Connect with us

Idaho

Man killed, woman flown to hospital following northern Idaho rollover crash – East Idaho News

Published

1 year ago

on

Man killed, woman flown to hospital following northern Idaho rollover crash – East Idaho News


The next is a information launch from Idaho State Police.

Idaho State Police are investigating a single automobile rollover crash that occurred at 2:04 a.m. on Nov. 15, in Bonner County. A Mercury SUV was touring northbound on US 95 at roughly milepost 469 when it left the roadway, overcorrected and rolled.

The automobile was occupied by 35-year-old feminine and a 33-year-old male. The feminine was taken to Bonner Basic and was subsequently airlifted to Kootenai Well being. The male succumbed to his accidents on scene.

Proof was discovered on scene to point alcohol/medication might have been concerned on this crash. That proof is a part of an ongoing investigation.

Advertisement

The incident stays underneath investigation by the Idaho State Police.

Share This

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0Dpercent0Apercent0Dpercent0A=get_permalink()?>%0Dpercent0Apercent0Dpercent0A=htmlentities(‘For extra tales like this one, you’ll want to go to https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for the entire newest information, neighborhood occasions and extra.’)?>&topic=Checkpercent20outpercent20thispercent20storypercent20frompercent20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>



Source link

Advertisement
Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Idaho

Idaho Department of Environmental Quality revokes permit granted to Perpetua Resources

Published

6 hours ago

on

May 3, 2024

By

Idaho Department of Environmental Quality revokes permit granted to Perpetua Resources


The Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Board of Environmental Quality Wednesday pulled back a permit granted last year to Perpetua Resources for its planned gold and antimony mine at Stibnite in Valley County.

The Nez Perce Tribe and multiple conservation groups had appealed the air permit, saying it allowed excessive dust-based toxic air pollution beyond the mine’s boundaries, threatening land users with carcinogens like arsenic. The main focus of the challenge was the permit’s “project-specific adjustment factor for ambient concentration.” State rules do allow an “acceptable risk” level of contaminants released into the air, depending on a variety of factors.

The permit DEQ granted Perpetua allowed greater emissions than generally allowed because of the way expected toxic air emissions (known as Ambient Air Concentration for Carcinogen, or AACC) were calculated over the 16-year predicted life of the mine versus a standard human life span, explained the Idaho Conservation League’s Will Tiedemann.

“It’s kind of like saying, if you were allowed so much arsenic to be exposed to in 70 years, let’s allow Perpetua to emit that much arsenic in just 16 years,” he said.

Advertisement

ICL was among the groups challenging the air permit, and have filed multiple challenges to the proposed mine over other environmental concerns.

DEQ board members ultimately agreed that pro-rating emissions in that way was not a safe calculation.

“DEQ’s project specific adjustment factor creates a new, higher level of cancer risk for 16 years,” said board Vice President J Randy MacMillan during Wednesday’s determination meeting. He said the approved permit did not fit within any measure of ‘acceptable risk’ identified in the state’s air quality rules.

MacMillan spoke at length Wednesday from a prepared statement regarding the board’s reasoning behind remanding that portion of the air permit. The board in March heard oral arguments over the issue, but deliberated in closed executive session before primarily relying on MacMillan to speak publicly.

“By applying the, what I would call short sighted, project-specific adjustment factor to the Stibnite Gold project,” he said. “DEQ created a misleading risk analysis that greatly underestimates the actual cancer risk.”

Advertisement

The board unanimously voted to pull the permit back to DEQ to be reworked based on that finding. It upheld several other aspects of the permit which had also been challenged by the outside groups.

It’s not clear how the decision could affect Perpetua’s planned site operations. The air permit is one of a handful of ‘major’ permits needed to fully operate, in addition to approvals through the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process. A Forest Service spokesman said the final environmental impact statement and draft record of decision for the Stibnite Gold project should be released this summer, with a final record of decision issued by the end of the year. Those dates are only estimates.

Prep work at Stibnite has been underway for several years already, including as of 2022, SuperFund-sponsored cleanup of some previous mining leftovers. Perpetua has long said their plan is to mine the area and fully remediate their impact and the mess previous companies left behind after decades of mining.

Perpetua could appeal the DEQ board’s decision in state court. In a statement, the company characterized the board’s action as remanding only a ‘narrow issue’ for additional review, and said it will work with DEQ to respond. But Perpetua reserved additional reaction until after it receives the full written order from DEQ May 9.

Tiedemann called the board’s decision a big win that validates opposition groups’ concerns about the project.

Advertisement

“It’s maybe not as glamorous or as romanticized as water,” Tiedemann said. “But harmful effects on air quality can be just as significant and harmful to human health and the environment as water pollution. And so I think it’s an important win.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

An end to an Idaho lawsuit on grizzly bears raises questions about delisting

Published

13 hours ago

on

May 3, 2024

By

An end to an Idaho lawsuit on grizzly bears raises questions about delisting


A lawsuit over the Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s killing of three grizzly bears in Eastern Idaho has been settled, with potential implications beyond the state’s borders.

A Montana-based nonprofit, Save the Yellowstone Grizzly, filed suit against Fish and Game and the federal government after the state killed a sow and two cubs near Tetonia in November 2021.

“They were not getting into the garbage. They were not threatening or harassing people,” said Graham Coppes, an attorney representing the advocacy group.

The lawsuit alleged violations of the Endangered Species Act, including claims that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) illegally authorized the killing of the sow and one cub and that Idaho killed the second cub without USFWS approval. The federal agency had a potential relocation site for the cub in mind.

Advertisement

In response, Idaho Fish and Game acknowledged that the federal agency had concerns about killing the bears and had urged the state to pursue non-lethal options. Idaho said it attempted to dart and trap the remaining cub as part of these efforts.

However, the state said that the USFWS “did not make it clear to Idaho that [it] would consider lethal removal of the second young bear to be unauthorized if non-lethal methods were unsuccessful.”

According to Fish and Game, the bears, which had recently been relocated from Gardiner, Mont., were wandering near a rural subdivision and posed a risk to public safety.

Additionally, Idaho filed a counterclaim against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, saying the state shouldn’t be subject to the Endangered Species Act for these bears, which it contends don’t qualify for protection.

“Because they have recovered,” said Kathleen Trever, a deputy attorney general. “And, the entity that is on the list does not meet the definition of a species that is [protected].”

Advertisement

Grizzly bears have been listed as “threatened” under the ESA since 1975. A year ago, the federal government rejected Idaho’s petition to delist grizzly bears across the contiguous U.S., saying it “failed to present any credible scientific” information. At the same time, it moved forward with other petitions to consider delisting in two specific recovery areas, including the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

However, the settlement in this case could effectively open the door to delisting across the lower 48 once again. Under the agreement, the USFWS will revise or remove protections for the bears by Jan. 31, 2026.

“This action will allow the Service to evaluate the listed entity for grizzly bears in the lower 48 within a modern ESA framework,” USFWS spokesperson Joe Szuszwalak wrote in an email, “including consideration of updated science, additional information, and policies enacted since the entity was listed in 1975, including the Service’s 1996 policy for evaluating distinct population segments for listing, delisting, and reclassification under the ESA.”

The process will involve proposed rulemaking and a public comment period.

The fact that USFWS will now reconsider Idaho’s delisting request concerns some conservation advocates, including Kristine Akland, a senior attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, who was not involved with the case.

Advertisement

“It’s an incredibly unfortunate result of this lawsuit,” Akland said.

Still, Coppes, the attorney for Save the Yellowstone Grizzly, noted that the USFWS could end up making only a minimal change to the ESA listing. It’ll still need to follow the science, he said. Also, under the settlement, Idaho confirmed that it would seek an agreement with the USFWS before lethally removing any ESA-listed bear.

Meanwhile, federal officials announced plans last week to reintroduce grizzly bears to North Cascades National Park in Washington, and they are considering reintroduction efforts in the Bitterroot Recovery Area, which includes parts of Montana and Idaho.

Find reporter Rachel Cohen on Twitter @racheld_cohen

Copyright 2024 Boise State Public Radio

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Biden to nominate former FRA head Batory, Idaho transit official Clegg for Amtrak board – Trains

Published

20 hours ago

on

May 2, 2024

By

Biden to nominate former FRA head Batory, Idaho transit official Clegg for Amtrak board – Trains















Advertisement


Biden to nominate former FRA head Batory, Idaho transit official Clegg for Amtrak board – Trains



















Advertisement





Advertisement

biden-to-nominate-former-fra-head-batory-idaho-transit-official-clegg-for-amtrak-board
https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/biden-to-nominate-former-fra-head-batory-idaho-transit-official-clegg-for-amtrak-board/
Biden to nominate former FRA head Batory, Idaho transit official Clegg for Amtrak board – Trains
WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden will nominate former Federal Railroad Admininstration Administrator Ron Batory and Elaine Marie Clegg, CEO of Valley Regional Transit in Idaho’s Ada and Canyon counties, to serve on Amtrak’s Board of Directors, the White House announced today (May 2). Batory, now a resident of New Mexico, and Clegg, of Boise, Idaho, […]Read More…
https://www.trains.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/BatoryNEW.jpg
InStock
USD
1.00
1.00
news-wire
news-reviews

article
TRN
2024-05-02
2024-05-02

196904




false

product



Advertisement

Advertisement

News & Reviews News Wire Biden to nominate former FRA head Batory, Idaho transit official Clegg for Amtrak board

Nominees of two western residents will address concerns over board’s geographic makeup

Advertisement

Former FRA administrator Ron Batory will be nominated to serve on Amtrak’s board of directors. David Lassen

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden will nominate former Federal Railroad Admininstration Administrator Ron Batory and Elaine Marie Clegg, CEO of Valley Regional Transit in Idaho’s Ada and Canyon counties, to serve on Amtrak’s Board of Directors, the White House announced today (May 2).

Batory, now a resident of New Mexico, and Clegg, of Boise, Idaho, would help address the geographic requirements that have been a stumbling block in filling board vacancies [see “Senators challenge Northeast Corridor tilt of Amtrak board nominees …,” Trains News Wire, April 26, 2023, and “Senate confirms three nominees …,” News Wire, Jan. 24, 2024].

Batory’s lengthy resume in the rail industry spans more than 45 years, and includes stints as president of the Belt Railway of Chicago and CEO of Conrail Shared Assets. He also recently served as the trustee of the CP-Kansas City Southern Voting Trust, overseeing KCS prior to the approval of the CPKC merger. He served as FRA administrator from February 2018 to January 2021, overseeing the implementation of positive train control and publication of a final governing Amtrak on-time performance on host railroads, among other accomplishments.

Woman standing with steam locomotive in background
Amtrak board nominee Elaine Clegg outside the Boise Depot, the 1925 Union Pacific station now a city events facility. Valley Regional Transit

Clegg has spent 25 years as a public servant focusing on transportation and land use, including nearly 20 years on the Boise City Council; she has been Valley Regional Transit’s CEO since February 2023.

“I am deeply honored to be given this opportunity by the Biden-Harris administration to join the Amtrak Board of Directors and contribute to the advancement of rail transportation in our country,” Clegg said in a press release. “I look forward to working alongside my colleagues to ensure Amtrak continues to serve the needs of passengers and communities across America. It is especially exciting to have a chance to serve at this time as passenger rail is making a comeback and to represent the West as it seeks rail expansion.”

Advertisement

Both nominees must be confirmed by the Senate and would serve five-year terms.


Advertisement

Related Articles

Shop our Hobby Store

Members enjoy 15% off any purchase in our store. Join Today!

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending