Connect with us

Nevada

On the Record: Nevada Republican secretary of state candidate Jim Marchant

Published

on

On the Record: Nevada Republican secretary of state candidate Jim Marchant


That is an installment in a sequence of “On the File” items highlighting the coverage stances of candidates working for main workplaces within the 2022 Nevada election. Verify again within the coming days and weeks for added protection. You will discover our protection of Marchant’s opponent, Cisco Aguilar, right here.

Within the race for Nevada secretary of state, former Republican assemblyman and one-time congressional candidate Jim Marchant has minimize a nationwide profile as a outstanding denier of the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election and vocal critic of the state’s election administration.

Marchant — who additionally unsuccessfully sued for a brand new election in his misplaced congressional bid following unfounded fraud claims — was among the many first Republicans to launch a marketing campaign for secretary of state. Although he was out-fundraised within the Republican major by Reno-area actual property developer Jesse Haw, he secured the secretary of state nomination in a crowded major discipline with 37.6 % of the vote.

On the path, he has most frequently talked about elections, together with saying that he wouldn’t have licensed President Joe Biden’s electoral victory had he been secretary of state and that Nevada votes haven’t counted “for many years,” due to a “cabal” rigging elections.

A assessment of fraud claims from the 2020 election by outgoing Republican Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske discovered no “evidentiary assist” for claims of widespread fraud. Her workplace stated later that, following a assessment of machines and workplace protocols, that it was “sure” Nevada voting machines weren’t compromised.

Advertisement

Marchant is amongst a nationwide “America First” slate of secretary of state candidates who deny the legitimacy of the 2020 election, he has been backed by outstanding election deniers like MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, has stated QAnon influencer Juan O Savin urged him to run for secretary of state, and has seen a monetary enhance from a national-level equipment of Republicans constructed across the post-2020 fraud claims.

Most notably, that features the America Mission — a gaggle based by former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne and former Trump Nationwide Safety Advisor Michael Flynn that has to this point given greater than $136,000 to a political motion committee, Conservatives for Election Integrity PAC, managed by Marchant.

That PAC has drawn at the very least two formal complaints, together with one from his former GOP opponent, Haw, in Might, and one other from the Democrat-aligned PAC Finish Residents United, which accused Marchant of utilizing his PAC’s sources to spice up his personal election bid and flout marketing campaign finance limits.

Nevada’s secretary of state maintains numerous duties, although the job primarily entails election administration, sustaining the state’s marketing campaign finance database and submitting techniques, and overseeing enterprise licensing, company registration and notaries.

Marchant is working in opposition to Democrat Cisco Aguilar, a lawyer and former member of the state’s athletic fee. The winner will substitute Cegavske, who’s termed out of workplace.

Advertisement

Marchant’s marketing campaign didn’t reply to a number of requests for an interview for our “On the File” sequence. A abstract of his coverage positions, taken from public statements and media appearances, is included under.

On elections

Throughout a candidate forum final month in Pahrump, Marchant informed an viewers that he took a “deep dive” into the state’s election administration insurance policies following his loss in Congressional District 4 in 2020, and that “what I realized is horrifying,” partly as a result of election techniques have been too advanced.

“One of many issues we will do after I get there’s simplify the election system,” he stated. “One of many issues that I realized, it’s so difficult proper now to placed on an election. It is wonderful we’ve the integrity that we’ve there, which isn’t lots. So we will change that. We will simplify the system, and most significantly, we’re going to open it up.”

Marchant’s push for simplicity and transparency, in his view, has already begun beneath the auspices of a multi-county effort to ditch the usage of digital voting machines and implement hand-counted paper ballots as an alternative.

Advertisement

Earlier this yr, Marchant and others pitched the usage of hand-counted paper ballots as an answer to unfounded claims of vote-rigging.

“With the paper ballots, hand-counted on the precinct stage, decentralized — we’re going in opposition to what the forces need,” Marchant informed Nye County commissioners in March. “They need centralized [systems] to allow them to manipulate it. So if we go in opposition to that and get again to decentralized … that is how we will assure that we’ve a good and clear election.”

Through the Pahrump discussion board, Marchant claimed that voting machines have been “simple” to hack, and known as for a “non-computer” election system.

Commissioners later adopted the proposal, becoming a member of Esmeralda County in ending the usage of voting machines. Extra just lately, the county’s latest clerk, Mark Kampf — who additionally denies the legitimacy of the 2020 election and has promoted election conspiracies — sparred with Cegavske’s workplace over new laws for hand-counting. Ultimately, state election officers authorized a compromise that noticed these laws carried out — with out making use of to Nye.

Nye County can be by far the most important county hand-counting ballots with greater than 32,000 registered voters. Esmeralda and Lander counties, which hand-counted major ballots this yr, counted simply 317 and roughly 1,500 ballots, respectively. Exterior teams have raised issues that the transfer would introduce human error into the counting course of.

Advertisement

Marchant has additionally promised to “do away with ERIC,” or the Digital Registration Info Heart. A nonprofit managed by 33 member-states, ERIC permits states to share voter registration data with one another and with the federal authorities, and permits states to determine duplicate registrations to be able to hold their respective voter rolls up to date.

Within the wake of the 2020 election, ERIC emerged as a goal for right-wing election deniers, who accused this system, with out proof, of functioning as a part of an enormous left-wing conspiracy funded by billionaire George Soros.

Marchant, within the mould of many Republicans each in Nevada and throughout the nation, has backed the implementation of voter I.D. laws that will require exhibiting state identification to vote. He has additionally frequently criticized the implementation of common mail-in voting, and implicitly linked the introduction of vote-by mail with alleged fraud.

He has additionally known as for a ban on mail-ballot drop packing containers, and as late as October of final yr, called for a nationwide audit of 2020 election outcomes. Republicans in key battleground states have jockeyed for such audits, usually in a bid to justify fraud claims. Nonetheless, these audits have additionally not discovered proof of widespread fraud, and election officers have been particularly important of probably the most outstanding audit in Arizona’s Maricopa County.

In the summertime of 2020, Nevada Democrats authorized sweeping election adjustments throughout a particular legislative session, together with the creation of common mail ballots designed as a response to the pandemic. Later, in the course of the common legislative session in 2021, the Democratic majority made a lot of the adjustments everlasting with AB321.

Advertisement

In June, Marchant informed a conservative radio host that he backed a proposal that will pressure all voters to re-register — an thought just like one floated by Pennsylvania Republican governor candidate Doug Mastriano. Such applications would probably violate federal legislation, and echo legal guidelines from the Jim Crow South that required re-registration yearly to be able to hold Black voters from the polls.

Final September, Marchant additionally informed Reuters that he would look to finish early voting and ban the usage of voting machines till they could possibly be inspected for proof of fraud.

On enterprise coverage

In a major debate in February, Marchant proposed lowering or eliminating the state’s enterprise licensing price. The state’s annual enterprise license price runs $500 for companies and $200 for different companies, although numerous different charges are additionally nonetheless relevant.

Extra just lately, he has extra particularly proposed a “business filing fee holiday” as “the primary of my guarantees to Nevadans.” He additionally has argued in campaign tweets that the submitting course of have to be streamlined and stated that “beginning a enterprise ought to solely take one type.”

Advertisement

Through the Pahrump discussion board, he argued the price vacation ought to final “till we get out of this malaise that we’re having proper now,” and, individually, known as for “much less and fewer burdensome laws on enterprise, identical to President Trump did.”

Marchant has touted his personal enterprise file, highlighting a decades-long profession as a tech enterprise entrepreneur on his marketing campaign web site. Nonetheless, the Las Vegas Evaluate-Journal reported final month that one among Marchant’s companies, a telecommunications firm known as Maxcess, paid out tens of millions of {dollars} in authorized settlements in 2002 and 2003.

Through the major, Marchant additionally often campaigned or tweeted about points unrelated to the workplace of secretary of state, together with calling for a ban on “underage transgender remedy in Nevada,” casting himself as anti-abortion and “pro-life,” calling for the opening of the controversial Thacker Go lithium mine in Humboldt County, and attacking Democrats, specifically Gov. Steve Sisolak and President Joe Biden.

This story is used with the permission of The Nevada Impartial. Go right here for updates to this and different tales.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Latest COVID strain doesn’t appear to pose a threat in Las Vegas Valley

Published

on

Latest COVID strain doesn’t appear to pose a threat in Las Vegas Valley


Wastewater is an early warning system for COVID and other diseases, and a collaborative effort in Nevada appears to be the first in the nation to detect a new strain of the disease — known as FLiRT.

“We detected it as early as March 29,” said UNLV Professor Dr. Edwin Oh, director of the UNLV lab that monitors wastewater in southern and northern Nevada, adding that his check of various websites from labs across the country that do such wastewater monitoring, indicates UNLV was first in finding the new variant.

The goal of the wastewater surveillance and research is to determine if any new strain of the constantly evolving disease — that once killed 25,000 Americans a week at its height in 2020 — might pose a problem for humans.

“So far it does not look like it (FLiRT) poses any major threats,” Oh said of the the two variants — KP.1 and KP.2. — that are mutations of FLiRT.

Advertisement

“We nerd out a lot on the different pathogens and variants,” Oh said of his crew that includes UNLV undergrads and wastewater treatment plant operators. About 15 different sites are checked weekly in Clark County and three or four sites in Northern Nevada.

The effort is to warn and protect the community from COVID variants that could raise the risk of major sickness potential.

Genetic material from the virus that causes COVID-19 can be found in human waste even when individuals have no symptoms. Tracking the amount of viral genetic material (viral load) in wastewater is an emerging method of monitoring increasing and decreasing trends of the virus in communities.

Wastewater surveillance has been ongoing for years. The most recent variant that raised eyebrows was JN.1 around Christmas time, Oh said. “It had about 50 mutations and a lot of us were concerned that it might bring added risk to the immunocompromised (population) or the vaccine resistant (population).”

The wastewater monitoring project is a collaboration between Southern Nevada Health District, Southern Nevada Water Authority, Desert Research Institute and UNLV.

Advertisement

Contact Marvin Clemons at mclemons@reviewjournal.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court rejects teachers union-backed appeal to put A's public funding on '24 ballot

Published

on

Nevada Supreme Court rejects teachers union-backed appeal to put A's public funding on '24 ballot


The Nevada Supreme Court on Monday struck down a proposed ballot initiative that would allow voters to decide whether to repeal the public funding that lawmakers approved last year for a new MLB stadium in Las Vegas.

The Monday ruling dealt a blow for detractors of the funding who saw a ballot question this year as the most effective route to repeal key parts of the sweeping bill that paved the way for the Oakland Athletics to move to Las Vegas.

NEVADA SUPREME COURT WILL TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT CHASING HORSE’S REQUEST TO DISMISS SEX ABUSE CHARGES

Five judges voted to uphold a lower court ruling that struck down the referendum. One judge dissented, while another concurred in-part and dissented in-part.

Advertisement

In a statement following the ruling, Schools over Stadiums political action committee spokesperson Alexander Marks said their focus is now to get the question on the 2026 ballot. The PAC is backed by the Nevada State Education Association, a statewide teachers union who has long opposed public funding for the stadium.

The stadium financing debate in Nevada mirrors those happening nationwide over whether public funds should be used to help finance sports stadiums.

People gather outside the Nevada Supreme Court in Carson City, May 8, 2018. The Nevada Supreme Court, Monday, May 13, 2024, struck down a proposed ballot initiative that would allow voters to decide whether to repeal the public funding that lawmakers approved last year for a new MLB stadium in Las Vegas.  (AP Photo/By Scott Sonner)

A’s representatives and some Nevada tourism officials have said the public funding could add to Las Vegas’ growing sports scene and act as an economic engine. But a growing chorus of stadium economists, educators and some lawmakers had warned that it would bring minimal benefits, especially when compared to the hefty public price tag.

The Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the entirety of the 66-page bill must be included in the ballot question to provide its full context. But ballot referendums can be no more than 200 words — which lawyers for Schools over Stadiums admitted made it difficult to explain the complex bill during oral arguments last month.

Advertisement

The court ruled that the 200-word description submitted by Schools over Stadiums was “misleading” and “explains the general effect of a referendum, but it does not describe the practical effects of this specific referendum.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Attorney Bradley Schrager, who represents the two plaintiffs who are labor union lobbyists in favor of the public funding, said on Monday that “all Nevadans have a right to participate in direct democracy, but they need to observe the laws that require properly informing the voters of a proposal. This measure obviously fails to do that.”

MLB owners have unanimously approved the A’s move to Las Vegas.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada shows biggest lead for Trump over Biden – 13 points – in new poll of swing states

Published

on

Nevada shows biggest lead for Trump over Biden – 13 points – in new poll of swing states


Could the third time be the charm for Donald Trump in Nevada?

It certainly looks like a possibility based on a new poll by the New York Times, Siena College and the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Trump lost in 2016 by 2.4 percentage points to Hillary Clinton and in 2020 by about the same difference to Joe Biden.

But the new poll of six swing states shows that among likely voters surveyed in Nevada, former President Trump leads President Joe Biden by 13 percentage points: 51% to 38%.

Advertisement

That difference may hinge on favorability.

Those with a “net unfavorable” view of Biden – somewhat or very unfavorable – is 64%. It rises to 70% net unfavorable among Nevada’s large nonpartisan population.

Regarding Trump, Nevada registered voters have a 49% net unfavorable view, according to those who responded to the poll. Fifty-four percent of registered nonpartisan have a net unfavorable view – 16 percentage points lower than for Biden.

If Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other third-party candidates are added to the mix, the difference stays approximately the same: Trump 14 points ahead of Biden if the vote were held today.

Advertisement

RFK Jr. would get 12% of Nevada’s votes, according to the survey.

As for whether he helps or harms one of the major party candidates, it doesn’t appear obvious: 10% of registered Republicans, 10% of Democrats and 15% of independents said they’d vote for RFK Jr.

Other poll findings – race/ethnicity, Rosen v. Brown

The poll shows Trump with a 9 percentage point lead in Nevada among registered Hispanic voters and a 6-point lead among “other” racial or ethnic minorities.

When Nevada voters were asked if they would support Democrat Jacky Rosen or Republican Sam Brown for U.S. Senate, Rosen holds a 2 percentage point advantage: 40% to 38%, which amounts to a toss-up based on the margin of error.

The Senate race shows a lot of room for movement, as about 23% of respondents said they didn’t know which one they’d pick or they refused to answer.

Advertisement

Trump leading in most other swing states

Among all the swing states surveyed, Trump has a 6 percentage point lead with a margin of error of 1.9 points for the overall survey.

Trump has an advantage in all but one of the other swing states surveyed.

  • Arizona: Trump ahead by 6 percentage points among likely voters
  • Georgia: Trump ahead by 9
  • Michigan: Biden ahead by 1
  • Pennsylvania: Trump ahead by 3
  • Wisconsin: Trump ahead by 1

The margin of error in Nevada’s results is reported as 4.5 percentage points.

The polls were conducted from April 28 to May 9, and 21% of the surveys of Nevada Hispanic voters were conducted in Spanish.

How this poll compares to others

An Emerson College/The Hill poll released April 30 showed the presidential race much tighter in Nevada, with Trump having a 1-point lead over Biden.

A Bloomberg/Morning Consult poll, also in April, showed Trump up by 8 percent points in Nevada while one in March by the Wall Street Journal had Trump ahead by 4.

Advertisement

However, the latest results track with another New York Times/Siena College poll about six months ago that showed Trump with a 12-point lead over Biden.

Mark Robison is the state politics reporter for the Reno Gazette Journal, with occasional forays into other topics. Email comments to mrobison@rgj.com or comment on Mark’s Greater Reno Facebook page.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending