Connect with us

Montana

Standout Montana, SDSU Players Repping Home States In FCS Championship

Published

on

Standout Montana, SDSU Players Repping Home States In FCS Championship


“Why are FCS teams in the Dakotas and Montanas so good?”

That’s been a popular question when HERO Sports does radio hits in SEC areas of the country. These stations spend 99.9% of their college football conversation talking FBS. So it’s an understandable question when they want to get the lowdown on the FCS and how the Midwest has had a stranglehold on it recently.

Only three states have been represented in the last three FCS title games, including this year’s: Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

North Dakota State played Montana State two years ago, NDSU played South Dakota State last year, and SDSU plays Montana this weekend.

Advertisement

In each of the last three playoff brackets, 3/4 of the semifinals have been teams from Montana or the Dakotas. And the national title game has become the Mon-Dak Challenge.

Casual college football fans are generally surprised at the level of play in such rural states. They are even more surprised to learn some of the biggest contributors are from in-state players. This year’s participants, No. 1 seed South Dakota State and No. 2 seed Montana, both have 16 in-state players on their 2-deeps. In total, the Jackrabbits have 28 players from South Dakota. The Grizzlies have 48 players from Montana.

And plenty of them are the star players.

For SDSU…

Its top four pass-catchers are SD natives in wide receivers Jadon and Jaxon Janke (Madison), WR Griffin Wilde (Sioux Falls), and tight end Zach Heins (Sioux Falls). Mason McCormick (Sioux Falls) is a multi-year All-American offensive lineman. Gus Miller (Brookings) won this season’s Rimington Award as the best FCS center. Cade Terveer (Brandon) is a starting defensive end for the No. 1 FCS scoring defense. Tucker Large (Sioux Falls) is a dynamic safety and punt returner

Advertisement

For Montana…

The top five tacklers are Montana natives: LB Braxton Hill (Anaconda), safety Ryder Meyer (Fairfield), LB Tyler Flink (Missoula), LB Ryan Tirrell (Missoula), and LB Levi Janacaro (Missoula). Trevin Gradney (Billings) is a starting cornerback with a team-high five interceptions. Jaxon Lee (Missoula), TJ Rausch (Missoula), and Garrett Graves (Eureka) are part of a deep stable of safeties. Junior Bergen (Billings) is an electric wide receiver and punt returner. Offensive lineman Journey Grimsrud (Huntley) received All-Conference accolades this fall.

Why do these teams dominate a subdivision of 128 members?

Actually, being in such rural states is an advantage. FCS schools in the east and south are surrounded by FBS schools, fighting to sell tickets, keep alumni engaged in their product and not the P5 product down the road, get more media attention, and attract local and regional sponsors.

“I think the best football is played in the Dakotas and the Montanas,” SDSU head coach Jimmy Rogers said. “You look at FCS football, the couple states — well, we don’t have professional sports. We are the professional sport in a sense. That, I think is cool. … I think it’s cool to have a bunch of guys that take pride in playing for their home state. You can see it with the passion on both sides and how we both play. There’s a physicality to it. There’s an effort to it. It’s bigger than just playing college football. It’s representing something that they take pride in, and I think that you could see it.”

Advertisement

Pound for pound, Montana is as fervent of college football fandom in America. You’re either a Grizzly or a Bobcat, and there is a genuine dislike for the other side. NDSU is the lowest-subsidized public FCS-level athletic department, yet its facilities are FBS-level due to external support. And SDSU has more momentum than anyone in the FCS with newer facilities and growing external support after last year’s national championship.

You need to invest for national success, even at the FCS level where there is still a purity aspect of college football that’s been lost in the power conferences. It’s easier to invest deeply in football when you know there will be a return on it with such passionate support from fans and local businesses.

“It’s just a cool experience,” Hill said. “I’m the only one from my town [Anaconda] on the Griz. And then you have guys like Levi Janacaro and Tyler Flink. We go around the state of Montana [for recruits] and everyone kind of meets up and everyone is similar. Once you start developing a relationship with one another and you develop that team goal, it’s just fun. And then the fan base in rural communities is amazing. It’s special. You go to Missoula on Saturdays and half the town of Anaconda or wherever that player may be from is there and supporting you.”

Of course, several power FCS programs in the south and east have moved up to the FBS. That has seen the power shift to the Big Sky and Missouri Valley Football Conference, where before the CAA and SoCon had years of owning the subdivision. However, NDSU’s run of national titles began when teams like App State, Georgia Southern, and Coastal Carolina were still in the FCS. And recent move-ups Sam Houston, Jacksonville State, and Kennesaw State were rarely going toe-to-toe with top FCS teams in the playoffs.

Location also helps in recruiting.

Advertisement

The Dakota and Montana programs recruit regionally. But they also get players from the south or the west. Coaches at these schools will often say they just need to get recruits from out of the region onto campus and at a game. The towns, town support, facilities, investments, and gameday atmospheres can’t be beaten by other FCS schools and plenty of FBS G5 schools.

While the current age of recruiting has seen power programs dip into the Dakotas and Montanas more, there still are hidden gems in the states. Guys who would probably be 3-star recruits if they lived elsewhere are 0-star recruits because they don’t go to the big camps. Offensive linemen who are 6-foot-5 and 250-pound three-sport athletes are overlooked because they’re still developing and play in towns of less than 1,000 people. They’re then 300-pounders as college upperclassmen and NFL prospects.

“I don’t think a lot of people expect that out of us,” Heins said. “I think we’re a bit underrecruited. It goes to show the level of talent that we have here even if we aren’t in major cities. We’re hard-working kids in these states, we’re going to grow and be tough and know how to play football.”

There is also something to be said about playing for their home-state teams.



For Montana kids growing up, sure they’d love to play in the NFL. But their football dreams are to play for the Grizzlies or the Bobcats. The heart and soul of the 2023 Montana team is the defense led by Montana guys, some of them former walk-ons who never faltered in their want to be a part of the team even though it took them four, sometimes five years to become a starter.

Advertisement

Montana star defensive tackle Alex Gubner is from California and said he didn’t know anything about Montana football when recruited. But he quickly learned as a redshirt.

“The moment I went in freshman year with coach Hauck and all the players, the team meetings and in the locker room, you understand that it’s a privilege and an honor to be on this team,” Gubner said. “Kids all over the state dream of putting on the Griz uniform. There are no pro teams here. We’re it. It’s either us or the neighbors. Guys like Braxton and Levi, it’s been their dream since they could walk to play for the Griz. And they’re living it out. It’s special to see so many guys want this for years and it’s finally coming to fruition.”

SDSU doesn’t have the decades-long tradition of Montana. But the Jacks’ rise in the 2010s from a playoff contender to a quarterfinalist to a semifinalist to now the juggernaut of the subdivision has brought new fandom across the state. And with that comes kids who grew up watching those former teams and are now current members. There is something to be said about keeping in-state recruits from getting out and also staving off the transfer portal when the core of your team has a unique sense of pride playing for your program.

“It’s big boy football up here,” Jaxon Janke said. “A lot of us are farm kids growing up. We learned what hard work is. It’s a testament to each school to recruit their areas. If you look at the comparison between SDSU and USD, we have way more dudes on the team from South Dakota and we’re more successful. We like to say that goes hand-in-hand. This team is super-connected, and being from the same state is a part of that.”

Advertisement



Source link

Montana

Montana AG letter alleges Helena violates law banning ‘sanctuary cities’

Published

on

Montana AG letter alleges Helena violates law banning ‘sanctuary cities’


HELENA — On Monday, Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen sent a letter to the City of Helena claiming the municipality is not in compliance with the state’s law banning “sanctuary cities.” The letter comes just under a month after the State of Montana launched an investigation into a city resolution on Helena Police policy and Helena’s involvement in federal immigration enforcement.

In the letter, Knudsen laid out the ways he believes the city’s resolution violated state law. The attorney general gave Helena 15 days to respond or reverse the policy. If the city does not comply, his office will pursue legal action.

“Helena’s resolution appears to contain blatant violations of this law,” wrote Knudsen.

MTN News

Advertisement

On January 26, 2026, the City of Helena adopted a resolution clarifying when and how the Helena Police Department will cooperate with federal immigration officials. The vote was 4 to 1. The Helena commission seats and the mayor are elected in non-partisan races.

In the letter, Knudsen alleges the resolution established “a broad sanctuary city policy” that seeks to protect every illegal immigrant, regardless of whether the individual had committed a serious crime or not. The state further claims the resolution gives illegal immigrants “special privileges” in plea deals and establishes a “free-for-all policy” where a police officer can request the unmasking of Department of Homeland Security and ICE officers.

Knudsen has requested that the City of Helena, in their response, specifically describe in detail how the resolution complies with Montana law, provide emails and correspondence from city staff and the commission regarding the resolution.

Helena City manager Alana Lake told MTN in a statement: “The City of Helena is aware of the issues being raised by the Attorney General’s Office and is reviewing the matter. While we cannot discuss the details of a potential legal issue, the City is committed to transparency and compliance with the law. The City takes these matters seriously and will continue to cooperate with the appropriate authorities while remaining focused on serving our community.”

City of Helena Commission Chambers

MTN News

Advertisement

Passed in 2021, Montana House Bill 200 prohibits a state agency or local government from implementing any policy that prevents employees or departments from communicating with federal agencies regarding immigration or citizenship status for lawful purposes. It also states governments must comply with immigration detainer requests if they are lawfully made.

HB 200 was backed by Republicans and passed with only Republican votes. Gov. Greg Gianforte signed the legislation into law on March 31, 2021.

Passage of the resolution by the Helena City Commission has drawn ire from conservative voices in Montana politics and on the national level.

ICE protest in Helena

MTN News

The resolution said the commission supported the Helena Police Department avoiding “committing its resources to federal action for which it has no authority,” such as entering into an agreement with the federal government to directly enforce immigration laws. Under federal law, immigration enforcement is conducted by federal agencies under the Department of Homeland Security. However, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, state and local governments can voluntarily enter into 287 (g) agreements with the federal government that allow them to enforce immigration laws.

Advertisement

The commission further supported HPD’s policy not to stop, detain, or arrest a person solely on suspected violations of immigration law, including assisting other agencies in an arrest based solely on immigration law.

DEEPER LOOK: Helena has seen a growing debate over ICE and local police involvement

In the resolution, the commission also supported an HPD officer, using their own discretion, requesting the identification and unmasking of a Department of Homeland Security Officer if the HPD officer “feels it will not be interfering with the actions of federal officers exercising their jurisdiction.”

“This adversarial relationship by local law enforcement toward federal officers itself undermines public safety and forces immigration officers to fear for their safety when they are simply carrying out their lawful duties,” wrote Knudsen.

The resolution further supports the City of Helena’s policy not to consider immigration consequences in a plea agreement with a defendant.

Advertisement
Montana state flag

Mack Carmack, MTN News

Montana state flag

The commission also supports the City of Helena not disclosing any sensitive information about any person – including immigration status, sexual orientation, or social security number – except as required by law.

“This is a restriction that directly conflicts with Montana’s prohibition on sanctuary jurisdictions, specifically ‘sending to, receiving from, exchanging with, or maintaining for a federal, state, or local government entity information regarding a person’s citizenship or immigration status for a lawful purpose,’” the attorney general wrote.

If a government is found to be violating Montana’s law banning “sanctuary cities”, the state could fine them $10,000 every five days, prevent them from receiving new grants from the state, and have their projects with the state re-prioritized. A government in violation can avoid penalties by becoming compliant with the law within 14 days of being notified of the violation.

Read the full letter from the Montana Attorney General to the City of Helena:

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Dispatches from the Wild: Montana’s wild inheritance at risk | Explore Big Sky

Published

on

Dispatches from the Wild: Montana’s wild inheritance at risk | Explore Big Sky


Steve Pearce and the future of the BLM  

By Benjamin Alva Polley EBS COLUMNIST 

If you care about hunting elk in crisp October air, floating a clear-running river for cutthroat trout, or simply taking your kids camping beneath a sky unspoiled by drill rigs, you should be outraged that Steve Pearce was ever considered to run the Bureau of Land Management. 

The BLM is the largest landlord in the West. It oversees nearly 245 million acres of public land—millions of those acres in and around Montana’s most cherished places. This land is the backbone of our elk and mule deer herds, our sage grouse leks, our pronghorn migration routes and our blue-ribbon trout streams. It’s also the stage on which Montana’s hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation economy plays out. 

Putting someone with Steve Pearce’s environmental record in charge of that land is like handing your cabin keys to the arsonist who’s always hated it. In the four months since Pearce was first nominated, it emerged that, if confirmed, he and his wife would divest from more than 1,000 oil and gas leases in Oklahoma to address potential conflicts of interest. While some senators strongly support his “active forest management” approach, he still faces opposition from groups alarmed by his record on public land transfers. On March 4, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee voted 11-9 to advance his nomination, despite concerns from conservation groups. 

Advertisement

Pearce’s track record is no mystery. He has consistently sided with extractive industries at the expense of wildlife, habitat and public access. He has supported opening more public lands to oil and gas drilling, weakening bedrock environmental safeguards and undermining science-based management. His votes and public statements have signaled again and again that he sees wild country as an obstacle to be overcome, not a legacy to be stewarded. 

For Montana, that posture is an existential threat. Our big-game herds rely on intact winter range and unfragmented migration corridors across BLM lands. Aggressive drilling, poorly planned roads and relaxed reclamation standards shred those habitats. Once you carve up a landscape with pads, pipelines and traffic, you don’t get solitude—or mature bull elk—back with the stroke of a pen. 

Anglers should be just as alarmed. Headwater streams and riparian corridors on BLM ground are the life support system for native bull trout, cutthroat and wild trout. A BLM director hostile to environmental safeguards is far more likely to greenlight development that increases sediment, degrades water quality and depletes the cold, clean flows our rivers depend on. 

If Pearce takes office, outdoor recreation—and the rural economies built around it—will not be spared. In Montana, hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation pump billions of dollars into local businesses, guiding operations, gear shops and main-street cafes. People travel here precisely because of the open space, healthy herds and functioning ecosystems that BLM lands help sustain. When those landscapes are sacrificed to short-term profit, we don’t just lose scenery; we lose jobs, identity and a way of life. 

This is not a partisan issue, especially in Montana. Public lands are one of the few things we truly share: ranchers who graze allotments, tribal communities with cultural ties to these places, hunters and anglers who’ve long defended habitat, and families who just want a place to pitch a tent. A BLM director should be a careful, science-driven steward accountable to all Americans—not a politician with a history of dismissing environmental protections as red tape. 

Advertisement

Montanans know what’s at stake. We’ve fought bad ideas before—land transfers, giveaway leases, rollbacks to bedrock conservation laws—and we’ve won when we stood together. Steve Pearce’s nomination should have been dead on arrival. The fact that he was even on the list tells us how vigilant we must remain. 

Our outrage must translate into action: calling elected officials, packing public hearings, writing letters and voting as if our public lands are on the line. Truly, they are. The BLM needs a director who sees these landscapes the way Montanans do: as sacred ground, not a balance sheet. 

Anything less is a betrayal of the wild inheritance we’re supposed to pass on. 

Benjamin Alva Polley is a place-based storyteller. His words have been published in Rolling StoneEsquireField & StreamThe GuardianMens JournalOutsidePopular ScienceSierra, and WWF, among other notable outlets,  and are available on his website.   

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Californians caught using ‘Montana Loophole’ to dodge supercar sales tax — and Beverly Hills is the worst

Published

on

Californians caught using ‘Montana Loophole’ to dodge supercar sales tax — and Beverly Hills is the worst


California has launched a huge crackdown on criminals buying and registering supercars outside of the state to avoid eye-popping sales tax.

Fourteen people have been charged after $20 million worth of vehicles were sourced to the Big Sky State in what authorities are calling the “Montana Loophole.”

California has launched a huge crackdown on criminals buying and registering supercars outside of the state to avoid eye-popping sales tax. Office of the Attorney General of California

The cars include a $1.8 million McLaren Elva, a Porsche 918 Spyder and a $1.26 million Ferrari F12TDF, the attorney general’s office said.

In the Golden State base rate sales tax is 7.25%. For a Lamborghini or Ferrari that can reach up to $250,000 or higher, that can mean a tax bill over $18,000. In Montana it is zero.

Advertisement

The gang, from Alameda, Marin, Santa Clara and Sacramento, allegedly dodged more than $1.8 million in taxes since 2018.

They are accused of filing false records showing the supercars were bought in Montana but then drove and kept them in California.

Fourteen people have been charged after $20 million worth of vehicles were sourced to the Big Sky State in what authorities are calling the “Montana Loophole.” Office of the Attorney General of California

The DMV has launched nearly 100 criminal investigations into similar schemes across California since 2023 and recovered $2.3 million. It says the schemes are costing over $10 million per year.

It says there are 601 fraudulently registered cars involved and the DMV and California Department of Tax and Fee Administration have reviewing all car sales made in Montana.

California AG Rob Bonta said: “When bad actors abuse legal loopholes and submit fraudulent documents to evade their obligations, the California Department of Justice will not stand idly by.

Advertisement

“Every dollar of unpaid taxes is a dollar taken from California’s roads, schools and the vital services our communities rely on.”

The DMV has launched nearly 100 criminal investigations into similar schemes across California since 2023 and recovered $2.3 million. It says the schemes are costing over $10 million per year. Office of the Attorney General of California

The AG’s office said Beverly Hills was the city with the most suspicious car sales, with 416 cases on its radar from the luxury enclave.

It also released a series of text messages from defendants in Marin County and Walnut Creek, which said: “Don’t want the state of California to know anything about this car.”

Another asked: “Before you deliver it to him can you please remove the dealer plate.” One more asked if those with Montana plates had issues, the reply was: “Not yet.”

Another defendant added: “70k saved — I can’t believe the registration lasts for five years — that’s crazy. Stupid California. Paid 3k to own a 600k car for 5 years — lol in Cali that’s like 75k for 5 years. Hella dumb.”

Advertisement

California DMV Director Steve Gordon said: “We encourage all Californians to do the right thing and register their vehicle here if they are operating it in California.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending