billion