Connect with us

Denver, CO

Denver City Council advances collective bargaining rights for more city workers

Published

on

Denver City Council advances collective bargaining rights for more city workers


The Denver City Council advanced a proposed change to the city charter that would grant collective bargaining rights to some city employees.

If the council gives it a final approval next week, the measure will appear on the November ballot. 

The bill was amended five times by three councilmembers and, due to the nature of those changes, had to be “republished.”

Advertisement

Its final stop will be the council’s full vote next week before it gets sent to the ballot for voters to decide.

Its passage through the council is likely — the proposal has the support of Denver Mayor Mike Johnston and it was sponsored by nine of the city’s 13 councilmembers.

The five amendments came about as a result of 46 total changes requested by councilmembers Sarah Parady, Shontel Lewis and Serena Gonzales Gutierrez. The first and third amendments brought about the most substantial changes, establishing binding arbitration and expanding the flexibility of an employee’s ability to strike.

“This amendment removes the word ‘imminent’ from the finding that is required before employees are prohibited from striking — meaning that employees will be prohibited from striking if the employees’ absence will result in a ‘substantial’ threat to public health, safety, or welfare,” Parady said. “The amendment also establishes the standard that County Court is to use in overturning a decision prohibiting certain employees from striking.”

The amendments were approved unanimously.

Advertisement






Union Organizers rally outside the Denver City and County Building

Chris Hinds, Denver City Council member for District 10, delivers remarks outside the Denver City and County Building during a rally to show support for city employees seeking collective bargaining rights on Monday, July 8, 2024. (Stephen Swofford, Denver Gazette)






While the council was still in session, a rally in support of the collective bargaining agreement took place outside the City and County Building. Their chants could be heard inside the council chambers, surprising some councilmembers.

Several councilmembers left during the 5 p.m. public comment session to speak at the rally that drew other elected officials, such as state Sen. Chris Hansen and Secretary of State Jena Griswold.

“Well, at the end of the day Denver employees deserve to have a seat at the table and to be able to negotiate for themselves,” Griswold said after the rally. “I grew up in rural Colorado on food stamps, and I think good, strong unions lead to good middle-class jobs.”

Advertisement

“I’m a big supporter of people being able to unionize,” she added.

After the rally, participants shuffled inside and waited for the 30-minute courtesy public hearing. Only 11 people signed up for comments, two of whom spoke in opposition to the proposal.

Troy Bettinger, a vocal opponent of collective bargaining, said he’s worked in Denver for 16 years and his family have been residents in the city since 1919. It is the council’s duty to protect Denver residents from three things — inefficiency, politics and divisiveness, which Bettinger said unions only stoke and encourage.







Union Organizers rally outside the Denver City and County Building

People gather on the steps of the Denver City and County Building during a rally to show support for city employees seeking collective bargaining rights on Monday, July 8, 2024. (Stephen Swofford, Denver Gazette)

Advertisement






“Collective Bargaining unions will rob us of our apolitical views, forcing us to get involved in union campaigns, union votes and union meetings,” he said. “The last thing Denver employees need is more meetings. Please save us from more meetings.”

He recalled his experience as a bus driver at the unionized Cherry Creek School District and said he saw firsthand how unions favor seniority over merit and worked with people “who hated management.”

The unions at the time “promoted that hate,” he said.

Denise Salter, who has worked for Denver for 12 years and is a “proud member” of Teamsters Local 17, argued that unions are necessary.

“I am here to tell you that you can love your job and you can still be in a union,” said Salter, who currently works at the airport. “My experiences have shown me that employees must have an independent voice at work. Just going to HR is not enough.”

Advertisement

Councilmember Kevin Flynn, who previously balked at the proposal, changed his vote to “yes.”

Flynn had voted no at the last council session because of one very specific issue — he said he didn’t hire the council aides for the other councilmembers, and they didn’t hire his. For them to be represented by the same bargaining unit is an issue, he said. 

“I didn’t want my no vote last week to be seen as objecting to the overall goal of this charter amendment,” Flynn said. “I’ve been a union member, and in one of the darkest moments of my working career, I, along with about 200 other working stiffs, were thrown out on the street when our newspaper closed. We all benefited very greatly from the representation that the newspaper guild provided.”



Source link

Advertisement

Denver, CO

Sandwich shop owed more than $40,000 in taxes before seizure, city says

Published

on

Sandwich shop owed more than ,000 in taxes before seizure, city says


Long-running Denver lunch spot Mr. Lucky’s Sandwiches, which closed in December after Denver’s Department of Finance seized its two locations, owes more than $40,000 in unpaid taxes, according to the city agency. Galen Juracek, who owns the shops in Capitol Hill and the Highland neighborhood, specifically owes $40,556.11.

Multiple notices posted to the door of Mr. Lucky’s Capitol Hill location showed that the city demanded payment for the back taxes starting in July. But the city’s “distraint warrant” — a legal notice that a business owner owes a specific amount, and that the business could be seized if they don’t pay it — notes the shops, at 711 E. 6th Ave. and 3326 Tejon St., were forced to close on Tuesday, Dec. 23.

Mr. Lucky’s had already decided it would close its two locations by the end of 2025, said Laura Swartz, communications director for the Department of Finance. But the city’s seizure of the business shows that it had not been keeping up on basic requirements, with a $39,956 bill for unpaid sales taxes and $600.11 in “occupational privilege” taxes, which fund local services and allow a business to operate within a specific area.

“When businesses charge customers sales tax but then do not submit that sales tax to the city, the city is responsible for becoming involved,” she said in an email to The Denver Post

Advertisement

Juracek did not respond to multiple phone calls from The Denver Post requesting comment. His business, which is described on its website as a “go-to spot for handcrafted sandwiches since 1999, roasting our meats in-house and making every bite unforgettable,” is listed on the documents as G&J Concepts.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Suspects sought in Denver shooting that killed teen, wounded 3 others

Published

on

Suspects sought in Denver shooting that killed teen, wounded 3 others


Denver police are searching for suspects in a Saturday night parking lot shooting that killed a 16-year-old and wounded three men, at least one of whom is not expected to survive, according to the agency.

Officers responded to the shooting in the 10100 block of East Hampden Avenue about 10:30 p.m. Saturday, near where East Hampden intersects South Galena Street, according to an alert from the Denver Police Department.

Police said a group of people had gathered in a parking lot on the edge of the city’s Kennedy neighborhood to celebrate the U.S. capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro when the shooting happened.

Paramedics took one victim to a hospital, and two others were taken to the hospital in private vehicles, police said. A fourth victim, identified by police as 16-year-old William Rodriguez Salas, was dropped off near Iliff Avenue and South Havana Street, where he died from his wounds.

Advertisement

At least one of the three victims taken to hospitals — a 26-year-old man, a 29-year-old man and a 33-year-old man — is not expected to survive, police said Tuesday. One man was in critical condition Sunday night, one was in serious condition and one was treated for a graze wound and released.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Denver’s flavored vape ban sends customers across city lines

Published

on

Denver’s flavored vape ban sends customers across city lines


The new year in Colorado brought new restrictions for people who vape in Denver. As of January 1, a voter-approved ban on flavored nicotine products is now in effect in Denver, prohibiting the sale of flavored e-cigarettes and vaping products within city limits.

Just outside the Denver border, vape shops say they’re already feeling the ripple effects.

Advertisement

CBS


At Tokerz Head Shop in Aurora, located about a block and a half from the Denver city line, owner Gordon McMillon says customers are beginning to trickle in from Denver.

“I was in shock it passed, to be honest,” McMillon said. “Just because of how many people vape in Denver. But we’re hoping to take care of everybody that doesn’t get their needs met over there anymore.”

One of those customers is Justin Morrison, who lives in the Denver area and vapes daily. He stopped by the Aurora shop a day after the ban went into place.

Morrison says the ban won’t stop him from vaping. It will just change where he buys his products.

Advertisement

“I’m going to have to come all the way to Aurora to get them,” he said. “It’s pretty inconvenient. I smoke flavored vapes every day.”

The goal of the ban, according to public health advocates, is to reduce youth vaping.

Morrison said flavored vapes helped him quit smoking cigarettes, an argument frequently raised by adult users and vape retailers who oppose flavor bans.

“It helped tremendously,” he said. “I stopped liking the flavor of cigarettes. The taste was nasty, the smell was nasty. I switched all the way over to vapes, and it helped me stop smoking cigarettes completely.”

McMillon worries bans like Denver’s could push some former smokers back to cigarettes.

Advertisement

“If they can’t get their vapes, some will go back to cigarettes, for sure,” he said. “I’ve asked people myself, and it’s about 50-50.”

While McMillon acknowledges it will bring more business to shops outside Denver, he says the ban wasn’t something he wanted.

“Even if it helps me over here in Aurora, I’m against it,” he said. “I feel like adults should have the rights if they want to vape or not.”

More than 500 retailers in Denver removed their flavored products. For many, they accounted for the majority of their sales. Denver’s Department of Public Health and Environment says it will begin issuing fines and suspensions to retailers found selling flavored tobacco products.

Both McMillan and Morrison say they’re concerned the ban could spread to other cities. For now, Aurora vape shops remain legal alternatives for Denver customers.

Advertisement

Despite the added drive, Morrison says quitting isn’t on the table.

“It’s an addiction. You’re going to find a way to get it. That’s why I don’t see the point of banning it here,” Morrison said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending