Connect with us

Denver, CO

Affordability remains a problem for homebuyers in Denver area. That won’t change in 2024.

Published

on

Affordability remains a problem for homebuyers in Denver area. That won’t change in 2024.


Since November, Joe and Sarah Webber have searched for a larger home to replace the small bungalow they own near the University of Denver in the Corey-Merrill neighborhood.

They want to stay in that part of Denver, with its spacious parks, but doing so will cost them at least $1 million for a basic home large enough to accommodate future kids. They are realizing that $1 million, even $1.2 million, doesn’t buy what it used to, much less what they hoped it could.

“We are feeling like prices are high, which we knew. But it feels like the prices are really high for what you get. We have been consistently disappointed in the quality of the houses,” lamented Sarah Webber, director of marketing and communications with the Denver Metro Association of Realtors.

Joe and Sarah Webber and their dog, Bowie, in their bungalow-style home in Denver on Thursday, Jan. 18, 2024. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)

If they can swing it, the couple, in their 30s, wants to buy another place and then rent out the two-bedroom home they own, which is 1,000 square feet including the basement. With a mortgage rate in the 2% range, rents should generate enough cash to cover the costs.

Advertisement

Last year, metro Denver home prices kept rising, even as 30-year mortgage rates reached a 23-year high of around 7.8% in October. The median price of a single-family home sold in December was $613,500 compared to $600,000 a year earlier, according to a monthly update from DMAR.

Normally, a big spike in interest rates should cause home prices to flatten and then fall, restoring affordability and keeping things in check. But the housing market has proven anything but normal since the pandemic.

Now that mortgage rates on 30-year loans are back to 6.6%, and are expected to go even lower once the Federal Reserve starts cutting rates sometime this year, a big question is what comes next for the housing market in 2024.

Will home prices heat up on stronger demand as affordability improves and buyers jump back in? Or if rates drop a lot, could that release a backlog of listings from sellers, unexpectedly pushing prices down?

Zillow, which runs the country’s largest real estate portal, puts Denver in the camp of metro areas where homeowners should prepare for slightly lower home prices and another stretch of sluggish sales because of a lack of relative affordability.

Advertisement

“Demand is still leaning towards places that offer affordability, while Denver is among the least affordable markets in the U.S. when looking at the cost of a mortgage compared to local incomes,” said Nicole Bachaud, a Zillow senior economist, in an email. “We are expecting affordability to improve, but home shoppers in Denver will still be challenged financially.”

Zillow is predicting Denver metro home values will drop 1.3% this year, while Colorado Springs home values will be down 0.6%. Nationally, Zillow is calling for home values to remain flat.

Realtor.com predicts Denver is in store for a larger 5.1% decline in prices and a 15.3% drop in sales from a weak 2023. Sales this year could run about 42% below the pace averaged from 2017 to 2019 if that happens.

A “hot” housing market for years, Denver now ranks 95th out of the 100 largest metros in Realtor.com’s 2024 forecast. Joining Denver in the cellar are other formerly popular markets like Portland, Ore.; Austin, Texas; and Charlotte, N.C.

Toledo, Ohio; Oxnard, Calif., and Rochester, N.Y., by contrast, are expected to lead the country in terms of sales activity and price gains. And in the case of Toledo and Rochester, and many of the most robust markets listed for  2024, it comes down to affordability. Buyers are desperate for it.

Advertisement
Construction is ongoing at the Sterling Ranch development in Littleton on Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024. Sterling Ranch is Colorado's largest active master planned community, with 432 homes sold in 2023. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)
Construction is ongoing at the Sterling Ranch development in Littleton on Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024. Sterling Ranch is Colorado’s largest active master-planned community, with 432 homes sold in 2023. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

But not every forecast relegates metro Denver to a housing has-been. CoreLogic is forecasting a 2.5% gain in its national home price index over the next 12 months, with Denver expected to beat that with a 4.5% gain in its single-family home price index.

“This continued strength remains remarkable amid the nation’s affordability crunch but speaks to the pent-up demand that is driving home prices higher,” said Selma Hepp, CoreLogic chief economist, in the company’s November 2023 Home Price Index report.

Hepp notes that metro areas in the Mountain West and Northwest have proven more vulnerable to higher interest rates. But conversely, they should benefit more as interest rates move lower.

If the Federal Reserve, as expected, eases monetary policy over the next year, then mortgage rates should continue to come down, which will improve affordability and contribute to a “more lively housing market in 2024,” predicted Charlie Dougherty, senior economist with Wells Fargo Economics, in a research note.

“That said, lower debt costs are unlikely to change the underlying supply and demand dynamics of the current market, which means home buying and selling will likely remain fairly subdued,” he cautioned.

Two-thirds of current mortgage holders are sitting on a rate below 4%, while nine in 10 are below 6%. Mortgage rates, at around 6.6%, still have a way to drop to motivate someone holding a low rate to move if they don’t have to move.

Advertisement

“Many people are stuck in their houses and unwilling to move. The cost of moving is relatively high,” said Gerald Cohen, chief economist at the Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise during a recent economic update call.

A home for sale on S. Cherry St. near Cornell Ave. in Denver on Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)
A home for sale on S. Cherry St. near Cornell Ave. in Denver on Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)

One line of thinking is that lower rates will cause demand to spike again. But with so many sellers still locked in place by a low rate, the inventory of listings won’t meet that added demand. Bidding wars will return and prices will shoot up again. If so, the time to get in is now —  before prices spike.

That concern has Abby Walkush and her husband Evan Nolan out actively looking for something to buy. The couple has rented since moving to Denver four years ago, initially apartments, and now a condo in Aurora near Cherry Creek State Park.

The irony of their search is that they could save serious money in monthly payments by renting a condo rather than trying to buy one.

Real estate brokerage firm Redfin estimated last summer that someone purchasing a median-priced home nationally could expect to pay $630 more a month than if they rented a comparable property. In Denver, that premium to own versus rent came in at $1,663 a month, or 58% higher. That gap was the largest outside of California metros and Seattle, surpassing the gap seen in places like New York City and Boston.

Walkush said when she and her husband pencil out the numbers, renting is cheaper than buying. Lower mortgage rates could help close that gap, but higher property taxes and insurance premiums this year could widen it.

Advertisement

“The motive is to build that equity and to have a house with the touches we want. We are looking for townhomes and condos, but we are also dabbling with buying land and then building,” said Walkush, who works as a marketing manager at Guide Real Estate in Glendale.

Short-term buying may look like a losing proposition, but long-term it should be a winning one. The couple’s price point is in the $425,000 to $450,000 range. In an ideal world, the pair, in their mid-20s, would like to live in the Golden and Morrison area.

Abby Walkush and Evan Nolan on the porch of the condominium they rent in Aurora on Jan. 19, 2024. The two hope to take advantage of the recent drop in interest rates and purchase their first home. (Photo By Kathryn Scott/Special to The Denver Post)
Abby Walkush and Evan Nolan on the porch of the condominium they rent in Aurora on Jan. 19, 2024. The two hope to take advantage of the recent drop in interest rates and purchase their first home. (Photo By Kathryn Scott/Special to The Denver Post)

Walkush grew up in Wisconsin and her husband comes from Minnesota, two states where housing costs are much lower than in Colorado. Although the thought of returning home has entered their minds, she said, “Stronger forces are holding us here.”

“It is definitely tough seeing how much cheaper it is to live there. But you can’t put a price on living in a state you want to, on all the awesome things Denver offers,” she said.

That tug of war between sellers who don’t want to sell unless they have to and buyers who can no longer afford to buy or reject the paltry inventory out there should keep prices in check across 2024, predicts Andrew Abrams, a member of the Market Trends Committee at DMAR and Walkush’s boss.

If financing costs can settle down, then buyers and sellers alike can gain their footing, he said. Consistent interest rates should create consistent behavior in the market.

Advertisement

“Right now the consistency with rates will increase the number of listings and sales compared to 2023, but not enough to make a dramatic shift in the market,” he said.

He predicts home prices in the metro area will end the year up 0% to 2%. Sales should also rise, ending two years of declines. He has tried to brainstorm any sources of “hidden inventory” out there that might swing the market more strongly in favor of buyers, but can’t find one.

But a lot depends on interest rates. Ken Shinoda, a portfolio manager with DoubleLine specializing in residential mortgage-backed securities, argues that falling rates could work to unexpectedly push home prices lower, in what he calls the “rate paradox.”

There’s a “magic” mortgage rate that could free up what he describes as a “frozen” market, bringing enough sellers and buyers to the table at the same time to get deals flowing again and to trigger lower prices. Just as 2023 was a contrarian year, 2024 could also prove to be one as well.

One place that needs a thawing is metro Denver. Closings were down 18% last year compared to 2022 and are around 34% lower compared to both 2021 and 2022, according to DMAR.

Advertisement

Sales are running 29% below 2019 levels and last year’s market was the most sluggish seen here since 2011. Despite that, the median price of a single-family home sold still rose 2.25% year-over-year in December.

So what is the magic rate to keep an eye out for? Shinoda estimates that a 5% rate on a 30-year mortgage could do the trick.

“In today’s context of frozen inventories, lower rates can potentially revive transaction activity and soften prices,” he wrote in a research note late last month.

Construction is ongoing at the Sterling Ranch development in Littleton on Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)
Construction is ongoing at the Sterling Ranch development in Littleton on Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024. (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)

Rental markets facing a surplus

As the home purchase market struggles with ongoing shortages, the area’s rental market faces a surge in supply, with about 120,000 apartments under construction or in the planning stages, said Marc Cunningham, president of Grace Property Management & Real Estate in Thornton, in a letter to his clients.

About two-thirds of that 120,000 number, however, is aspirational. Apartment projects are getting dropped because of a lack of financing and concerns over a softening market, said Scott Rathbun, president of Apartment Appraisers & Consultants in Denver.

Still, Rathbun estimates about 45,000 apartments are under construction in metro Denver, which represents about a three-year supply assuming enough construction labor can be put to the task. Labor and other bottlenecks resulted in about 13,348 units completed last year, a robust number but one that could have been even bigger.

Advertisement

RealPage, which tracks the multifamily market nationally, said apartment construction reached a 35-year high in the U.S. last year and new units should go up substantially this year in what it describes as a “generational” apartment boom. Denver is a leader in that boom.

“That’s a pretty massive amount coming in 2024 (in Denver). Only three other markets in the nation — Dallas, Phoenix and Austin — have more units expected to complete in 2024,” said Julia Bunch, a content manager at RealPage.

That added supply might explain why rent increases were fairly subdued last year, with the average rent coming in at $1,870 a month in the region, according to the Metro Denver Vacancy & Rent Report from the Apartment Association of Metro Denver. The vacancy rate edged up to 5.8% in the fourth quarter from 5.6% a year earlier.

Both Rathbun and RealPage expect new apartment construction to start thinning substantially beyond the next couple of years, reflecting the greater difficulties developers face in getting financing and the higher regulatory burdens.

Permits are dropping sharply in Denver, which accounts for nearly half of the new apartment supply, and Rathbun predicts that after a stretch of flat to falling rents, a shortage could emerge, causing rents to spike in late 2026 or 2027.

Advertisement

The new supply is hitting at a time when household budgets are getting squeezed by inflation, and the resumption of student loan payments, and other pressures. Cunningham expects that will slow demand from renters.

More people may delay moving out on their own or may double up with roommates or other families or just stay put in their existing rentals, he said.

“Rental supply is up, renter demand is down, rents are flat, expenses are up, and legal risks have increased,” Cunningham said.

Construction moves along at a K2 Residential Solutions multi-family development near S. Huron St. and W. Ithaca Ave. in Englewood on Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)
Construction moves along at a K2 Residential Solutions multi-family development near S. Huron St. and W. Ithaca Ave. in Englewood on Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2024. (Photo by Andy Cross/The Denver Post)

Nearly four in 10 apartments in Denver carry a rent above $2,000 a month, according to a study from the website RentCafe. Despite that, the city ranks seventh in terms of its popularity and is the most popular city in the Western part of the country among people searching for an apartment on its website, RentCafe said.

Denver is among the major metros, along with Salt Lake City, Philadelphia and Seattle, that John Burns Research & Consulting listed last year as having a small out-migration now becoming a “big out-migration.” Being a “migration loser” should result in less housing demand on both the purchase and rental sides.

Census numbers show Colorado has seen a shift in migration patterns. Net migration over the past two years is running at half the pace averaged last decade, and about six in 10 net migrants are international rather than transplants coming from other states.

Advertisement

The apartments developers have in the pipeline were designed with younger, high-paid tech and professional workers from California and other states in mind. They likely won’t meet the needs of refugees coming from places like Afghanistan and Venezuela. Making a shift from urban “luxury” units to working-class affordable options could take years and will be tougher to pull off financially.

But near-term, falling rents and a more abundant supply represent good news for tenants. If home prices continue to escalate this year, and rents go down, the home purchase market might see reduced pressure.

Webber said she and her husband aren’t in a rush to buy immediately, although they would like to find something suitable by spring. On weekends they head out to open houses and to tour the slim pickings, only to grow more disappointed by how much sellers are asking, and how little they are offering in return.

One example was a listing that boasted about its “updates,” which were made in 1998, a quarter century ago. That might feel recent to someone in their 70s, but not for someone in the prime buying age of early 30s.

She said the couple isn’t averse to putting money into fixing up a home, but they want a discount on the front end. They don’t want to pay a high price, financed with money at a high rate, and then have to put a lot of work into a home.

Advertisement

“I am hopeful and I do believe we are going to find something. Rates will come down. More people are going to list their homes,” she said.

And if they don’t, they could either try to get by in their current home, small as it is, or rent that one out and then rent rather than buy a larger home to live in.

Get more real estate and business news by signing up for our weekly newsletter, On the Block.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Denver, CO

After Further Review: Denver Broncos vs Buffalo Bills

Published

on

After Further Review: Denver Broncos vs Buffalo Bills


The wild card game had expedited replay reviews but no challenge. There were a total of ten accepted penalties for a total of seventy two penalty yards. The penalties did not determine the outcome for or against the Denver Broncos, and while there were some hiccups the officials also had some notable successes. The Buffalo Bills played a better overall game, and the officials kept the game moving and focused hard on keeping emotions under control for both playoff teams.

Bo Nix Runs Into the Bills Bench

One of the most terrifying plays in football is when in a highly emotional game a player gets tackled into the opposing bench. This is a red alert for officials and for several reasons. First, the player is hilariously out-manned on the sideline, making it very easy for situations to escalate. Second, if things escalate even a little bit, the bench can get involved without breaking the rules about leaving the sideline for a scuffle, while the opposing team cannot. Third, many offensive linemen are coached that especially if it’s the quarterback out of bounds, they need to defend their guy, and want to come to his help. There is basically no situation on a bench that is going to be improved by adding 1500 lbs of hostility. So for these and other reasons, officials are drilled to react fast to plays out of bounds to the bench.The wing secures the spot but pivots (and frequently steps onto the field of play) to have a clear and unobstructed view of as much of the sideline as possible. The referee and the closest deep wing crash hard, to put neutral bodies on the sidelines and hopefully calm any tensions.

In this game, this very situation happened ten minutes into the game when Nix scrambled into the Bills bench. It took referee Bill Vinovich three seconds to get there from approximately 20 yards upfield, and field judge Jabir Walker took a much less impressive six seconds to arrive from approximately thirty five yards downfield. These officials had other post-play responsibilities, but covered a large distance fast. As normally happens when the officials use their deescalating mechanics correctly, nothing happened on the sideline and probably no one noticed the situation. Which is entirely the point, and it was reasonably well executed. In this case, it appeared that a Buffalo substitute wanted to help up Buffalo linebacker Matt Milano, and basically shoved Nix in his attempt to do so. This was really stupid of the substitute, and could have gotten very nasty fast, but deescalated into nothing. I would not have hated an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on the sideline for the call (depending on what was said), but did not mind the no call either.

Aiding the Runner

It is against the rules for an offensive player to pull a runner forward. They are allowed to push the runner from behind (controversially so), and allowed to push defenders (though not pull them – that would be holding). This foul has not been enforced in a game in over thirty years, but that does not make it less relevant. When Bills lineman Dion Dawkins clearly pulled runner James forward in the first quarter it should have been called as a foul. This would have set the Bills up with a first and 17 instead of a gain of 16. It is hard to call “exotic” penalties that rarely get called, especially in the playoffs, but it was an egregious foul and a huge no-call.

Advertisement

Surtain Holding Missed

Mixed crew officiating is tough on the little things. There are some definitive rules for which officials should be observing which players at which times, but there is more art than science to it on some plays. The Bills and announcers highlighted one play in the third quarter where Surtain clearly committed holding, but it went uncalled. Replay shows that Surtain was right in front of back judge Jimmy Russell, and that Russell was looking elsewhere. This was not a bad play by Russell, who had another assignment on the play. At the snap the covering official on tight end Dalton Kincaid was Frank Steratore. Its also not obvious (though it is probable) that it was Steratore’s fault. Someone should have caught the interference, but with a mixed crew there is the chance one official switched faster to zone coverage than the other. Officials always start passing plays in “man” on the offense, and switch to “zone” coverage no later than when the ball is away, though knowing when the ball is away without watching the passer is an art in itself. It is also possible that Steratore had a bad angle on the hold, though it looked fairly obvious from most angles. The end result helped the Broncos, but it was a bad missed call.

Referee Bill Vinovich Talks with Allen

After a timeout, cameras showed a replay of Referee Bill Vinovich talking on Bills sideline with Josh Allen. I have heard a number of complaints about this in the context that referees prefer “star” quarterbacks and give them special treatment. This is a really complicated topic to understand, so I want to explain in depth why people are wrong to think that.

First, most people assume that football is basically the same everywhere, and with a few exceptions they are correct. One of the exceptions has to do with media and time outs. Almost no high school games are broadcast by media, and those that are typically do not have media timeouts. College games range from almost never having media timeouts, to minute plus timeouts on minor games, to major network games typically having ~3:30 media timeouts every change of possession. The NFL has smaller media timeouts than big college games, typically blocking out ~2:30 per timeout. So, in the professional game, unlike in high school or most college games, officials have relatively large blocks of time off. This is extremely welcome, and helps officials do our jobs better. We can coordinate observations on formations, play types, borderline calls, warnings we have given, etc. Most importantly, we can answer rules questions. Officials are always allowed to discuss the game with the teams (though obviously we take enormous efforts to avoid giving an unfair advantage via this). Most of these conversations are player or coach initiated, but officials will frequently seek out players, especially if they are doing something potentially dangerous to themselves or others, or if the player seems to have a shortening fuse. However, most players and coaches are fairly overwhelmed by the pace of the game, and are not really in the space mentally to discuss things with officials. We try our best to have these conversations in ways that will not impact the game. For example – if there is a minor offensive line problem, we will try to tell a defensive coach we want a chat with the offensive line coach after the next change of possession, so that we are not distracting him while the offense is out on the field or getting ready (this also changes a lot by the level of football as to how many coaches or players are on the team). By this logic though, players who are seasoned veterans like Josh Allen tend to have chats with the officials more frequently than younger players, because the veterans are playing a slower game and have more head space to interact with officials. It is a known flaw that this can give veterans, especially veteran quarterbacks a small advantage by this. However, the advantage is in their processing and their headspace, not in our treatment of the veteran, or in other words, it’s a skill issue. In short, there is nothing wrong or strange with Vinovich discussing something with Allen. Its what we want to be able to do with all players all the time.

I will say I found it deeply weird that Vinovich patted Allen on the back. I had an internal rule (not in the rules or mechanics) about never deliberately touching a player or coach under almost any circumstances, and it served me extremely well. This is not a universal thing, but I am amazed that it has not caught on more. Vinovich clearly has different habits than I do on this front, but I still found it bizarre.

Payton/Nix Delay of Game Watch

Denver burned one time out on getting a play in, and had two other plays where the snap barely beat the play clock. Sean Payton and Bo Nix have work to do in the off-season on this.

Advertisement

Official Evaluation

I charted three bad calls in the game. Two were discussed above, and one was an illegal formation, which while I continue to note them, the league does not want enforced anymore so the officials are not being graded down on. There were six questionable calls in the game, including the Kincaid catch late that probably was not one, as well as the final non-interception by Nix that might have been one. The questionable calls were pretty low leverage except for the Kincaid catch. The spots in the game were playoff caliber. I noted three spots throughout the game that I disagreed with, but none were off by even a yard, and none were in high leverage situations. The officials were very quick to whistle that forward progress had stopped. This is a choice that can de escalate fierce games, but also cuts down on fun running plays. I generally favor slower whistles, but it was consistent throughout and certainly within the realm of valid philosophies. Back Judge Jimmy Russell has relatively under-performed as an official through his career, but I was impressed by his work in this game.

I am not a Bill Vinovich fan. But the NFL consistently likes his style, and in this game you can see why. Vinovich moves things along fairly expeditiously, and places a heavy priority on calming tensions and making the game less prone to escalation. The short wings, who regularly work with Vinovich were interesting enough this game that I am eager to see their work next year.

Mailbag

What is the most unrealistic representation about officials in the media?

I am not sure if this question was about entertainment or punditry, so I will answer for both. For entertainment (in movies or tv shows about football), its coaches arguing calls about the goal line. The reality is coaches are not allowed to move closer to the goal line than 25 yards away, and so they always have a terrible view of goal line plays and no mechanism to argue unless they call time out specifically to do so. For pundits, they underestimate officials – how much they work on the rulebook, how much they practice, and how experienced NFL officials are (most have officiated 15+ years before their rookie year in the NFL).

I will have a few more regular columns talking about how different Broncos officials did in the playoffs before we get into the off-season schedule. Thanks for reading this year and for all the questions throughout the year. And lets always remember, its the officials fault!



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Barnstable leads St. Thomas against Denver after 28-point outing

Published

on

Barnstable leads St. Thomas against Denver after 28-point outing


TOP PERFORMERS: Barnstable is scoring 14.9 points per game and averaging 2.7 rebounds for the Tommies.

Nicholas Shogbonyo is scoring 14.3 points per game with 4.8 rebounds and 2.0 assists for the Pioneers.

LAST 10 GAMES: Tommies: 9-1, averaging 89.3 points, 27.0 rebounds, 15.3 assists, 7.3 steals and 3.0 blocks per game while shooting 51.7% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 77.8 points per game.

Pioneers: 2-8, averaging 72.6 points, 24.7 rebounds, 11.9 assists, 7.1 steals and 2.4 blocks per game while shooting 44.3% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 83.1 points.

Advertisement

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Denver 16th Street Mall stabbings suspect charged with first degree murder

Published

on

Denver 16th Street Mall stabbings suspect charged with first degree murder


Elijah Caudill, the suspect in a series of random knife attacks last weekend in Denver, is now facing first degree murder charges.

Elijah Caudill

Denver Police

Advertisement


The Denver District Attorney’s Office announced the formal charges on Friday. Caudill, 24, is facing two counts of first degree murder, two counts of attempted first degree murder and two counts of assault.

Three of the stabbings happened in the area of the 16th Street Mall downtown on Saturday night and one happened on Sunday. Caudill was arrested soon after the fourth attack and first appeared in Denver court on Monday.

elijah-caudill-1.jpg
Elijah Caudill in a Denver courtroom on Monday morning. 

CBS


Two people died — Celinda Levno, 71, and Nicholas Burkett, 34. The other victims haven’t been identified.

Advertisement

In announcing the charges Denver District Attorney Walsh said his office will “prosecute this case to the full extent of the law.”

“Our thoughts are with the victims of these terrible attacks and their families,” he said in a prepared statement.

While the crimes were apparently random in nature, Denver police said after the attacks that they have added additional security along 16th Street for added security presence.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending