Connect with us

Montana

Everyone agrees Montana needs more state psychiatric beds, no one in Laurel wants them there • Daily Montanan

Published

on

Everyone agrees Montana needs more state psychiatric beds, no one in Laurel wants them there • Daily Montanan


LAUREL — To understand the controversy surrounding locating a psychiatric hospital in Laurel, city officials have heard hours and hours of testimony objecting to the concept — even though nothing formal has been proposed and it’s nearly impossible to find a single public official willing to offer opinions on the record.

Part of that is because nothing has been formally proposed to the Laurel City Council — and on advice of the city’s attorney, the eight council members have remained silent because if and when a proposal is submitted to build the 32-bed facility there, those council members will decide whether to accept the annexation not (currently the land is in the county).

For years, the Montana State Hospital has been over capacity, forcing the state to do something about just having 53 psychiatric beds for criminal justice holds in a state of 1.2 million.

What spurred on a flood of negative comments and rallied the community was notice of the state entering a buy-sell agreement for 114 acres at the western edge of town, along Old U.S. Highway 10.

Advertisement

Since the state purchased the acreage, residents have implored the city council to stop the project. State lawmakers and administration officials have budgeted for, and repeatedly outlined, the need for more psychiatric beds, and a location that isn’t deep inside the western side of the state.

Laurel residents have already organized, split up public comment time and led an effort to recall the mayor, Dave Waggoner, saying his treatment for cancer has made him unable to devote enough attention to the psychiatric facility and other council business, a charge which he denied.

During a Jan. 27 meeting, citizens packed the small city council chambers in Laurel, and dozens of residents had their objections read into the record, even though city officials repeatedly reminded them there was nothing official to comment on.

Members of the public spilled beyond the City Council chambers of Laurel on Jan. 27, 2026, even though the city had not received any formal plans for a proposed psychiatric facility near town (Laurel City Council feed via YouTube).

“While mental health treatment is important, this is a forensic mental health facility that serves individuals who are in the criminal justice system. That reality must be acknowledged,” said resident Bailey Dempster, who lives near the potential project site. “This is not a sigma or fear. It is about responsibility and a facility of this nature should be located in areas designed to support secure operations and public safety, not next to children, schools and family homes. Once the facility is built, the the impact is permanent. The consequences will be carried by residents long after this vote is taken. Please reconsider this location and look for safer alternatives.”

Limited to a three-minute time period, the comments lasted for nearly two hours. Residents have banded together, with an extensive list of questions they took turns reading. As one person’s time limit expired another would begin reading so that more than 100 questions were read into the record, including demands to know whether city staff had been disciplined for speaking to state officials about the project.

Advertisement

City officials acknowledge that the chief administrative officer did reach out in August to offer a suggestion of a different site, one that was ultimately not chosen. Irritated residents wanted to know who authorized the conversation, and accused city officials of orchestrating the deal before the public had any chance to comment. During the meeting, city officials pointed out other cities had made similar inquiries and proposals.

Residents have decried the project, ticking off a litany of concerns ranging from its proximity to an elementary school to a strain on the Laurel Police or the municipal water system. Furthermore, they say building a state psychiatric facility so close to residential homes will lessen the value of current property and put owners at risk in case of an inmate escape.

“I got grandkids going to school here,” said resident Rich Holstein. “And there’s just nothing good that really comes out of this. And in the end, I think that we really need to be looking at that: What would benefit Laurel? If there’s no benefit to Laurel other than we sold them some land, then why are we doing this? It’s really simple. Why we are doing it, and it just doesn’t make sense.”

But they’re not the only ones objecting.

Laurel Public Schools has passed a resolution calling on the city council to reject any proposal from the state to build the facility, with school board members and even Superintendent Matt Torix testifying at a council meeting, urging council members to vote against a proposal that doesn’t exist yet.

Advertisement

In a legislative update earlier this week, officials briefed the Child, Families, Health and Human Services Interim Committee about the possible siting, noting that while the parcel of land spans 114 acres, the actual location of the building will be more than a half-mile away from Laurel Elementary School. The state also provided maps of other Montana communities, including showing that the current Yellowstone County Detention Facility remains closer to an elementary school than the proposed psychiatric site.

An aerial map of the proposed site for a state-run psychiatric facility and its proximity to the nearest elementary school (Courtesy Montana Legislature).

One of the vocal opponents to the Laurel site is the chairman of the Yellowstone County Commission, Mark Morse, who has criticized the state for taking advantage of the largest county’s residents because they have invested in facilities and programs that help those getting out of prison while receiving little support from the state itself.

“The devil is in the details. Without details, I can’t support this facility being in Yellowstone County and that is ashamed, because Montana is in dire need of additional mental health resources but without details, I am concerned that they are building this facility not for additional space for these mentally ill folks, but as a replacement for the current forensic facility … which the state has admitted they struggle to staff,” Morse said.

Some of the claims, including Morse’s, have become almost accepted as gospel, which led the state to create a fact-and-myth, question-and-answer style presentation for lawmakers and the public in Helena earlier this week. One of the slides addressed the concern that Laurel was just opening the door to a larger facility, but officials from Montana DPHHS detailed millions of dollars of investments at Galen and Warm Springs, including staffing, saying, “DPHHS has invested more than $75M in MSH and Galen since 2021, signaling no intention of shuttering either facility.”

City officials aren’t commenting on the concept on the advice of the city attorney who has expressed concerns that weighing in publicly on the issue could prejudice the project and lead to a protracted legal fight.

Other state government officials are as conspicuously silent as Laurel residents are vocal.

Advertisement

During the hours of testimony reviewed by the Daily Montanan, two of Laurel’s legislative delegation — Sen. Vince Ricci and Rep. Lee Deming, both Republicans — have been invoked frequently as staunch opponents of the project. They wrote a letter to Gov. Greg Gianforte stating their public opposition to the state project.

When contacted by the Daily Montanan, Ricci said the letter spoke for itself, while Deming said he wasn’t even willing to talk about the letter.

Ricci and Deming oppose the project for several reasons. Both reference meetings that were originally planned and scrapped, including one which was going to be hosted by the Laurel Chamber of Commerce which was cancelled after members of the public were invited, but the press prohibited, something that would be a violation of the state’s open meeting laws and constitution.

“We maintain that the meetings should have proceeded. If only to respond to legitimate community concerns. The state has a responsibility to engage directly with the Laurel community on an issue of this importance and long-term impacts,” the letter said.

Laurel residents have also targeted other leaders, including Gov. Greg Gianforte, to try and halt the project. However, the governor’s office did not respond to inquiries sent this week about whether he had concerns with the project or the location siting in Laurel.

Advertisement

Other sites had been in the running to host the new facility, including Hardin and Miles City. The state has said repeatedly that Montana — a huge state geographically — should have two facilities to serve the east and west portions of the state. Demand is certainly a part of that driver — currently Yellowstone County is housing 18 prisoners who are being held because there’s no availability at the state’s only facility in Galen.

Moreover, nearly three-out-of-every four people needing admission to the psychiatric facility east of the Continental Divide are from Yellowstone County, with officials saying without the facility being located there, it may just re-create one of the current concerns: The travel time transporting prisoners back and forth from the eastern half of the state to Galen, located between Butte and Missoula, along Interstate 90.

One official who is working on the project told the Daily Montanan that both the governor’s office as well as officials from the Department of Public Health and Human Services both agree that because of huge demand for services in Yellowstone County, locating the psychiatric hospital anywhere else would be a misuse of state resources.

“Finally, it is abundantly clear that our constituents do not want this facility built anywhere near our town,” the letter from the two Laurel legislators concluded. “This issue is splitting Laurel and causing bitter divisions that we believe will be long-lasting. The fight over placing this facility in Laurel is just getting started. We believe that the fight against the facility will continue and the costs to the state and money will continue to increase.”

Advertisement



Source link

Montana

The Best Small Town In Montana For Seniors

Published

on

The Best Small Town In Montana For Seniors


With a growing number of seniors moving to Montana, Butte is an affordable town oriented around community and ideal for retirees. Montana is among the most culturally and artistically rich states in the nation, with 687 arts and recreation venues per 100,000 older adults. Combined with the tax-friendly economy, Butte remains a place with top dining options, such as Uptown Café, and reputable healthcare at St. James Hospital, which has earned recognition through awards. For these reasons and more, including a low cost of living, seniors are sure to find the perfect place to call home in the small Montana town of Butte.

Making Money Stretch in Butte

Aerial panorama of Butte, Montana, along Park Street.

By many metrics, life in Montana is one of the more affordable states, and Butte can be especially helpful for spreading out retirement savings. Using the Economic Research Institute’s cost of living data, Butte is 8% lower than the national average and 3% lower than the average in Montana.

Quaint winter residential neighborhood in Butte, Montana.
Quaint winter residential neighborhood in Butte, Montana.

Where a senior decides to live plays a big role in their financial stability, and that choice is easier when living in Butte. Zillow’s Home Value Index indicates an average home value of $271,700, a tremendous value, far lower than similar mountain towns in Colorado and Idaho. Montana’s average typical home sells for $460,700, so a homebuyer in Butte is saving almost $180,000 compared to the state average.

Dining

Butte's Historic District.
Butte’s Historic District. Photo: Andrew Douglas

Dining here offers a range of cuisines and specialties, making options diverse and keeping things fresh for residents and visitors. To tour a couple of the community’s favorites, begin at Uptown Café on East Broadway. With a reputation for serving “civilized dining in the Wild West,” the restaurant offers upscale comfort food such as beef wellington, chicken piccata, and melt-in-your-mouth desserts. Just a short distance from the Uptown Café lies Casagranda’s Steakhouse inside the 1900 Bertoglio Warehouse on Utah Avenue. Here, premium Rocky Mountain steak cuts vie for the spotlight alongside Italian pasta dishes and fresh seafood. With the famous Guido’s Bar inside, the eatery has earned a place among the best dining experiences in Southwestern Montana, thanks to its food and historical location.

Things to Do

A street corner scene in the neighborhood of Uptown Butte.
A street corner scene in the neighborhood of Uptown Butte. Editorial credit: JWCohen / Shutterstock.com

The mining history that formed and sustained Butte for decades was not forgotten here. The town pays homage to these days, and guests or locals can learn all about the copper mining through the World Museum of Mining. This historical center is located on the grounds of the original Orphan Girl Mine, a rare site built directly over an old mine yard. Walk through Hell Roarin’ Gulch, an authentic recreation of a 1890s mining town with original or reconstructed buildings, and then take a guided tour 100 feet underground to see one of the few publicly accessible exposed veins of minerals in North America.

At the World Museum of Mining.
At the World Museum of Mining. Editorial credit: JWCohen / Shutterstock.com

For those looking to see what sort of entertainment can be found in Butte, begin this search at Mother Lode Theatre. Originally a Masonic Temple, the renovated space now hosts the Butte Symphony, various concerts, touring productions, and Montana Repertory Theatre in a warm and lively acoustic environment. The schedule is full most of the year, making this a common place for seniors in the community to frequent for regular entertainment.

Accessible Healthcare

 Intermountain Health St James Hospital sign with logo and directions.
Intermountain Health St James Hospital sign with logo and directions. Editorial credit: Ian Dewar Photography / Shutterstock.com

At the heart of Butte’s appeal to seniors is Intermountain Health St. James Hospital, a full-service acute care facility on South Clark Street that is part of a prestigious nonprofit health system serving the American West. It offers a complete spectrum of specialty care services, including cancer care, emergency care, heart care, rehabilitation services, surgical care, and care for women’s health. Its goal is to see all patients within 30 minutes of their arrival. St. James has been honored as a recipient of the Chartis Center for Rural Health Performance Leadership Award for excellence in clinical outcomes in both 2022 and 2023. This is the highest level of performance for rural hospitals nationwide in quality, outcomes, and patient experience.

Nearby Towns to Explore

Main Street in Anaconda, Montana.
Main Street in Anaconda, Montana.

One of the advantages of living in such a prime position along Interstate 90 is how accessible nearby towns become when you settle in Butte. This region of Montana does a lot to preserve its history and heritage, so nearby communities have much to explore.

Anaconda

Main Street in Anaconda, Montana.
Main Street in Anaconda, Montana. Image credit: Ian Dewar Photography / Shutterstock.com.

Twenty-five miles northwest of Butte on Interstate 90, Anaconda is another community that does a lot to preserve the memory of Montana’s copper era, with a downtown area still offering a glimpse of certain facades from days long gone. The thing most people come to see in Anaconda is the Washoe Theater, one of a small number of remaining Art Deco-era movie palaces in the United States, where ornate decoration and lighting envelop a constant schedule of movies and live acts. Golfers head to Old Works Golf Course, Montana’s only public Jack Nicklaus Signature Course, built on the site of Anaconda’s old copper smelter. It’s known for its spectacular black sand traps made from copper smelting waste and views of Anaconda’s famous Anaconda Stack.

Deer Lodge

Deer Lodge, Montana.
Deer Lodge, Montana. Editorial Photo Credit: Acroterion, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons.

About 35 miles northeast of Butte via Interstate 90, Deer Lodge offers the chance to dig deeper into the state’s frontier past. The main attraction is the Old Montana Prison Complex, one of the state’s most visited historic sites. Here, you can visit the original territorial prison built in 1871 as well as several satellite museums, including a collection of classic cars and a frontier town. Just outside the downtown area, the Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site preserves one of the most important cattle empires of the West, with National Park Service-guided tours available at no charge anytime of the year. Back in the downtown area, Deer Lodge’s pedestrian-friendly historic main street makes exploration a breeze, with plenty of antiquing and dining to discover, the most popular of which is the Broken Arrow Steakhouse and Casino right on Main Street.

Montana’s wide swath of undeveloped farmland has helped keep costs affordable for seniors looking to retire somewhere new. Butte, Montana, especially has a lot to offer those wanting to stretch fixed incomes further, with a cost of living that is 8% lower than the national average. With Montana’s reputation as a cultural and artistic hub of the nation, the historic significance of Butte, and the natural wonder of the Continental Divide, this small town might be the best place for seniors.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Lottery Mega Millions, Big Sky Bonus results for April 3, 2026

Published

on


The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at April 3, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Mega Millions numbers from April 3 drawing

31-45-62-63-68, Mega Ball: 15

Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from April 3 drawing

02-07-18-20, Bonus: 08

Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from April 3 drawing

08-16-37-45-53, Bonus: 03

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
  • Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Montana Cash: 8 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.

Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Tribes in Montana lose millions after USDA kills farm grants

Published

on

Tribes in Montana lose millions after USDA kills farm grants


Kim Paul, executive director of the Piikani Lodge Health Institute, a nonprofit on the Blackfeet Reservation that promotes health and well-being, saw the email notification flash across her computer screen as she was working late last week.

It was the U.S. Department of Agriculture saying a nearly $9 million grant contract with Piikani Lodge had been terminated.

“The U.S. Department of Agriculture has determined that awards under this program involved discriminatory preferences based on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and wasteful spending that did little to further lawful agricultural land purchases,” the USDA wrote.

Paul was stunned. Piikani Lodge had planned to use the grant to improve operations for Native and non-Native farmers and ranchers in the region. The nonprofit had already separately acquired 600 acres on the Blackfeet Reservation, and planned to use the USDA funds to build a training hub for food producers and support about 300 farmers and ranchers in Glacier and Pondera counties.

Advertisement

Paul said she became short of breath when she saw the email. She dreaded sharing the news with her team.

“It was horror,” she said. “The horror of losing stability for our community.”

Funded through the Biden-era American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the Increasing Land, Capital and Market Access Program was designed to support “underserved” farmers and ranchers. It awarded about $300 million to 50 grantees in 2023. Forty-nine of those grants were terminated last week.

At least two additional projects in Montana were affected by the cancellations: a Chippewa Cree Tribe project to purchase land and train young farmers and ranchers how to manage it; and one run by South Dakota-based Four Bands Community Fund that would have trained and financially supported at least 25 low-income agricultural producers in North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana.

Montana-based awardees called the terminations “devastating.” They also say the grant cancellations were based on a false presumption that tribal initiatives fall under the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) rubric, and that USDA claims of wasteful spending are baseless.

Advertisement

Asked for comment, a USDA spokesperson said Thursday the agency “has worked to clean up the mess left for us by the last Administration. To no surprise, a peek behind the curtain of this Biden-era program revealed the egregious misuse of taxpayer dollars.”

Piikani Lodge Health Institute leaders say they will have to restructure budgets and reconfigure staffing to keep some semblance of their project going. The Chippewa Cree Tribal project may be halted altogether. Four Bands Community Fund did not respond to an interview request by publication deadline. Awardees say the terminations hinder economic progress, not just in their communities, but across the state.

MONTANA PROJECTS CUT

The Chippewa Cree Tribe in north-central Montana was awarded a grant of nearly $6 million for a land acquisition project.

Chippewa Cree planning director Neal Rosette said the tribe planned to purchase agricultural land on and around the reservation and train prospective farmers and ranchers how to manage it.

Advertisement

Though reservation land can be used for farming and ranching, Rosette said, land prices can keep people from entering the industry. The Rocky Boy’s Reservation is home to almost 3,400 people, about 35% of whom live below the poverty line, according to U.S. Census data. The median household income on the reservation is $49,550, almost $26,000 less than the state’s average.

“We are trying to give opportunities to our young folks to make a living,” Rosette said.

Rosette said people working on the project had been trying to close on a 320-acre reservation property for months. The land costs about $400,000, but according to Rosette the tribe has received only about $50,000 of the nearly $6 million grant since 2023. The tribe, he said, asked USDA repeatedly to release the funds, but received minimal communication from the federal agency.

“They drug their feet, drug their feet, and then finally they pulled the rug out from under us,” he said.

Rosette has written many grants for the tribe in the past. He said receiving the termination letter from USDA marked “the first time I’ve ever got to the point where I felt like crying.”

Advertisement

“It’s so, so, so cruel,” he said. “It’s the worst feeling in the world. It was devastating for everybody. We were so proud of this project. We were so happy that we were finally going to be able to recover some lands for the benefit of our young people. And now it’s gone.”

Micaela Young, development director at Piikani Lodge Health Institute, said the canceled grant will delay construction on the community training center on the Blackfeet Reservation.

The Piikani Lodge project included building an industrial community kitchen where agricultural producers could prepare and process products like jams and jerky.

In its termination letter to Piikani Lodge, the USDA cited a “$20,000 allocation for a barbeque smoker” as an example of funding for items “outside the program’s mission of increasing land access.” The USDA has also mentioned a “$20,000 barbeque smoker” in statements to other media outlets as an example of “inappropriate spending.”

Paul said the characterization is hurtful.

Advertisement

“We did all this work, we spent so many years on this,” she said. “To say this was built on fraud? It’s a travesty. This was going to be five years of jobs for our people. Can you imagine the economic development that would come from that?”

‘DEI IS THE NEW BUZZWORD IN D.C.’

Paul and Rosette both took issue with the USDA’s assertion that programs benefiting tribes fall into the category of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI). It’s well established in federal law that tribal citizenship is a political classification, not a racial one. In a May 2025 memorandum, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins acknowledged the distinction, writing, “the Department’s unique government-to-government relationship” with tribes and their members “are legally distinct from policy-based Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.”

“We are a sovereign nation,” Rosette said of the Chippewa Cree Tribe. “We have a political relationship with this government.”

Democratic state Sen. Jonathan Windy Boy, a citizen of the Chippewa Cree Tribe who is running for Congress in Montana’s eastern district, called the agriculture department’s DEI reasoning “ludicrous.”

Advertisement

“DEI is the new buzzword in D.C.” he said. “Why isn’t our delegation protecting the sovereign status of the tribes? The bottom line is we don’t have representation in D.C.”

Asked for comment on the grant terminations, a spokesperson for incumbent eastern district U.S. Congressman Troy Downing said his “office is aware of the rescinded grants and welcomes input from community members regarding their impact.” A spokesperson for Sen. Steve Daines said the senator “is looking into the grant cancellations and will always work to support Montana’s tribal communities.”

Sen. Tim Sheehy and Rep. Ryan Zinke did not respond to requests for comment.

Walter Schweitzer, president of the Montana Farmers Union, said that as land, livestock and equipment prices increase, and as more farms are purchased by corporate entities, it becomes increasingly hard for young people to enter the agriculture industry.

“The average age of a farmer or rancher is somewhere around 60,” he said. “We need to encourage and incentivize any way we can to get young people involved in agriculture. And having diversity in who gets into agriculture is a positive thing because they bring a diverse set of ideas.”

Advertisement

Micaela Young, of Piikani Lodge Health Institute, said ag producers living on tribal land additionally face unique challenges. A patchwork of historical and sometimes conflicting federal policies have congealed over the course of more than a century into an unwieldy system of property ownership on reservations. Banks have not learned to effectively navigate the legal, bureaucratic and financial peculiarities of that system, making it difficult for prospective producers to access the capital necessary to enter the agricultural industry. Tribes, Young said, are also often located far from markets where they could sell their products.

“These kinds of projects that bring capital into Native communities can really help revitalize their main streets, increase public safety, there’s the opioid crisis, the suicide crisis in tribal communities, and people are really looking for hope,” Young said. “People are looking for jobs. Families need that income. So this kind of work really does lift up our Native communities to strengthen the overall state.”

WHAT’S NEXT?

Piikani Lodge leaders said they plan to file an appeal through the National Appeals Division, which reports directly to the Secretary of Agriculture, before the 30-day deadline.

Andrew Berger, director of agriculture and climate adaptation at Piikani Lodge, said the organization is drafting a petition urging restoration of the funds.

Advertisement

“We’re still wrapping our heads around this,” he said. “[The grant] supported salaries and internships and all kinds of things. So we need to fill those gaps with other funding.”

Rosette isn’t sure whether the Chippewa Cree Tribe will file an appeal — an action he said requires time and resources. He said the tribe plans to ask the USDA to reconsider its decision.

“Whether they will listen?” he said. “Who knows.”

——-

Nora Mabie | nmabie@montanafreepress.org

Advertisement

Nora Mabie covers Indigenous affairs at Montana Free Press. She previously covered Indigenous communities at the five Lee Montana newspapers: the Missoulian, Billings Gazette, Independent Record (Helena), Ravalli Republic and Montana Standard (Butte). Prior to that, she covered tribal affairs for the Great Falls Tribune. Nora’s reporting about the return of ancestral remains and disparities in Native life expectancy have received state and national journalism awards. She was a 2023 National Fellow at the USC Annenberg Center for Health Journalism and a McGraw Center for Business Journalism Fellow… More by Nora Mabie



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending